1. A Critical Analysis of the Evidence for the SARS-CoV-2 Origin Hypotheses
- Author
-
James C. Alwine, Arturo Casadevall, Lynn W. Enquist, Felicia D. Goodrum, and Michael J. Imperiale
- Subjects
COVID-19 ,SARS-CoV-2 ,zoonosis ,coronavirus ,lab leak ,origin ,Microbiology ,QR1-502 - Abstract
ABSTRACT When humans experience a new, devastating viral infection such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), significant challenges arise. How should individuals as well as societies respond to the situation? One of the primary questions concerns the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that infected and was transmitted efficiently among humans, resulting in a pandemic. At first glance, the question appears straightforward to answer. However, the origin of SARS-CoV-2 has been the topic of substantial debate primarily because we do not have access to some relevant data. At least two major hypotheses have been suggested: a natural origin through zoonosis followed by sustained human-to-human spread or the introduction of a natural virus into humans from a laboratory source. Here, we summarize the scientific evidence that informs this debate to provide our fellow scientists and the public with the tools to join the discussion in a constructive and informed manner. Our goal is to dissect the evidence to make it more accessible to those interested in this important problem. The engagement of a broad representation of scientists is critical to ensure that the public and policy-makers can draw on relevant expertise in navigating this controversy.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF