Search

Your search keyword '"Lozynskyy, Y"' showing total 7 results
Start Over Author "Lozynskyy, Y"
7 results on '"Lozynskyy, Y"'

2. Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis

Author

Sands, B. E., Sandborn, W. J., Panaccione, R., O'Brien, C. D., Zhang, H., Johanns, J., Adedokun, O. J., Li, K., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Van Assche, G., Danese, S., Targan, S., Abreu, M. T., Hisamatsu, T., Szapary, P., Brown S, Marano C., Connor, S, De Cruz, P, Ding, Nj, Florin, T, Hendy, P, Leong, R, Moore, G, Pavli, P, Sparrow, M, Gassner, S, Vogelsang, H, Baert, F, Colard, A, De Vos, M, D'Heygere, F, Ferrante, M, Louis, E, Staessen, D, Berova, T, Churchev, J, Draganova, R, Gancheva, D, Ivanova, N, Marinova, I, Markov, M, Nikolov, R, Tsonev, N, Vassileva, G, Afif, W, Berstein, C, Bressler, B, Jairath, V, Lachance, Jr, Singh, R, Tilbe, K, Komarek, V, Kozeluhova, J, Lukas, M, Volfova, M, Dahlerup, J, Altwegg, R, Beorchia, S, Bouguen, G, Cadiot, G, Dupas, Jl, Desreumaux, P, Flourie, B, Grimaud, Jc, Guillaud, O, Moreau, J, Roblin, X, Zerbib, F, Baumgart, D, Beckebaum, S, Bokemeyer, B, Ebert, M, Hasselblatt, P, Lügering, A, Maaser, C, Schiefke, I, Schreiber, S, Seidler, U, Altorjay, I, Kiss, Gg, Literati-Nagy, B, Patai, A, Pecsi, G, Salamon, A, Schnabel, R, Székely, A, Tulassay, Z, Varga, M, Fich, A, Fishman, S, Konikoff, F, Lichtenstein, L, Rainis, T, Sbeit, W, Schwartz, D, Annese, V, Biancone, L, Bossa, F, Costintino, R, Danese, S, Fries, W, Gasbarrini, A, Guidi, L, Kohn, A, Maconi, G, Rocca, R, Rogai, F, Villa, E, Zoli, G, Akiho, H, Aoyama, N, Arisawa, T, Hidaka, H, Hisamatsu, T, Horiki, N, Inaba, T, Inoue, S, Ishida, T, Ishida, H, Ishiguro, Y, Ishihara, S, Iwabuchi, M, Kato, J, Katsushima, S, Kobayashi, T, Kojima, Y, Kurihara, H, Masuo, T, Matsui, T, Matsumoto, T, Matsuoka, K, Mitsuyama, K, Motoya, S, Nakagawa, T, Nakai, K, Nakamura, S, Niihara, T, Ohnishi, Y, Ohta, A, Osada, T, Ryuichi, I, Sakai, Y, Sakata, Y, Sameshima, Y, Sano, K, Shibatoge, M, Shibuya, T, Suzuki, Y, Takeshima, F, Tanaka, S, Taruishi, M, Tokito, S, Ueo, T, Watanabe, K, Yamagami, H, Cheon, Jh, Cho, Kb, Knowles, Kim, Kim, Hj, Kim, Y, Lee, Km, Yang, Sk, D'Haens, G, Pierik, M, Gearry, R, Inns, S, Rowbotham, D, Schultz, M, Bochenek, A, Gawdis-Wojnarska, B, Kleczkowski, D, Leszczyszyn, J, Malecka-Panas, E, Mamos, A, Petryka, R, Regula, J, Rozciecha, J, Stefanuik, P, Wozniak-Stolarska, B, Cimpoeru, N, Craciun, E, Ovidiu, Cf, Goldis, E, Ionita-Radu, F, Lazar, D, Suciu, I, Abdulkhakov, R, Alikhanov, B, Apartsin, K, Bakulin, I, Belousova, E, Gofman, A, Grinevich, V, Kulyapin, A, Nizov, A, Osipenko, M, Simanenkov, V, Tkachev, A, Uspenskiy, Y, Valuyskikh, E, Jovanovic, I, Nagorni, A, Svorcan, P, Zdravkovic, N, Bunganic, I, Abrahamovych, O, Bilianskyi, L, Datsenko, O, Golovchenko, O, Kharchenko, N, Klymenko, V, Levchenko, O, Lozynskyy, Y, Murenets, N, Oliinyk, O, Prystupa, L, Pyrogovskyi, V, Reznikova, V, Rishko, I, Stanislavchuk, M, Vizir, V, Yatsyshyn, R, Arasaradnam, R, Bloom, S, Cummings, F, Iqbal, T, Irving, P, Kaser, A, Shonde, A, Subramanian, S, Aberra, F, Aguilar, H, Araya, V, Bakken, A, Beaulieu, D, Cappa, Ja, Chiorean, M, Cohen, N, Dryden, G, Duvall, G, Ehrlich, A, Eisner, M, Ertan, A, Fogel, R, Friedenberg, K, Gatof, D, Glover, S, Grosman, I, Gunaratnam, N, Gupta, N, Haynes, P, Hemaidan, A, Higgins, P, Hou, J, Hudesman, D, Iskandar, H, Jazrawi, S, Jones, M, Karnam, U, Khurana, S, Killpack, M, Kreines, M, Lawlor, G, Lee, S, Loftus, E, Lukin, Dj, Marcet, J, Mattar, M, Melmed, G, Minor, T, Mirkin, K, Mutlu, E, Nichols, M, Nudell, J, Rai, R, Ramos, C, Mcleod, Randall, Rausher, D, Ritter, T, Singh Saini, S, Salzberg, B, Saubermann, L, Scherl, E, Sedghi, S, Sellin, J, Shafran, I, Sorrentino, D, Suiter, D, Swaminath, A, Tiongco, F, Vrabie, R, Walp, K, Warner, N, Winstead, N, Wolf, Dc, Woods, J, Yen, E, Younes, Z., Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy), Nutrition-Génétique et Exposition aux Risques Environnementaux (NGERE), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Lorraine (UL), Humanitas Clinical and Research Center [Rozzano, Milan, Italy], RS: NUTRIM - R2 - Liver and digestive health, MUMC+: MA Maag Darm Lever (9), Interne Geneeskunde, Sands, Be, Sandborn, Wj, Panaccione, R, O'Brien, Cd, Zhang, H, Johanns, J, Adedokun, Oj, Li, K, Peyrin-Biroulet, L, Van Assche, G, Danese, S, Targan, S, Abreu, Mt, Hisamatsu, T, Szapary, P, and Marano, C

