Search

Objective To assess the diagnostic and prognostic characteristics of borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) detected during pregnancy, and to establish an inventory of French practices. Materials and methods A retrospective multi-centre case study of 14 patients treated for BOTs, diagnosed during pregnancy between 2005 and 2017, in five French pelvic cancerology expert centres, including data on clinical characteristics, histological tumour characteristics, surgical procedure, adjuvant treatments, follow-up and fertility. Results The mean age of patients was 29.3 [standard deviation (SD) 6.2] years. Most BOTs were diagnosed on ultrasonography in the first trimester (85.7 %), and most of these cases (78.5 %) also underwent magnetic resonance imaging to confirm the diagnosis (true positives 54.5 %). Most patients underwent surgery during pregnancy (57 %), with complete staging surgery in two cases (14.3 %). Laparoscopy was performed more frequently than other procedures (50 %), and unilateral adnexectomy was more common than cystectomy (57.5 %). Tumour size influenced the surgical approach significantly (mean size 7.5 cm for laparoscopy, 11.9 cm for laparoconversion, 14 cm for primary laparotomy; P = 0.08), but the type of resection did not. Most patients were initially diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA (92.8 %) tumours, but many were upstaged after complete restaging surgery (57.1 %). Most BOTs were serous (50 %), two cases had a micropapillary component (28.5 %), and one case had a micro-invasive implant. BOTs were bilateral in two cases (14.2 %). Mean follow-up was 31.4 (SD 14.8) months. Recurrent lesions occurred in two patients (14.2 %) and no deaths have been recorded to date among the study population. Conclusion BOTs remain rare, but this study – despite its small sample size – supports the hypothesis that BOTs during pregnancy have potentially aggressive characteristics.

Resume Objectif Determiner la place de l’imagerie, des marqueurs tumoraux, le type de traitement et la voie d’abord chirurgicale, la place de la surveillance, la voie d’accouchement, et la restadification des TFO pendant la grossesse, afin d’emettre des recommandations. Methode Analyse systematique de la litterature sur les TFO pendant la grossesse, consultee sur PUBMED, des articles publies entre 1990 et 2019, incluant les mots-cles « borderline ovarian tumor and pregnancy ». Resultats L’echographie pelvienne est l’examen de reference et de premiere intention pour la detection et la caracterisation des masses annexielles durant la grossesse (grade C). L’IRM pelvienne est recommandee a partir de 12 SA en cas de masse annexielle indeterminee et devra etre conclue par un score diagnostique (grade C). L’injection de gadolinium est a limiter au maximum en raison des risques prouves sur le fœtus et devra etre discutee au cas par cas apres information de la patiente (grade C). En l’absence de donnees dans la litterature, il n’est pas possible d’emettre de recommandations quant a l’utilisation de marqueur tumoral pour le diagnostic de TFO pendant la grossesse. En cas de necessite de realiser une chirurgie d’une TFO en cours de grossesse, il n’existe pas d’arguments suffisants pour recommander une kystectomie ou une annexectomie. Pour les TFO, la voie cœlioscopique doit etre privilegiee en cours de grossesse si elle est realisable (grade C). La voie d’abord et le type de traitement chirurgical doivent etre adaptes a la taille de la lesion, au terme obstetrical, et au desir ulterieur de grossesse, apres avis de la RCP. En l’absence de donnees suffisantes dans la litterature, il n’est pas possible d’emettre de recommandations concernant la surveillance d’une suspicion de TFO non operee presumee pendant la grossesse. Il n’existe pas suffisamment d’arguments dans la litterature pour modifier la prise en charge obstetricale en cas de TFO survenant au cours de la grossesse. En cas de stadification incomplete d’une TFO operee en cours de grossesse, une chirurgie de restadification pourra etre discutee selon les memes modalites qu’en dehors de la grossesse (grade C). Conclusion Le diagnostic de TFO survenant au cours de la grossesse reste rare malgre un depistage systematique des masses annexielles au premier trimestre de la grossesse et l’avancee de l’âge maternel. Il existe peu de donnees dans la litterature concernant la prise en charge des TFO pendant la grossesse. L’ensemble des decisions doivent etre prises apres avis en RCP.

