Search

Schnitzler’s Syndrome (SS) is a rare late-onset acquired autoinflammatory disorder which consists of chronic urticaria associated with a monoclonal IgM-kappa gammopathy, arthralgias, skeletal hyperostosis, lymphadenopathy, and recurrent constitutional symptoms. The average age of diagnosis is 51 years with a slight male predominance with a male to female ratio of 1.6. Diagnosis of SS requires the presence of 2 major criteria including chronic urticaria and monoclonal IgM along with at least two of the following minor criteria: recurrent intermittent fevers, bone pain, arthralgias, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), neutrophilic dermal infiltrate on skin biopsy, and leukocytosis or elevated C-reactive protein (CRP). Early diagnosis and clinical awareness are paramount in SS as it is associated with a 15-20% risk of lymphoproliferative malignancy. The median overall survival is 12.8 years. We present a case of a 39-year-old female with new onset urticaria associated with recurrent fevers and joint pain. Symptoms were refractory to steroids, and high dose antihistamines. Multi-disciplinary evaluation resulted in the ultimate diagnosis of Schnitzler’s Syndrome. The patient was ultimately treated with canakinumab (Il-1 inhibitor), with near resolution of symptoms. This case demonstrates the importance of a broad differential diagnosis and maintaining a high clinical suspicion for rare diseases when presented with a complex form of an otherwise common condition.

Patient care in the allergy and respiratory fields is advancing rapidly, offering the possibility of the inclusion of a variety of digital tools that aim to improve outcomes of care. Impaired access to several health care facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic has considerably increased the appetite and need for the inclusion of e-health tools amongst end-users. Consequently, a multitude of different e-health tools have been launched worldwide with various registration and access options, and with a wide range of offered benefits. From the perspective of both patients and healthcare providers (HCPs), as well as from a legal and device-related perspective, several features are important for the acceptance, effectiveness,and long-term use of e-health tools. Patients and physicians have different needs and expectations of how digital tools might be of help in the care pathway. There is a need for standardization by defining quality assurance criteria. Therefore, the Upper Airway Diseases Committee of the World Allergy Organization (WAO) has taken the initiative to define and propose criteria for quality, appeal, and applicability of e-health tools in the allergy and respiratory care fields from a patient, clinician, and academic perspective with the ultimate aim to improve patient health and outcomes of care.

Background: Anaphylaxis is the most severe clinical presentation of acute systemic allergic reactions and can cause death. Given the prevalence of anaphylaxis within healthcare systems, it is a high priority public health issue. However, management of anaphylaxis – both acute and preventative – varies by region. Methods: The World Allergy Organization (WAO) Anaphylaxis Committee and the WAO Junior Members Steering Group undertook a global online survey to evaluate local practice in the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis across regions. Results: Responses were received from WAO members in 66 countries. While intramuscular epinephrine (adrenaline) is first-line treatment for anaphylaxis, some countries continue to recommend alternative routes in contrast to guidelines. Epinephrine auto-injector (EAI) devices, prescribed to individuals at ongoing risk of anaphylaxis in the community setting, are only available in 60% of countries surveyed, mainly in high-income countries. Many countries in South America, Africa/Middle-East and Asian-Pacific regions do not have EAI available, or depend on individual importation. In countries where EAIs are commercially available, national policies regarding the availability of EAIs in public settings are limited to few countries (16%). There is no consensus regarding the time patients should be observed following emergency treatment of anaphylaxis. Conclusion: This survey provides a global snapshot view of the current management of anaphylaxis, and highlights key unmet needs including the global availability of epinephrine for self-injection as a key component of anaphylaxis management.