Search

The Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centers, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients.To elaborate practice guidelines for difficult diagnoses in surgical pathology or cytopathology in cancer patients.The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts who define the CPGs according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guidelines has been defined, the document is submitted for review by independent reviewers.The main recommendations to prevent and reduce the number of difficult diagnoses in surgical pathology or cytopathology are: The main recommendations to detect lesions associated with difficult diagnosis in surgical pathology or cytopathology are: The main recommendations to solve difficult diagnosis in surgical pathology or cytopathology are

The majority of patients with advanced cancer develop malnutrition. This malnutrition has an important impact on quality of life, performance status and immune status. It can be responsible for increased morbidity, particularly infectious complications and thus mortality. In five to more than 20% of patients with cancer, death can be directly related to cachexia in the terminal phase (Inagaki et al, 1974; Bozzetti, 1995).

Summary report of the Standards, Options and Recommendations for the use of serum tumour markers in breast cancer: 2000

The Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) collaborative project was initiated in 1993 by the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), with the 20 French Regional Cancer Centres, several French public university and general hospitals, as well as private clinics and medical speciality societies. Its main objective is the development of serviceable clinical practice guidelines in order to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review, followed by critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts. Draft guidelines are produced, then validated by specialists in cancer care delivery.Produce clinical practice guidelines for the management and shipment of histological and cytopathological cancer specimens using the methodology developed by the Standards, Options and Recommendations project.The FNCLCC designated the group of experts. Available data were collected by a search of Medline and lists selected by experts in the group. A first draft of the guidelines was written, then validated by independent reviewers.The main recommendations are: 1/ High-quality transmission of information between professionals is essential to the management of cancer specimens in order to assure high-quality diagnosis and evaluation of prognostic factors; 2/ Written procedures concerning sample shipment, handling, storage, registration, tracking and fixation exist; these procedures, as well as the necessary shipping material, will be sent to all clinical services involved; 3/ When possible, fresh, unfractionated, oriented surgical samples will be submitted to the same histological and cytopathological laboratory; 4/ Samples collected for extemporaneous examination, freezing or cell culture must be shipped immediately under appropriate storage conditions; 5/ Once frozen, samples can be stored in a deep freezer at temperatures of -80 degrees C or below, or kept in liquid nitrogen; 6/ Fixing tissues shortly after sample collection is essential to prevent cell lysis; 7/ Computerised systems will be used to assure correct specimen registration and tracking in histological and cytopathological laboratories.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for the content of the anatomic and surgical pathology or cytopathology reports in field of oncology.Data were identified either by searching on Medline or via members of the expert groups personal references lists. When the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted to 49 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres.The main recommendations for the composition of the anatomic and surgical pathology or cytopathology reports in oncology are 1/ The reports must contain the identification of the pathologist, of the patient and of the specimen, a gross description for the surgical specimen, eventually a microscopic description, the diagnosis, all the elements essential for establishing the prognosis and for the clinical care, and a conclusion. 2/ The reports could contain some comments. 3/ The reports must be brief, precise, clear, homogeneous and ideally standardised, in order to be comprehensible for all the clinicians and the pathologists.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of french cancer centers (FNCLCC), the 20 french cancer centers, and specialists from french public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop clinical practice guidelines for non metastatic breast cancer patients according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project.Data were identified by searching Medline, web sites, and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 148 independent reviewers.This article presents the chapter radiotherapy resulting from the 2001 update of the version first published in 1996. The modified 2001 version of the standards, options and recommendations takes into account new information published. The main recommendations are: (1) Breast irradiation after conservative surgery significantly decrease the risk of local recurrence (level of evidence A) and the decrease in the risk of local recidive after chest wall irradiation is greater as the number of risk factors for local recurrence increases (level of evidence A). (2) After conservative surgery, a whole breast irradiation should be performed at a minimum dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (standard, level of evidence A). (3) A boost in the tumour bed should be performed in women under 50 years, even if the surgical margins are free (standard, level of evidence B). (4) Internal mammary chain irradiation is indicated for internal or central tumours in the absence of axillary lymph node involvement (expert agreement) and in the presence of lymph node involvement (standard, level of evidence B1). (5) Sub- and supra-claviculr lymph node irradiation is indicated in patients with axillary node involvement (standard, level of evidence B1).

