Search

The incidence of new-onset seizures, which we defined as de novo seizures occurring within 4 weeks of receiving any of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved COVID-19 vaccinations as reported in patient-reported data compiled in the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System Data (CDC VAERS), has not been explored. The VAERS database contains de-identified patient-reported adverse events following vaccination and represents post-marketing surveillance and analysis of vaccine safety. After adjusting for time at risk, this resulted in estimated incidence rates of 3.19 seizures per 100 000 persons per year for the COVID-19 vaccine and 0.090 seizures per 100 000 persons per year for the influenza vaccines. A data-driven, individualized dataset that is comprehensive and coupled with a longitudinal follow-up in larger numbers of vaccinated individuals is needed to expand on our preliminary findings of vaccine-related seizures.

It remains unclear whether electrical currents can affect biological factors that determine chronic wound healing in humans. Purpose The aim of this study was to determine whether anodal and cathodal high-voltage monophasic pulsed currents (HVMPC) provided to the area of a pressure injury (PI) change the blood level of cytokines (interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α) and growth factors (insulin-like growth factor [IGF]-1 and transforming growth factor [TGF]-β1) in patients with neurological injuries and whether the level of circulatory cytokines and growth factors correlates with PI healing progression. Methods This study was part of a randomized clinical trial on the effects of HVMPC on PI healing. All patients with neurological injuries (spinal cord injury, ischemic stroke, and blunt trauma to the head) and a stage 2, stage 3, or stage 4 PI of at least 4 weeks' duration hospitalized in one rehabilitation center were eligible to participate if older than 18 years of age and willing to consent to donating blood samples. Exclusion criteria included local contraindications to electrical stimulation (cancer, electronic implants, osteomyelitis, tunneling, necrotic wounds), PIs requiring surgical intervention, patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (HbA1C > 7%), critical wound infection, and/or allergies to standard wound treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: anodal (AG) or cathodal (CG) HVMPC treatment (154 μs; 100 Hz; 360 µC/sec; 1.08 C/day) or a placebo (PG, sham) applied for 50 minutes a day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks. TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10, TGF-β1, and IGF-1 levels in blood serum were assessed using the immunoenzyme method (ELISA) and by chemiluminescence, respectively, at baseline and week 4. Wound surface area measurements were obtained at baseline and week 4 and analyzed using a digitizer connected to a personal computer. Statistical analyses were performed using the maximum-likelihood chi-squared test, the analysis of variance Kruskal-Wallis test, the Kruskal-Wallis post-hoc test, and Spearman's rank order correlation; the level of significance was set at P ≤.05. Results Among the 43 participants, 15 were randomized to AG (mean age 53.87 ± 13.30 years), 13 to CG (mean age 51.08 ± 20.43 years), and 15 to PG treatment (mean age 51.20 ± 14.47 years). Most PIs were located in the sacral region (12, 74.42%) and were stage 3 (11, 67.44%). Wound surface area baseline size ranged from 1.00 cm2 to 58.04 cm2. At baseline, none of the variables were significantly different. After 4 weeks, the concentration of IL-10 decreased in all groups (AG: 9.8%, CG: 38.54%, PG: 27.42%), but the decrease was smaller in the AG than CG group (P = .0046). The ratio of pro-inflammatory IL-10 to anti-inflammatory TNF-α increased 27.29% in the AG and decreased 26.79% in the CG and 18.56% in the PG groups. Differences between AG and CG and AG and PG were significant (AG compared to CG, P = .0009; AG compared to PG, P = .0054). Other percentage changes in cytokine and growth factor concentration were not statistically significant between groups. In the AG, the decrease of TNF-α and IL-1β concentrations correlated positively with the decrease of PI size (P Conclusion Anodal HVMPC elevates IL-10/TNF-α in blood serum. The decrease of TNF-α and IL-1β concentrations in blood serum correlates with a decrease of PI wound area. More research is needed to determine whether the changes induced by anodal HVMPC improve PI healing and to determine whether and how different electrical currents affect the activity of biological agents responsible for specific wound healing phases, both within wounds and in patients' blood. In clinical practice, anodal HVMPC should be used to increase the ratio of anti-inflammatory IL-10 to pro-inflammatory TNF-α , which may promote healing.