Subjects
Adult, Male, Infusions, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Injections, Subcutaneous, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Ulcerative, Klinikai orvostudományok, Article, Injections, Maintenance Chemotherapy, Dose-Response Relationship, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Double-Blind Method, INFLIXIMAB, Colitis, Ulcerative, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Induction Chemotherapy, Infusions, Intravenous, Patient Acuity, Remission Induction, Ustekinumab, ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS, ACTIVITY INDEXES, Subcutaneous, Orvostudományok, General Medicine, EFFICACY, Colitis, 3. Good health, INFECTIONS, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology, Drug, Intravenous
Abstract

The efficacy of ustekinumab, an antagonist of the p40 subunit of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23, as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis is unknown.We evaluated ustekinumab as 8-week induction therapy and 44-week maintenance therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. A total of 961 patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous induction dose of ustekinumab (either 130 mg [320 patients] or a weight-range-based dose that approximated 6 mg per kilogram of body weight [322]) or placebo (319). Patients who had a response to induction therapy 8 weeks after administration of intravenous ustekinumab were randomly assigned again to receive subcutaneous maintenance injections of 90 mg of ustekinumab (either every 12 weeks [172 patients] or every 8 weeks [176]) or placebo (175). The primary end point in the induction trial (week 8) and the maintenance trial (week 44) was clinical remission (defined as a total score of ≤2 on the Mayo scale [range, 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease] and no subscore1 [range, 0 to 3] on any of the four Mayo scale components).The percentage of patients who had clinical remission at week 8 among patients who received intravenous ustekinumab at a dose of 130 mg (15.6%) or 6 mg per kilogram (15.5%) was significantly higher than that among patients who received placebo (5.3%) (P0.001 for both comparisons). Among patients who had a response to induction therapy with ustekinumab and underwent a second randomization, the percentage of patients who had clinical remission at week 44 was significantly higher among patients assigned to 90 mg of subcutaneous ustekinumab every 12 weeks (38.4%) or every 8 weeks (43.8%) than among those assigned to placebo (24.0%) (P = 0.002 and P0.001, respectively). The incidence of serious adverse events with ustekinumab was similar to that with placebo. Through 52 weeks of exposure, there were two deaths (one each from acute respiratory distress syndrome and hemorrhage from esophageal varices) and seven cases of cancer (one each of prostate, colon, renal papillary, and rectal cancer and three nonmelanoma skin cancers) among 825 patients who received ustekinumab and no deaths and one case of cancer (testicular cancer) among 319 patients who received placebo.Ustekinumab was more effective than placebo for inducing and maintaining remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; UNIFI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02407236.).

