Search

Source Segregation (SS) is a novel strategy in dairy housing that can reduce emissions and separate organic matter and nutrients more efficiently than traditional slurry solid-liquid separation. The anaerobic digestion (AD) methane yield of the SS fractions, however, is unknown. We aimed at unveiling the biomethane yield of these fractions by conducting AD experiments under different configurations: batch, continuous feeding, and fed-batch. In the batch test, the solid (SF) and liquid fraction (LF) from the SS system, a slurry collected from the pit (CS), and a self-made slurry (MF) were used as substrates. The results showed that the specific CH4 yields of the SF and MF were in same range and both higher than the CS. We concluded that SS can increase the CH4 yield of dairy excreta mainly by reducing losses in the animal house. The SF and MF were then compared in a continuously-fed thermophilic test, where SF had a higher specific (174 compared to 105 NL kg−1 VS) and volumetric (12.2 compared to 9.9 NL CH4 kg−1 excreta) yields. We concluded that the SF can effectively substitute slurry in AD without compromising the yield, possibly increasing economic viability by reducing transport costs and reactor size. Further, SF produced 356 NL CH4 kg−1 VS and a digestate with 1.8% lower dry matter in the fed-batch as compared to continuous feeding. Continuously stirred fed-batch can thus increase the CH4 yield of the SF and reduce the DM of its digestate potentially contributing to lower emissions in storage and field application.

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is an important tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production. A prolonged retention time by adding an extra anaerobic digestion step can be utilized to further degrade the digestates, contributing to increased nitrogen mineralisation and reducing decomposable organic matter. These modifications could influence the potential N fertiliser value of the digestate and soil carbon sequestration after field application. This study investigated the effects of prolonging retention time by implementing an additional anaerobic digestion step on carbon and nitrogen dynamics in the soil and soil carbon sequestration. Two digestates obtained from two biogas plants operating at contrasting hydraulic retention times, with and without an additional digestion step, were applied to a loamy sand soil. N mineralisation dynamics were measured during 80 days and C mineralisation during 212 days. After 80 days of incubation, the net inorganic N release from digestates obtained from a secondary AD step increased by 9–17 % (% of the N input) compared to corresponding digestates obtained from a primary AD step. A kinetic four-pool carbon model was used to fit C mineralisation data to estimate carbon sequestration in the soil. After 212 days of incubation, the net C mineralisation was highest in undigested solid biomass (68 %) and digestates obtained from the primary AD step (59–65 %). The model predicted that 26–54 % of C applied is sequestered in the soil in the long-term. The long-term soil C retention related to the C present before digestion was similar for one- and two-step AD at 12–16%. Weconclude that optimizing the anaerobic digestion configurations by including a secondary AD step could potentially replace more mineral N fertiliser due to an improved N fertiliser value of the resultant digestate without affecting carbon sequestration negatively.