Search

ObjectivesThe majority of newborns in the United States receive intramuscular (IM) vitamin K for prophylaxis against vitamin K deficiency bleeding (VKDB). Oral vitamin K is less effective than IM vitamin K in preventing VKDB but is widely used in Europe and by some in the United States when parents refuse IM vitamin K for their newborn. Our aim was to assess the practices, opinions, and knowledge of newborn clinicians regarding oral vitamin K prophylaxis when parents refuse IM vitamin K.MethodsWe conducted an electronic survey of newborn clinicians from 3 academic medical centers in California, Iowa, and Connecticut. Descriptive statistics and χ2 tests were performed.ResultsOf 160 newborn clinicians at 3 sites, 110 (69%) completed the survey. Of respondents, 58 (53%) believed the incidence of IM vitamin K refusal is increasing and had prescribed or recommended oral vitamin K at least once. Regarding knowledge, 32 (28%) and 23 (20%) respondents did not know whether oral vitamin K decreases the risk of early- and late-onset VKDB, respectively. There were no significant differences in opinions, knowledge, or practices across institutions or practice settings (NICU, well-newborn nursery, or both) (P > .05).ConclusionsOur study findings suggest that newborn clinicians may lack knowledge about the effectiveness of oral vitamin K in preventing VKDB. More information is needed about oral vitamin K regimens and outcomes of newborns who receive oral vitamin K.

Background The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends one intramuscular (IM) vitamin K injection at birth to prevent Vitamin K Deficiency Bleeding of the Newborn (VKDB). Among factors associated with IM vitamin K refusal, investigators have reported an increased frequency of IM vitamin K refusal among parents who select midwife-assisted deliveries. Reasons behind this association are unclear. Methods To understand the perspectives of midwives on IM vitamin K prophylaxis and approach to counseling parents using qualitative methodology, we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews of midwives associated with 3 tertiary academic medical centers and surrounding communities in Connecticut, Iowa and Michigan. We used the grounded theory approach and the constant comparative method until saturation was reached. Results We interviewed 19 white female midwives from different training pathways. Participants who were Certified Nurse Midwives (CNMs) routinely recommended IM vitamin K prophylaxis and Certified Professional Midwives (CPMs) took a more neutral approach. The following 4 themes emerged: (1) Emphasis on an educational approach to counseling that supports parents' decision-making authority; (2) Low-intervention philosophy in the midwifery model of care attracts certain parents; (3) Need for relationship building between midwives and pediatricians and (4) Opportunities for the future. Conclusions Midwives in our study perceived that the midwifery model of care, the focus on physiologic birth and prioritizing parents' decision-making autonomy appears to attract a sub-set of expectant parents with certain belief systems who question interventions such as IM vitamin K prophylaxis. There are opportunities for better collaboration between midwives and pediatricians., Author(s): Jaspreet Loyal [sup.1] , Phoebe Danziger [sup.2] , Kelly E. Wood [sup.3] Author Affiliations: (1) grid.47100.32, 0000000419368710, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University, , 333 Cedar Street, 06445, New Haven, [...]

ObjectiveDespite American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations, some parents refuse intramuscular (IM) vitamin K as prophylaxis against vitamin K deficiency bleeding for their newborns. The purpose of our study was to describe attitudes and perceptions of parents who choose to defer IM vitamin K for their newborns.MethodsUsing qualitative methodology, we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with parents of newborns in 3 hospitals in Connecticut and California. We used the grounded theory approach and the constant comparative method until saturation was reached.ResultsNineteen participants (17 mothers and 2 fathers) of 17 newborns were interviewed; 14 newborns did not receive IM vitamin K due to refusal by the parents, and for 3 newborns IM vitamin K administration was delayed due to initial hesitation by the parents. Four major themes emerged: 1) risk-to-benefit ratio, where parents refused IM vitamin K due to a perceived risk to their newborn from preservatives, for example; 2) "natural" approaches, which led to seeking oral vitamin K or increasing the mother's own prenatal dietary vitamin K intake; 3) placement of trust and mistrust, which involved mistrust of the medical and pharmaceutical community with overlapping concerns about vaccines and trust of self, like-minded allopathic and non-allopathic health care providers, the social circle, the internet, and social media; and 4) informed by experiences, reflecting hospital experiences with prior pregnancies and communication with health care providers.ConclusionsParents' perception of risk, preference for alternative options, trust, and communication with health care providers were pivotal factors when making decisions about IM vitamin K.

Background Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of sensorineural hearing loss. By law, newborns in Connecticut who fail newborn hearing screening are tested for infection with CMV. This targeted screening is controversial, because most children with congenital CMV infection are asymptomatic, and CMV-related hearing loss can have a delayed onset. Our hospital uses a saliva polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (confirmed by a urine PCR assay) to detect CMV. Here, we report the results of the first year of our screening program. Methods We reviewed the medical records of newborns in the Yale New Haven Health System who failed the newborn hearing screening test between January 1 and December 31, 2016. Results Of 10964 newborns, 171 failed newborn hearing screening, and 3 of these newborns had positive saliva CMV PCR test results. Of these 3 newborns, 2 had positive results on the confirmatory test (for 1 of them the confirmatory test was not performed until the infant was 10 weeks old), and 1 had a negative result on the confirmatory test. Three additional newborns with congenital CMV infection were tested because of clinical indications (1 for ventriculomegaly on prenatal ultrasound and 2 for CMV infection of the mother). Results of audiology follow-up were available for 149 (87.1%) of the 171 newborns who failed newborn hearing screening; 127 (85.2%) had normal results. Conclusion Our targeted screening program for congenital CMV infection had a low yield. Consideration should be given to other strategies for identifying children at risk of hearing loss as a result of congenital CMV infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Refusal of intramuscular (IM) vitamin K administration by parents is an emerging problem. Our objective was to assess the frequency of and factors associated with refusal of IM vitamin K administration in well newborns in the United States. METHODS: We determined the number of newborns admitted to well newborn units whose parents refused IM vitamin K administration in the Better Outcomes through Research for Newborns network and, in a nested patient-control study, identified factors associated with refusal of IM vitamin K administration by using a multiple logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 102 878 newborns from 35 Better Outcomes through Research for Newborns sites, parents of 638 (0.6%) refused IM vitamin K administration. Frequency of refusal at individual sites varied from 0% to 2.3%. Exclusive breastfeeding (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1-5.5), non-Hispanic white race and/or ethnicity (aOR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2-2.4), female sex (aOR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2-2.3), gestational age (aOR = 1.2; 95% CI: 1.1-1.4), and mother's age (aOR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.08) were significantly associated with refusal of IM vitamin K administration. Refusal of the administration of both ocular prophylaxis and hepatitis B vaccine was also strongly associated with refusal of IM vitamin K administration (aOR = 88.7; 95% CI: 50.4-151.9). CONCLUSIONS: Refusal of IM vitamin K by parents of newborns is a significant problem. Interventions to minimize risks to these newborns are needed. a [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: The authors have indicated they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.