Search

Aims: The single-freeze strategy using the second-generation cryoballoon (CB-A, Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) has been reported to be as effective as the recommended double-freeze approach in several single-centre studies. In this retrospective, international, multicentre study, we compare the 3-min single-freeze strategy with the 4-min single-freeze strategy.Methods and results: Four hundred and thirty-two patients having undergone pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by means of CB-A using a single-freeze strategy were considered for this analysis. A cohort of patients who were treated with a 3-min strategy (Group 1) was compared with a propensity score-matched cohort of patients who underwent a 4-min strategy (Group 2). Pulmonary vein isolation was successfully achieved in all the veins using the 28-mm CB-A. The procedural and fluoroscopy times were lower in Group 1 (67.8 ± 17 vs. 73.8 ± 26.3, P < 0.05; 14.9 ± 7.8 vs. 24.2 ± 10.6 min, P < 0.05). The most frequent complication was PNP, with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.67). After a mean follow-up of 13 ± 8 months, taking into consideration a blanking period of 3 months, 85.6% of patients in Group 1 and 87% of patients in Group 2 were free from arrhythmia recurrence at final follow-up (P = 0.67).Conclusion: There is no difference in acute success, rate of complications, and freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrences during the follow-up between 3-min and 4-min per vein freeze strategies. The procedural and fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter in 3-min per vein strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Real Time Recordings (RTR) of pulmonary vein (PV) activity provide important information in the setting of the 2nd generation Cryoballoon (CB-A), as a funcion of time to isolation. Visualization of RTR with the standard inner lumen mapping catheter (ILMC) 20mm Achieve (AC) is possible in roughly 50% of PVs. A novel 25mm-Achieve Advance (AC-A) has been developed with the aim of increasing the detection of RTR. The purpose of this study is to compare the AC-A with the AC, to feasibility and improvement of RTR. Methods: We assigned 50 patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation to CB-A PVI, using the AC-A as ILMC. We compared this group with 50 patients, matched for age and left atrial volume, who previously underwent the CB-A PVI using the AC. Results: RTR were more frequently observed with the AC-A than with the AC (74% vs 49%; p= 0.02). RTR in the left superior PVs was similar in both groups (74% vs 72%, p= 0.8). RTR with the AC-A were equally appreciated in left or right sided, superior or inferior PVs. No significant differences were found in terms of feasibility, procedure fluoroscopy and freezing times, nadir temperatures, and acute PVI. Conclusions: CB-A PVI with the AC-A is feasible and safe in all PVs. The AC-A has proven significantly superior in visualising RTR if compared to the AC, affording RTR in 74% of PVs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The single-freeze strategy using the second-generation cryoballoon (CB-A, Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) has been reported to be as effective as the recommended double-freeze approach in several single-centre studies. In this retrospective, international, multicentre study, we compare the 3-min single-freeze strategy with the 4-min single-freeze strategy., Methods and Results: Four hundred and thirty-two patients having undergone pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by means of CB-A using a single-freeze strategy were considered for this analysis. A cohort of patients who were treated with a 3-min strategy (Group 1) was compared with a propensity score-matched cohort of patients who underwent a 4-min strategy (Group 2). Pulmonary vein isolation was successfully achieved in all the veins using the 28-mm CB-A. The procedural and fluoroscopy times were lower in Group 1 (67.8 ± 17 vs. 73.8 ± 26.3, P < 0.05; 14.9 ± 7.8 vs. 24.2 ± 10.6 min, P < 0.05). The most frequent complication was PNP, with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.67). After a mean follow-up of 13 ± 8 months, taking into consideration a blanking period of 3 months, 85.6% of patients in Group 1 and 87% of patients in Group 2 were free from arrhythmia recurrence at final follow-up (P = 0.67)., Conclusion: There is no difference in acute success, rate of complications, and freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrences during the follow-up between 3-min and 4-min per vein freeze strategies. The procedural and fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter in 3-min per vein strategy.

Aims: Real Time Recordings (RTR) of pulmonary vein (PV) activity provide important information in the setting of the 2nd generation Cryoballoon (CB-A), as a funcion of time to isolation. Visualization of RTR with the standard inner lumen mapping catheter (ILMC) 20mm Achieve (AC) is possible in roughly 50% of PVs. A novel 25mm-Achieve Advance (AC-A) has been developed with the aim of increasing the detection of RTR. The purpose of this study is to compare the AC-A with the AC, to feasibility and improvement of RTR., Methods: We assigned 50 patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation to CB-A PVI, using the AC-A as ILMC. We compared this group with 50 patients, matched for age and left atrial volume, who previously underwent the CB-A PVI using the AC., Results: RTR were more frequently observed with the AC-A than with the AC (74% vs 49%; p= 0.02). RTR in the left superior PVs was similar in both groups (74% vs 72%, p= 0.8). RTR with the AC-A were equally appreciated in left or right sided, superior or inferior PVs. No significant differences were found in terms of feasibility, procedure fluoroscopy and freezing times, nadir temperatures, and acute PVI., Conclusions: CB-A PVI with the AC-A is feasible and safe in all PVs. The AC-A has proven significantly superior in visualising RTR if compared to the AC, affording RTR in 74% of PVs.