19 results on '"Lucas, AB"'
Search Results
2. Filamin protects myofibrils from contractile damage through changes in its mechanosensory region
- Author
-
González Morales, Nicanor, primary, Fisher, Lucas AB, additional, Carriquí-Madroñal, Belén, additional, Mulder, Tiara, additional, Huelsmann, Sven, additional, and Schöck, Frieder, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Cross-oncopanel study reveals high sensitivity and accuracy with overall analytical performance depending on genomic regions
- Author
-
Gong, B, Li, D, Kusko, R, Novoradovskaya, N, Zhang, Y, Wang, S, Pabón-Peña, C, Zhang, Z, Lai, K, Cai, W, LoCoco, JS, Lader, E, Richmond, TA, Mittal, VK, Liu, LC, Johann, DJ, Willey, JC, Bushel, PR, Yu, Y, Xu, C, Chen, G, Burgess, D, Cawley, S, Giorda, K, Haseley, N, Qiu, F, Wilkins, K, Arib, H, Attwooll, C, Babson, K, Bao, L, Bao, W, Lucas, AB, Best, H, Bhandari, A, Bisgin, H, Blackburn, J, Blomquist, TM, Boardman, L, Burgher, B, Butler, DJ, Chang, CJ, Chaubey, A, Chen, T, Chierici, M, Chin, CR, Close, D, Conroy, J, Coleman, JC, Craig, DJ, Crawford, E, del Pozo, A, Deveson, IW, Duncan, D, Eterovic, AK, Fan, X, Foox, J, Furlanello, C, Ghosal, A, Glenn, S, Guan, M, Haag, C, Hang, X, Happe, S, Hennigan, B, Hipp, J, Hong, H, Horvath, K, Hu, J, Hung, LY, Jarosz, M, Kerkhof, J, Kipp, B, Kreil, DP, Łabaj, P, Lapunzina, P, Li, P, Li, QZ, Li, W, Li, Z, Liang, Y, Liu, S, Liu, Z, Ma, C, Marella, N, Martín-Arenas, R, Megherbi, DB, Meng, Q, Mieczkowski, PA, Morrison, T, Muzny, D, Ning, B, Parsons, BL, Paweletz, CP, Pirooznia, M, Qu, W, Raymond, A, Rindler, P, Ringler, R, Sadikovic, B, Gong, B, Li, D, Kusko, R, Novoradovskaya, N, Zhang, Y, Wang, S, Pabón-Peña, C, Zhang, Z, Lai, K, Cai, W, LoCoco, JS, Lader, E, Richmond, TA, Mittal, VK, Liu, LC, Johann, DJ, Willey, JC, Bushel, PR, Yu, Y, Xu, C, Chen, G, Burgess, D, Cawley, S, Giorda, K, Haseley, N, Qiu, F, Wilkins, K, Arib, H, Attwooll, C, Babson, K, Bao, L, Bao, W, Lucas, AB, Best, H, Bhandari, A, Bisgin, H, Blackburn, J, Blomquist, TM, Boardman, L, Burgher, B, Butler, DJ, Chang, CJ, Chaubey, A, Chen, T, Chierici, M, Chin, CR, Close, D, Conroy, J, Coleman, JC, Craig, DJ, Crawford, E, del Pozo, A, Deveson, IW, Duncan, D, Eterovic, AK, Fan, X, Foox, J, Furlanello, C, Ghosal, A, Glenn, S, Guan, M, Haag, C, Hang, X, Happe, S, Hennigan, B, Hipp, J, Hong, H, Horvath, K, Hu, J, Hung, LY, Jarosz, M, Kerkhof, J, Kipp, B, Kreil, DP, Łabaj, P, Lapunzina, P, Li, P, Li, QZ, Li, W, Li, Z, Liang, Y, Liu, S, Liu, Z, Ma, C, Marella, N, Martín-Arenas, R, Megherbi, DB, Meng, Q, Mieczkowski, PA, Morrison, T, Muzny, D, Ning, B, Parsons, BL, Paweletz, CP, Pirooznia, M, Qu, W, Raymond, A, Rindler, P, Ringler, R, and Sadikovic, B
- Abstract
Background: Targeted sequencing using oncopanels requires comprehensive assessments of accuracy and detection sensitivity to ensure analytical validity. By employing reference materials characterized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-led SEquence Quality Control project phase2 (SEQC2) effort, we perform a cross-platform multi-lab evaluation of eight Pan-Cancer panels to assess best practices for oncopanel sequencing. Results: All panels demonstrate high sensitivity across targeted high-confidence coding regions and variant types for the variants previously verified to have variant allele frequency (VAF) in the 5–20% range. Sensitivity is reduced by utilizing VAF thresholds due to inherent variability in VAF measurements. Enforcing a VAF threshold for reporting has a positive impact on reducing false positive calls. Importantly, the false positive rate is found to be significantly higher outside the high-confidence coding regions, resulting in lower reproducibility. Thus, region restriction and VAF thresholds lead to low relative technical variability in estimating promising biomarkers and tumor mutational burden. Conclusion: This comprehensive study provides actionable guidelines for oncopanel sequencing and clear evidence that supports a simplified approach to assess the analytical performance of oncopanels. It will facilitate the rapid implementation, validation, and quality control of oncopanels in clinical use.
- Published
- 2021
4. Single-nuclei isoform RNA sequencing unlocks barcoded exon connectivity in frozen brain tissue.
- Author
-
Hardwick SA, Hu W, Joglekar A, Fan L, Collier PG, Foord C, Balacco J, Lanjewar S, Sampson MM, Koopmans F, Prjibelski AD, Mikheenko A, Belchikov N, Jarroux J, Lucas AB, Palkovits M, Luo W, Milner TA, Ndhlovu LC, Smit AB, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VMY, Fedrigo O, Sloan SA, Tombácz D, Ross ME, Jarvis E, Boldogkői Z, Gan L, and Tilgner HU
- Subjects
- Alternative Splicing genetics, Exons genetics, Humans, Protein Isoforms genetics, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Brain metabolism, RNA genetics
- Abstract
Single-nuclei RNA sequencing characterizes cell types at the gene level. However, compared to single-cell approaches, many single-nuclei cDNAs are purely intronic, lack barcodes and hinder the study of isoforms. Here we present single-nuclei isoform RNA sequencing (SnISOr-Seq). Using microfluidics, PCR-based artifact removal, target enrichment and long-read sequencing, SnISOr-Seq increased barcoded, exon-spanning long reads 7.5-fold compared to naive long-read single-nuclei sequencing. We applied SnISOr-Seq to adult human frontal cortex and found that exons associated with autism exhibit coordinated and highly cell-type-specific inclusion. We found two distinct combination patterns: those distinguishing neural cell types, enriched in TSS-exon, exon-polyadenylation-site and non-adjacent exon pairs, and those with multiple configurations within one cell type, enriched in adjacent exon pairs. Finally, we observed that human-specific exons are almost as tightly coordinated as conserved exons, implying that coordination can be rapidly established during evolution. SnISOr-Seq enables cell-type-specific long-read isoform analysis in human brain and in any frozen or hard-to-dissociate sample., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A verified genomic reference sample for assessing performance of cancer panels detecting small variants of low allele frequency.
- Author
-
Jones W, Gong B, Novoradovskaya N, Li D, Kusko R, Richmond TA, Johann DJ Jr, Bisgin H, Sahraeian SME, Bushel PR, Pirooznia M, Wilkins K, Chierici M, Bao W, Basehore LS, Lucas AB, Burgess D, Butler DJ, Cawley S, Chang CJ, Chen G, Chen T, Chen YC, Craig DJ, Del Pozo A, Foox J, Francescatto M, Fu Y, Furlanello C, Giorda K, Grist KP, Guan M, Hao Y, Happe S, Hariani G, Haseley N, Jasper J, Jurman G, Kreil DP, Łabaj P, Lai K, Li J, Li QZ, Li Y, Li Z, Liu Z, López MS, Miclaus K, Miller R, Mittal VK, Mohiyuddin M, Pabón-Peña C, Parsons BL, Qiu F, Scherer A, Shi T, Stiegelmeyer S, Suo C, Tom N, Wang D, Wen Z, Wu L, Xiao W, Xu C, Yu Y, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zheng Y, Mason CE, Willey JC, Tong W, Shi L, and Xu J
- Subjects
- Cell Line, Tumor, DNA Copy Number Variations, Genetic Heterogeneity, Genetic Testing standards, Genomics standards, Humans, Neoplasms diagnosis, Workflow, Alleles, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene Frequency, Genetic Testing methods, Genetic Variation, Genomics methods, Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Background: Oncopanel genomic testing, which identifies important somatic variants, is increasingly common in medical practice and especially in clinical trials. Currently, there is a paucity of reliable genomic reference samples having a suitably large number of pre-identified variants for properly assessing oncopanel assay analytical quality and performance. The FDA-led Sequencing and Quality Control Phase 2 (SEQC2) consortium analyze ten diverse cancer cell lines individually and their pool, termed Sample A, to develop a reference sample with suitably large numbers of coding positions with known (variant) positives and negatives for properly evaluating oncopanel analytical performance., Results: In reference Sample A, we identify more than 40,000 variants down to 1% allele frequency with more than 25,000 variants having less than 20% allele frequency with 1653 variants in COSMIC-related genes. This is 5-100× more than existing commercially available samples. We also identify an unprecedented number of negative positions in coding regions, allowing statistical rigor in assessing limit-of-detection, sensitivity, and precision. Over 300 loci are randomly selected and independently verified via droplet digital PCR with 100% concordance. Agilent normal reference Sample B can be admixed with Sample A to create new samples with a similar number of known variants at much lower allele frequency than what exists in Sample A natively, including known variants having allele frequency of 0.02%, a range suitable for assessing liquid biopsy panels., Conclusion: These new reference samples and their admixtures provide superior capability for performing oncopanel quality control, analytical accuracy, and validation for small to large oncopanels and liquid biopsy assays.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Cross-oncopanel study reveals high sensitivity and accuracy with overall analytical performance depending on genomic regions.
- Author
-
Gong B, Li D, Kusko R, Novoradovskaya N, Zhang Y, Wang S, Pabón-Peña C, Zhang Z, Lai K, Cai W, LoCoco JS, Lader E, Richmond TA, Mittal VK, Liu LC, Johann DJ Jr, Willey JC, Bushel PR, Yu Y, Xu C, Chen G, Burgess D, Cawley S, Giorda K, Haseley N, Qiu F, Wilkins K, Arib H, Attwooll C, Babson K, Bao L, Bao W, Lucas AB, Best H, Bhandari A, Bisgin H, Blackburn J, Blomquist TM, Boardman L, Burgher B, Butler DJ, Chang CJ, Chaubey A, Chen T, Chierici M, Chin CR, Close D, Conroy J, Cooley Coleman J, Craig DJ, Crawford E, Del Pozo A, Deveson IW, Duncan D, Eterovic AK, Fan X, Foox J, Furlanello C, Ghosal A, Glenn S, Guan M, Haag C, Hang X, Happe S, Hennigan B, Hipp J, Hong H, Horvath K, Hu J, Hung LY, Jarosz M, Kerkhof J, Kipp B, Kreil DP, Łabaj P, Lapunzina P, Li P, Li QZ, Li W, Li Z, Liang Y, Liu S, Liu Z, Ma C, Marella N, Martín-Arenas R, Megherbi DB, Meng Q, Mieczkowski PA, Morrison T, Muzny D, Ning B, Parsons BL, Paweletz CP, Pirooznia M, Qu W, Raymond A, Rindler P, Ringler R, Sadikovic B, Scherer A, Schulze E, Sebra R, Shaknovich R, Shi Q, Shi T, Silla-Castro JC, Smith M, López MS, Song P, Stetson D, Strahl M, Stuart A, Supplee J, Szankasi P, Tan H, Tang LY, Tao Y, Thakkar S, Thierry-Mieg D, Thierry-Mieg J, Thodima VJ, Thomas D, Tichý B, Tom N, Garcia EV, Verma S, Walker K, Wang C, Wang J, Wang Y, Wen Z, Wirta V, Wu L, Xiao C, Xiao W, Xu S, Yang M, Ying J, Yip SH, Zhang G, Zhang S, Zhao M, Zheng Y, Zhou X, Mason CE, Mercer T, Tong W, Shi L, Jones W, and Xu J
- Subjects
- DNA Copy Number Variations, Genetic Testing standards, Genomics standards, Humans, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques methods, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques standards, Mutation, Neoplasms diagnosis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Tumor, Genetic Testing methods, Genomics methods, Neoplasms genetics, Oncogenes
- Abstract
Background: Targeted sequencing using oncopanels requires comprehensive assessments of accuracy and detection sensitivity to ensure analytical validity. By employing reference materials characterized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-led SEquence Quality Control project phase2 (SEQC2) effort, we perform a cross-platform multi-lab evaluation of eight Pan-Cancer panels to assess best practices for oncopanel sequencing., Results: All panels demonstrate high sensitivity across targeted high-confidence coding regions and variant types for the variants previously verified to have variant allele frequency (VAF) in the 5-20% range. Sensitivity is reduced by utilizing VAF thresholds due to inherent variability in VAF measurements. Enforcing a VAF threshold for reporting has a positive impact on reducing false positive calls. Importantly, the false positive rate is found to be significantly higher outside the high-confidence coding regions, resulting in lower reproducibility. Thus, region restriction and VAF thresholds lead to low relative technical variability in estimating promising biomarkers and tumor mutational burden., Conclusion: This comprehensive study provides actionable guidelines for oncopanel sequencing and clear evidence that supports a simplified approach to assess the analytical performance of oncopanels. It will facilitate the rapid implementation, validation, and quality control of oncopanels in clinical use.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Global Transcriptional Response to CRISPR/Cas9-AAV6-Based Genome Editing in CD34 + Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells.
