Search

B Methods: b Retrospective multicenter study (on behalf of the Spanish Lymphoma Group GELTAMO) including de novo DLBCL patients with >=70 years old at diagnosis who received first-line therapy ( I N i = 386). Comparison Between aaIPI, LAB-PI, NCCN-IPI and GELTAMO-IPI to Predict Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Diffuse Large-B Cell Lymphoma who Undergo R-CHOP/R-miniCHOP B Background: b Elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) need thorough evaluation at diagnosis to select the most suitable approach. [Extracted from the article]

Over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients who receive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells will experience disease progression. There is no standard next line of therapy and information in this setting is scarce and heterogeneous. We analyzed 387 R/R LBCL patients who progressed after CAR T cells from July 2018 until March 2022 in Spain and the United Kingdom. Median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months, with significant differences according to the interval between infusion and progression (<2 months [1.9 months], 2-6 months [5.2 months], and >6 months [not reached]). After progression, 237 (61%) patients received treatment. Focusing on the first subsequent therapy, overall (complete) response rates were 67% (38%) for polatuzumab-bendamustine-rituximab (POLA), 51% (36%) for bispecific antibodies (BsAb), 45% (35%) for radiotherapy (RT), 33% (26%) for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), 25% (0%) for lenalidomide (LENA), and 25% (14%) for chemotherapy (CT). In terms of survival, 12-month progression-free survival and OS was 36.2% and 51.0% for POLA, 32.0% and 50.1% for BsAb, 30.8% and 37.5% for RT, 29.9% and 27.8% for ICI, 7.3% and 20.8% for LENA, and 6.1% and 18.3% for CT. Thirty-two (14%) patients received an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant with median OS not reached after a median follow-up of 15.1 months. In conclusion, patients with R/R LBCL who progress within the first 2 months after CAR T-cell therapy have dismal outcomes. Novel targeted agents, such as polatuzumab and BsAbs, can achieve prolonged survival after CAR T-cell therapy failure., Competing Interests: Gloria Iacoboni: Honoraria and travel support: Novartis, Kite/Gilead, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Abbvie, Autolus, Sandoz, Miltenyi, and AstraZeneca. Maeve O'Reilly has served on advisory boards and received honoraria from Kite/Gilead and Novartis. Mi Kwon: Consulting and lectures: Gilead and Jazz, Pfizer. Javier Delgado: Honoraria from Kite‐Gilead, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen. Claire Roddie has served on advisory boards and received honoraria from Kite/Gilead, Novartis, and BMS. Manuel Guerreiro: Consultancy: Novartis, Kite, BMS, Pierre Fabre, and MSD. Alberto Mussetti: BMS: consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria; Gilead: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Robin Sanderson: Kite/Gilead and Novartis—speakers fees, honoraria, conference travel. Sunil Iyengar: Abbvie—Conference support; Beigene—advisory board; BMS—Conference support; Janssen—Speaker fees; Kite—advisory board; Takeda—advisory board, speaker fees, and conference support. Juan‐Manuel Sancho: Honoraria as speaker in medical education activities from Roche, Gilead‐Kite, Celgene‐BMS, Janssen, Novartis, and Incyte. Honoraria as participant in advisory boards or consulting for Roche, Gilead‐Kite, Celgene‐BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Incyte, Lilly, Beigene, and Myltenyi Biomedicine. Pere Barba: Advisory board and consultancy: Allogene, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Incyte, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Novartis, Nektar, Pfizer, and Pierre Fabre. Rafael Hernani: Research: Gilead. Travel support: Gilead. Honoraria: Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Celgene, and Novartis. Anna Sureda: Honoraria from Takeda, BMS, Merck, Janssen, Sanofi, Roche, Novartis, and Gilead. Alejandro Martin Garcia‐Sancho: Consultancy for Roche, BMS/Celgene, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Lilly, ADC Therapeutics America, Miltenyi, Ideogen, Abbvie, and Sobi. Honorario from Roche, BMS/Celgene, Janssen, Gilead/Kite, Takeda, Eusa Pharma, and Abbvie. Pau Abrisqueta: consulting/advisory: Roche, Genmab, Janssen, BMS, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene; Honoraria: Roche, Genmab, Janssen, BMS, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead, and Incyte. Andrea Kuhnl has served on advisory boards and received honoraria from Kite/Gilead, Novartis, and BMS. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Authors. HemaSphere published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. on behalf of European Hematology Association.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Background: Second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are now available to treat chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) in the first and second line. However, vascular adverse events (VAEs) have been reported for patients with CML treated with some TKIs., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the cumulative incidence (CI) and cardiovascular risk for 210 patients included in the Canarian Registry of CML., Result: With a mean follow up of 6 years, 19/210 (9.1%) patients developed VAEs, all of whom presented at least one cardiovascular risk factor at diagnosis. The mean time to VAE presentation was 54 months from the start of TKI treatment. We found a statistically significant difference between the CI for nilotinib-naïve vs. nilotinib-treated patients ( p = 0.005), between dasatinib-naïve and dasatinib-treated patients ( p = 0.039), and for patients who received three lines of treatment with first-line imatinib vs. first-line imatinib ( p < 0.001). From the multivariable logistic regression analyses, the Framingham risk score (FRS) and patients with three lines of TKI with first-line imatinib were the only variables with statistically significant hazard ratios for VAE development. Significant increases in HDL-C and total cholesterol may also be predictive for VAE., Conclusions: In conclusion, it is important to estimate the cardiovascular risk at the diagnosis of CML as it can help determine whether a patient is likely to develop a VAE during TKI treatment.

High dose-intensive or infusional intermediate-dose immunochemotherapy is highly effective treatment for Burkitt lymphoma irrespective of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. However, toxicities of these regimens are relevant, especially in older adults and elderly patients. The prospective multicenter BURKIMAB14 trial included four to six blocks of immunochemotherapy according to stage (localized: 1 and 2 non-bulky; advanced: 2 bulky, 3, 4) and age, with dose reduction in patients >55 years old. Dose-intensity of chemotherapy was reduced in patients ≤55 years old after achieving complete metabolic response (CMR). Their outcomes were compared with those of similar patients included in the former BURKIMAB08 trial, in which there was no dose reduction. CMR was attained in 86 of 107 (80%) patients (17/19 in localized stages and 69/88 in advanced stages). Patients from the BURKIMAB14 trial ≤55 years old showed similar overall survival (OS), fewer infections and cytopenias than patients from the BURKIMAB08 trial. Patients >55 years old had a significantly higher treatment- related mortality despite dose reduction of chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 3.61 years the 4-year OS probability was 73% (range, 63-81%). Age (≤55 vs. >55 years) and stage (localized vs. advanced) had prognostic significance. No significant differences in OS were observed in HIV-positive versus HIV-negative patients. The results of BURKIMAB14 are similar to those of other dose-intensive immunochemotherapy trials. Age >55 years and advanced stage, but not HIV infection, were associated with poor survival. Dose reduction of chemotherapy in young adults in CMR is safe and does not impact outcomes (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT05049473).

