Search

Your search keyword '"Luehwink, A"' showing total 10 results
Start Over Author "Luehwink, A"
10 results on '"Luehwink, A"'

2. Breaking bad news in assisted reproductive technology: a proposal for guidelines

Author

Daniela Leone, Julia Menichetti, Lorenzo Barusi, Elisabetta Chelo, Mauro Costa, Luciana De Lauretis, Anna Pia Ferraretti, Claudia Livi, Arne Luehwink, Giovanna Tomasi, and Elena Vegni

Subjects
Art, Bad news, Communication, Buckman protocol, Infertility, Qualitative method, Gynecology and obstetrics, RG1-991
Abstract

Abstract Background The issue of breaking bad news in assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been only partially explored by literature, and although some recommendations are available, specific guidelines are lacking. The present study aimed to explore the applicability of the oncologic SPIKES Protocol to the ART context. Methods Thirteen ART clinicians (7 gynecologists; 4 psychologists; 1 biologist; 1 obstetrician) completed the Critical Incidents Report (CIR) to describe the experience of delivering bad news in ART. The CIRs were first discussed with clinicians, then a focus group was created composed of 13 clinicians, one health communication expert and a patient to discuss the applicability of the six-step (SPIKES) Buckman Protocol to ART. The discussion was audiotaped, transcribed and analyzed with content analysis. Results The SPIKES Protocol seems to fit ART consultations and participants found it practical and easy to understand. Some specificities were found for the ART context: the reiteration of bad news, the “patient” as a couple and the fact that ability to conceive is closely related to self-esteem, as well as to social and family identity. During the discussion of the SPIKES Protocol, participants highlighted the importance of: 1) providing a caring setting, by adding a reflection on the value of communication by phone; 2) exploring patients’ perceptions but also misinformation; 3) exploring patients’ desires and expectations, while balancing the need to be honest and clear; 4) applying Buckman’s suggestions for delivering information, and integrating clinical aspects with psychosocial ones; 5) managing and legitimizing patients’ emotions, in particular anger; 6) having a strategy for follow-up and supporting couples to make meaning of the ART experience. Conclusion The proposal of a shared protocol for giving bad news in ART could be the starting point for training and experimental studies.

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Doctor–couple communication during assisted reproductive technology visits

Author

Arne Luehwink, Daniela Leone, Lidia Borghi, C Filippini, Mauro Costa, L. De Lauretis, Alberto Revelli, F. Tomei, Elena Vegni, G. Tomasi, E. Chelo, S Del Negro, G. Giuffrida, R. Palermo, A. P. Ferraretti, C. Becattini, and Claudia Livi

Subjects
Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, communication content, medicine.medical_treatment, media_common.quotation_subject, MEDLINE, Context (language use), patient-centered score, doctor-patient communication, 03 medical and health sciences, Reproductive Techniques, 0302 clinical medicine, Pregnancy, medicine, Humans, Conversation, 030212 general & internal medicine, media_common, Physician-Patient Relations, 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine, Assisted reproductive technology, Socioemotional selectivity theory, Communication, Hawthorne effect, Rehabilitation, Obstetrics and Gynecology, ART, verbal dominance, Female, Italy, Treatment Outcome, Reproductive Medicine, Assisted, Family medicine, Models of communication, Observational study, Psychology
Abstract