It is recommended to classify Borderline Ovarian Tumors (BOTs) according to the WHO classification. Transvaginal and suprapubic ultrasonography are recommended for the analysis of an ovarian mass (Grade A). In case of an undetermined ovarian lesion on ultrasonography, it is recommended to perform a pelvic MRI (Grade A) with a score for malignancy (ADNEX MR/O-RADS) (Grade C) included in the report and to formulate a histological hypothesis (Grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended to characterize a tumor suspected of being BOT (Grade C). It is recommended to evaluate serum levels of HE4 and CA125 and to use the ROMA score for the diagnosis of indeterminate ovarian mass on imaging (grade A). If there is a suspicion of a mucinous BOT on imaging, serum levels of CA 19-9 may be proposed (Grade C). For Early Stages (ES) of BOT, if surgery without risk of tumor rupture is possible, laparoscopy with protected extraction is recommended over laparotomy (Grade C). For treatment of a bilateral serous ES BOT with a strategy to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, bilateral cystectomy is recommended where possible (Grade B). For mucinous BOTs with a treatment strategy of fertility and/or endocrine function preservation, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended (grade C). For mucinous BOTs treated by initial cystectomy, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended (grade C). For serous or mucinous ES BOTs, routine hysterectomy is not recommended (Grade C). For ES BOTs, lymphadenectomy is not recommended (Grade C). For ES BOTs, appendectomy is recommended only in case of a macroscopically pathological appendix (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended in cases of serous BOTs with micropapillary architecture and an incomplete abdominal cavity inspection during initial surgery (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended for mucinous BOTs after initial cystectomy or in cases where the appendix was not examined (Grade C). If restaging surgery is decided for ES BOTs, the following procedures should be performed: peritoneal washing (grade C), omentectomy (grade B), complete exploration of the abdominal cavity with peritoneal biopsies (grade C), visualization of the appendix and appendectomy in case of a pathological macroscopic appearance (grade C) as well as unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in case of a mucinous BOT initially treated by cystectomy (grade C). In advanced stages (AS) of BOT, it is not recommended to perform a lymphadenectomy as a routine procedure (Grade C). For AS BOT in a patient with a desire to fall pregnant, conservative treatment involving preservation of the uterus and all or part of the ovary may be proposed (Grade C). Restaging surgery aimed at removing all lesions, not performed initially, is recommended for AS BOTs (Grade C). After treatment, follow-up for a duration greater than 5 years is recommended due to the median recurrence time of BOTs (Grade B). It is recommended that a systematic clinical examination be carried out during follow-up of a treated BOT (Grade B). If the determination of tumor markers is normal preoperatively, the routine dosage of tumor markers in BOT follow-up is not recommended (Grade C). In case of an initial elevation in serum CA 125 levels, it is recommended to monitor CA 125 during follow up (Grade B). In case of conservative treatment, it is recommended to use transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound during follow up of a treated BOT (Grade B). In the event of a BOT recurrence in a woman of childbearing age, a second conservative treatment may be proposed (Grade C). A consultation with a physician specialized in Assisted Reproductive Technique (ART) should be offered in the case of BOTs in women of childbearing age (Grade C). When possible, a conservative surgical strategy is recommended to preserve fertility in women of childbearing age (Grade C). In the case of optimally treated BOT, there is no evidence to contraindicate the use of ART. The use of hormonal contraception after serous or mucinous BOT is not contraindicated (Grade C). After management of mucinous BOT, for women under 45 years, given the benefit of Hormonal Replacement Therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular and bone risks, and the lack of hormone sensitivity of mucinous BOTs, it is recommended to offer HRT (Grade C). Over 45 years of age, HRT can be prescribed in case of a climacteric syndrome after individual benefit to risk assessment (Grade C).

This work was carried out under the aegis of the CNGOF (Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français) and proposes guidelines based on the evidence available in the literature. The objective was to define the diagnostic and surgical management strategy, the fertility preservation and surveillance strategy in Borderline Ovarian Tumor (BOT). No screening modality can be proposed in the general population. An expert pathological review is recommended in case of doubt concerning the borderline nature, the histological subtype, the invasive nature of the implant, for all micropapillary/cribriform serous BOT or in the presence of peritoneal implants, and for all mucinous or clear cell tumors (grade C). Macroscopic MRI analysis should be performed to differentiate the different subtypes of BOT: serous, seromucinous and mucinous (intestinal type) (grade C). If preoperative biomarkers are normal, follow up of biomarkers is not recommended (grade C). In cases of bilateral early serous BOT with a desire to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, it is recommended to perform a bilateral cystectomy if possible (grade B). In case of early mucinous BOT, with a desire to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, it is recommended to perform a unilateral adnexectomy (grade C). Secondary surgical staging is recommended in case of serous BOT with micropapillary appearance and uncomplete inspection of the abdominal cavity during initial surgery (grade C). For early-stage serous or mucinous BOT, it is not recommended to perform a systematic hysterectomy (grade C). Follow up after BOT must be pursued for more than 5 years (grade B). Conservative treatment involving at least the conservation of the uterus and a fragment of the ovary in a patient wishing to conceive may be proposed in advanced stages of BOT (grade C). A new surgical treatment that preserves fertility after a first non-invasive recurrence may be proposed in women of childbearing age (grade C). It is recommended to offer a specialized consultation for Reproductive Medicine when diagnosing BOT in a woman of childbearing age. Hormonal contraceptive use after serous or mucinous BOT is not contraindicated (grade C).

To determine the place of imaging, tumour markers, type of treatment and surgical route, follow-up, delivery mode, and re-staging in case of BOT during pregnancy, in order to provide guidelines.A systematic bibliographical analysis on BOT during pregnancy was performed through a PUDMED search on articles published from 1990 to 2019 using keywords « borderline ovarian tumour and pregnancy ».Pelvic ultrasound is the gold standard and first-line examination for the detection and characterization of adnexal masses during pregnancy (grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended from 12 gestational weeks in case of indeterminate adnexal masses and should be concluded by a diagnostic score (grade C). Gadolinium injection should be minimized because of proven risk to the fetus and should be discussed on a case-by-case basis after patient information (grade C). In the absence of data in the literature, it is not possible to recommend the use of any tumour marker for the diagnosis of BOT during pregnancy. In case of a surgical treatment of BOT during pregnancy, there is insufficient evidence to recommend either a cystectomy or an oophorectomy. For BOT, the laparoscopic approach should be preferred during pregnancy if it is feasible (grade C). Surgical route and type of surgery should be chosen after taking into account the tumour size, the obstetrical term, and the subsequent desire for pregnancy, following discussion in a multidisciplinary meeting. In the absence of sufficient data in the literature, it is not possible to make any recommendation on the follow-up of a BOT suspected during pregnancy. There is not enough evidence in the literature to change obstetrical management for delivery in patients with BOT. In case of incomplete staging of a BOT treated during pregnancy, restaging can be discussed as for non-pregnant patients (grade C).The diagnosis of BOT occurring during pregnancy remains rare despite systematic screening of adnexal masses in the first trimester of pregnancy and an increasing maternal age. There is limited data in the literature concerning the management of BOT during pregnancy. All decisions must be taken after discussion in a multidisciplinary meeting.

