Search

Objective: Our study aimed to assess the ability of high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic Score (HS-mGPS) predicting survival in patients undergoing radical surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to compare the impact with other Inflammation-Based prognostic scoring systems including Glasgow prognostic Score (GPS) and modified GPS (mGPS). Methods: Our study evaluated 293 patients with HCC who had undergone hepatectomy at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between 2010 and 2018. The HS-mGPS, mGPS, and GPS were calculated based on particular cut-off values of preoperative C-reactive protein and albumin, and the correlations between HS-mGPS and clinicopathological parameters were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted by Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. To evaluate the discrimination ability of each prognostic score, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were generated and the areas under the curve (AUC) were measured and compared. Result: The study results indicated a correlation between elevated HS-mGPS scores and adverse clinical factors, including higher BCLC stage, C-P grade, multiple tumors, and larger tumor diameter. Kaplan-Meier and univariate survival analyses revealed that higher scores of HS-mGPS, GPS, and mGPS were all associated with significantly reduced overall survival (OS) (all p < 0.001). In multivariate survival analysis, HS-mGPS emerged as an independent risk factor for poor OS in patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC (p = 0.010), along with factors including maximal tumor diameter (p < 0.001), microvascular invasion (MVI) (p = 0.008), and BCLC stage (p = 0.001). The analysis of ROC curves and the AUC values indicated that HS-mGPS outperforms GPS and mGPS in predicting the long-term prognosis of patients with resectable HCC. Conclusion: Preoperative HS-mGPS proves superior in predicting adverse long-term outcomes in HCC patients undergoing radical surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]