Study question What are the characteristics of doctor-couple communication content during actual ART visits? Summary answer Physicians were mainly focused on providing biomedical information, while communication content from couples had a 2-fold focus on providing biomedical information and on positive talk. What is known already Communication aspects in ART seem crucial for clinical decision-making, retention in care and critical conversations with couples due to low treatment success rates. However, no studies have been carried out on the actual interaction between the doctor and the couple in this context. Study design, size, duration This observational study involved 28 clinicians and 160 patients referred to eight Italian ART clinics during a one-year recruitment period. Participants/materials, setting, methods ART visits at eight Italian clinics were videotaped. The visits were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS), particularly focusing on RIAS composite categories, verbal dominance and patient-centeredness score. Main results and the role of chance A total of 85 visits were eligible for analysis (62% acceptance rate), involving 28 clinicians and 160 patients (including 75 couples). The average visit duration was 37 ± 17.7 min. The mean verbal dominance was 1.9 ± 0.86 (range: 0.72-5.74). Physicians mainly focused on providing biomedical information. Communication content from couples had a 2-fold focus on providing biomedical information and on positive talk. The mean of patient centeredness index (PCI) was 0.51 (SD = 0.28; range 0.08-1.77); visits in which the doctor was a woman or the treatment indication was for heterologous fertilization showed higher PCI scores. Overall, females accounted for 67% of all patient talk. Taking this imbalance into account as expected frequencies for each composite category, males reported significantly more utterances in almost all of the socioemotional categories. Limitations, reasons for caution These results are preliminary and observational and only regard Italy. Communication during visits may have been biased since the professionals who agreed to participate showed an interest in communication issues. Another limitation is a possible Hawthorne effect due to the fact that participants were aware of being videotaped. Wider implications of the findings Our study showed that ART physicians mainly adopted an informative model of communication and a more disease-oriented approach. Findings revealed the complexity of communication content during ART consultations, given its triadic characteristic in which the third party is also a patient; clinicians should be aware of this complex aspect and of the specific male and female perspectives to be taken into account. The results could be useful for training ART professionals. Study funding/competing interest(s) This study was possible thanks to an unconditional grant from Ferring Spa to the Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan. There are no competing interests to declare. Trial registration number N/A.

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Impairments in life satisfaction in infertility: Associations with perceived stress, affectivity, partnership quality, social support and the desire to have a child

Author

Manuel Kiesswetter, Arne Luehwink, Alois Mahlknecht, Massimiliano Fistarol, Heidi Marsoner, and Stefan Duschek

Subjects
Adult, Male, media_common.quotation_subject, Population, Psychological intervention, Context (language use), Personal Satisfaction, Anxiety, 03 medical and health sciences, Social support, 0302 clinical medicine, medicine, Humans, 030212 general & internal medicine, education, Spouses, Applied Psychology, media_common, education.field_of_study, 030505 public health, Life satisfaction, Social Support, Psychiatry and Mental health, Affect, Infertility, Female, Family Relations, Worry, medicine.symptom, 0305 other medical science, Psychology, Psychosocial, Stress, Psychological, Clinical psychology
Abstract

Between 10% and 15% of couples in western society are affected by infertility. As a major source of psychological distress, infertility may be accompanied by a substantial decline in well-being, and mental symptoms including those of depression and anxiety. This study aimed to quantify impairments in life satisfaction in infertile couples and to identify psychosocial variables moderating these impairments. For this purpose, 228 infertile couples completed the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ), Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), Partnership Questionnaire (PQ), Social Support Questionnaire, (SSQ) and Questionnaire on the Desire to Have a Child (QDC). Our sample scored below the norm of the general population on the LSQ sum score and various subscales, including those assessing social relationships, health, sexuality, leisure activities, and self-evaluation. Correlation and regression analysis revealed an inverse association of life satisfaction (LSQ) with stress (PSQ), negative affect (PANAS), and worry (PSWQ), and positive associations with positive affect (PANAS), partnership quality (PQ), social support (SSQ), and the strength of the desire to have a child (QDC). These findings support the notion of markedly reduced satisfaction with numerous life areas in the context of infertility. Psychosocial factors such as increased stress related to infertility treatment, affective impairments, partnership problems, lack of social support or social exclusion may contribute to this reduction. Psychological interventions aimed at controlling stress, strengthening partnerships, and improving social inclusion may be helpful in reducing the burden of infertility and improving the life satisfaction of affected couples.