- Author
-
Cromer MK, Vaidyanathan S, Ryan DE, Curry B, Lucas AB, Camarena J, Kaushik M, Hay SR, Martin RM, Steinfeld I, Bak RO, Dever DP, Hendel A, Bruhn L, and Porteus MH
- Subjects
- Antigens, CD34 genetics, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9 genetics, CRISPR-Cas Systems genetics, Dependovirus, Electroporation, Gene Editing methods, Gene Expression Regulation genetics, Genetic Vectors therapeutic use, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Hematopoietic Stem Cells drug effects, Humans, Stem Cells drug effects, Genetic Therapy, Genetic Vectors genetics, Microarray Analysis methods, Parvovirinae genetics
- Abstract
Genome-editing technologies are currently being translated to the clinic. However, cellular effects of the editing machinery have yet to be fully elucidated. Here, we performed global microarray-based gene expression measurements on human CD34
+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells that underwent editing. We probed effects of the entire editing process as well as each component individually, including electroporation, Cas9 (mRNA or protein) with chemically modified sgRNA, and AAV6 transduction. We identified differentially expressed genes relative to control treatments, which displayed enrichment for particular biological processes. All editing machinery components elicited immune, stress, and apoptotic responses. Cas9 mRNA invoked the greatest amount of transcriptional change, eliciting a distinct viral response and global transcriptional downregulation, particularly of metabolic and cell cycle processes. Electroporation also induced significant transcriptional change, with notable downregulation of metabolic processes. Surprisingly, AAV6 evoked no detectable viral response. We also found Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein treatment to be well tolerated, in spite of eliciting a DNA damage signature. Overall, this data establishes a benchmark for cellular tolerance of CRISPR/Cas9-AAV6-based genome editing, ensuring that the clinical protocol is as safe and efficient as possible., (Copyright © 2018 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. SureSelect XT RNA Direct: A Technique for Expression Analysis Through Sequencing of Target-Enriched FFPE Total RNA.
- Author
-
Jones JC, Siebold AP, Livi CB, and Lucas AB
- Subjects
- Gene Library, Humans, Paraffin Embedding, RNA isolation & purification, Tissue Fixation, Workflow, Biomarkers analysis, Gene Expression Profiling methods, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing methods, Neoplasms genetics, RNA genetics, Sequence Analysis, RNA methods, Transcriptome
- Abstract
Gene expression profiling of samples from biobanks requires a method that can be used with intact as well as partially degraded RNA. High throughput applications can benefit from reducing the number of processing steps including eliminating the poly(A) selection and ribosomal depletion steps. When performing targeted capture, we have found that we can eliminate the upfront poly(A) selection/ribosomal depletion steps that cause bias in standard mRNA-Seq workflows. This target enrichment solution allows for whole transcriptome or customized content to characterize differential gene expression patterns (especially for mid/low level transcripts). Protocol modifications to the Agilent Strand-Specific RNA Library Prep kit resulted in a new workflow called "RNA Direct" that generates RNA-Seq data with minimal ribosomal contamination and good sequencing coverage. Using RNA isolated from a set of matched samples including fresh frozen (FF) or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) from tumor/normal tissues we generated high-quality data using a protocol that does not require upfront ribosomal depletion or poly(A) selection. Using SureSelect
XT RNA Direct protocol (RNA Direct) workflow, we found transcripts to be upregulated or downregulated to similar degrees with similar confidence levels in both the FF and FFPE samples, demonstrating the utility for meaningful gene expression studies with biobank samples of variable quality.- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. ER stress and distinct outputs of the IRE1α RNase control proliferation and senescence in response to oncogenic Ras.
- Author
-
Blazanin N, Son J, Craig-Lucas AB, John CL, Breech KJ, Podolsky MA, and Glick AB
- Subjects
- Animals, Apoptosis physiology, Cell Proliferation physiology, Endoplasmic Reticulum metabolism, Endoplasmic Reticulum physiology, Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress genetics, Endoribonucleases genetics, Inositol metabolism, Keratinocytes cytology, Keratinocytes physiology, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Primary Cell Culture, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases genetics, RNA Splicing, RNA Stability, RNA, Messenger metabolism, Ribonucleases genetics, Signal Transduction, Transcription Factors metabolism, Unfolded Protein Response, X-Box Binding Protein 1 genetics, X-Box Binding Protein 1 metabolism, ras Proteins metabolism, Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress physiology, Endoribonucleases metabolism, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases metabolism, Ribonucleases metabolism, ras Proteins genetics
- Abstract
Oncogenic Ras causes proliferation followed by premature senescence in primary cells, an initial barrier to tumor development. The role of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) in regulating these two cellular outcomes is poorly understood. During ER stress, the inositol requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α) endoribonuclease (RNase), a key mediator of the UPR, cleaves Xbp1 mRNA to generate a potent transcription factor adaptive toward ER stress. However, IRE1α also promotes cleavage and degradation of ER-localized mRNAs essential for cell death. Here, we show that oncogenic HRas induces ER stress and activation of IRE1α. Reduction of ER stress or Xbp1 splicing using pharmacological, genetic, and RNAi approaches demonstrates that this adaptive response is critical for HRas-induced proliferation. Paradoxically, reduced ER stress or Xbp1 splicing promotes growth arrest and premature senescence through hyperactivation of the IRE1α RNase. Microarray analysis of IRE1α- and XBP1-depleted cells, validation using RNA cleavage assays, and 5' RACE identified the prooncogenic basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor ID1 as an IRE1α RNase target. Further, we demonstrate that Id1 degradation by IRE1α is essential for HRas-induced premature senescence. Together, our studies point to IRE1α as an important node for posttranscriptional regulation of the early Ras phenotype that is dependent on both oncogenic signaling as well as stress signals imparted by the tumor microenvironment and could be an important mechanism driving escape from Ras-induced senescence., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Evaluation of the External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) reference material using a modified Latin square design.