The diagnosis and treatment of patients with vertebral metastases are the objects of many articles in the literature. Analysis of these articles shows the variety of techniques and strategies of patient management used. The editors of this treatise decided to complete the thematic chapters with a critical analysis of the literature concerning the diagnosis and treatment of metastases to contribute to the elaboration of recommendations. The authors of this chapter established an annotated bibliography to provide readers an access easy to the literature on vertebral metastases. The description of available results in this domain is completed with elements of assessment of methodological quality.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, involves a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centres, some French public university and general hospitals and private Clinics and medical scientific societies. Its main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review followed by a critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts to produce the draft guidelines which are then validated by specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop clinical practice guidelines for hospital catering for cancer patient using the methodology developed by the Standards, Options and Recommendations project.Data were identified by a literature search of Medline and the reference lists of experts in the groups. After the guidelines were drafted, they were validated by independent reviewers.The main recommendations are: 1) While taking into consideration the specific needs of cancer patients, the dietician is responsible for the hygiene, the sanitary quality of alimentation, the equilibrium and nutritional quality of the hospital catering. 2) Ordering and distribution of meals, and clearing up afterwards contribute to the quality of hospital catering and the personnel who do this should have time and be willing to listen to the patients. 3) The ordering of meals should be adapted to individual patient's requirements and must take into account the patient's medication. 4) The method of transporting the food chosen by the institution (cold or warm method) should be respected. The personnel responsible should receive regular and specific training to use the method correctly. 5) The intake of patients with nutritional follow-up should be reliably and reproducibly evaluated by the personnel after every meal. 6) Patient satisfaction should be assessed once a year and the results of this assessment used to improve the quality of hospital catering. 7) The dietician is the interface between the accounts department, the medical wards, the hospital catering department and the patients.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To define, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project, the characteristics of the main tumor markers in thyroid cancer and the potential role of these markers in the management of patients with this malignancy.Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 55 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centers.The main recommendations are: 1) Thyroglobulin is a serum tumor marker for the monitoring of operated thyroid differentiated neoplasms (standard). 2) It is essential to know if the patient is under TSH stimulation or under thyroid suppression therapy to interpret thyroglobulin results (standard). 3) Thyroglobulin assay must be performed regularly during the monitoring of differentiated thyroid neoplasms (standard, level of evidence B2), should be coupled with the measurement of anti-thyroglobulin antibodies concentration using a sensitive method (standard, level of evidence B2). 4) Thyroglobulin assay should not be performed to detect or diagnose differentiated thyroid neoplasms (standard, level of evidence B2). 5) The methods used to assay thyroglobulin must have a limit of detection lower than 3 mug.l- 1 (standard, expert agreement). 6) Calcitonin is a marker for medullary thyroid cancer (standard). 7) Its assay, associated with RET gene study if indicated, enables medullary thyroid cancer to be diagnosed. 8) The pentagastrin test is essential to diagnose familial forms of medullary thyroid cancer. 9) All analyses for each patient must be performed in the same laboratory, using the same technique (standard, expert agreement). 10) Calcitonin and carcinoembryonic-antigen are serum markers for the monitoring of medullary thyroid cancer and allow the detection of recurrent disease (standard).

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993 is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for difficult diagnoses in surgical pathology or cytopathology in cancer patients.Data were identified by searching Medline and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 71 independent reviewers.The main recommendations to prevent and reduce the number of difficult diagnoses in surgical pathology or cytopathology are: 1) The development of quality insurance programs with use of written procedures in each pathology laboratory (standard). 2) The knowledge of clinical data in order to explain surgical pathology or cytopathology results (standard). 3) The availability of complementary patient informations (radiologic data . . .) can be useful to explain surgical pathology or cytopathology results (option). The main recommendations to detect lesions associated with difficult diagnosis in surgical pathology or cytopathology are: 1) Tumor types known as potential difficult diagnosis in surgical pathology or cytopathology should be reviewed by a second pathologist. 2) The systematic second reviewing for every case is expensive but has to be done when the difficulty is know (sarcoma, lymphoma . . .) by experienced pathologists. The main recommendations to solve difficult diagnosis in surgical pathology or cytopathology are: 1) Block recuts, use of special techniques (immunocytohistochemistry and molecular biology), additional data from clinicians, second opinion by a local pathologist, or new specimen can be required for establishing the diagnosis (options). 2) Outside second opinion by expert pathologist has to be considered once the other steps did not allow to establish surgical or cytopathology diagnosis (recommendations, expert agreement).