Published
2019

5. Patient-centered communication, patient satisfaction, and retention in care in assisted reproductive technology visits

Author

G. Tomasi, A. P. Ferraretti, Alberto Revelli, G. Giuffrida, Daniela Leone, F. Tomei, E. Chelo, Elena Vegni, Claudia Filippini, Lidia Borghi, C. Becattini, R. Palermo, L. De Lauretis, S. Poli, Claudia Livi, Arne Luehwink, and Mauro Costa

Subjects
0301 basic medicine, Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Adolescent, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, medicine.medical_treatment, Retention in care, Reproductive medicine, Satisfaction, Context (language use), RIAS, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Patient satisfaction, Patient-centered communication, Patient-Centered Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Genetics, medicine, Humans, Assisted Reproduction Technologies, Genetics (clinical), Physician-Patient Relations, 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine, Assisted reproductive technology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Medicine, Middle Aged, Test (assessment), 030104 developmental biology, Reproductive Medicine, Italy, Content analysis, Patient Satisfaction, Family medicine, Conventional PCI, Female, Doctor-patient interaction, Psychology, Developmental Biology
Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the association between patient-centered communication, patients’ satisfaction, and retention in care in assisted reproductive technology (ART) visits. METHODS: ART visits at eight Italian clinics were videotaped and coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System, which includes a Patient-Centered Index (PCI), a summary “patient-centered communication” ratio. After the visit, patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire (SATQ). After 3 months, patients were asked about their retention in care. Spearman correlations and Mann-Whitney tests were used to test associations between the study variables; the open-ended item of SATQ was analyzed through content analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-five visits were videotaped (involving 28 gynecologists and 160 patients). PCI score (μ = 0.51 ± 0.28) revealed a more disease-oriented communication during the visit. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the visit and identified in the information provision or in the doctor’s humanity or kindness the main reasons of satisfaction. At the follow-up, the majority of the couples declared to have followed the clinicians’ recommendations and to have remained related to the ART center. No associations were found among the study variables, except for a lower male satisfaction among couples who declared to have changed ART clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to what was expected, the style of physician-patient communication was not found to be associated with patient satisfaction and retention in care. However, patients were highly satisfied and engaged. The actual meaning of a communication that is “patient-centered” in the ART context might be wider, including the couples’ need for information, as suggested by qualitative findings.