International audience; This work was carried out under the aegis of the CNGOF (Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français) and proposes guidelines based on the evidence available in the literature. The objective was to define the diagnostic and surgical management strategy, the fertility preservation and surveillance strategy in Borderline Ovarian Tumor (BOT). No screening modality can be proposed in the general population. An expert pathological review is recommended in case of doubt concerning the borderline nature, the histological subtype, the invasive nature of the implant, for all micropapillary/cribriform serous BOT or in the presence of peritoneal implants, and for all mucinous or clear cell tumors (grade C). Macroscopic MRI analysis should be performed to differentiate the different subtypes of BOT: serous, seromucinous and mucinous (intestinal type) (grade C). If preoperative biomarkers are normal, follow up of biomarkers is not recommended (grade C). In cases of bilateral early serous BOT with a desire to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, it is recommended to perform a bilateral cystectomy if possible (grade B). In case of early mucinous BOT, with a desire to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, it is recommended to perform a unilateral adnexectomy (grade C). Secondary surgical staging is recommended in case of serous BOT with micropapillary appearance and uncomplete inspection of the abdominal cavity during initial surgery (grade C). For early-stage serous or mucinous BOT, it is not recommended to perform a systematic hysterectomy (grade C). Follow up after BOT must be pursued for more than 5 years (grade B). Conservative treatment involving at least the conservation of the uterus and a fragment of the ovary in a patient wishing to conceive may be proposed in advanced stages of BOT (grade C). A new surgical treatment that preserves fertility after a first non-invasive recurrence may be proposed in women of childbearing age (grade C). It is recommended to offer a specialized consultation for Reproductive Medicine when diagnosing BOT in a woman of childbearing age. Hormonal contraceptive use after serous or mucinous BOT is not contraindicated (grade C).

No abstract available

The incidence (rate per 100 000) of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) increases progressively with age, starting at 15-19 years and peaking at around 4.5 cases per 100 000 at an age of 55-59 years (LE3) with a median age of 46 years. The five year survival for FIGO stages I, II, III and IV is 99.7 % (95 % CI: 96.2-100 %), 99.6 % (95 % CI: 92.6-100 %), 95.3 % (95 % CI: 91.8-97.4 %) and 77.1 % (95 % CI: 58.0-88.3 %), respectively (LE3). An epidemiological association exists between the individual risk of BOT and family history of BOT and certain other cancers (pancreatic, lung, bone, leukemia) (LE3), a personal history of benign ovarian cyst (LE2), a personal history of tubo-ovarian infection (LE3), the use of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LE3), oral contraceptive use (LE3), multiparity (LE3), Hormonal replacement therapy (LE3), high consumption of Coumestrol (LE4), medical treatment for infertility with progesterone (LE3) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (LE3). Screening for BOTs is not recommended for patients (Grade C). The overall risk of recurrence of BOTs varies between 2% and 24 %, with an overall survival greater than 94 % at 10 years, and the risk of an invasive recurrence of a BOT ranges from 0.5 % to 3.8 %. The use of scores and nomograms can be useful in assessing the risk of recurrence, and providing patients with information (Grade C). The WHO classification is recommended for classifying BOTs. It is recommended that the presence of a microinvasive focus (5 mm) and microinvasive carcinoma (5 mm with an atypical nuclei and a desmoplastic stroma reaction) within a BOT be reported. In cases of serous BOT, it is recommended to specify the classic histological subtype or micropapillary / cribriform type (Grade C). When confronted with a BOT, it is recommended that the invasive or non-invasive nature of peritoneal implants can be investigated based solely on the invasion and destruction of underlying adipose or peritoneal tissue which has a desmoplastic stromal reaction where in contact with the invasive clusters (Grade B). For bilateral mucinous BOTs and / or in cases with peritoneal implants or peritoneal pseudomyxoma, it is recommended to also look for a primitive digestive or pancreato-biliary cancer (Grade C). It is recommended to sample ovarian tumors suspected of being BOTs by focusing samples on vegetations and solid components, with at least 1 sample per cm in tumors with a size less than 10 cm and 2 samples per cm in tumors with a size greater than 10 cm (Grade C). In cases of BOTs and in the absence of macroscopic omental involvement after careful macroscopic examination, it is recommended to perform at least 4-6 systematic sampling blocks and to include all peritoneal implants (Grade C). It is