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for home parenteral or enteral nutrition in adult cancer patients.Data were identified by searching Medline, Cancerlit, web sites and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 72 independent reviewers.The main recommendations for home parenteral or enteral nutrition in adult cancer patients are: 1) Home parenteral or enteral nutrition concerns cancer patients with malnutrition or with inadequate/impossible oral intake, during therapy of because of therapeutic after-effects (standard). Same indications apply for home and hospital artificial nutrition (standard). 2) Patients need a multidisciplinary follow-up (oncologists, nutritionists, and pain specialists), and this follow-up will make treatment adaptations according to the nutritional status possible (recommendation, expert agreement). An active participation of patients and/or their family circle is very important (standard). 3) The benefit of home parenteral or enteral nutrition on the quality of life of terminally ill patients (vs. hydration) has not been demonstrated. When life expectancy is below 3 months, and the Karnofsky index below 50, the drawbacks of home artificial nutrition are more important than its advantages. In this case, home parenteral or enteral nutrition is not recommended (recommendation, expert agreement). 4) Prospective clinical trials are recommended to evaluate the impact of home nutrition on quality of life in cancer patients (expert agreement). 5) The use of educational booklets that mention the telephone number of a referent health care and what to do when a problem happens (e.g. fever on home parenteral nutrition) is recommended (expert agreement). In France, patients should be referred to authorized home parenteral nutrition centres (recommendation, expert agreement).

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCL CC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feed-back from specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for the dietetic consultation for cancer patient.Data have been identified by literature search wing Medline and the expert groups personal reference lists. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 74 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres.The main recommendations for the referral of cancer patients for dietary advice are: I) in oncology, there are 3 types of dietetic consultation: diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic; 2) the following cancer patients must have a dietetic consultation: i) those with, or at risk of malnutrition, ii) those without malnutrition but in need of counseling and iii) those at risk of treatment-related nutritional side effects; 3) a nutritional assessment is standard at the time of the first dietetic consultation. Patients must be given individualized and written advice; 4) the dietetic opinion and advice should be brought to the attention of medical staff to facilitate a multidisciplinary approach to cancer treatment; 5) patient's relatives should be involved in the dietetic management; 6) the efficacy of dietetic advice can be assessed by monitoring weight, gastrointestinal signs and patient satisfaction.

Four hematopoietic growth factors have marketing approval in France: filgrastime (G-CSF), malgraostime (GM-CSF), lenograstime (glycolysated G-CSF) and erythropoietin. A standards, options and recommendations document has not yet been established for erythropoietin which is excluded from this report. Administration of hematopoietic growth factors can be proposed in five clinical situations: primary prophylaxis, secondary prophylaxis, curative care, after myeloablative chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell grafting, and finally mobilization of peripheral stem cells. Primary prophylaxis: excepting therapeutic trials, the use of hematopoietic growth factors is recommended for clinical situations where a significant incidence of neutropenia with fever has been reported in randomized trials and in rare cases where there is an increased risk of severe infectious complications. Hematopoietic growth factors are indispensable for increasing the quality of cytapheresis peripheral stem cell harvesting.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To define, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project, the characteristics of various tumour markers in breast cancer and the potential role of these markers in the management of patients with this malignancy.Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 43 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres.The main recommendations are: 1) CA 15.3 and CEA are the serum tumour markers most often used in breast cancer (standard). 2) If the CA 15.3 is raised at presentation, there is no place for the measurement of other tumour markers (standard, expert agreement). 3) All analyses for each patient must be performed in the same laboratory, using the same technique (standard, expert agreement). 4) CA 15.3 should not be used for screening or diagnosis. 5) The level of CA 15.3 before treatment is a recognised prognostic factor, the independent value of which has not been proven (standard, level of evidence C). 6) If the initial value of CA 15.3 is greater than 50 kU.L(-1), disseminated disease should be actively sought before any treatment decisions are made (standard, expert agreement). 7) An initial elevation of CA 15.3 that does not return to normal, reflects a lack of response to treatment and is a strong adverse prognostic factor (standard, level of evidence C). 8) The accuracy of tumours markers (especially CA 15.3) as early indicators of metastatic disease is well recognised (standard) but the clinical benefit has not been established. 9) There is a correlation between tumour markers and clinical response in the treatment of metastatic disease (level of evidence C). The level of CA 15.3 in metastatic disease does not predict response to treatment.

