Search

Background: The disease severity index (DSI) for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) combines measures of disease phenotype, inflammatory activity, and patient-reported outcomes. We aimed to validate the DSI and assess its utility in predicting a complicated IBD course., Methods: A multicenter cohort of adults with IBD was recruited. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and weighted Kappa assessed inter-rater reliability. Cronbach's alpha measured internal consistency of DSI items. Spearman's rank correlations compared the DSI with endoscopic indices, symptom indices, quality of life, and disability. A subgroup was followed for 24 months to assess for a complicated IBD course. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and multivariable logistic regression assessed the utility of the DSI in predicting disease progression., Results: Three hundred and sixty-nine participants were included (Crohn's disease [CD], n = 230; female, n = 194; mean age, 46 years [SD, 15]; median disease duration, 11 years [interquartile range, 5-21]), of which 171 (CD, n = 99; ulcerative colitis [UC], n = 72) were followed prospectively. The DSI showed inter-rater reliability for CD (ICC 0.93, n = 65) and UC (ICC 0.97, n = 33). The DSI items demonstrated inter-rater agreement (Kappa > 0.4) and internal consistency (CD, α > 0.59; UC, α > 0.75). The DSI was significantly associated with endoscopic activity (CDn=141, r = 0.65, P < .001; UCn=105, r = 0.80, P < .001), symptoms (CDn=159, r = 0.69, P < .001; UCn=132, r = 0.58, P < .001), quality of life (CDn=198, r = -0.59, P < .001; UCn=128, r = -0.68, P < .001), and disability (CDn=83, r = -0.67, P < .001; UCn=52, r = -0.74, P < .001). A DSI of 23 best predicted a complicated IBD course (AUROC = 0.82, P < .001) and was associated with this end point on multivariable analyses (aOR, 9.20; 95% confidence interval, 3.32-25.49)., Conclusions: The DSI reliably encapsulates factors contributing to disease severity and accurately prognosticates the longitudinal IBD course., (© 2023 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation.)

Background: No large, prospective study has investigated respiratory symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. We aimed to describe the prevalence of and factors associated with respiratory symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease., Methods: In an observational, prospective, cross-sectional study, we evaluated the frequency of respiratory symptoms using a validated self-reporting questionnaire from February 2019 to February 2021 during routine follow-up outpatient visits of patients with inflammatory bowel disease followed in the Gastroenterology Department of the Nancy University Hospital. In case of a positive questionnaire, patients were systematically offered a consultation with a pulmonologist in order to investigate a potential underlying respiratory disease., Results: There were 325 patients included, and 180 patients had a positive questionnaire (144 with Crohn's disease). Of the included patients, 165 (50.8%) presented with respiratory symptoms, with dyspnea being the most frequent symptom (102 patients). There were 102 patients (56.7%) who benefited from a consultation in the pulmonology department: 43 (42.2%) were diagnosed with a respiratory disease, mainly asthma (n = 13) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 10). Fourteen patients (13.7%) had obstructive sleep apnea. A body mass index increase, being a smoker or ex-smoker, and having articular extra-intestinal manifestations were independently associated with a higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms., Conclusions: Half of patients with inflammatory bowel disease reported respiratory symptoms in our study. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease should be systematically screened, as pulmonary disease is frequently present in this population, with specific attention being given to smokers or ex-smokers and patients with extra-articular intestinal manifestations., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Patients with Crohn's disease can develop intestinal strictures, containing various degrees of inflammation and fibrosis. Differentiation of the main component of a stricturing lesion is the key for defining the therapeutic management., Aims: We assessed for the first time the accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography in detecting intestinal fibrosis and predicting clinical course in patients with Crohn's disease., Methods: This was a prospective study of adult patients with Crohn's disease and magnetic resonance imaging examination, including magnetic resonance elastography, between April 2019 and February 2020. The association between the bowel stiffness value and the degree of fibrosis was evaluated. The relationship between the stiffness value and the occurrence of clinical events was also investigated., Results: A total of 69 patients were included. The stiffness value measured by magnetic resonance elastography was correlated with the degree of fibrosis (p < 0.001). A bowel stiffness ≥ 3.57 kPa predicted the occurrence of clinical events with an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% CI 0.71-0.93). Bowel stiffness ≥ 3.57 kPa was associated with an increased risk of clinical events (p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: In Crohn's disease, magnetic resonance elastography is a reliable tool for detecting intestinal fibrosis and predicting a worse disease outcome., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Messages from an Internet forum are raw material that emerges in a natural setting (i.e., non-induced by a research situation)., Aims: The FLARE-IBD project aimed at using an innovative approach consisting of collecting messages posted by patients in an Internet forum and conducting a machine-learning study (data analysis/language processing) for developing a patient-reported outcome measuring flare in inflammatory bowel disease meeting international requirements., Methods: We used web-based and machine learning approaches, in the following steps. 1) Web-scraping to collect all available posts in an Internet forum (23 656 messages) and extracting metadata from the forum. 2) Twenty patients were randomly assigned 50 extracted messages; participants indicated whether the message corresponded or not to the flare phenomenon (labeling). If yes, participants were asked to identify excerpts from the text they considered significant flare markers (annotation). 3) The set of annotated messages underwent a vocabulary analysis., Results: The phenomenon of flare was circumscribed with the identification of 20 surrogate flare markers classified into five dimensions with their frequency within extracted labeled data: impact on life, symptoms, extra-intestinal manifestations, drugs and environmental factors. Web-based and machine-learning approaches met international recommendations to inform the content and structure for the development of patient-reported outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared, (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at increased risk of colorectal cancer, which has worse prognosis than sporadic colorectal cancer. Until recently, understanding of pathogenesis in inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer was restricted to the demonstration of chromosomic/microsatellite instabilities and aneuploidy. The advance of high-throughput sequencing technologies has highlighted the complexity of the pathobiology and revealed recurrently mutated genes involved in the RTK/RAS, PI3K, WNT, and TGFβ pathways, leading to potentially new targetable mutations. Moreover, alterations of mitochondrial DNA and the dysregulation of non-coding sequences have also been described, as well as several epigenetic modifications. Although recent studies have brought new insights into pathobiology and raised the prospect of innovative therapeutic approaches, the understanding of colorectal carcinogenesis in inflammatory bowel disease and how it differs from sporadic colorectal cancer remains not fully elucidated. Further studies are required to better understand the pathogenesis and molecular alterations leading to human inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer.

