Search

BackgroundThe clinical utility of molecular profiling and targeted therapies for neuro-oncology patients outside of clinical trials is not established. We aimed at investigating feasibility and clinical utility of molecular profiling and targeted therapy in adult patients with advanced tumors in the nervous system within a prospective observational study.Methodsmolecular tumor board (MTB)@ZPM (NCT03503149) is a prospective observational precision medicine study for patients with advanced tumors. After inclusion of patients, we performed comprehensive molecular profiling, formulated ranked biomarker-guided therapy recommendations based on consensus by the MTB, and collected prospective clinical outcome data.ResultsHere, we present initial data of 661 adult patients with tumors of the nervous system enrolled by December 31, 2021. Of these, 408 patients were presented at the MTB. Molecular-instructed therapy recommendations could be made in 380/408 (93.1%) cases and were prioritized by evidence levels. Therapies were initiated in 86/380 (22.6%) cases until data cutoff. We observed a progression-free survival ratio >1.3 in 31.3% of patients.ConclusionsOur study supports the clinical utility of biomarker-guided therapies for neuro-oncology patients and indicates clinical benefit in a subset of patients. Our data might inform future clinical trials, translational studies, and even clinical care.

INTRODUCTION The CeTeG/NOA-09 trial demonstrated superior median overall survival (mOS, 48.1 months) in MGMT-methylated glioblastoma treated with lomustine/temozolomide compared to temozolomide. We retrospectively analyzed an off-study cohort of patients treated with lomustine/temozolomide to gather real-world data on this new regimen. METHODS Adult patients from 20 centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland were included. Inclusion criteria were MGMT-methylated IDHwt glioblastoma newly diagnosed prior to end of 2020, and lomustine/temozolomide treatment as part of first-line therapy. RESULTS 321 patients with a median age of 57 years (range, 21-78) and a median follow-up of 19.9 months were included. In the whole cohort, mOS was 41.0 months (95%CI, 33.0 – not reached). In patients starting lomustine/temozolomide immediately upon initiation of radiotherapy strictly following the CeTeG protocol (88%), mOS was 52.8 months (35.8 – not reached) as compared to 24.6 months (17.6 – not reached) in patients starting lomustine/temozolomide after completion of radiotherapy/concomitant temozolomide (12%, logrank test: p = 0.06). Patients with a KPS < 80 had a shorter mOS of 19.7 months (95%CI, 16.6 – not reached) compared to 41.0 months (33.0 – not reached, p = 0.009) in KPS 80-100. Gross total resection (GTR, 53.9%) was associated with longer mOS (52.8 months, 95%CI 24.1 – not reached) compared to partial resection/biopsy (30.5 months, 95%CI 36.8 – not reached, p=0.004). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed GTR (HR 0.66, p = 0.033) and younger age ( ≤ 50 years: HR 0.42, p = 0.001), but not KPS (80-100 vs. lower: HR 0.66, p = 0.12) as independent prognostic factors. DISCUSSION In this real-world multicenter cohort, survival was similar to the promising results of CeTeG/NOA-09. Further analyses should investigate a potentially reduced benefit from lomustine/temozolomide in patients with low KPS/no GTR and a possible detrimental effect from deferred lomustine/temozolomide initiation. The median follow-up is admittedly short, updated data will be presented.

Comprehensive genomic profiling and biomarker-based therapeutic strategies are currently used in clinical trials and in innovative health care systems including the center for personalized medicine network. Systematic assessments of patient-reported outcomes are warranted to gain insight into the perspective of patients and their relatives during biomarker-based therapies. In the present study, we focused on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), psychosocial situation, and physical symptoms in patients treated at the Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen. First, we retrospectively evaluated symptom burden of n=265 (neuro-)oncological patients in the Molecular Tumor Board (MTB). Sixty percent of patients reported at least 1 neurological symptom, and psychosocial burden/unmet needs were high (overall 156/265; 59%, patients with malignant tumors n=86/106; 81%, Fisher’s exact, p < 0.0001). We therefore developed an app by 14 expert rounds and pretesting including validated assessments of HRoL, symptom und psychological burden and tested it in a pilot study. We conducted a structured interview with users 3 months afterwards to assess the app’s usability and feasibility. The interview was transcribed and analyzed according to a qualitative content analysis. So far, a total of 10 patients and caregivers have been enrolled in this pilot study. They reported that (i) the app is compatible with their daily routine (median 9.3, range 0-10), that (ii) they are more aware of their health status, which was rated as positive, and that (iii) completing app-based questionnaires was easier compared to paper questionnaires. Two patients reported technical problems, which were resolved timely. The pilot study proved feasibility and acceptance of the app. The app might optimize symptom burden assessment, adapted to the patients’ profiles. The next step is to prospectively compare HRQoL before and after start of targeted therapy in a multicenter study.