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Ein neues 1g Mesalazin-Suppositorium (Salofalk®) ist bei mittelschwerer proctitis ulcerosa genauso wirksam wie die 3 x tägliche Gabe von 500mg Suppositorien: Eine randomisierte multizentrische Studie

Author

Andus, T, primary, Kocjan, A, additional, Müser, M, additional, Simanenkov, V, additional, Baranovsky, A, additional, Mikhailova, TL, additional, Zvyagintseva, TD, additional, Dorofeyev, A, additional, Lozynskyy, Y, additional, Lavy, A, additional, Mohrbacher, R, additional, and Greinwald, R, additional

Published
2009
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Budesonide Suppositories Are Effective and Safe for Treating Acute Ulcerative Proctitis

Author

Kruis W., Neshta V., Pesegova M., Alekseeva O., Andreev P., Datsenko O., Levchenko O., Abdulkhakov S., Lozynskyy Y., Mostovoy Y., Soloviev K., Dorofeyev A., Vieth M., Stiess M., Greinwald R., Mohrbacher R., Siegmund B., Kruis W., Neshta V., Pesegova M., Alekseeva O., Andreev P., Datsenko O., Levchenko O., Abdulkhakov S., Lozynskyy Y., Mostovoy Y., Soloviev K., Dorofeyev A., Vieth M., Stiess M., Greinwald R., Mohrbacher R., and Siegmund B.

Abstract

© 2019 AGA Institute Background & Aims: Although proctitis is the most limited form of ulcerative colitis, it causes unpleasant symptoms. Topical mesalamine, the standard treatment, is not always effective. We conducted a randomized phase 2 trial to determine the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of a budesonide suppository vs mesalamine suppositories vs combined budesonide and mesalamine suppositories for proctitis. Methods: We performed a prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter trial in 337 patients with active proctitis to compare the efficacies of 4 different suppository treatments. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given 2 mg budesonide suppositories (2 mg BUS; n = 89 patients), 4 mg BUS (n = 79), 1 g mesalamine suppositories (1 g MES; n = 81), or the combination of 2 mg BUS and 1 g MES (n = 88). The study was performed from November 2013 through July 2015 at 36 study sites in Europe and Russia. The primary end point was the time to resolution of clinical symptoms, defined as the first of 3 consecutive days with a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and stool frequency. Results: The mean time to resolution of symptoms in the 4 mg BUS (29.8 days) and combination of 2 mg BUS and 1 g MES (29.3 days) groups resembled that of the standard 1 g MES treatment (29.2 days), but was significantly longer in the 2 mg BUS group (35.5 days). Furthermore, proportions of patients with deep, clinical, and endoscopic remission, as well as mucosal healing, were similar among the 1 g MES, 4 mg BUS, and combination therapy groups, but significantly lower in the group that received 2 mg BUS. No safety signals were observed, and the patients’ treatment acceptance was high (67%–85% of patients). Conclusions: In a multicenter randomized trial, we found that the efficacy and safety of 4 mg BUS in treatment of active proctitis did not differ significantly from those of 1 g MES. Budesonide suppositories offer an alternative therapy to mesalamine for topical treatment of procti

6. Budesonide Suppositories Are Effective and Safe for Treating Acute Ulcerative Proctitis.

Author

Kruis W, Neshta V, Pesegova M, Alekseeva O, Andreev P, Datsenko O, Levchenko O, Abdulkhakov S, Lozynskyy Y, Mostovoy Y, Soloviev K, Dorofeyev AE, Vieth M, Stiess M, Greinwald R, Mohrbacher R, and Siegmund B

Subjects
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents adverse effects, Budesonide adverse effects, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination adverse effects, Drug Therapy, Combination methods, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions epidemiology, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Mesalamine administration & dosage, Mesalamine adverse effects, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Russia, Suppositories adverse effects, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Anti-Inflammatory Agents administration & dosage, Budesonide administration & dosage, Colitis, Ulcerative drug therapy, Proctitis drug therapy, Suppositories administration & dosage
Abstract

Background & Aims: Although proctitis is the most limited form of ulcerative colitis, it causes unpleasant symptoms. Topical mesalamine, the standard treatment, is not always effective. We conducted a randomized phase 2 trial to determine the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of a budesonide suppository vs mesalamine suppositories vs combined budesonide and mesalamine suppositories for proctitis., Methods: We performed a prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter trial in 337 patients with active proctitis to compare the efficacies of 4 different suppository treatments. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given 2 mg budesonide suppositories (2 mg BUS; n = 89 patients), 4 mg BUS (n = 79), 1 g mesalamine suppositories (1 g MES; n = 81), or the combination of 2 mg BUS and 1 g MES (n = 88). The study was performed from November 2013 through July 2015 at 36 study sites in Europe and Russia. The primary end point was the time to resolution of clinical symptoms, defined as the first of 3 consecutive days with a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and stool frequency., Results: The mean time to resolution of symptoms in the 4 mg BUS (29.8 days) and combination of 2 mg BUS and 1 g MES (29.3 days) groups resembled that of the standard 1 g MES treatment (29.2 days), but was significantly longer in the 2 mg BUS group (35.5 days). Furthermore, proportions of patients with deep, clinical, and endoscopic remission, as well as mucosal healing, were similar among the 1 g MES, 4 mg BUS, and combination therapy groups, but significantly lower in the group that received 2 mg BUS. No safety signals were observed, and the patients' treatment acceptance was high (67%-85% of patients)., Conclusions: In a multicenter randomized trial, we found that the efficacy and safety of 4 mg BUS in treatment of active proctitis did not differ significantly from those of 1 g MES. Budesonide suppositories offer an alternative therapy to mesalamine for topical treatment of proctitis. Clinicaltrialsregister.eu no: 2012-003362-41., (Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Treatment algorithms in the case of perianal complications of Crohn's disease.

Author

Lozynskyy YS

Subjects
Combined Modality Therapy, Crohn Disease complications, Female, Humans, Rectovaginal Fistula surgery, Anal Canal surgery, Crohn Disease surgery
Abstract

Aim: To construct an algorithm of the treatment tactics which would include modern conservative and surgical methods., Materials and Methods: Endoscopy under anesthesia, endorectal ultrasonography, histological and radiological examinations, MRT. In the last 22 years, 310 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) have been treated in our clinic of which 144 had perianal complications (60 fissure, 52 fistula, 61 perianal abscess)., Results: The treatment of perianal abscesses is opening and drainage, followed by conservative treatment (local and systemic). Using conservative treatment for patients with fissure, clinical remission was attained in 45 (75%); another 15 patients (25%) were operated using Maslyak's method. We have not conducted surgical treatment of fissures for the last 5 years. 51 patients with fistulas were operated on. When the malignization was confirmed, we conducted extirpation of the rectum or coloproctectomy. Recurrence of CD was observed in 65 patients (45.1%) during the first 2 years after the beginning treatment and in 128 patients (88.9%) during 5 years. CDAI varied from 150 to 450. PCDAI was in the range of 5-20., Conclusions: (1) Planned surgical treatment of perianal complications requires complex examination of the gastrointestinal tract; (2) pararectal fistulas should be operated in the period of complete remission; (3) surgical treatment of perianal complications should be microinvasive, using non-cutting seton, fistulotomy and advancement flap, and (4) coloproctectomy is the final stage of treatment of perianal CD in severe cases.

Published
2009
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results