recommended to consult an expert pathologist in gynecology when a BOT suspicion requires intraoperative extemporaneous histology (grade C). Endo-vaginal and suprapubic ultrasonography are recommended for the analysis of an ovarian mass (Grade A). In case of an undetermined ovarian lesion on ultrasonography, it is recommended that a pelvic MRI be performed (Grade A). To analyze an adnexal mass with MRI, it is recommended to use an MRI protocol with T2, T1, T1 Fat Sat, dynamic and diffusion sequences as well as gadolinium injection (Grade B). To characterize an adnexal mass with MRI, it is recommended to include a score system for malignancy (ADNEX MR/O-RADS) (Grade C) in the report and to formulate a histological hypothesis (Grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended to characterize a tumor suspected of being a BOT (Grade C). Macroscopic MRI features should be analyzed to differentiate BOT subtypes (Grade C). Pelvic ultrasound is the first-line examination for the detection and characterization of adnexal masses during pregnancy (Grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended from 12 weeks of gestation in case of an indeterminate adnexal mass and should provide a diagnostic score (Grade C). Gadolinium injection must be minimized as fetal impairment has been proven (Grade C). It is recommended that serum levels of HE4 and CA125 be evaluated and that the ROMA score for the diagnosis of an indeterminate ovarian mass on imaging be used (grade A). In case of suspicion of a mucinous BOT on imaging, dosage of serum levels of CA 19-9 can be considered (Grade C). If the determination of tumor markers is normal preoperatively, routine dosage of tumor markers in BOT follow-up is not recommended (Grade C). In case of preoperative elevation in tumor markers, the determination of serum CA 125 levels is recommended in the follow-up of BOT (Grade B). When conservative treatment of a BOT has been adopted, the use of endovaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography is recommended during follow-up (Grade B).

In the Early Stages (ES) of Borderline Ovarian Tumor (BOT), if surgery without risk of tumor rupture is possible, then laparoscopy with protected extraction is recommended over laparotomy (Grade C). In case of bilateral serous ES BOT treatment with a strategy to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, bilateral cystectomy is recommended if possible (Grade B). In case of mucinous BOT treatment with a strategy to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, unilateral adnexectomy is recommended (grade C). In the case of a mucinous BOT in a patient who has had an initial cystectomy, unilateral adnexectomy is recommended (grade C). In the case of treatment of a serous ES BOT in a patient who has had an initial cystectomy, with a strategy to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, restaging surgery for adnexectomy is not recommended in the absence of suspicious residual lesions at the time of surgery and/or postoperative imaging (reference ultrasonography or pelvic MRI) (grade C). For serous or mucinous ES BOTs, routine hysterectomy is not recommended (Grade C). In cases of ES BOTs, lymphadenectomy is not recommended (Grade C). For ES BOTs, appendectomy is recommended only if there is a macroscopically pathological aspect to the appendix (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended in case of a serous BOT with a micropapillary aspect and an unsatisfactory inspection of the abdominal cavity during initial surgery (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended in cases of mucinous BOT if only a cystectomy has been performed or if the appendix has not been evaluated (Grade C). If restaging surgery is decided for an ES BOT, the following procedures should be performed: peritoneal cytology (grade C), omentectomy (there is no data in literature to recommend which type of omentectomy should be performed) (grade B), complete exploration of the abdominal cavity with peritoneal biopsies (grade C), visualization of the appendix +/- appendectomy in case of pathological macroscopic appearance (grade C) and unilateral adnexectomy in case of a mucinous BOT (grade C). In advanced stages of BOT it is not recommended to perform a lymphadenectomy as a routine procedure (Grade C). In cases of an advanced stage BOT, in a patient with a desire to fall pregnant, conservative treatment involving preservation of the uterus and all or part of the ovary may be proposed after a multidisciplinary meeting (Grade C). Second surgery aimed at removing all lesions, if not performed initially, is recommended in cases of advanced stage BOT (Grade C). It is not recommended to perform completion surgery after conservative treatment (preservation of the ovaries and the uterus) and after the achievement of fertility desire for a serous BOT (Grade B). After treatment for a BOT, follow-up beyond 5 years is recommended due to the median time to recurrence (Grade B). It is recommended that a systematic clinical examination be carried out during follow-up of a treated