- Author
-
Pine PS, Munro SA, Parsons JR, McDaniel J, Lucas AB, Lozach J, Myers TG, Su Q, Jacobs-Helber SM, and Salit M
- Subjects
- Algorithms, Gene Expression Profiling methods, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing methods, Humans, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Gene Expression Profiling standards, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing standards, RNA genetics, RNA standards, Sequence Analysis, RNA standards
- Abstract
Background: Highly multiplexed assays for quantitation of RNA transcripts are being used in many areas of biology and medicine. Using data generated by these transcriptomic assays requires measurement assurance with appropriate controls. Methods to prototype and evaluate multiple RNA controls were developed as part of the External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) assessment process. These approaches included a modified Latin square design to provide a broad dynamic range of relative abundance with known differences between four complex pools of ERCC RNA transcripts spiked into a human liver total RNA background., Results: ERCC pools were analyzed on four different microarray platforms: Agilent 1- and 2-color, Illumina bead, and NIAID lab-made spotted microarrays; and two different second-generation sequencing platforms: the Life Technologies 5500xl and the Illumina HiSeq 2500. Individual ERCC controls were assessed for reproducible performance in signal response to concentration among the platforms. Most demonstrated linear behavior if they were not located near one of the extremes of the dynamic range. Performance issues with any individual ERCC transcript could be attributed to detection limitations, platform-specific target probe issues, or potential mixing errors. Collectively, these pools of spike-in RNA controls were evaluated for suitability as surrogates for endogenous transcripts to interrogate the performance of the RNA measurement process of each platform. The controls were useful for establishing the dynamic range of the assay, as well as delineating the useable region of that range where differential expression measurements, expressed as ratios, would be expected to be accurate., Conclusions: The modified Latin square design presented here uses a composite testing scheme for the evaluation of multiple performance characteristics: linear performance of individual controls, signal response within dynamic range pools of controls, and ratio detection between pairs of dynamic range pools. This compact design provides an economical sample format for the evaluation of multiple external RNA controls within a single experiment per platform. These results indicate that well-designed pools of RNA controls, spiked into samples, provide measurement assurance for endogenous gene expression studies.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. lincRNAs act in the circuitry controlling pluripotency and differentiation.
- Author
-
Guttman M, Donaghey J, Carey BW, Garber M, Grenier JK, Munson G, Young G, Lucas AB, Ach R, Bruhn L, Yang X, Amit I, Meissner A, Regev A, Rinn JL, Root DE, and Lander ES
- Subjects
- Animals, Cell Lineage genetics, Chromatin genetics, Chromatin metabolism, Gene Expression Regulation genetics, Gene Knockdown Techniques, Mice, Protein Binding, Transcription Factors metabolism, Cell Differentiation genetics, Pluripotent Stem Cells cytology, Pluripotent Stem Cells metabolism, RNA, Untranslated genetics, RNA, Untranslated metabolism
- Abstract
Although thousands of large intergenic non-coding RNAs (lincRNAs) have been identified in mammals, few have been functionally characterized, leading to debate about their biological role. To address this, we performed loss-of-function studies on most lincRNAs expressed in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and characterized the effects on gene expression. Here we show that knockdown of lincRNAs has major consequences on gene expression patterns, comparable to knockdown of well-known ES cell regulators. Notably, lincRNAs primarily affect gene expression in trans. Knockdown of dozens of lincRNAs causes either exit from the pluripotent state or upregulation of lineage commitment programs. We integrate lincRNAs into the molecular circuitry of ES cells and show that lincRNA genes are regulated by key transcription factors and that lincRNA transcripts bind to multiple chromatin regulatory proteins to affect shared gene expression programs. Together, the results demonstrate that lincRNAs have key roles in the circuitry controlling ES cell state.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models.
