Search

ObjectiveGout is associated with a higher risk of fracture; however, findings on the associations of hyperuricemia and urate-lowering therapy (ULT) with the risk of fracture have been inconsistent. We examined whether lowering serum urate (SU) levels with ULT to a target level (i.e.,

Objectives Angiotensin II is implicated in GCA pathology. We examined whether the use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) is associated with GCA risk compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or other antihypertensives. Methods We performed a matched cohort study including adults who were initiators of antihypertensives in UK primary care data between 1995 and 2019. Treatment-naïve individuals without prior GCA or PMR were categorized into three groups—ARB initiators, ACEi initiators, or other antihypertensive initiators (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics or alpha-adrenoceptor blockers)—and followed for up to 5 years. Incident GCA was defined using validated Read codes, with age of onset ≥50 years and two or more glucocorticoid prescriptions. Inverse probability–weighted Cox models were used to model outcome risk, adjusting for lifestyle parameters, comorbidities and comedications. Results Among >1 million new starters of antihypertensives (81 780 ARBs, 422 940 ACEis and 873 066 other antihypertensives), the incidence rate of GCA per 10 000 patient-years was 2.73 (95% CI 2.12, 3.50) in the ARB group, 1.76 (95% CI 1.25, 2.39) in the ACEi group and 1.90 (95% CI 1.37, 2.56) in the other antihypertensives group. The hazard of GCA was higher in ARB initiators [hazard ratio (HR) 1.55; 95% CI 1.16, 2.06] than initiators of ACEis, but similar between initiators of other antihypertensives and ACEis (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.87, 1.35). Conclusions Initiation of ARBs is associated with a higher risk of GCA compared with ACEis or other antihypertensives. Mechanistic studies of angiotensin receptor biology will provide further clarity for our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare the biomechanical stability of slide compression anatomic plates of the femoral neck, cannulated compression screws and dynamic hip screws with derotation screws for stabilizing unstable femoral neck fractures (Pauwels angle = 70°). Pauwels III femoral neck fractures were created on 45 Sawbones femurs and randomly assigned to three implant groups (1:1:1). The biomechanical stability of all Sawbones in each treatment group was evaluated with three tests. First, in the static loading test, the load–displacement curve, vertical stiffness (load/vertical displacement [N/mm]) and 5 mm failure load were recorded. Second, in the incremental cyclic loading test (700, 1000, and 1400 N), the cyclic−displacement curve and the displacement of the fragments were recorded. Third, in the torsion test, the torsional rigidity, maximum torque, and torsional angle corresponding to the maximum torque were recorded. The static compression test showed that slide compression anatomic place‐femoral neck (SCAP‐FN) had the largest vertical stiffness (275 ± 11 N/mm, p < 0.01) and 5 mm failure load (1232 ± 156, p < 0.01). The cyclic loading test showed that SCAP‐FN had the lowest change in displacement after 30000 cycles of loading. The torsional stiffness and the maximum torque followed the order SCAP‐FN > dynamic hip screw systems (DHS) + derotational screw (DS) > CCS, and the torsional angle corresponding to the maximum torque followed the order SCAP‐FN < DHS + DS < CCS. The SCAP‐FN construct provides stiffness and stability compared with other standard fixation techniques (3CS and DHS + DS). The fixation strategy of SCAP‐FN might be sufficient for clinical use, indicating studies in the human body are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: There is still a large unmet need for novel osteoarthritis (OA) treatments that could provide clinically important effects on long-term pain relief (≥12 months). We examined the relation of bariatric surgery along with weight loss to analgesic prescription and all-cause mortality among individuals with OA.Methods: We conducted a cohort study among individuals with OA using The Health Improvement Network. We compared the rate of no analgesic prescription ≥12 consecutive months and the risk of all-cause mortality using inverse probability weighting Cox-proportional hazard models and the difference in number of analgesic prescriptions (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and paracetamol) in the 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles using quantile regression model between bariatric and non-bariatric cohorts.Results: Included were 588,494 individuals (694 had bariatric surgery). Compared with non-bariatric group, the rate of no analgesic prescription ≥12 consecutive months was higher (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.08-1.38) in bariatric surgery group, and the number of analgesic prescriptions was lower in the 75th (44 vs 58) and 90th (74 vs 106) percentiles during a mean follow-up of 4.3 years. All-cause mortality in bariatric surgery group was lower than comparison group (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.41-0.51).Conclusion: This study presents the first evidence that bariatric surgery was associated with decreased long-term analgesic prescription and decreased all-cause mortality among individuals with OA. However, our findings may be overestimated owing to intractable confounding by indication for bariatric surgery; thus, future studies (e.g., clinical trials) are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Target