Published
2019

6. Strategies for preventing group B streptococcal infections in newborns: A nation-wide survey of Italian policies

Author

Tzialla, C, berardi, A, farina, C, clerici, P, borghesi, A, viora, E, scollo, P, stronati, M, Task Force for group B streptococcal infections for the Italian Society of Neonatology including Stival, G, barbaglia, Ma, guala, A, giunta, E, parola, L, grossignani, Mr, perri, P, tubaldi, L, alletto, G, daidone, S, flacco, V, dani, C, sterpa, A, rapisardi, G, elicio, Mr, faldella, G, capretti, Mg, messner, H, bandiera, M, achille, C, azzali, A, montrasio, G, mariani, S, galvagno, G, giacosa, E, de Angelis, F, spandrio, M, serra, A, garofalo, F, perona, A, porcelli, F, ferrero, F, De Franco, S, paollilo, P, picone, S, besana, R, varisco, T, farina, M, memo, L, nicolini, G, lietti, D, Di Chiara, G, rottoli, A, Bonabitacola, T, Cortis, E, Neri, E, Martinelli, S, Ilardi, L, Rondanini, Gf, Calzi, P, Gatta, A, Quntadamo, Pa, Ivaldi, M, Terenzani, L, Di Lascio, N, Travaglio, Md, Vetrano, G, Furcolo, G, Vitacco, V, Intini, C, Frigerio, M, Stroppiana, P, Policicchio, G, Mesirca, P, Gianino, P, Audenio, E, Paludetto, R, Raimondi, F, Pugliese, A, Valentino, L, Nosari, N, Marchesano, G, Chirico, G, Bellù, R, Menchini, M, Poletti, A, E T, Vacchiano, Pinto, L, E D, Perri, Coppola, R, Perini, R, Vetrella, A, De Luca, G, Lista, G, Cavigioli, F, Bettinelli, A, Massironi, E, Franco, C, Bernardo, L, Poli, S, Palladini, M, Tota, V, Spadavecchia, F, Zuccotti, Gv, Pogliani, L, Bracaglia, G, Mancini, Al, Zocco, F, Iozzia, G, Auriemma, A, Teani, M, Mangilli, G, Tempra, Am, Di Terlizi, L, Bottino, R, Salvi, C, Fortunato, V, Musaico, R, Gargantini, G, Carrera, G, Magaldi, R, Taurino, L, D'Onofrio, Am, Buffone, E, Tempera, A, Agosti, M, Garzia, P, Mosca, F, Pugni, L, Tagliabue, P, Colombo, C, Demi, M, Picco, G, Carlucci, A, Zorzi, G, Padula, D, Cardone, Ml, Buonocore, G, Muraca, Mc, Boldrini, A, Ciantelli, M, Lanari, M, Serra, L, Felici, L, Banderalli, G, Brambilla, C, Dall'Agnola, A, Viviani, E, Zonca, Mc, Licardi, G, Chiara, A, Ancora, G, Papa, I, Gancia, P, Pomero, G, Deloglu, A, Villani, P, Mussini, P, Canidio, E, Migliavacca, D, Di Fabio, S, Cipollone, I, Biasucci, G, Rubbi, P, Piepoli, M, Guastaferro, N, Infriccioli, F, Bertino, E, Perathoner, C, Parmigiani, S, Suriano, G, Ianniello, C, Biasini, A, Azzalli, M, Timpani, G, Barresi, S, Caoci, G, Ciccotti, R, De Curtis, M, Natale, F, Finocchi, M, Haass, C, Milillo, F, Lucieri, S, Guercio, E, Canepa, Sa, Scozia, G, Antonucci, R, Limongelli, O, Macciò, S, Mongelli, F, Colonna, F, Dragovic, D, Calipa, Mt, Cohen, A, Moresco, L, Italian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists including La Spina, R, Ruggeri, R, Luehwink, A, Brattoli, M, Fedi, A, Lacchi, L, Ettore, G, Pappalardo, E, Conoscenti, G, Zeni, B, Spellecchia, D, Favretti, L, Spagna, L, Zaglio, S, Bresciani, D, Bandini, A, Mancini, R, Mustoni, P, Dodero, D, Grimaldi, M, Di Mario, M, Migliorini, P, Kemeny, A, Anastasio, Ps, Riccardi, T, Maggino, T, Cerri, G, Puggina, P, Marconi, Am, Morgia, S, Bellia, G, D'Anna, Mr, Catania, M, Bacchi Modena, A, Franchi, L, Calonaci, N, Schettini, S, Paradiso, R, Saccucci, P, Ioppi, M, Zorzi, M, Stellin, G, Patacchiola, F, Carrata, L, Bassini, D, San Marco, L, Todros, T, Tibadi, C, Liborio, M, Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists including Laricchia, R, Tauro, L, Ferrara, F, Nuara, C, Ghiraldi, E, Molinari, F, Comessatti, A, Rocchetti, A, Di Matteo, L, Miconi, V, Calvi, P, Pernigotti, A, Fabozzi, F, Micca, G, Monticone, G, Sarti, M, Da Rin, G, Zoppelletto, M, Modolo, E, Landini, Mp, Furlini, G, Galluppi, E, Pagani, E, Aschbacher, R, Innocenti, P, Bresolin, N, Raggi, Me, Bonfanti, C, De Francesco, M, Santer, P, Griessmaier, A, De Francesco, D, Pirali, A, Prasciolu, C, Usai, F, Cuzzone, G, Scutellà, M, Tramacere, P, Fossati, D, Piaserico, G, Bordignon, G, Sciacca, A, Di