- Author
-
Shi L, Campbell G, Jones WD, Campagne F, Wen Z, Walker SJ, Su Z, Chu TM, Goodsaid FM, Pusztai L, Shaughnessy JD Jr, Oberthuer A, Thomas RS, Paules RS, Fielden M, Barlogie B, Chen W, Du P, Fischer M, Furlanello C, Gallas BD, Ge X, Megherbi DB, Symmans WF, Wang MD, Zhang J, Bitter H, Brors B, Bushel PR, Bylesjo M, Chen M, Cheng J, Cheng J, Chou J, Davison TS, Delorenzi M, Deng Y, Devanarayan V, Dix DJ, Dopazo J, Dorff KC, Elloumi F, Fan J, Fan S, Fan X, Fang H, Gonzaludo N, Hess KR, Hong H, Huan J, Irizarry RA, Judson R, Juraeva D, Lababidi S, Lambert CG, Li L, Li Y, Li Z, Lin SM, Liu G, Lobenhofer EK, Luo J, Luo W, McCall MN, Nikolsky Y, Pennello GA, Perkins RG, Philip R, Popovici V, Price ND, Qian F, Scherer A, Shi T, Shi W, Sung J, Thierry-Mieg D, Thierry-Mieg J, Thodima V, Trygg J, Vishnuvajjala L, Wang SJ, Wu J, Wu Y, Xie Q, Yousef WA, Zhang L, Zhang X, Zhong S, Zhou Y, Zhu S, Arasappan D, Bao W, Lucas AB, Berthold F, Brennan RJ, Buness A, Catalano JG, Chang C, Chen R, Cheng Y, Cui J, Czika W, Demichelis F, Deng X, Dosymbekov D, Eils R, Feng Y, Fostel J, Fulmer-Smentek S, Fuscoe JC, Gatto L, Ge W, Goldstein DR, Guo L, Halbert DN, Han J, Harris SC, Hatzis C, Herman D, Huang J, Jensen RV, Jiang R, Johnson CD, Jurman G, Kahlert Y, Khuder SA, Kohl M, Li J, Li L, Li M, Li QZ, Li S, Li Z, Liu J, Liu Y, Liu Z, Meng L, Madera M, Martinez-Murillo F, Medina I, Meehan J, Miclaus K, Moffitt RA, Montaner D, Mukherjee P, Mulligan GJ, Neville P, Nikolskaya T, Ning B, Page GP, Parker J, Parry RM, Peng X, Peterson RL, Phan JH, Quanz B, Ren Y, Riccadonna S, Roter AH, Samuelson FW, Schumacher MM, Shambaugh JD, Shi Q, Shippy R, Si S, Smalter A, Sotiriou C, Soukup M, Staedtler F, Steiner G, Stokes TH, Sun Q, Tan PY, Tang R, Tezak Z, Thorn B, Tsyganova M, Turpaz Y, Vega SC, Visintainer R, von Frese J, Wang C, Wang E, Wang J, Wang W, Westermann F, Willey JC, Woods M, Wu S, Xiao N, Xu J, Xu L, Yang L, Zeng X, Zhang J, Zhang L, Zhang M, Zhao C, Puri RK, Scherf U, Tong W, and Wolfinger RD
- Subjects
- Animals, Breast Neoplasms diagnosis, Breast Neoplasms genetics, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Gene Expression Profiling methods, Gene Expression Profiling standards, Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Liver Diseases etiology, Liver Diseases pathology, Lung Diseases etiology, Lung Diseases pathology, Multiple Myeloma diagnosis, Multiple Myeloma genetics, Neoplasms diagnosis, Neuroblastoma diagnosis, Neuroblastoma genetics, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality Control, Rats, Survival Analysis, Liver Diseases genetics, Lung Diseases genetics, Neoplasms genetics, Neoplasms mortality, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis methods, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis standards
- Abstract
Gene expression data from microarrays are being applied to predict preclinical and clinical endpoints, but the reliability of these predictions has not been established. In the MAQC-II project, 36 independent teams analyzed six microarray data sets to generate predictive models for classifying a sample with respect to one of 13 endpoints indicative of lung or liver toxicity in rodents, or of breast cancer, multiple myeloma or neuroblastoma in humans. In total, >30,000 models were built using many combinations of analytical methods. The teams generated predictive models without knowing the biological meaning of some of the endpoints and, to mimic clinical reality, tested the models on data that had not been used for training. We found that model performance depended largely on the endpoint and team proficiency and that different approaches generated models of similar performance. The conclusions and recommendations from MAQC-II should be useful for regulatory agencies, study committees and independent investigators that evaluate methods for global gene expression analysis.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Evaluation of external RNA controls for the assessment of microarray performance.
- Author
-
Tong W, Lucas AB, Shippy R, Fan X, Fang H, Hong H, Orr MS, Chu TM, Guo X, Collins PJ, Sun YA, Wang SJ, Bao W, Wolfinger RD, Shchegrova S, Guo L, Warrington JA, and Shi L
- Subjects
- Algorithms, RNA standards, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Equipment Failure Analysis methods, Gene Expression Profiling instrumentation, Gene Expression Profiling standards, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis instrumentation, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis standards, RNA analysis, RNA genetics
- Abstract
External RNA controls (ERCs), although important for microarray assay performance assessment, have yet to be fully implemented in the research community. As part of the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) study, two types of ERCs were implemented and evaluated; one was added to the total RNA in the samples before amplification and labeling; the other was added to the copyRNAs (cRNAs) before hybridization. ERC concentration-response curves were used across multiple commercial microarray platforms to identify problematic assays and potential sources of variation in the analytical process. In addition, the behavior of different ERC types was investigated, resulting in several important observations, such as the sample-dependent attributes of performance and the potential of using these control RNAs in a combinatorial fashion. This multiplatform investigation of the behavior and utility of ERCs provides a basis for articulating specific recommendations for their future use in evaluating assay performance across multiple platforms.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements.