In the pre-chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy era, the SCHOLAR-1 study identified a group of patients with refractory aggressive B cell lymphoma (ABCL) with particularly poor prognoses. We recently published our real-world data from Spain, focused on this SCHOLAR-1 refractory group, and compared patients who underwent CAR-T therapy with the previous standard of care. In this study, we found that the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in refractory patients, in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), was superior to that of the treatments available in the pre-CAR-T era. The main objective of these new analyses was to analyze treatment efficacy in terms of response rates and survival for patients with ABCL with or without the SCHOLAR-1 criteria. In addition, we analyzed the prognostic impact of each SCHOLAR-1 criterion independently. Our study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of SCHOLAR-1 criteria on ABCL patients treated with CAR-T therapy in Spain. This multicenter, retrospective, observational study. We included all adult patients treated with commercially available CAR-T cell products and diagnosed with ABCL different from primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma between February 2019 and July 2022. Patients meeting any SCHOLAR-1 criteria (progressive disease as the best response to any line of therapy, stable disease as the best response to ≥4 cycles of first-line therapy or ≥2 cycles of later-line therapy, or relapse at <12 months after autologous stem cell transplantation [auto-SCT]) in the line of treatment before CAR-T therapy (SCHOLAR-1 group) were compared with those not meeting any of these criteria (non-SCHOLAR-1 group). To analyze the prognostic impact of individual SCHOLAR-1 criteria, all the patients who met any of the SCHOLAR-1 criteria at any time were included to assess whether these criteria have the same prognostic impact in the CAR-T era. In addition, patients were grouped according to whether they were refractory to the first line of treatment, refractory to the last line of treatment, or relapsed early after auto-SCT. The PFS and OS were calculated from the time of appearance of the SCHOLAR-1 refractoriness criteria. Of 329 patients treated with CAR-T (169 with axi-cel and 160 with tisa-cel), 52 were in the non-SCHOLAR-1 group and 277 were in the SCHOLAR-1 group. We found significantly better outcomes in the non-SCHOLAR-1 patients compared with the SCHOLAR-1 patients (median PFS of 12.2 and 3.3 months, respectively; P = .009). In addition, axi-cel showed better results in terms of efficacy than tisa-cel for both the non-SCHOLAR-1 group (hazard ratio [HR] for PFS, 2.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1 to 6.7; P = .028]; HR for OS, 7.1 [95% CI, 1.5 to 34.6; P = .015]) and SCHOLAR-1 group (HR for PFS, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.3 to 2.5; P < .001]; HR for OS, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.2 to 2.6; P = .002]), but also significantly more toxicity. Finally, separately analyzing the prognostic impact of each SCHOLAR-1 criterion revealed that refractoriness to the last line of treatment was the variable with the most significant impact on survival. In conclusion, SCHOLAR-1 refractoriness criteria notably influence the efficacy of CAR-T therapy. In our experience, axi-cel showed better efficacy than tisa-cel for both SCHOLAR-1 and non-SCHOLAR-1 patients. Refractoriness to the last line of treatment was the variable with the most significant impact on survival in the CAR-T therapy era., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Real-world evidence comparing the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy against that of the previous standard of care (SOC) for refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is scarce. We retrospectively collected data from patients with LBCL according to SCHOLAR-1 criteria treated with commercial CAR T-cell therapy in Spain (204 patients included and 192 treated, 101 with axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel], and 91 with tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel]) and compared the results with a historical refractory population of patients (n = 81) obtained from the GELTAMO-IPI study. We observed superior efficacy for CAR-T therapy (for both axi-cel and tisa-cel) over pSOC, with longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median of 5.6 vs. 4-6 months, p ≤ 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (median of 15 vs. 8 months, p < 0.001), independently of other prognostic factors (HR: 0.59 (95% CI: 0.44-0.80); p < 0.001] for PFS, and 0.45 [(95% CI: 0.31-0.64)] for OS). Within the CAR-T cohort, axi-cel showed longer PFS (median of 7.3 versus 2.8 months, respectively, p = 0.027) and OS (58% versus 42% at 12 months, respectively, p = 0.048) than tisa-cel. These differences were maintained in the multivariable analysis. On the other hand, axi-cel was independently associated with a higher risk of severe cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. Our results suggest that the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy is superior to pSOC in the real-world setting. Furthermore, axi-cel could be superior in efficacy to tisa-cel, although more toxic, in this group of refractory patients according to SCHOLAR-1 criteria., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Bastos-Oreiro, Gutierrez, Reguera, Iacoboni, López-Corral, Terol, Ortíz-Maldonado, Sanz, Guerra-Dominguez, Bailen, Mussetti, Abrisqueta, Hernani, Luzardo, Sancho, Delgado-Serrano, Salar, Grande, Bento, González de Villambrosía, García-Belmonte, Sureda, Pérez-Martínez, Barba, Kwon and Martín García-Sancho.)