BOT (Grade B). In the particular case of an initial elevation of CA 125 levels, it is recommended to monitor CA 125 during follow up (Grade B). In cases treated conservatively (ovarian and uterine conservation), it is recommended to use endovaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography during the follow up period (Grade B). In the event of a recurrence of a BOT, in a woman of childbearing age, a conservative treatment strategy can again be proposed (Grade C). In the presence of non-invasive BOT implants, conservative treatment may be considered after a first non-invasive recurrence in women who wish to preserve their fertility (Grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended after 12 weeks of amenorrhea in case of an undetermined adnexal mass and should be concluded with a diagnostic score (Grade C). The injection of gadolinium, in case of pregnancy, should be discussed on a case-by-case basis due to the proven risks for the foetus (Grade C). If feasible, a laparoscopic approach should be preferred during pregnancy (Grade C). A consultation with a specialist reproductive physician should be offered to patients with a BOT and of childbearing age (Grade C). It is recommended that patients be provided with full information on the risk of decreased ovarian reserve following to surgical treatment. It is recommended that the ovarian reserve be evaluated prior to surgical management of a suspected BOT (Grade C). When possible, a conservative surgical strategy is recommended to preserve fertility in women of childbearing age (Grade C). There is no specific data on the management of infertility following to conservative treatment of BOT. In case of durable infertility following to conservative treatment of BOT, a consultation with a specialist reproductive physician is required (Grade C). In the case of optimally treated BOT, there is no evidence in literature to contraindicate the use of Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART). The use of hormonal contraception after serous or mucinous BOT is not contraindicated (Grade C). After treatment of a mucinous BOT, for women aged under 45 years, given the benefit of hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular and bone risks, and the lack of hormone-sensitivity of mucinous BOTs, it is recommended to offer HRT (Grade C). After treatment of a mucinous BOT, for women over 45 years of age, there is no argument to contraindicate the use of HRT. HRT can be prescribed in case of a climacteric syndrome, as part of an individual benefit to risk assessment (Grade C).

Study Objective Although the standard technique is currently based on laparoscopic promontofixation, the standard vaginal technique for the treatment of uterine prolapse is sacrospinofixation according to Richter 1 , 2 , 3 . Described by Kurt Richter in 1968, this intervention corrects the middle floor and consists of fixing the vaginal dome (after hysterectomy or not) on the sacrospinous ligament(s) 4 , 5 . The technique includes a wide dissection of the pararectal fossa using several Breisky valves to grip the sacrospinous ligament under strict visual control. This crucial step of the intervention implies optimal visual control for the operator but does not allow visual access to the operative assistants, which is regrettable for the purpose of teaching 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 . The aim of this surgical video is to describe the different stages of the sacrospinofixation surgical technique, showing sacrospinous ligaments during the crucial step thanks to a laparoscopic camera. Design A step-by-step explanation of the surgery using a video (an instructive video [Video 1]) approved by the local ethics committee. Setting Gynecological Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. Patients A 70-year-old woman with multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. Interventions Installation in the conventional gynecologic position with 2 operating assistants on both sides of the operator. The steps are as follows: step 1, posterior colpotomy; step 2, rectovaginal dissection and opening of the pararectal fossa; step 3, dissection of the sacrospinous ligament; and step 4, gripping of the sacrospinous ligament. The following 4 steps are realized bilaterally: step 5, suspension of the vaginal dome; step 6, beginning of vaginal closure; step 7, tightening the spinofixation threads; and step 8, ending the closure of the vaginal colpotomy. Measurements and Main Results The operative time was 60 minutes. The operation was simple and shows precisely the sacrospinous ligaments. There were no intraoperative complications. The vaginal mesh urinary catheter was removed on day 1, and the patient was discharged on day 3. Conclusion Thanks to a laparoscopic column, this video of the surgical technique of sacrospinofixation using the Richter procedure is an original approach to show sacrospinous ligaments. The latter is a crucial step of this surgery, which remains the reference vaginal technique for the treatment of a uterine prolapse.