Vincenzo, F, Imbriani, A, Melotti, D, Catanoso, G, Rivetti, I, Neri, G, Bruno, R, Bacelle, L, Sartore, P, Giana, G, Sala, E, Giraldi, C, Cavalcanti, P, Perugini, M, Perugini, A, Ginardi, C, Maritano, D, Ferrini, A, Bonettini, A, Avanzini, A, Gasperoni, S, Pieretti, B, Montanari, E, Carillo, C, Rossi, Mr, Laureti, A, Baldoni, Ml, Serra, D, Melioli, G, Bandettini, R, Oneto, F, Colla, R, Storchi Incerti, S, Lanzini, F, Pauri, P, Tili, E, Leone, Ra, Verdastro, G, Megha, M, Luzzaro, F, Conti, A, Busulini, L, Mirri, P, Diodati, R, Vettori, C, Pittalis, S, Anesi, A, Fiore, A, Goglia, L, Vitullo, E, Sinno, A, Platzgummer, S, Spitaler, C, Trabucchi, Mc, Besozzi, M, Cesana, E, Inghilleri, G, Grosso, S, D'Angelo, R, Fogato, E, Lavarda, F, Ortisi, G, Clementi, M, Cichero, P, Rumpianesi, F, Venturelli, C, Mortillaro, F, Daffara, S, Catania, Mr, Iula, D, Andreoni, S, Politi, A, Agostinelli, C, Paparella, C, Capozzi, D, Notaris, P, Bistoni, F, Mencacci, A, Valentini, M, Filippetti, A, Confalonieri, M, Novarese, O, Bonini, F, Salamone, D, Camporese, A, De Rosa, R, Casprini, P, Degl'Innocenti, R, Giordano, R, Allù, Mt, Zanella, D, Malandrino, M, Tronci, M, Valmarin, M, Leonetti, G, Falco, S, Meledandri, M, Ballardini, M, Spanò, A, Cava, Mc, Mascellino, Mt, Schinella, M, Gualdi, P, Casari, E, Scattolo, N, Motta, C, Perfetti, C, Bassano, M, Cera, G, Iafisco, P, Mura, I, Palmieri, A, Migliardi, M, Ferlini, M, Grandi, G, Giardini, F, Albano, F, Latino, M, Ferrero, Mp, Bellizia, L, Russolo, M, Russolo, S, Pesenti, A, Fasano, Ma, Previato, S, Radillo, O, Busetti, M, Ferrari, P, Siderini, V, Puzzolante, L, Scarparo, C, Arzese, A, Cappuccia, N, Lodolo, L, Delledonne, L, Gramoni, A, Maiolo, V, Gheller, A, Spadaro, S, Balzaretti, M, Tzialla, C., Berardi, A., Farina, C., Clerici, P., Borghesi, A., Viora, E., Scollo, P., Stronati, M., Stival, G., Barbaglia, M. A., Guala, A., Giunta, E., Parola, L., Grossignani, M. R., Perri, P., Tubaldi, L., Alletto, G., Daidone, S., Flacco, V., Dani, C., Sterpa, A., Rapisardi, G., Elicio, M. R., Faldella, G., Capretti, M. G., Messner, H., Bandiera, M., Achille, C., Azzali, A., Montrasio, G., Mariani, S., Galvagno, G., Giacosa, E., de Angelis, F., Spandrio, M., Serra, A., Garofalo, F., Perona, A., Porcelli, F., Ferrero, F., De Franco, S., Paollilo, P., Picone, S., Besana, R., Varisco, T., Farina, M., Memo, L., Nicolini, G., Lietti, D., Di Chiara, G., Rottoli, A., Bonabitacola, T., Cortis, E., Neri, E., Martinelli, S., Ilardi, L., Rondanini, G. F., Calzi, P., Gatta, A., Quntadamo, P. A., Ivaldi, M., Terenzani, L., Di Lascio, N., Travaglio, M. D., Vetrano, G., Furcolo, G., Vitacco, V., Intini, C., Frigerio, M., Stroppiana, P., Policicchio, G., Mesirca, P., Gianino, P., Audenio, E., Paludetto, R., Raimondi, F., Pugliese, A., Valentino, L., Nosari, N., Marchesano, G., Chirico, G., Bell(`u), R., Menchini, M., Poletti, A., Vacchiano, T., Pinto, L., Perri, D., Coppola, R., Perini, R., Vetrella, A., De Luca, G., Lista, G., Cavigioli, F., Bettinelli, A., Massironi, E., Franco, C., Bernardo, L., Poli, S., Palladini, M., Tota, V., Spadavecchia, F., Zuccotti, G. V., Pogliani, L., Bracaglia, G., Mancini, A. L., Zocco, F., Iozzia, G., Auriemma, A., Teani, M., Mangilli, G., Tempra, A. M., Di Terlizi, L., Bottino, R., Salvi, C., Fortunato, V., Musaico, R., Gargantini, G., Carrera, G., Magaldi, R., Taurino, L., D?onofrio, A. M., Buffone, E., Tempera, A., Agosti, M., Garzia, P., Mosca, F., Pugni, L., Tagliabue, P., Colombo, C., Demi, M., Picco, G., Carlucci, A., Zorzi, G., Padula, D., Cardone, M. L., Buonocore, G., Muraca, M. C., Boldrini, A., Ciantelli, M., Lanari, M., Serra, L., Felici, L., Banderalli, G., Brambilla, C., Dall?agnola, A., Viviani, E., Zonca, M. C., Licardi, G., Chiara, A., Ancora, G., Papa, I., Gancia, P., Pomero, G., Deloglu, A., Villani, P., Mussini, P., Canidio, E., Migliavacca, D., Di