Objectives: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive heterogeneous lymphoma with standard treatment. However, 30%-40% of patients still fail, so we should know which patients are candidates for alternative therapies. IPI is the main prognostic score but, in the rituximab era, it cannot identify a very high-risk (HR) subset. The MD Anderson Cancer Center reported a score in the prerituximab era exclusively considering tumor-related variables: Tumor Score (TS). We aim to validate TS in the rituximab era and to analyze its current potential role., Methods: From GELTAMO DLBCL registry, we selected those patients homogeneously treated with R-CHOP (n = 1327)., Results: Five-years PFS and OS were 62% and 74%. All variables retained an independent prognostic role in the revised TS (R-TS), identifying four different risk groups, with 5-years PFS of 86%, 71%, 50%, and very HR (28%). With a further categorization of three variables of the original TS (Ann Arbor Stage, LDH and B2M), we generated a new index that allowed an improvement in HR assessment., Conclusions: (a) All variables of the original TS retain an independent prognostic role, and R-TS remains predictive in the rituximab era; (b) R-TS and additional categorization of LDH, B2M, and AA stage (enhanced TS) increased the ability to identify HR subsets., (© 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Lymphomas are a large, heterogeneous group of neoplasms with well-defined characteristics, and this heterogeneity highlights the importance of epidemiological data. Knowledge of local epidemiology is essential to optimise resources, design clinical trials, and identify minority entities. Given there are few published epidemiological data on lymphoma in Spain, the Spanish Lymphoma and Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Group created the RELINF project. The aim of this project is to determine the frequencies and distribution of lymphoid neoplasms in Spain and to analyse survival. We developed an online platform for the prospective collection of data on newly diagnosed cases of lymphoma in Spain between January 2014 and July 2018; 11,400 patients were registered. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) were the most frequent lymphomas in our series. Marginal B cell lymphoma frequency was higher than that reported in other studies, representing more than 11% of mature B cell lymphomas. Peripheral T cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) was the most common subtype of T cell lymphoma, and NK/T cell lymphomas were more frequent than expected (5.4% of total). Hodgkin's lymphoma accounted for 12% of lymphoproliferative syndromes. Overall survival was greater than 90% at 2 years for indolent B cell lymphomas, and approximately 60% for DLBCL, somewhat lower than that previously reported. Survival was poor for PTCL-NOS and angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma, as expected; however, it was somewhat better than that in other studies for anaplastic large cell anaplastic lymphoma kinase lymphomas. This is the first prospective registry to report the frequencies, distribution, and survival of lymphomas in Spain. The frequencies and survival data we report here are globally consistent with that reported in other Western countries. These updated frequencies and survival statistics are necessary for developing appropriate management strategies for neoplasias in the Spanish population.

The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is the most widely used score for non-Hodgkin lymphoma but lacks the ability to identify a high-risk population in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Low absolute lymphocyte count and high monocytes have proved to be unfavourable factors. Red-cell distribution width (RDW) has been associated with inflammation and beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) with tumour load. The retrospective study included 992 patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP. In the multivariate analysis, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), stage, bulky mass, B2M, RDW, and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) were independently related to progression-free survival (PFS). A new prognosis score was generated with these variables including age categorized into three groups (0, 1, 2 points); ECOG ≥ 3-4 with two; stage III/IV, bulky mass, high B2M, LMR < 2·25 and RDW > 0·96 with one each; for a maximum of 9. This score could improve the discrimination of a very high-risk subgroup with five-year PFS and overall survival (OS) of 19% and 24% versus 45% and 59% of R (revised)-IPI respectively. This score also showed greater predictive ability than IPI. A new score is presented including complete blood cell count variables and B2M, which are readily available in real-life practice without additional tests. Compared to R-IPI, it shows a more precise high-risk assessment and risk discrimination for both PFS and OS., (© 2019 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is associated with severe end-organ damage and a high risk of thrombosis. Budd-Chiari syndrome, which develops after thrombotic occlusion of major hepatic blood vessels, is relatively common in PNH and has been associated with increased mortality. We report the case of a 46-year-old male with PNH who presented with Budd-Chiari syndrome associated with portal cavernoma, portal hypertension and hypersplenism. In September 2010, the patient suffered gastrointestinal bleeding, hematuria, and elevated plasma lactate dehydrogenase; he started eculizumab therapy with a good response. In October 2012, he developed upper gastrointestinal variceal bleeding and a splenorenal shunt was placed. At the time of writing, the patient remains stable and eculizumab continues to be effective. There is limited data on the use of eculizumab for prevention of hemolysis and its consequences in PNH patients undergoing surgery. Our findings provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of eculizumab in this setting., Competing Interests: the authors declare no potential conflict of interest.