Search

Introduction Women with obesity are at a higher risk of infertility as well as gestational and neonatal complications. Lifestyle changes are universally recommended for women with obesity seeking fertility treatments, but such intervention has only been assessed in very few robust studies. This study’s objectives are therefore to assess the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an interdisciplinary lifestyle intervention (the Fit-For-Fertility Programme; FFFP) targeting women with obesity and subfertility in a diverse population.Methods and analysis This pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) will include 616 women with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 or ≥27 kg/m2 with polycystic ovary syndrome or at-risk ethnicities) who are evaluated at a Canadian fertility clinic for subfertility. Women will be randomised either to (1) the FFFP (experimental arm) alone for 6 months, and then in combination with usual care for infertility if not pregnant; or (2) directly to usual fertility care (control arm). Women in the intervention group benefit from the programme up to 18 months or, if pregnant, up to 24 months or the end of the pregnancy (whichever comes first). Women from both groups are evaluated every 6 months for a maximum of 18 months. The primary outcome is live birth rate at 24 months. Secondary outcomes include fertility, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes; lifestyle and anthropometric measures; and cost-effectiveness. Qualitative data collected from focus groups of participants and professionals will also be analysed.Ethics and dissemination This research study has been approved by the Research Ethics Board (REB) of Centre intégré universtaire de santé et des services sociaux de l’Estrie—CHUS (research coordinating centre) on 10 December 2018 and has been or will be approved successively by each participating centres’ REB. This pragmatic RCT will inform decision-makers on improving care trajectories and policies regarding fertility treatments for women with obesity and subfertility.Trial registration number NCT03908099.Protocol version: 1.1, 13 April 2019

Podcasts are used in medical education to supplement conventional teaching methods such as lectures and reading. We identified a lack of Canadian medical education podcasts covering obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) content and created a podcast specific for Canadian medical students and residents. The podcast called "OB-G in YEG" is freely available and currently has fourteen episodes that cover common topics in Ob/Gyn. We describe the process for creating a high-quality medical education resource that is widely accessible to learners that readers may be able to replicate in their own discipline., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare, (© 2021 Black, Drummond, Jain, Sagle; licensee Synergies Partners.)

Objective: The shift to competency-based medical education (CBME) is associated with changes in the way residents are taught and assessed. Although there are many purported benefits of CBME, an understanding of the preparedness of faculty to meet the needs of this new paradigm is lacking. The aim of this study was to characterize faculty needs to support the transition to CBME., Methods: An online survey was designed with the aim of characterizing faculty understanding of the principles of CBME and common trainee assessment methods, as well as exploring barriers to the implementation of CBME in obstetrics and gynaecology residency programs across Canada. The survey was sent to faculty across Canada in English and French., Results: A total of 284 responses were collected between September 2015 and December 2016. Although most faculty viewed CBME as a positive change, there were gaps in their knowledge about CBME and workplace-based assessment methods. Barriers to the implementation of CBME included lack of training in assessment of residents and feedback, financial implications, and time constraints., Conclusion: To facilitate the transition to CBME, institutions may need to consider establishing faculty training programs and implementing systemic change aimed at addressing faculty needs and barriers during this fundamental shift in the structure of residency training., (Copyright © 2019 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Obesity in infertile women increases the costs of fertility treatments, reduces their effectiveness and increases significantly the risks of many complications of pregnancy and for the newborn. Studies suggest that even a modest loss of 5-10 % of body weight can restore ovulation. However, there are gaps in knowledge regarding the benefits and cost-effectiveness of a lifestyle modification program targeting obese infertile women and integrated into the fertility clinics. This study will evaluate clinical outcomes and costs of a transferable interdisciplinary lifestyle intervention, before and during pregnancy, in obese infertile women. We hypothesize that the intervention will: 1) improve fertility, efficacy of fertility treatments, and health of mothers and their children; and 2) reduce the cost per live birth, including costs of fertility treatments and pregnancy outcomes., Methods/design: Obese infertile women (age: 18-40 years; BMI ≥30 kg/m(2) or ≥27 kg/m(2) with polycystic ovary syndrome) will be randomised to either a lifestyle intervention followed by standard fertility treatments after 6 months if no conception has been achieved (intervention group) or standard fertility treatments only (control group). The intervention and/or follow-up will last for a maximum of 18 months or up to the end of pregnancy. Evaluation visits will be planned every 6 months where different outcome measures will be assessed. The primary outcome will be live-birth rates at 18 months. The secondary outcomes will be sub-divided into four categories: lifestyle and anthropometric, fertility, pregnancy complications, and neonatal outcomes. Outcomes and costs will be also compared to similar women seen in three fertility clinics across Canada. Qualitative data will also be collected from both professionals and obese infertile women., Discussion: This study will generate new knowledge about the implementation, impacts and costs of a lifestyle management program in obese infertile women. This information will be relevant for decision-makers and health care professionals, and should be generalizable to North American fertility clinics., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01483612. Registered 25 November 2011.

