Search

The physical structure value of conserved grass/clover forages of spring harvest was evaluated by assessing effects of harvest time, conservation method, iNDF/NDF ratio and NDF intake (NDFI) per kg BW on chewing activity and fecal particle size in dairy heifers. A mixed sward consisting of ryegrass (Lolium perenne), red clover (Trifolium pratense) and white clover (Trifolium repens) was harvested in 2009 on May 9 (early) and 25 (late), and both cuts were conserved as silage and hay. The early silage, early hay, late silage and late hay contained dry matter (DM) of 454, 842, 250 and 828 g/kg, and NDF of 315, 436, 414 and 503 g/kg DM, respectively. Forages were fed as sole feed to four Jersey heifers of 435±30 kg BW in a 4×4 Latin square experiment. Feeding level was 90% of individual ad libitum intake, divided equally across two daily meals offered at 0800 and 1530 h. Chewing activity was estimated from recorded jaw movements (JM) oscillations continuously logged for 96 h and summarized per 24 h as mean effective rumination time and eating time. Eating behavior was further observed during four 20-min test meals. Weight proportion of large feces particles (>1.0 mm) and geometric mean fecal particle size (GPS) were calculated. Potentially indigestible NDF (iNDF) was estimated by incubation for 288 h in situ. The daily DM intake (DMI) decreased with progressing maturity at harvest (P0.05). Earlier harvest led to less rumination per kg NDFI (P0.05) and similar proportion of large particles (P>0.01) compared with later harvest. Rumination time per kg NDFI decreased with higher NDFI per kg BW (P

This study was conducted with the objective to validate a rumination monitoring system (RMS). The RMS was developed by SCR Engineers Ltd. (Netanya, Israel) to record individual rumination times in commercial dairy herds. Four heifers were fed 4 forage types at 3 feeding levels in 4 periods in a Latin square design. The forage types were spring growth of grass/clover harvested early (May 9) and late (May 25) conserved as silage and hay, creating 4 forage types: early harvest silage (ES), early harvest hay (EH), late harvest silage (LS), and late harvest hay (LH). Feeding levels were ad libitum, 90% of ad libitum, and 60% of ad libitum. Data were collected for 24 h at ad libitum feeding level, for 96 h at 90% of ad libitum, and for 24 h at 60% of ad libitum. Rumination time was recorded by the RMS in minutes per 2-h interval (RT(RMS2_i)) and per 24-h interval (RT(RMS24)). As a reference method, rumination time was recorded by chewing halters identifying rumination time by jaw movements (JM) and was accumulated into minutes per 2-h interval (RT(JM2_i)) and per 24-h interval (RT(JM24)) over the same time intervals as RT(RMS2_i) and RT(RMS24). Differences between RT(RMS2_i) and RT(JM2_i) were observed for EH, LS, and LH, with differences of 3.4 (P < 0.001), 1.1 (P = 0.03), and 3.3 (P < 0.001) min per 2-h interval. In addition, feeding restrictively at 90% and 60% of ad libitum resulted in greater rumination time recorded by the RMS compared to JM, with differences of 2.6 min per 2-h interval (P < 0.001) for 90% of ad libitum and 1.6 min per 2-h interval (P = 0.01) for 60% of ad libitum. Further, the differences between rumination times recorded by the RMS compared to JM were different among the 4 heifers. Despite these effects, rumination time recorded by the RMS correlated well with rumination time recorded by JM with correlation between RT(RMS2_i) and RT(JM2_i) of r = 0.91 (P < 0.001) and between RT(RMS24) and RT(JM24) of r = 0.79 (P < 0.001).

This study was conducted with the objective to validate a rumination monitoring system (RMS). The RMS was developed by SCR Engineers Ltd. (Netanya, Israel) to record individual rumination times in commercial dairy herds. Four heifers were fed 4 forage types at 3 feeding levels in 4 periods in a Latin square design. The forage types were spring growth of grass/clover harvested early (May 9) and late (May 25) conserved as silage and hay, creating 4 forage types: early harvest silage (ES), early harvest hay (EH), late harvest silage (LS), and late harvest hay (LH). Feeding levels were ad libitum, 90% of ad libitum, and 60% of ad libitum. Data were collected for 24 h at ad libitum feeding level, for 96 h at 90% of ad libitum, and for 24 h at 60% of ad libitum. Rumination time was recorded by the RMS in minutes per 2-h interval (RT(RMS2_i)) and per 24-h interval (RT(RMS24)). As a reference method, rumination time was recorded by chewing halters identifying rumination time by jaw movements (JM) and was accumulated into minutes per 2-h interval (RT(JM2_i)) and per 24-h interval (RT(JM24)) over the same time intervals as RT(RMS2_i) and RT(RMS24). Differences between RT(RMS2_i) and RT(JM2_i) were observed for EH, LS, and LH, with differences of 3.4 (P0.001), 1.1 (P = 0.03), and 3.3 (P0.001) min per 2-h interval. In addition, feeding restrictively at 90% and 60% of ad libitum resulted in greater rumination time recorded by the RMS compared to JM, with differences of 2.6 min per 2-h interval (P0.001) for 90% of ad libitum and 1.6 min per 2-h interval (P = 0.01) for 60% of ad libitum. Further, the differences between rumination times recorded by the RMS compared to JM were different among the 4 heifers. Despite these effects, rumination time recorded by the RMS correlated well with rumination time recorded by JM with correlation between RT(RMS2_i) and RT(JM2_i) of r = 0.91 (P0.001) and between RT(RMS24) and RT(JM24) of r = 0.79 (P0.001).