Fabio, S., Cipollone, I., Biasucci, G., Rubbi, P., Piepoli, M., Guastaferro, N., Infriccioli, F., Bertino, E., Perathoner, C., Parmigiani, S., Suriano, G., Ianniello, C., Biasini, A., Azzalli, M., Timpani, G., Barresi, S., Caoci, G., Ciccotti, R., De Curtis, M., Natale, F., Finocchi, M., Haass, C., Milillo, F., Lucieri, S., Guercio, E., Canepa, S. A., Scozia, G., Antonucci, R., Limongelli, O., Macci(`o), S., Mongelli, F., Colonna, F., Dragovic, D., Calipa, M. T., Cohen, A., Moresco, L., La Spina, R., Ruggeri, R., Luehwink, A., Brattoli, M., Fedi, A., Lacchi, L., Ettore, G., Pappalardo, E., Conoscenti, G., Zeni, B., Spellecchia, D., Favretti, L., Spagna, L., Zaglio, S., Bresciani, D., Bandini, A., Mancini, R., Mustoni, P., Dodero, D., Grimaldi, M., Di Mario, M., Migliorini, P., Kemeny, A., Anastasio, P. S., Riccardi, T., Maggino, T., Cerri, G., Puggina, P., Marconi, A. M., Morgia, S., Bellia, G., D?anna, M. R., Catania, M., Bacchi Modena, A., Franchi, L., Calonaci, N., Schettini, S., Paradiso, R., Saccucci, P., Ioppi, M., Zorzi, M., Stellin, G., Patacchiola, F., Carrata, L., Bassini, D., San Marco, L., Todros, T., Tibadi, C., Liborio, M., Laricchia, R., Tauro, L., Ferrara, F., Nuara, C., Ghiraldi, E., Molinari, F., Comessatti, A., Rocchetti, A., Di Matteo, L., Miconi, V., Calvi, P., Pernigotti, A., Fabozzi, F., Micca, G., Monticone, G., Sarti, M., Da Rin, G., Zoppelletto, M., Modolo, E., Landini, M. P., Furlini, G., Galluppi, E., Pagani, E., Aschbacher, R., Innocenti, P., Bresolin, N., Raggi, M. E., Bonfanti, C., De Francesco, M., Santer, P., Griessmaier, A., De Francesco, D., Pirali, A., Prasciolu, C., Usai, F., Cuzzone, G., Scutell(`a), M., Tramacere, P., Fossati, D., Piaserico, G., Bordignon, G., Sciacca, A., Di Vincenzo, F., Imbriani, A., Melotti, D., Catanoso, G., Rivetti, I., Neri, G., Bruno, R., Bacelle, L., Sartore, P., Giana, G., Sala, E., Giraldi, C., Cavalcanti, P., Perugini, M., Perugini, A., Ginardi, C., Maritano, D., Ferrini, A., Bonettini, A., Avanzini, A., Gasperoni, S., Pieretti, B., Montanari, E., Carillo, C., Rossi, M. R., Laureti, A., Baldoni, M. L., Serra, D., Melioli, G., Bandettini, R., Oneto, F., Colla, R., Storchi Incerti, S., Lanzini, F., Pauri, P., Tili, E., Leone, R. A., Verdastro, G., Megha, M., Luzzaro, F., Conti, A., Busulini, L., Mirri, P., Diodati, R., Vettori, C., Pittalis, S., Anesi, A., Fiore, A., Goglia, L., Vitullo, E., Sinno, A., Platzgummer, S., Spitaler, C., Trabucchi, M. C., Besozzi, M., Cesana, E., Inghilleri, G., Grosso, S., D?angelo, R., Fogato, E., Lavarda, F., Ortisi, G., Clementi, M., Cichero, P., Rumpianesi, F., Venturelli, C., Mortillaro, F., Daffara, S., Catania, M. R., Iula, D., Andreoni, S., Politi, A., Agostinelli, C., Paparella, C., Capozzi, D., Notaris, P., Bistoni, F., Mencacci, A., Valentini, M., Filippetti, A., Confalonieri, M., Novarese, O., Bonini, F., Salamone, D., Camporese, A., De Rosa, R., Casprini, P., Degl?innocenti, R., Giordano, R., All(`u), M. T., Zanella, D., Malandrino, M., Tronci, M., Valmarin, M., Leonetti, G., Falco, S., Meledandri, M., Ballardini, M., Span(`o), A., Cava, M. C., Mascellino, M. T., Schinella, M., Gualdi, P., Casari, E., Scattolo, N., Motta, C., Perfetti, C., Bassano, M., Cera, G., Iafisco, P., Mura, I., Palmieri, A., Migliardi, M., Ferlini, M., Grandi, G., Giardini, F., Albano, F., Latino, M., Ferrero, M. P., Bellizia, L., Russolo, M., Russolo, S., Pesenti, A., Fasano, M. A., Previato, S., Radillo, O., Busetti, M., Ferrari, P., Siderini, V., Puzzolante, L., Scarparo, C., Arzese, A., Cappuccia, N., Lodolo, L., Delledonne, L., Gramoni, A., Maiolo, V., Gheller, A., Spadaro, S., Balzaretti, M., Tzialla, Chryssoula, Berardi, Alberto, Farina, Claudio, Clerici, Pierangelo, Borghesi, Alessandro, Viora, Elsa, Scollo, Paolo, Stronati, Mauro, [.., Lanari, Marcello, Faldella, Giacomo, and ]