Objective: To determine whether women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and abnormal insulin levels treated with metformin had different rates of ovulation and pregnancy from women with PCOS and normal insulin levels., Methods: The outcomes of treatment with metformin in 146 infertile women with PCOS were analyzed using a retrospective cohort study design. Baseline characteristics and initial blood work results were recorded. The follow-up period was three months, and the primary outcome was ovulation., Results: Of the 146 women with PCOS, one third had elevated fasting insulin levels. After treatment with metformin, cumulative rates of ovulation were similar in women with elevated fasting serum insulin levels (48.8%) and those with normal levels (44.7%). Rates of ovulation were also similar in women with normal and abnormal glucose to insulin ratios. There was no difference in cumulative pregnancy rates based on fasting insulin levels. A fasting insulin level above 20 mU/L correlated with an abnormal glucose to insulin ratio (98%)., Conclusion: In anovulatory women with PCOS, fasting insulin levels and glucose to insulin ratios do not predict the ovulatory response to metformin.

A review of 392 cycles of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was carried out in order to identify whether any factors such as sperm concentration at insemination, sperm motility or morphology, oocyte grading, number of oocytes retrieved, patient age, follicular stimulation protocols or duration of follicular growth, could be associated with the incidence of polyploidy or completely failed fertilization. The majority of polypronuclear fertilizations occurred in mature oocytes and in patients < 37 years of age and the incidence of polyploidy was strongly associated with fertilization and pregnancy rates. Fertilization rates were highest with mature oocytes. A significant linear trend was observed with failed fertilization and sperm concentration, morphology and motility. High rates of failed fertilization were found in patients > 37 years of age and with one to five oocytes retrieved. No significant difference was seen in stimulation protocols and oocyte grading between oocytes that fertilized and those that did not. Cycles with good sperm morphology and motility, the presence of mature oocytes, the retrieval of a large number of oocytes and younger maternal age seem to provide the best chance for IVF success.

Women with anovulation due to polycystic ovary syndrome are likely to develop multiple follicles during gonadotrophin therapy and therefore have a high risk of multiple pregnancy. We have developed a low-dose regimen for use in these women; 100 women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome were treated. Ninety-five of the women ovulated at least once, 72% of the 401 cycles induced were ovulatory and the majority (73%) of these were uni-ovulatory. The overall cumulative conception rate was 55% at 6 months with only two multiple pregnancies. The rate of early pregnancy loss was 32%, which is similar to that reported by other groups. The prevalence of complications was low with no cases of severe hyperstimulation and less than 5% of cycles were abandoned because of development of multiple follicles. Analysis of baseline and mid-follicular luteinizing hormone levels showed that a raised baseline and/or mid-follicular luteinizing hormone level was associated with a poor response to treatment, i.e. anovulation, ovulation but no conception, or early pregnancy loss. There were no successful pregnancies in the women whose luteinizing hormone levels were persistently raised during ovulatory cycles. Low-dose gonadotrophin therapy is a safe and effective method of inducing ovulation; it is associated with a high incidence of single follicular development and a very low multiple pregnancy rate.