trial emulation is an intuitive design framework that encourages investigators to formulate their comparative effectiveness research (CER) question as a hypothetical randomised controlled trial (RCT). Our aim was to systematically review CER studies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to provide examples of design limitations that could be avoided using target trial emulation, and how these limitations might introduce bias.Methods: We searched for head-to-head CER studies of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in RA. Study designs were reviewed for seven components of the target trial emulation framework: eligibility criteria, treatment strategies, assignment procedures, follow-up period, outcome, causal contrasts of interest (ie, intention-to-treat (ITT) or per-protocol effect) and analysis plan. Hypothetical trials corresponding to the reported methods were assessed to identify design limitations that would have been avoided with an explicit target trial protocol. Analysis of the primary effectiveness outcome was chosen where multiple analyses were performed.Results: We found 31 CER studies, of which 29 (94%) had at least one design limitation belonging to seven components. The most common limitations related to: (1) eligibility criteria: 19/31 (61%) studies used post-baseline information to define baseline eligibility; (2) causal contrasts: 25 (81%) did not define whether ITT or per-protocol effects were estimated and (3) assignment procedures: 13 (42%) studies did not account for confounding by indication or relied solely on statistical confounder selection.Conclusions: Design limitations were found in 94% of observational CER studies in RA. Target trial emulation is a structured approach for designing observational CER studies that helps to avoid potential sources of bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare achievement of remission in 2 early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treat‐to‐target (TTT) cohorts, a tight control cohort with a target of stringent remission in a randomized controlled trial and an observational cohort targeting a looser definition of remission in clinical practice. Methods: We analyzed data from the Aiming for Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a randomised trial examining the benefit of ultrasound in a Clinical Tight Control regimen (ARCTIC) trial and the Norwegian Very Early Arthritis Clinic (NOR‐VEAC) observational study. Both were Norwegian multicenter studies that included disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)–naive RA patients and implemented TTT. The target in the ARCTIC trial was remission defined as a Disease Activity Score (DAS) of <1.6 plus 0 swollen joints on a 44‐joint count, while the target in the NOR‐VEAC study was the less stringent remission target of a DAS28 of <2.6. We assessed achievement of the study‐specific targets and compared the odds of achieving the American College of Rheumatology(ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Boolean remission during 2 years of follow‐up. Results: We included 189 patients from the ARCTIC trial and 330 patients from the NOR‐VEAC study. The study‐specific target had been achieved in more than half of the patients in each cohort at 6 months, increasing to >60% at 12 and 24 months. The odds of achieving ACR/EULAR Boolean remission during follow‐up were higher in the ARCTIC trial than in the NOR‐VEAC study, with significant differences at 3 months (odds ratio 1.73 [95% confidence interval 1.03–2.89]), 12 months (odds ratio 1.97 [95% confidence interval 1.21–3.20]), and 24 months (odds ratio 1.82 [95% confidence interval 1.05–3.16]). Conclusion: A majority of patients in both cohorts reached the study‐specific treatment targets. More patients in the ARCTIC trial than in the NOR‐VEAC study achieved ACR/EULAR Boolean remission during follow‐up, suggesting that targeting a more stringent definition of remission provides further potential for favorable outcomes of a TTT strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of anaemia, leucopoenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia associated with MTX plus folic acid among patients with rheumatic diseases. Methods We searched MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE through August 2016 for all randomized controlled clinical trials with a MTX monotherapy arm. We excluded randomized controlled clinical trials for cancer and included only double-blind studies that reported on haematologic adverse events. Studies were excluded if patients did not receive folic acid or leucovorin supplementation. Full text articles were assessed by two independent reviewers. Incidence estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results Of 1601 studies identified, 30 (1.87%) were included, representing 3858 patients; all had RA. Seventeen trials reported on anaemia (n = 2032), 17 reported on leucopoenia (n = 2220), 16 reported on neutropenia (n = 2202) and 12 reported on thrombocytopenia (n = 1507). The incidence for any anaemia was 2.55% (95% CI 0.60–5.47%), any leucopoenia 1.17% (95% CI 0.16–2.80%), any neutropenia 1.77% (95% CI 0.33–4.00%), and any thrombocytopenia 0.19% (95% CI 0.00–0.86%). Four cases of severe anaemia were reported, as defined by authors, along with three cases of severe neutropenia. No cases of severe leucopoenia, severe thrombocytopenia or pancytopenia were reported. Conclusion Cytopenias are an uncommon side effect of low-dose MTX with folic acid supplementation among RA patients. Further research is needed to reach a more precise estimate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]