Subjects
Male, Pediatrics, Group B, 0302 clinical medicine, Neonate, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence, Mass Screening, Blood culture, 030212 general & internal medicine, Antibiotic prophylaxis, Survey, GBS, Group B streptococcus, Infection, Newborn infant, Adult, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Italy, Neonatal Screening, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Prenatal Care, Primary Prevention, Risk Assessment, Streptococcal Infections, Streptococcus agalactiae, reproductive and urinary physiology, Group B streptococcu, medicine.diagnostic_test, lcsh:RJ1-570, Infectious, Perinatology and Child Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, medicine.medical_specialty, Antibiotic sensitivity, Group B Streptococcal Infection, Prenatal care, 03 medical and health sciences, 030225 pediatrics, medicine, Intensive care medicine, Mass screening, business.industry, Public health, Infant, lcsh:Pediatrics, Newborn, Pregnancy Complications, business
Abstract

Background There are no Italian data regarding the strategies for preventing neonatal group B streptococcal (GBS) infection. We conducted a national survey in order to explore obstetrical, neonatal and microbiological practices for the GBS prevention. Methods Three distinct questionnaires were sent to obstetricians, neonatologists and microbiologists. Questionnaires included data on prenatal GBS screening, maternal risk factors, intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, microbiological information concerning specimen processing and GBS antimicrobial susceptibility. Results All respondent obstetrical units used the culture-based screening approach to identify women who should receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, and more than half of the microbiological laboratories (58%) reported using specimen processing consistent with CDC guidelines. Most neonatal units (89 out of 107, 82%) reported using protocols for preventing GBS early-onset sepsis consistent with CDC guidelines. Conclusions The screening-based strategy is largely prevalent in Italy, and most protocols for preventing GBS early-onset sepsis are consistent with CDC guidelines. However, we found discrepancies in practices among centers that may reflect the lack of Italian guidelines issued by public health organizations.