Background and Aims: Histological healing may be the ultimate therapeutic goal in ulcerative colitis [UC]. We investigated, for the first time, the association between vedolizumab trough levels and histological healing in UC., Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective cohort study including all consecutive UC patients on vedolizumab maintenance therapy who had a histological evaluation blindly to clinical data and underwent therapeutic drug monitoring, between June 2014 and March 2018. Per-event analysis was performed. Histological healing was defined as a Nancy histological index ≤1., Results: Thirty-five histological samples were analysed. Median [interquartile range] vedolizumab trough levels were higher in the group with histological healing (31.5 [25-49.1] μg/mL) compared with the group without histological healing (15 [9-26.6] μg/mL, p = 0.02). The higher vedolizumab trough level quartiles tended to be associated with greater rates of histological healing [p = 0.10]. A cut-off vedolizumab trough level of 25 μg/mL predicted histological healing with an accuracy of 74% and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.62 [95% confidence interval 0.58-0.92, p = 0.004]. Bivariate analysis identified a vedolizumab trough level ≥25 µg/mL [p = 0.006], a partial Mayo score ≤1 [p = 0.008], C-reactive protein level <5 mg/L [p = 0.005] and a Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1 [p = 0.0004] as factors associated with histological healing., Conclusions: Histological healing was associated with higher vedolizumab trough levels during maintenance therapy in UC. A vedolizumab trough level threshold of 25 μg/mL proved most optimal to predict histological healing according to the Nancy histological index. Confirmation of these data in larger, independent cohorts is needed., (Copyright © 2019 European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Infliximab and adalimumab are widely used in the treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). There are few published data on the treatment persistence of infliximab and adalimumab in patients with UC., Methods: We aimed to compare the treatment persistence rates of infliximab versus adalimumab as first- and second-line tumor necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNF), to identify factors potentially associated with persistence, and to evaluate reasons for withdrawal in UC patients. We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of UC patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab for at least 6 months between June 2002 and May 2018., Results: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of follow-up was 5.4 (3.2-8.3) years. For first-line anti-TNF agent, data on 160 patients with UC were analyzed. The mean (SD) duration of persistence was 3.4 (3.5) years and 2.1 (2.0) years in the infliximab and adalimumab subgroups, respectively (P = 0.24). Concomitant use of 5-aminosalicylate was associated with higher persistence of first-line anti-TNF treatment in the overall population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8; P = 0.002). For second-line anti-TNF agent, data on 43 patients were analyzed. The mean (SD) duration of persistence was 2.0 (1.7) years and 3.2 (3.1) years in the infliximab and adalimumab subgroups, respectively (P = 0.95). No factors were associated with persistence of second-line anti-TNF treatment., Conclusions: Infliximab and adalimumab showed similar levels of persistence as first- and second-line anti-TNF treatments. Concomitant use of 5-aminosalicylates was associated with higher persistence of first-line anti-TNF treatment., (© 2018 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Dolutegravir (DTG) is approved in the United States to treat HIV-1-infected patients weighing ≥30 kg. A dispersible DTG tablet formulation was recently developed for pediatric patients. This study compares the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the dispersible tablet with that of a previously evaluated granule formulation. In this randomized, open-label, crossover study, 15 healthy adults received single oral doses of DTG 20 mg every 7 days across 5 treatment arms: granules consumed immediately after mixture with purified water, dispersible DTG consumed immediately after reconstitution in low-mineral-content (LMC) or high-mineral-content (HMC) water, and dispersible DTG consumed 30 minutes after dispersal in LMC or HMC water. Primary endpoints were bioavailability of immediately consumed dispersible tablet in LMC water relative to granule formulation reconstituted in purified water and PK of the dispersible tablet. Secondary endpoints included tolerability and palatability. The DTG dispersible tablet showed equivalent exposures to the granule formulation with geometric least-squares mean treatment ratios of 1.06 and 1.12 for AUC 0-∞ and C max , respectively. DTG PK parameters were unaffected by mineral content or the 30-minute delay. Adverse events were mild; only nausea (n = 1) was considered drug related. DTG exposure observed with the dispersible tablet supports evaluation of this formulation for further development., (© 2017 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Dolutegravir is an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) licensed for use in HIV-1 infection and is an inhibitor of organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2). This study assessed the effect of dolutegravir on the pharmacokinetics of metformin, an OCT2 substrate., Design: This was an open-label, parallel-group, 3-period crossover study in healthy adult subjects. Subjects were enrolled into 1 of 2 treatment cohorts (15 subjects/cohort) receiving metformin 500 mg q12h for 5 days in period 1; metformin 500 mg q12h plus dolutegravir 50 mg q24h (cohort 1) or 50 mg q12h (cohort 2) for 7 days in period 2; and metformin 500 mg q12h for 10 days in period 3. There were no washout periods between treatments. Effects of dolutegravir on metformin transport and paracellular permeability were evaluated in vitro., Results: Co-administration of dolutegravir 50 mg q24h increased metformin area under the curve(0-τ) by 79% and Cmax by 66%, whereas dolutegravir 50 mg q12h increased metformin area under the curve(0-τ) and Cmax by 145% and 111%, respectively. Metformin t(1/2) remained unchanged. Increased metformin exposure during dolutegravir co-administration returned to period 1 levels after dolutegravir discontinuation in period 3. Co-administration of dolutegravir and metformin was well tolerated. In vitro, dolutegravir was not a clinically relevant inhibitor of OCT1, OCT3, multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1, multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2-K, or plasma membrane monoamine transporter, and it did not affect metformin paracellular permeability or uptake into an intestinal cell line., Conclusions: Dolutegravir significantly increased metformin plasma exposure, which can be partially explained by OCT2 inhibition. It is recommended that dose adjustments of metformin be considered to maintain optimal glycemic control when patients are starting/stopping dolutegravir while taking metformin.