The use of electrical stimulation (ES) should be considered for treating nonhealing pressure ulcers (PUs), but optimal ES wound treatment protocols have yet to be established. A randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical study was conducted to evaluate the effects of cathodal and anodal high-voltage monophasic pulsed current (HVMPC) on periwound skin blood flow (PSBF) and size reduction of Stage 2 to Stage 4 PUs of at least 4 weeks' duration. Persons18 years of age, hospitalized with neurological injuries, at high risk for PU development (Norton scale14 points; Waterlow scale15 points), and with at least 1 Stage 2 to Stage 4 PU were eligible to participate in the study. Persons with necrotic wounds, osteomyelitis, electronic or metal implants in the PU area, PUs in need of surgical intervention, acute wound inflammation, diabetes (HBA1c7%), diabetic neuropathy, cancer, and/or allergies to standard wound treatments were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: anodal (AG), cathodal (CG), or placebo (PG) ES. All groups received individualized PU prevention and standard wound care. In the PG, sham ES was applied; the AG and CG were treated with anodal and cathodal HVMPC, respectively (154 μs 100 Hz; 360 µC/second; 1.08 C/day), 50 minutes per day, 5 days per week, for a maximum of 8 weeks. PSBF was measured using laser Doppler flowmetry at baseline, week 2, and week 4, and wound surface area measurements were obtained and analyzed using a digitizer connected to a personal computer. Data analysis utilized the maximum-likelihood chi-squared test, the analysis of variance Kruskal-Wallis test, the Kruskal-Wallis post-hoc test, and Spearman's rank order correlation. Nonlinear approximation based on exponential function was used to calculate treatment time needed to reduce the wound area by 50%. In all tests, the level of significance was set at P ≤.05. Of the 61 participating patients, 20 were in the AG (mean age 53.2 ± 13.82 years), 21 in the CG (mean age 55.67 ± 17.83 years), and 20 in the PG (mean age 52.5 ± 13.18 years). PUs (baseline size range 1.01 cm2 to 59.57 cm2; duration 4 to 48 weeks) were most frequently located in the sacral region (73.77%) and classified as Stage 3 (62.29%). PSBF at week 2 was significantly higher in the AG and CG than in the PG (P.05). Week 4 differences were not statistically significant. Wound percentage area reduction calculated at week 8 for the AG (64.10% ± 29.22%) and CG (74.06% ± 23.23%) were significantly different from PG ulcers (41.42% ± 27.88%; P = .0391 and P = .0024, respectively). In both ES groups, PSBF at week 4 and percent wound surface area reductions between weeks 4 and 8 were positively correlated, but only the AG correlation was statistically significant (P = .049). In this study, both ES modalities improved blood flow and wound area reduction rate. Studies examining optimal ES treatment times for healing to occur, the effect of comorbidities and baseline wound variables on ES outcomes, and the nature of the relationship between blood flow and healing are necessary.

Background. Studies show that anode and cathode electrical stimulation (ES) promotes the healing of wounds, but specific protocols for both electrodes are not available. Objective. To compare the effectiveness of cathodal versus cathodal+anodal ES in the treatment of Category II-IV pressure ulcers (PrUs). Design. Prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical study. Setting. Three nursing and care centers. Patients. Sixty-three participants with PrUs were randomly formed into a cathodal ES group (CG: N = 23; mean age of 79.35; SD 8.48), a cathodal+anodal ES group (CAG: N = 20; mean age of 79.65; SD 11.44) and a placebo ES group (PG: N = 20; mean age of 76.75; SD 12.24). Intervention. All patients were treated with standard wound care and high-voltage monophasic pulsed current (HVMPC; twin-peak impulses; 154 μs; 100 pps; 0.25 A; 250 μC/s) for 50 minutes per day, 5 times a week, for 6 weeks. The CG, CAG, and PG received, respectively, cathodal, cathodal+anodal, and sham ES through electrodes placed on a moist gauze pad. The treatment electrode was placed on the wound, and the return electrode was positioned on healthy skin at least 20 cm from the PrU. Measurements. Measurements were made at baseline, and after each of the 6 weeks of treatment. Primary outcome was percentage wound surface area reduction at week 6. Results. Wound surface area decreased in the CG by 82.34% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70.06-94.63) and in the CAG by 70.77% (95% CI 53.51-88.04). These reductions were significantly greater than in the PG (40.53%; 95% CI 23.60-57.46). The CG and CAG were not statistically significantly different regarding treatment results. Limitations. The time of treatment proved insufficient for PrUs to close. Conclusions. Cathodal and cathodal+anodal HVMPC similarly reduced the area of Category II-IV PrUs.

The effectiveness of measuring petiole sap nitrate-nitrogen concentration (PSNC) using ion selective electrode (ISE) has been scrutinized due to claims that PSNC poorly predicts leaf tissue nitrogen concentration (LTNC) or crop yield. This study evaluated the relationship among PSNC, LTNC, and marketable yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Two tomato trials were conducted using seepage irrigation and controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) in fall 2011 and 2012. At 15 days intervals, six most recently mature leaves were collected to measure PSNC and LTNC. PSNC and LTNC declined throughout the growing seasons, but PSNC was affected by weather. PSNC and LTNC were correlated (P = 0.0001, r = 0.38), though not meaningfully. PSNC and LTNC correlated negatively and positively with crop yield in most correlations, respectively. Correlations of CRFs and soluble fertilizers (SFs) separately, did not improve relationships. Measuring LTNC may be a more reliable nutrient management tool compared to PSNC me...