- Author
-
Shi L, Reid LH, Jones WD, Shippy R, Warrington JA, Baker SC, Collins PJ, de Longueville F, Kawasaki ES, Lee KY, Luo Y, Sun YA, Willey JC, Setterquist RA, Fischer GM, Tong W, Dragan YP, Dix DJ, Frueh FW, Goodsaid FM, Herman D, Jensen RV, Johnson CD, Lobenhofer EK, Puri RK, Schrf U, Thierry-Mieg J, Wang C, Wilson M, Wolber PK, Zhang L, Amur S, Bao W, Barbacioru CC, Lucas AB, Bertholet V, Boysen C, Bromley B, Brown D, Brunner A, Canales R, Cao XM, Cebula TA, Chen JJ, Cheng J, Chu TM, Chudin E, Corson J, Corton JC, Croner LJ, Davies C, Davison TS, Delenstarr G, Deng X, Dorris D, Eklund AC, Fan XH, Fang H, Fulmer-Smentek S, Fuscoe JC, Gallagher K, Ge W, Guo L, Guo X, Hager J, Haje PK, Han J, Han T, Harbottle HC, Harris SC, Hatchwell E, Hauser CA, Hester S, Hong H, Hurban P, Jackson SA, Ji H, Knight CR, Kuo WP, LeClerc JE, Levy S, Li QZ, Liu C, Liu Y, Lombardi MJ, Ma Y, Magnuson SR, Maqsodi B, McDaniel T, Mei N, Myklebost O, Ning B, Novoradovskaya N, Orr MS, Osborn TW, Papallo A, Patterson TA, Perkins RG, Peters EH, Peterson R, Philips KL, Pine PS, Pusztai L, Qian F, Ren H, Rosen M, Rosenzweig BA, Samaha RR, Schena M, Schroth GP, Shchegrova S, Smith DD, Staedtler F, Su Z, Sun H, Szallasi Z, Tezak Z, Thierry-Mieg D, Thompson KL, Tikhonova I, Turpaz Y, Vallanat B, Van C, Walker SJ, Wang SJ, Wang Y, Wolfinger R, Wong A, Wu J, Xiao C, Xie Q, Xu J, Yang W, Zhang L, Zhong S, Zong Y, and Slikker W Jr
- Subjects
- Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling methods, Quality Control, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Gene Expression Profiling instrumentation, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis instrumentation, Quality Assurance, Health Care methods
- Abstract
Over the last decade, the introduction of microarray technology has had a profound impact on gene expression research. The publication of studies with dissimilar or altogether contradictory results, obtained using different microarray platforms to analyze identical RNA samples, has raised concerns about the reliability of this technology. The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project was initiated to address these concerns, as well as other performance and data analysis issues. Expression data on four titration pools from two distinct reference RNA samples were generated at multiple test sites using a variety of microarray-based and alternative technology platforms. Here we describe the experimental design and probe mapping efforts behind the MAQC project. We show intraplatform consistency across test sites as well as a high level of interplatform concordance in terms of genes identified as differentially expressed. This study provides a resource that represents an important first step toward establishing a framework for the use of microarrays in clinical and regulatory settings.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Using RNA sample titrations to assess microarray platform performance and normalization techniques.
- Author
-
Shippy R, Fulmer-Smentek S, Jensen RV, Jones WD, Wolber PK, Johnson CD, Pine PS, Boysen C, Guo X, Chudin E, Sun YA, Willey JC, Thierry-Mieg J, Thierry-Mieg D, Setterquist RA, Wilson M, Lucas AB, Novoradovskaya N, Papallo A, Turpaz Y, Baker SC, Warrington JA, Shi L, and Herman D
- Subjects
- Algorithms, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Equipment Failure Analysis methods, Gene Expression Profiling instrumentation, Gene Expression Profiling standards, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis instrumentation, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis standards, RNA analysis, RNA genetics
- Abstract
We have assessed the utility of RNA titration samples for evaluating microarray platform performance and the impact of different normalization methods on the results obtained. As part of the MicroArray Quality Control project, we investigated the performance of five commercial microarray platforms using two independent RNA samples and two titration mixtures of these samples. Focusing on 12,091 genes common across all platforms, we determined the ability of each platform to detect the correct titration response across the samples. Global deviations from the response predicted by the titration ratios were observed. These differences could be explained by variations in relative amounts of messenger RNA as a fraction of total RNA between the two independent samples. Overall, both the qualitative and quantitative correspondence across platforms was high. In summary, titration samples may be regarded as a valuable tool, not only for assessing microarray platform performance and different analysis methods, but also for determining some underlying biological features of the samples.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. The Agilent in situ-synthesized microarray platform.
- Author
-
Wolber PK, Collins PJ, Lucas AB, De Witte A, and Shannon KW
- Subjects
- Animals, Humans, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis instrumentation, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis methods
- Abstract
Microarray technology has become a standard tool in many laboratories. Agilent Technologies manufactures a variety of catalog and custom long-oligonucleotide (60-mer) microarrays that can be used in multiple two-color microarray applications. Optimized methods and techniques have been developed for two such applications: gene expression profiling and comparative genomic hybridization. Methods for a third technique, location analysis, are evolving rapidly. This chapter outlines current best methods for using Agilent microarrays, provides detailed instructions for the most recently developed techniques, and discusses solutions to common problems encountered with two-color microarrays.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Management of pregnancy related carpal tunnel syndrome.