Background: Daclatasvir (DCV) is an NS5A replication complex inhibitor recently approved for chronic hepatitis C virus treatment., Methods: To assess drug interactions between the HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor dolutegravir (DTG) and DCV, subjects were randomized into 1 of 2 sequences in an open-label, 3-period, crossover study. Subjects received either DTG 50 mg once daily or DCV 60 mg once daily for 5 days in periods 1 and 2 and DTG 50 mg plus DCV 60 mg once daily for 5 days in period 3, with no washout between periods 2 and 3. Between periods 1 and 2, there was a washout period of at least 7 days., Results: The geometric least-squares mean ratios (90 % confidence intervals) of DCV area under the concentration-time curve over a dosing interval (AUC0-τ), maximum observed concentration (Cmax), and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Cτ) were 0.978 (0.831-1.15), 1.03 (0.843-1.25), and 1.06 (0.876-1.29), respectively, when DCV was administered with DTG compared with DCV alone. Compared with DTG alone, coadministration of DTG with DCV increased DTG AUC0-τ, Cmax, and Cτ by approximately 33, 29, and 45 %, respectively., Conclusions: DCV plasma exposure was not meaningfully affected by DTG. Coadministration of DTG with DCV resulted in slight increases in DTG AUC0-τ, Cmax, and Cτ. Accumulated safety and tolerability data in humans receiving DTG to date suggests this effect is not considered clinically significant. DTG and DCV can be coadministered without dose adjustment., Trial Registration: Registered on March 6, 2014 with ClinicalTrials.gov; registration number: NCT02082808 and as Study ID: 201102 on the ViiV Clinical Study Registry.