The main risk factors of infectious complications in cancer patients result from immune deficiency more or less related to cancer. Prognosis is related to the type and grade of the underlying disease. Prospective studies should be conducted to update data on the frequency of infections, morbidity and mortality (expert agreement). Prospective studies are needed to follow the epidemiology in cancer patients, particularly in neutropenic patients (expert agreement). Prospective studies should be conducted to determine prognosis factors allowing precise recognition of "low-risk" neutropenic patients with fever who could benefit from home care (expert agreement). When infection is suspected, the first criterion determining the therapeutic attitude concern signs of gravity requiring emergency care (septic shock). Beyond this situation, the first criterion determining the therapeutic attitude is the severity of the neutropenia. Microbial diagnosis is essential for initiating and later adapting anti-infectious treatment as well as for assessing efficacy.

Excepting emergency and aplasia: two to three blood samples should be draw for culture an hour apart within a 24 period (standard). For emergency or aplasia: two to three blood samples should be drawn for culture before initiating early antibiotic therapy. The delay between samples drawn from different sites should be less than one hour (standard). For patients on antibiotics: four to six blood samples should be drawn for culture within 48 hours, outside ongoing antibiotic administration. If the patient is given corticosteroids, it is recommended to draw two or three blood samples in case of deterioration (agreement of the experts). Rigorous aseptic techniques must be used (standard). Culture media are chosen according to the institution's microbial ecology (standard). The volume of blood drawn should be adapted to the system used (standard). Culture positivity is determined at 24 to 48 hours.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for the prevention and the surveillance of cross infection in oncology.Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 106 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres.1) Criteria of infection status and nosocomiality defined by the Centers for Infectious Diseases (CDC) and Prevention and the Superior Council of Public Hygiene (CSHPF) are not adapted and have to be redefined in oncology. 2) The epidemiology of nosocomial infections in oncology is not well known but their incidence seems to be higher. Numerous risk factors of cross infections coexist in cancer patients, among which the duration and depth of neutropenia. 3) Surveillance and prevention of cross infection are compulsory and were taken into account in the accreditation of hospitals. Obligation is expressed in terms of means and results. 4) The objectives of the cross infection surveillance are to detect major problems and critic situations, to guide probabilistic antibiotic therapy and to assess the effectiveness of the infections control. The surveillance means consist in prevalence and incidence survey, punctually and continuously conducted. 5) The three specific behaviors to be adopted to prevent cross infections are to control: all the patients, infected patients carrying multiresistant bacteria, immunodepressed patients. 6) Standards of care have to be applied to a/l patients with cancer. 7) It is necessary to add particular septic cares for the patients infected with micro-organisms indicated on reference lists or carrying multiresistant bacteria. 8) The only objective of the protective isolation of immunodepressed cancer patients is to reduce the cross infection. There is no standard behavior for the indications and the modalities of protective isolation. The prevention behaviors to be taken are defined by expert agreements.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature systematic review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for endocrine therapy in patients with non metastatic breast cancer.Data have been identified by literature search using Medline, Embase, Cancerlit and Cochrane databases - until july 1999 - and the personal reference lists of the expert group. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 125 independent reviewers.The main recommendations for the endocrine therapy of patients with non metastatic breast cancer are: 1) Endocrine therapy modalities depend on menopausal status or age of women: ovarian suppression for premenopausal women, antiestrogen drug therapy for postmenopausal women (standard). 2) Tamoxifen (20 mg/d - 5 years) is beneficial to women with positive estrogen receptor tumor (standard, level of evidence A). There is no indication of tamoxifen treatment for women with negative estrogen receptor tumor (standard, level of evidence A). 3) For postmenopausal women with positive estrogen receptor tumor, tamoxifen is the standard adjuvant treatment (level of evidence A). For postmenopausal women with negative estrogen receptor, adjuvant chemotherapy has to be considered (option, level of evidence A). No adjuvant treatment has to be considered for women with poor health condition (option). 4) For premenopausal women with estrogen receptor tumor, results of clinical trials of chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy, suggest a benefit for endocrine therapy. However, there is no sufficient evidence to consider endocrine therapy alone as a standard adjuvant treatment. 5) For premenopausal women, chemotherapy + ovarian suppression or chemotherapy + tamoxifen are not better than chemotherapy alone (level of evidence A). 6) For postmenopausal women, administration of chemotherapy plus adjuvant tamoxifen versus the same tamoxifen alone, is of additional benefit in reducing recurrences but not in prolonging overall survival (standard, level of evidence A). 7) Balance of known benefits (delay to recurrence and death) and risks (side-effects of therapy) for adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy has to be taken into consideration before decision making. Chemoendocrine therapy can be indicated for women at high risk of developing metastatic disease (recommendation, experts agreement).

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for the nutritional evaluation of cancer patients.Data were identified by searching Medline and personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 83 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres.The main recommendations for the nutritional evaluation of cancer patients are: 1) Clinical and anthropometric evaluation should measure height, current weight, ideal weight, weight lost and rate of loss, and Body Mass Index. Social and economic data, details of previous history, current treatment and clinical examination results should also be collected. Gastrointestinal disorders and energetic needs should be assessed. 2) Nutritional intervention is recommended for all patients with a weight loss of 10% or more. 3) A multidimensional assessment can be performed using three validated nutritional and clinical scales: the Subjective Global Assessment, the Scored PG-SGA and the Mini Nutritional assessment. 4) The predictive value of biological factors (albumin) is not sufficient individually, risk scales combining several factors should be used: the Prognostic Inflammatory and Nutritional Index (PINI), the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), the Prognostic Nutritional Index (Mullen) or the Sadan. 5) Minimal nutritional assessment should include clinical data, patient interview, height, current weight, ideal weight and weight change. 6) The efficacy of the nutrional management should be followed by assessing weight, and the presence of oedema and ascitis. The ratio of calorie to nitrogen intake should be calculated regularly.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommandations for the nutritional management of the head and neck cancer patients.Data have been identified by literature search using Medline and the expert groups personal reference lists. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 121 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres.The main recommendations for the nutritional management of head and neck cancer patients are that: 1) Nutritional management prevents undernutrition, improves quality of life, reduces adverse effects of the treatment and prevents treatment delay; 2) The nutritional management of the head and neck cancer patient must be done before, during and after cancer treatment; 3) Before treatment, the weight of the patient must be assessed: 10% of weight loss in 6 months requires to an urgent nutritional intervention; 4) During radiation therapy, feeding should be adapted to various characteristics such as swallowing mechanism, side effects of the treatment, age; 5) During chemotherapy, nutrition must be checked and assessed at each cycle; 6) During surgery, enteral feeding must be stopped and nasogastric feeding progressively introduced starting on day 1 post-operatively. The quality of feed must be adequate during all the healing period. Close surveillance of fever and regurgitation allows regular review of the amount and nature of enteral feed to be given; 7) The patients are given individualised and written advice at the end of treatment and the nutritional follow-up must be planned.

