Search

BackgroundColorectal cancer screening by fecal occult blood testing has been an important public health test and shown to reduce colorectal cancer–related mortality. However, the low participation rate in colorectal cancer screening by the general public remains a problematic public health issue. This fact could be attributed to the complex and unpleasant operation of the screening tool. ObjectiveThis study aimed to validate a novel toilet paper–based point-of-care test (ie, JustWipe) as a public health instrument to detect fecal occult blood and provide detailed results from the evaluation of the analytic characteristics in the clinical validation. MethodsThe mechanism of fecal specimen collection by the toilet-paper device was verified with repeatability and reproducibility tests. We also evaluated the analytical characteristics of the test reagents. For clinical validation, we conducted comparisons between JustWipe and other fecal occult blood tests. The first comparison was between JustWipe and typical fecal occult blood testing in a central laboratory setting with 70 fecal specimens from the hospital. For the second comparison, a total of 58 volunteers were recruited, and JustWipe was compared with the commercially available Hemoccult SENSA in a point-of-care setting. ResultsAdequate amounts of fecal specimens were collected using the toilet-paper device with small day-to-day and person-to-person variations. The limit of detection of the test reagent was evaluated to be 3.75 µg of hemoglobin per milliliter of reagent. Moreover, the test reagent also showed high repeatability (100%) on different days and high reproducibility (>96%) among different users. The overall agreement between JustWipe and a typical fecal occult blood test in a central laboratory setting was 82.9%. In the setting of point-of-care tests, the overall agreement between JustWipe and Hemoccult SENSA was 89.7%. Moreover, the usability questionnaire showed that the novel test tool had high scores in operation friendliness (87.3/100), ease of reading results (97.4/100), and information usefulness (96.1/100). ConclusionsWe developed and validated a toilet paper–based fecal occult blood test for use as a point-of-care test for the rapid (in 60 seconds) and easy testing of fecal occult blood. These favorable characteristics render it a promising tool for colorectal cancer screening as a public health instrument.

Carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) present a major threat to public health, demanding precise diagnostic techniques for their detection. Discrepancies among the CPO tests have raised concerns, partly due to limitations in detecting bacterial diversity within host specimens. We explored the impact of an unbiased colony selection on carbapenemase testing and assessed its relevance to various tests. Using the FirstAll method for unbiased colony selection to reduce bias, we compared the results from different methods, namely the modified carbapenem inactivation method/EDTA-modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM/eCIM), the Carba5, the CPO panel, and the multiplex PCR (MPCR). We compared the FirstAll method to the conventional colony selection for MPCR with seven CPO species. In addition, we evaluated the test performance on seven CPO species using MPCR as a reference and the FirstAll method as the colony-selection method. The results revealed that the selections from the FirstAll method have improved rates of carbapenemase detection, in comparison to approximately 11.2% of the CPO isolates that were noted to be false negatives in the conventional colony-selection methods. Both the Carba5 test and the CPO panel showed suboptimal performance (sensitivity/specificity: Carba5 74.6%/89.5%, CPO panel 77.2%/74.4%) in comparison to the FirstAll method. The Carba5 test provided specific carbapenemase class assignments, but the CPO panel failed in 18.7% of the cases. The Carba5 test and the CPO panel results correlated well with ceftazidime–avibactam minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs). The concordance for Class A/D with MICs was 94.7% for Carba5 and 92.7% for the CPO panel; whereas for Class B, it was 86.5% for Carba5 and 75.9% for the CPO panel. In conclusion, FirstAll, as the unbiased colony-selection method, was shown to impact carbapenemase testing. With FirstAll, the diagnostic performance of both the Carba5 and the CPO panel was found to be lower. Furthermore, the utilization of ceftazidime–avibactam guided by either the CPO panel or Carba5 was appropriate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Iron availability affects swarming and biofilm formation in various bacterial species. However, how bacteria sense iron and coordinate swarming and biofilm formation remains unclear. Using Serratia marcescens as a model organism, we identify here a stage-specific iron-regulatory machinery comprising a two-component system (TCS) and the TCS-regulated iron chelator 2-isocyano-6,7-dihydroxycoumarin (ICDH-Coumarin) that directly senses and modulates environmental ferric iron (Fe3+) availability to determine swarming initiation and biofilm formation. We demonstrate that the two-component system RssA-RssB (RssAB) directly senses environmental ferric iron (Fe3+) and transcriptionally modulates biosynthesis of flagella and the iron chelator ICDH-Coumarin whose production requires the pvc cluster. Addition of Fe3+, or loss of ICDH-Coumarin due to pvc deletion results in prolonged RssAB signaling activation, leading to delayed swarming initiation and increased biofilm formation. We further show that ICDH-Coumarin is able to chelate Fe3+ to switch off RssAB signaling, triggering swarming initiation and biofilm reduction. Our findings reveal a novel cellular system that senses iron levels to regulate bacterial surface lifestyle.

The emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria is a critical global crisis that poses a serious threat to public health, particularly with the rise of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Accurate assessment of drug resistance is essential for appropriate treatment and prevention of transmission of these deadly pathogens. Early detection of drug resistance in patients is critical for providing timely treatment and reducing the spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria. This study aims to develop a novel risk assessment framework for S. aureus that can accurately determine the resistance to multiple antibiotics. The comprehensive 7-year study involved ˃20 000 isolates with susceptibility testing profiles of six antibiotics. By incorporating mass spectrometry and machine learning, the study was able to predict the susceptibility to four different antibiotics with high accuracy. To validate the accuracy of our models, we externally tested on an independent cohort and achieved impressive results with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0. 94, 0.90, 0.86 and 0.91, and an area under the precision–recall curve of 0.93, 0.87, 0.87 and 0.81, respectively, for oxacillin, clindamycin, erythromycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In addition, the framework evaluated the level of multidrug resistance of the isolates by using the predicted drug resistance probabilities, interpreting them in the context of a multidrug resistance risk score and analyzing the performance contribution of different sample groups. The results of this study provide an efficient method for early antibiotic decision-making and a better understanding of the multidrug resistance risk of S. aureus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]