Purpose: Dolutegravir (DTG) is primarily metabolized by UGT1A1 with CYP3A as a minor route. Carbamazepine (CBZ) is a potent inducer of these enzymes; thus, the effect of oral extended-release CBZ on DTG pharmacokinetics (PK) was evaluated to provide dose recommendation when co-administered., Methods: This was a single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence, crossover study in healthy adults. Subjects received three treatments: DTG 50 mg every 24 h (q24h) × 5 days in period 1, followed by CBZ 100 mg every 12 h (q12h) × 3 days, then 200 mg q12h × 3 days, then 300 mg q12h × 10 days in period 2, and DTG 50 mg q24h + CBZ 300 mg q12h × 5 days in period 3. No washout intervals occurred. Each dose was administered with a moderate-fat meal. Serial PK samples for DTG were collected on day 5 of periods 1 and 3. Plasma DTG PK parameters were determined with non-compartmental analysis. Geometric least-squares mean ratios (GMRs) and 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) were generated by the mixed-effect model for within-subject treatment comparisons. Safety assessments were performed throughout the study., Results: Sixteen subjects enrolled; 14 completed the study. CBZ significantly reduced DTG exposure: GMRs (90 % CI) for DTG + CBZ versus DTG alone were 0.51 (0.48-0.549), 0.67 (0.61-0.73), and 0.27 (0.24-0.31) for area under the curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval (AUC(0-τ)), maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), and plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Cτ), respectively. DTG alone and co-administered with CBZ was well tolerated., Conclusion: Integrase strand transfer inhibitor-naive subjects taking CBZ should receive DTG 50 mg twice daily versus once daily, as is recommended with other potent UGT1A/CYP3A inducers. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01967771.

Introduction: Dolutegravir (DTG) is an HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor approved for use in combination with other antiretrovirals for the treatment of HIV-infection in adults and adolescents. Metformin is a drug frequently used in diabetic HIV-infected patients, which requires titration to optimize dosing. In vitro, DTG inhibits organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) and multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE 1) which are known to be involved in the disposition of metformin. The objective of this study was to assess the drug interaction between DTG and metformin., Materials and Methods: This was an open-label, parallel-group, three-period crossover study in healthy adult subjects. Eligible subjects were enrolled into one of the two treatment cohorts (15 subjects/cohort). Subjects received metformin 500 mg q12h for 5 days in Period 1; metformin 500 mg q12h plus DTG 50 mg q24h (Cohort 1) or 50 mg q12h (Cohort 2) for 7 days in Period 2; and metformin 500 mg q12h for 10 days in Period 3. There were no washout periods between treatments. All doses of study drug were taken with a moderate-fat meal. Serial plasma PK samples and safety assessments were obtained throughout the study. Non-compartmental PK analysis was performed and geometric least squares (GLS) mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CI) were generated by the mixed effect model for within-subject treatment comparisons for each cohort., Results: Fourteen and thirteen subjects completed study in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, respectively. Plasma exposures of metformin were significantly increased when co-administered with DTG (Table 1)., Conclusions: Co-administration of DTG and metformin was well tolerated, yet significantly increased metformin plasma exposure; effects were DTG dose dependent. Though metformin has a wide therapeutic index and alone is not associated with hypoglycemia, close monitoring is recommended when co-administering metformin and DTG. Dose adjustments of metformin may be considered.

We compared long-term treatment effectiveness of monthly olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI) with that of oral olanzapine. Outpatients with 2 or more episodes of psychotic worsening in the past 24 months with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score of lower than 70 were randomized to 405 mg/4 weeks of olanzapine LAI (n = 264) or 10 mg/d of oral olanzapine (n = 260) for 2 years of open-label treatment. Dosing thereafter was flexible (150-405 mg/4 weeks of LAI vs 5-20 mg/d of oral). Primary outcome was time to all-cause discontinuation. At baseline, patients were clinically stable (mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score of 57). Seventeen percent of patients had been psychiatrically hospitalized in the previous 6 months, and 4.6% were rated nonadherent in the month before study entry. The groups did not differ significantly in median time to all-cause discontinuation (645 days for LAI, 678 days for oral; P = 0.61), discontinuation rate (53.8% for LAI, 51.2% for oral; P = 0.60), or relapse rate (20.1% for LAI, 18.5% for oral; P = 0.66). Postbaseline psychiatric hospitalization rate was low for both groups (7.6% for LAI, 9.2% for oral), but mean hospitalization duration was significantly longer for oral patients (1.80 days [20 for those hospitalized] vs 0.43 days [6 for those hospitalized], P = 0.02). There were no clinically significant group differences in adverse events or safety measures. No post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome events occurred. In conclusion, olanzapine LAI and oral olanzapine were similarly effective and well tolerated for up to 2 years of treatment in patients with schizophrenia. Treatment discontinuation for olanzapine LAI was similar to that of oral olanzapine, despite the 3-hour post-injection observation period and other precautionary procedures related to risk of post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome.