Search

Purpose: Onco-nephrology is an emerging subspecialty aiming to better understand and prevent renal events in cancer patients. We assessed patients' knowledge about (1) oncological/hematological treatments induced renal toxicity and (2) kidney protective measures., Methods: Adult patients receiving systemic anti-tumor treatments in multiple day hospital units in France answered a self-administered questionnaire about their knowledge and expectations related to treatment-associated renal toxicity., Results: In total, 621 questionnaires were collected in 8 units from November 2021 to January 2022. Among respondents, 84.5% were treated for a solid tumor. Overall, 34.3% (n = 208) patients reported they had some knowledge about potential renal adverse events related to their anticancer treatment, and 38.5% (n = 234) about kidney protection measures. Their referring oncologist or hematologist represented the commonest source of knowledge (67.8%). Sufficient hydration was cited as a kidney protection measure by 93.2% (n = 218) of patients declaring some knowledge about renal toxicity; prevention of nausea/vomiting by 52.6% (n = 123). Consumption of still and alkaline water was chosen by respectively 64.4% (n = 400) and 16.8% (n = 104) of participants to correct dehydration. A majority of patients expressed strong interest for receiving more information about renal toxicity and prevention: median Likert scale score was 10/10 (Q1-Q3, 5-10), with online resources mentioned as the most desired source of information., Conclusion: One-third of patients declared they had some knowledge about potential renal toxicity of their oncologic treatment and the ways to prevent them, especially regarding hydration. However, a majority expressed interest for dedicated information, which conducted to the elaboration of free online educational sheets for patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Current guidelines recommend that patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receive sequentially two antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs): Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), despite a similar payload. However, the effectiveness of one after another is unknown., Methods: ADC-Low is a multicentre, retrospective study evaluating the efficacy of SG and T-DXd, one after another, with or without intermediary lines of chemotherapy, in patients with HER2-low MBC., Results: One hundred and seventy-nine patients were included: the majority with HR-negative tumours received SG first (ADC1) (n = 100/108) while most with HR-positive tumours received T-DXd first (n = 56/71). Median progression-free survival 2 was short: 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.4-3.3) in the whole population, respectively, 3.1 (95% CI: 2.6-3.6) and 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.9-2.7) for patients receiving T-DXd or SG second (ADC2). Intermediary lines of chemotherapy between ADC1 and ADC2 had no impact. Primary resistance to ADC2 occurred in 54.4% of patients. Certain patients showed initial response to ADC2., Conclusions: Clinical benefit of sequentially administered SG and T-DXd is limited for most patients. Nevertheless, a subset of patients might benefit-on the short term-from a second ADC. Additional studies are needed to identify patients who could benefit from two ADCs with similar payloads., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Introduction: Aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane and selective estrogen down-regulator (SERD) fulvestrant are used mostly to treat breast cancer estrogen receptor positive in post-menopausal women. These drugs are given either through the oral route or by intramuscular injection. They have shown great inter-individual variability with a risk of cardiometabolic disorders. Hence the importance of their therapeutic drug monitoring not only for exposure-efficacy but also exposure-toxicity. We describe here a LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane and fulvestrant in human plasma., Material and Methods: Plasma samples were prepared by a single-step protein precipitation. The liquid chromatography system was paired with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Quantification were achieved in Multiple Reactions Monitoring mode and the electrospray ionization was in positive mode., Results: The method demonstrated consistent analytical performance across various parameters, including linearity, specificity, sensitivity, matrix effect, upper and lower limits of quantification, extraction recovery, precision, accuracy, hemolysis effect, dilution integrity, and stability under different storage conditions, in accordance with established guidelines. The analysis time for each run was 4 min. Calibration curves exhibited linearity within the 1-100 ng/mL range, with correlation coefficients > 0.99 for the four analytes. Plasma concentrations from 42 patients were integrated into the selected calibration. Stability assessments indicated that the four drugs remained stable at - 20 °C for three months, 15 days under refrigeration, up to 7 days at room temperature, and after three freeze-thaw cycles., Conclusion: We have developed and validated this quantitative method for therapeutic drug monitoring of those four hormone therapy drugs:anastrozole, letrozole, fulvestrant and exemestane. This method can be also used for future clinical pharmacokinetics /pharmacodynamics studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the use of molecular genotyping to accurately diagnose and treat human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-producing tumors and to evaluate the discriminating capacity of molecular testing on prognosis and overall survival., Methods: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of patients registered with the French Reference Center for Trophoblastic Disease between 1999 and 2021. We included all patients with hCG-producing tumors for whom results of molecular genotyping were available., Results: Fifty-five patients with molecular genotyping were included: 81.2 % (n = 45) had tumors of gestational origin, 12.7 % (n = 7) of non-gestational origin and 5.5 % (n = 3) of undetermined origin. The results of molecular genotyping influenced the treatment decisions for 17 % of patients in this cohort. Overall survival was 93.3 % for patients with gestational tumors (after a median follow-up of 74 months) compared to 71.4 % for patients with non-gestational tumors (after a median follow-up of 23 months)., Conclusion: In atypical presentations of hCG-producing tumors, molecular genotyping is a valuable tool to guide diagnosis and tailor treatment recommendations., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. The elderly, whose numbers have been increasing, constitute a population in their own right, because of the many co-morbidities they suffer from. The epidemiology of breast cancer, particularly in elderly women, is described here, as well as the diagnosis and the assessment of extension, which do not differ from the rest of the population., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a devastating malignancy with an overall 5-year survival of 8% for all stages combined. Most of the PC patients diagnosed have an advanced disease (40%) or metastatic stage (40%), which eliminates surgery as a potentially curative treatment. The disease course is often complicated by venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, which per se account for significant morbidity and mortality, with significantly worsen survival. PC is associated with the highest risk of VTE among all cancer patients. We review the literature data to address the incidence and clinical outcomes of VTE in PC patients. VTE incidence varies from 5 to 41% according to epidemiological studies and is as high as 57% in postmortem series. Since 2013, international clinical practice guidelines recommend primary thromboprophylaxis with a grade 1B level of evidence as an adjuvant therapy in advanced PC. A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating the benefit and risk of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) in ambulatory advanced PC patients under chemotherapy showed that the incidence of VTE was 2.1% in patients treated with LMWH and 11.2% in controls (risk ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.083-0.39; P<0.0001). In conclusion, improved earlier diagnosis and effective management of VTE, a frequent and life-threatening complication in PC, is warranted to improve PC patient outcomes., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and serious complication in cancer patients, and the second leading cause of death in this setting. Cancer patients are also more likely to present recurrent VTE and major bleeding while taking anticoagulants. Management of VTE in these patients is always challenging and remains suboptimal worldwide. In 2013, the International Initiative on Thrombosis and Cancer (ITAC-CME) released international guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of VTE and central venous catheter-associated thrombosis, based on a systematic review of the literature ranked according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation scale. An update of these ITAC-CME consensus guidelines, including the use of direct oral anticoagulants, was recently published. In this review, we summarize these updated guidelines. Better adherence to the international guidelines, involving an adequate educational and active implementation strategies, will substantially decrease the burden of VTE and allow to increase survival in cancer patients., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)