- Author
-
Graeber MC and Lucas AB
- Subjects
- Adult, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome etiology, Decompression, Surgical methods, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Neural Conduction, Physical Therapy Modalities methods, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications etiology, Prognosis, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome diagnosis, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome therapy, Pregnancy Complications diagnosis, Pregnancy Complications therapy
- Published
- 2000
18. Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer.
- Author
-
Groeger JS, Lucas AB, Thaler HT, Friedlander-Klar H, Brown AE, Kiehn TE, and Armstrong D
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Child, Female, Humans, Infections etiology, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Survival Analysis, Time Factors, Bacteremia etiology, Catheterization, Central Venous adverse effects, Catheters, Indwelling adverse effects, Fungemia etiology, Infusion Pumps, Implantable adverse effects, Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Objective: To evaluate infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices., Design: Prospective, observational study., Setting: Comprehensive cancer center at a university hospital., Participants: 1431 consecutive patients with cancer requiring 1630 venous access devices for long-term use inserted between 1 June 1987 and 31 May 1989., Measurements: Quantitative microbiologic tests to identify device-related bacteremia and fungemia, catheter tunnel infection, pocket infection in implantable port devices, and site infections; number of days the device remained in situ and time until infectious morbidity; vessel or device thrombosis and device breakage., Results: At least one device-related infection occurred with 341 of 788 (43% [95% CI, 39% to 47%]) catheters compared with 57 of 680 (8% [CI, 6% to 10%]) completely implanted ports (P < or = 0.001). Device-related bacteremia or fungemia is the predominant infection occurring with catheters, whereas ports have a more equal distribution of pocket, site, and device-related bacteremia. The predominant organisms isolated in catheter-related bacteremia were gram-negative bacilli (55%) compared with gram-positive cocci (65.5%) in port-related bacteremia. The number of infections per 1000 device days was 2.77 (95% CI, 2.48 to 3.06) for catheters compared with 0.21 (CI, 0.16 to 0.27) for ports (P < or = 0.001). Based on a parametric model of time to first infection, devices lasted longer in patients with solid tumors than in those with hematopoietic tumors. Ports lasted longer than catheters across all patient groups., Conclusions: The incidence of infections per device-day was 12 times greater with catheters than with ports. Patients with solid tumors were the least likely to have device-related infectious morbidity compared with those with hematologic cancers. The reasons for the difference in infectious complications is uncertain but may be attributable to type of disease, intensity of therapy, frequency with which devices are accessed, or duration of neutropenia.
- Published
- 1993
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. A prospective, randomized evaluation of the effect of silver impregnated subcutaneous cuffs for preventing tunneled chronic venous access catheter infections in cancer patients.
- Author
-
Groeger JS, Lucas AB, Coit D, LaQuaglia M, Brown AE, Turnbull A, and Exelby P
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Bacteremia etiology, Bacteremia prevention & control, Bacterial Infections etiology, Chronic Disease, Fungemia etiology, Fungemia prevention & control, Humans, Middle Aged, Mycoses etiology, Neoplasms therapy, Prospective Studies, Bacterial Infections prevention & control, Catheterization, Central Venous adverse effects, Catheterization, Central Venous methods, Mycoses prevention & control, Silver therapeutic use
- Abstract
Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the effect of a silver-impregnated cuff on the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia/fungemia or tunnel tract infection in cancer patients with chronic dual-lumen tunneled venous access catheters., Summary Background Data: Infection is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication of tunneled chronic cuffed silastic central venous access catheters in cancer patients. Recent experience with antimicrobial silver-impregnated cuffs placed on nontunneled percutaneously inserted central venous catheters suggests that such a cuff may render the catheter less prone to infection., Methods: The authors prospectively randomized 200 cancer patients to receive either a dual-lumen 10 French tunneled cuffed silastic central venous access catheter or the same catheter with a second more proximal subcutaneous silver-impregnated cuff. All patients then were followed prospectively for infectious morbidity until the device was removed or the patient died., Results: The hazard rate for infection/day (95% confidence limits) was 0.0022 (0.0015 to 0.0030) for standard catheters compared with 0.0027 (0.0019 to 0.0037) for catheters with silver-impregnated cuffs (p = not significant). Regression analysis of infection-free interval of both catheter types shows no difference over the lifetime of catheter as well as the over the first 48 days after insertion., Conclusions: The study indicated no effect of a silver-impregnated cuff in decreasing the incidence of catheter-related bacteremias/fungemias, tunnel infections, or the spectrum of causative microorganisms involved in cancer patients with tunneled chronic venous access catheters.
- Published
- 1993
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.