Published
2017

8. Impairments in life satisfaction in infertility: Associations with perceived stress, affectivity, partnership quality, social support and the desire to have a child.

Author

Kiesswetter, Manuel, Marsoner, Heidi, Luehwink, Arne, Fistarol, Massimiliano, Mahlknecht, Alois, and Duschek, Stefan

Subjects
AFFECT (Psychology), FRIENDSHIP, INFERTILITY, QUALITY of life, QUESTIONNAIRES, REGRESSION analysis, SATISFACTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL stress, SOCIAL support, DISEASE complications
Abstract

Between 10% and 15% of couples in western society are affected by infertility. As a major source of psychological distress, infertility may be accompanied by a substantial decline in well-being, and mental symptoms including those of depression and anxiety. This study aimed to quantify impairments in life satisfaction in infertile couples and to identify psychosocial variables moderating these impairments. For this purpose, 228 infertile couples completed the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ), Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), Partnership Questionnaire (PQ), Social Support Questionnaire, (SSQ) and Questionnaire on the Desire to Have a Child (QDC). Our sample scored below the norm of the general population on the LSQ sum score and various subscales, including those assessing social relationships, health, sexuality, leisure activities, and self-evaluation. Correlation and regression analysis revealed an inverse association of life satisfaction (LSQ) with stress (PSQ), negative affect (PANAS), and worry (PSWQ), and positive associations with positive affect (PANAS), partnership quality (PQ), social support (SSQ), and the strength of the desire to have a child (QDC). These findings support the notion of markedly reduced satisfaction with numerous life areas in the context of infertility. Psychosocial factors such as increased stress related to infertility treatment, affective impairments, partnership problems, lack of social support or social exclusion may contribute to this reduction. Psychological interventions aimed at controlling stress, strengthening partnerships, and improving social inclusion may be helpful in reducing the burden of infertility and improving the life satisfaction of affected couples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Doctor–couple communication during assisted reproductive technology visits

Author

Leone, D, primary, Borghi, L, additional, Del Negro, S, additional, Becattini, C, additional, Chelo, E, additional, Costa, M, additional, De Lauretis, L, additional, Ferraretti, A P, additional, Giuffrida, G, additional, Livi, C, additional, Luehwink, A, additional, Palermo, R, additional, Revelli, A, additional, Tomasi, G, additional, Tomei, F, additional, Filippini, C, additional, and Vegni, E, additional

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results