Search

Many Fontan patients with and without systolic ventricular dysfunction are being treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, despite its effectiveness remaining unclear. In the present study, we evaluated the short-term effect of enalapril on exercise capacity, vascular and ventricular function in pediatric Fontan patients with moderategood systolic ventricular function. Fontan patients between 8 and 18 years with moderategood systolic ventricular function and without previous ACE inhibitor treatment were included and were treated with enalapril for 3 months. During the first 2 weeks, the dosage was titrated according to systolic blood pressure (SBP). Exercise tests, ventricular function assessed by echocardiography, arterial stiffness measurements, and plasma levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide assessed before and after a 3-month enalapril treatment period was compared. A total of 28 Fontan patients (median age 13.9 years, 6 to 15 years after Fontan operation) completed the study with a mean dosage of 0.3 +/- 0.1 mg/ kg/d. A total of 6 patients (21 %) experienced a significant drop in SBP and 6 others (21%) experienced other adverse events. Enalapril treatment lowered the SBP (from 110 to 104 mmHg, p = 0.003) and levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (from 80 to 72 ng/L, p = 0.036). However, enalapril treatment did not improve exercise capacity, ventricular function, or arterial stiffness. In conclusion, short-term ACE inhibition has no beneficial effect in Fontan patients with moderate-good systolic ventricular function. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Background: This study aimed to describe the current practice and results of genetic evaluation in Dutch children with dilated cardiomyopathy and to evaluate genotype-phenotype correlations that may guide prognosis. Methods: We performed a multicenter observational study in children diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy, from 2010 to 2017. Results: One hundred forty-four children were included. Initial diagnostic categories were idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in 67 children (47%), myocarditis in 23 (16%), neuromuscular in 7 (5%), familial in 18 (13%), inborn error of metabolism in 4 (3%), malformation syndrome in 2 (1%), and “other” in 23 (16%). Median follow-up time was 2.1 years [IQR 1.0–4.3]. Hundred-seven patients (74%) underwent genetic testing. We found a likely pathogenic or pathogenic variant in 38 children (36%), most often in MYH7 (n = 8). In 1 patient initially diagnosed with myocarditis, a pathogenic LMNA variant was found. During the study, 39 patients (27%) reached study endpoint (SE: all-cause death or heart transplantation). Patients with a likely pathogenic or pathogenic variant were more likely to reach SE compared with those without (hazard ratio 2.8; 95% CI 1.3–5.8, P = 0.007), while transplant-free survival was significantly lower ( P = 0.006). Clinical characteristics at diagnosis did not differ between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Genetic testing is a valuable tool for predicting prognosis in children with dilated cardiomyopathy, with carriers of a likely pathogenic or pathogenic variant having a worse prognosis overall. Genetic testing should be incorporated in clinical work-up of all children with dilated cardiomyopathy regardless of presumed disease pathogenesis.