TheStandards, Options and Recommendations(SOR), started in 1993, are a collaborative project between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcomes for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary experts group, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. The initial guidelines are being updated in case of new evidence.To update the clinical practice guideline [39] with definitions of new Standards, Options and Recommendations for the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in oncology.Data have been identified by literature search using Medline, Current Contents, Embase, Cancerlit (march 1996-march 1999). The main end points considered were hemoglobin level, haematocrit, quality of life, transfusion requirements, incidence and length of hospital stays, efficacy of cancer treatment, safety and costs. Once the guideline was updated and defined, the document was submitted to 42 reviewers for peer review, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres for review and agreement.The new key recommendations are: 1) The use of recombinant human erythropoietin in oncology is an alternative to treat chemotherapy-induced anemia when the chemotherapeutic regimen contains platinum; 2) Cancer-induced anemia reduces patients' quality of life. Treatment of anemia by transfusions of erythropoietin may improve quality of life; 3) We recommend assessment of haemoglobin levels during radiation therapy and the possible use of erythropoietin to optimise the efficacy of radiation therapy; 4) Erythropoietin is effective in others pathologies (multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, non-platinum based chemotherapy.) and also in pediatric patients but the risk/benefit ratio for anemia therapy (i.e. transfusion or erythropoietin therapy) must be analysed for each individual; 5) We recommend an economic analysis of the need of erythropoietin within the context of the french health care system.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature systematic review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for the management of squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx.Data have been identified by literature search using Medline (1991-1998) and the expert groups personal reference lists. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to national and international independent reviewers and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres.The main recommendations for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx management are that: 1) diagnosis and initial assessment should be based on appropriate clinical and radiological findings; 2) the therapeutic strategy is based on surgery, radiotherapy, bradytherapy and chemotherapy; 3) in limited tumours, the recommended strategy involved the use of one of these modality; 4) a multimodality approach is recommended for the treatment of extended resectable tumours. Following results of recent meta-analyses, use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended. The same studies have shown that association of chemotherapy and radiotherapy either in sequence or in combination significantly improve survival of extended curable tumours. These associations are recommended within the framework of clinical trials; 5) follow-up of squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx should involve physical examination of the upper aerodigestive tract and the lymph nodes areas every three months during the first year, every six months during the second year and then every year. An annual chest x-ray is recommended. Other investigations should be performed as indicated by symptoms and clinical manifestations.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR), initiated in 1993, is a collaborative project between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcomes for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary experts group, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop a clinical practice guideline for the management of neutropenic cancer patients (excluding prolonged neutropenia).Data have been identified by literature search using Medline and Current Contents (up to February 1997) and personal reference lists. The main end points considered were mortality, morbidity, risk factors, fever, source of infection, microbiological documentation, incidence and length of hospital stays, quality of life, efficacy of treatment, safety and costs. Once the guideline was defined, the document was submitted to 48 reviewers for peer review and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres for review and agreement.The key recommendations are: 1) before receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, patients must be informed of potential risks and precautions to observe; 2) non-febrile neutropenic patients can be followed at home (except specific context); antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended; 3) initial empirical antibiotic therapy for febrile patients is mandatory, whether associated beta-lactam and aminoglycoside, or monotherapy with a broad-spectrum beta-lactam (except in case of septic shock or pneumopathy). A glycopeptide can be added in case of overt catheter-related or cutaneous infection, in case of microbiologically documented infection with a oxacillin-resistant Gram positive bacteria, or in case of persistent fever in a clinically deteriorating patient; 4) at the present time, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the management of febrile neutropenic patients at home. We recommend participation in studies to identify predicting factors of low-risk patients and to assess the feasibility and safety of early discharge and home therapy.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR), started in 1993, are a collaborative project between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcomes for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary experts group, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.To develop a clinical practice guideline with definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in oncology.Data have been identified by literature search using Medline (up to march 1996) and Current Contents (up to october 1996) and personal references lists. The main end points considered were hemoglobin level, haematocrit, quality of life, transfusion requirements, incidence and length of hospital stays, efficacy of cancer treatment, safety and costs. Once the guideline was defined, the document was submitted to 39 reviewers for peer review, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres for review and agreement.The key recommendations are: 1) the use of recombinant human erythropoietin in oncology is validated for chemotherapy-induced anemia when the chemotherapeutic regimen contains platinum. In other cases, we recommend to suggest patients participating in prospective clinical trials; 2) for chemotherapy (platinum based)-induced anemia, the benefits/risks ratio for anemia therapy (i.e. transfusion or erythropoietin therapy) must be analysed for each individual patient; 3) we recommend participation in studies to identify predictive factors for non-response to erythropoietin therapy to select non-responding patients; 4) to investigate the clinical benefit of erythropoietin therapy for anemia due to intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation therapy, we recommend to suggest patients participating in large multicentre phase III trials; 5) at the present time, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of erythropoietin therapy in children.

Anorexia and cachexia are serious complications frequently found in patients with cancer (Bozetti, 1995; Donnelly and Walsh, 1995). They are present in about 10% of patients at the time of diagnosis (Bozetti et al, 1989). Multiple factors are involved in their aetiology (Puccio and Nathanson, 1997). The resultant malnutrition is associated with a poorer response to anticancer treatment and an impaired quality of life (Holmes and Dickerson, 1987; Bozetti, 1995; De Conno et al, 1998). Many clinical trials have been undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of drugs thought to be appetite stimulants.