Five patients with hyperprolactinaemic amenorrhoea who had been resistant to, or intolerant of bromocriptine were treated with pulsatile LHRH therapy. Ovulation was induced in 9 of 12 treatment cycles. In one patient hyperstimulation occurred in the first cycle of treatment but subsequently she ovulated normally on a reduced dose of LHRH. The gonadotrophin and ovarian responses to treatment in ovulatory cycles were normal despite prolactin concentrations that remained elevated throughout treatment and rose still further with resumption of ovarian activity. The length of the luteal phase and the mid-luteal serum progesterone concentrations were also normal. Pulsatile secretion of progesterone in response to LHRH pulses were observed. These data show that ovulation and normal luteal function can be induced by physiological LHRH replacement in women with persistent hyperprolactinaemia. This confirms that the mechanism of anovulation in hyperprolactinaemic amenorrhoea is disordered LHRH secretion.

Ovulation was induced by a pulsatile infusion of GnRH in a patient with hypogonadotrophic amenorrhoea. In order to investigate the effect of short-term withdrawal of gonadotrophin support in the luteal phase, the pulsatile infusion was stopped 3 d after ovulation and restarted 48 h later. After stopping the pump gonadotrophin and progesterone concentrations fell rapidly to very low levels, but when the infusion was restarted progesterone concentrations returned to normal mid-luteal values. Menstruation occurred 14 d after the LH surge. We conclude that normal progesterone secretion by the corpus luteum can be restored after temporary withdrawal of gonadotrophin support.

Normal gonadotrophin secretion, and therefore normal ovarian function, depend on delivery to the pituitary of the hypothalamic neuropeptide gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) in a pulsatile pattern. In the mid-follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, for example, discrete pulses of luteinizing hormone (LH) can be observed at approximately 90 min intervals. Many disorders of ovulation are caused by abnormalities of this natural pulsed signal. We have developed and used a small portable infusion pump to deliver GnRH to women with hypothalamic amenorrhoea; our studies, and those of other groups, have shown that successful ovulation and pregnancy result from such treatment. The results of treatment at St Mary's Hospital show that 16 women with hypogonadotrophic amenorrhoea received a total of 31 cycles of treatment with pulsatile GnRH; 25 (81%) of these cycles were ovulatory and 11 of the 14 women who were trying to conceive became pregnant. There was only one multiple pregnancy (twins).

We have studied pulsatile secretion of LH in 10 women with secondary amenorrhoea and multifollicular ovaries (MFO). This group of patients have a history of mild to moderate, or partially recovered weight loss. They have normal basal LH concentrations but evidence of oestrogen deficiency suggesting a hypothalamic abnormality of gonadotrophin regulation. The results of gonadotrophin pulse analysis were compared with those in normal women during the early follicular phase of the cycle. The mean LH concentration during the 8 h study (5.0 +/- 0.9 [SD] U/l) was not significantly different from that in normal women (5.7 +/- 2.5). There was no difference between the groups in mean LH pulse amplitude (2.1 +/- 0.5 in MFO; 2.2 +/- 1.3 in normal women). The frequency of LH pulses was, however, significantly lower in women with MFO (2.8 +/- 1.6 vs 4.8 +/- 1.5, P less than 0.05). Two women with MFO had LH pulses of normal frequency. One subsequently developed a normal pattern of ovarian follicles. The other showed a sleep-related rise in LH concentrations during a 24 h profile which was similar to the pattern of gonadotrophin secretion normally observed during late puberty. These results show that women with MFO have a hypothalamic disturbance of gonadotrophin regulation with slowing of LH pulses without a diminution of pulse amplitude.

The long-acting agonist analogue of LHRH, Buserelin (Hoechst) has been used to suppress endogenous gonadotrophins prior to induction of ovulation with low dose human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) in women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The results have been compared with those in a similar group of patients treated with HMG alone. Buserelin (900-1,500 micrograms/day) was given intranasally to 11 women who thereafter received a total of 33 cycles of treatment with low-dose HMG. The control group comprised 16 women who received 40 cycles of HMG without Buserelin pretreatment. The ovulation rate was similar in the two groups: Buserelin + HMG 70%, HMG alone 68% and both groups showed a high rate of single follicle ovulation (52 and 63%, respectively). The threshold dose of gonadotrophin required to induce a single follicle was similar in the two groups. Premature elevation of LH in the late follicular phase was common in women who received HMG alone, but did not occur in any cycle in the patients receiving Buserelin pretreatment. In summary, these data show that pretreatment with an LHRH analogue prevents a premature LH surge but it remains to be determined whether this will have a significant bearing on the rate of successful pregnancy in women with PCOS.