1. Pelvic floor rehabilitation for defecation disorders
- Author
-
P. Usai Satta, Enrico Corazziari, M. C. Neri, F. La Torre, C. Londoni, Gabriele Naldini, Massimo Bellini, Piera Rossitti, L. D’Alba, C. Boemo, M. De Bona, D. F. Altomare, F. Ferrarini, Giuseppe Milazzo, Santino Marchi, Guido Manfredi, R. Bocchini, Roberta Barbera, Francesca Galeazzi, Edda Battaglia, Filippo Pucciani, P. Alduini, M. A. Balestri, L. Iona, I. Berni, Gabrio Bassotti, Antonino Pulvirenti D'Urso, N. Busin, F. Torresan, Giuseppe Chiarioni, L. Turco, A. Bove, C. Calcara, and F. Goffredo
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Constipation ,Delphi Technique ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Biofeedback ,Guidelines ,Scientific evidence ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Defecation disorders ,Medical ,Medicine ,Fecal incontinence ,Humans ,Defecation ,Societies, Medical ,Rehabilitation ,Fecal Incontinence ,Gastroenterology ,Italy ,Pelvic Floor ,Practice Guidelines as Topic ,business.industry ,Surgery ,Pelvic floor rehabilitation ,Colorectal surgery ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Physical therapy ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Societies - Abstract
Pelvic floor rehabilitation is frequently recommended for defecation disorders, in both constipation and fecal incontinence. However, the lack of patient selection, together with the variety of rehabilitation methods and protocols, often jeopardize the results of this approach, causing difficulty in evaluating outcomes and addressing proper management, and above all, in obtaining scientific evidence for the efficacy of these methods for specific indications. The authors represent different gastroenterological and surgical scientific societies in Italy, and their aim was to identify the indications and agree on treatment protocols for pelvic floor rehabilitation of patients with defecation disorders. This was achieved by means of a modified Delphi method, utilizing a working team (10 members) which developed the statements and a consensus group (15 members, different from the previous ones) which voted twice also suggesting modifications of the statements.
- Published
- 2019