Search

Background: The hiatal ligament, as the anatomical landmark for the completion of total mesorectal excision (TME) for ultra‐low rectal cancer, represents a continuation of the longitudinal muscle of the rectum. It receives vascular supply from the median sacral artery and contains lymphatic vessels. In cases where ultra‐low rectal cancer is located in the posterior rectal wall, the hiatal ligament may theoretically serve as an anatomical region susceptible to direct tumor cell spread or distant metastasis. Objective: To evaluate the effect of circumferential tumor location (CTL) on postoperative survival of low rectal cancer and to determine the effect of total hiatal ligament excision (THLE) on the prognosis of patients with posterior rectal cancer. Methods: Patients with ultra‐low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery between March 2014 and October 2021 were enrolled in this study. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients in the posterior group and the non‐posterior group. Prognostic factors were identified using COX regression. PSM analysis was also used in the posterior tumor subgroup to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients in the hiatal ligament traditional transection (HLTT) and THLE groups. Results: After PSM, OS, and DFS were comparable between the posterior and non‐posterior groups. Similarly, no difference was noted in the local recurrence rate between the two groups (p = 0.23). The prognosis of ultra‐low rectal cancer was not affected by CTL. However, the local recurrence rate was significantly lower in the THLE group compared with the HLTT group (p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis of the posterior group identified CRM, TNM stage III, and HLTT as independent risk factors for local recurrence‐free survival. Conclusions: CTL is not a prognostic risk factor for low rectal cancer. In posterior wall tumors, THLE significantly reduces the local recurrence rate for low rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic ELAPE surgery has been carried out in our center for a long time, and some modifications have been made in clinical practice. In this study, we compared conventional ELAPE operation with modified ELAPE operation to investigate the efficacy and safety of modified ELAPE operation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 339 patients with low rectal cancer undergoing abdominoperineal resection from 2017 to 2021 in the Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Patients were classified into modified ELAPE groups (199 patients) and conventional ELAPE groups (140 patients). Total operation time, reconstruction time, postoperative hospital stay, total cost, intraoperative data, postoperative short-term and long-term complications and tumor recurrence were compared. Results: The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Total operation time was less with modified ELAPE group compared to conventional ELAPE group (190.6 ± 33.1 min vs 230.1 ± 51.6 min, P = 0.022). Pelvic floor reconstruction time was also less with modified ELAPE group compared to conventional ELAPE group (4.3 ± 1.2 min vs 11.9 ± 1.7 min, P = 0.004). Positive CRM was observed in 11 and 9 patients in modified ELAPE groups and conventional ELAPE groups (P = 0.744). IOP occurred in 12 and 7 patients in modified ELAPE group and conventional ELAPE group (P = 0.701). Total cost was also less with modified ELAPE group compared to conventional ELAPE group (9004 ± 1146 USD vs 10,336 ± 2047 USD, P = 0.031). The incidence of parastomal hernia was less with modified ELAPE group compared to conventional ELAPE group (7/199 vs 22/140, P < 0.001). Three-year follow-up data did not show any difference in overall survival rate or local occurrence between the two groups. Conclusion: Modified ELAPE surgery is technically safe and feasible, and oncologically comparable to that of conventional ELAPE surgery, which can be considered for popularization and application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Background The hiatal ligament, as the anatomical landmark for the completion of total mesorectal excision (TME) for ultra‐low rectal cancer, represents a continuation of the longitudinal muscle of the rectum. It receives vascular supply from the median sacral artery and contains lymphatic vessels. In cases where ultra‐low rectal cancer is located in the posterior rectal wall, the hiatal ligament may theoretically serve as an anatomical region susceptible to direct tumor cell spread or distant metastasis. Objective To evaluate the effect of circumferential tumor location (CTL) on postoperative survival of low rectal cancer and to determine the effect of total hiatal ligament excision (THLE) on the prognosis of patients with posterior rectal cancer. Methods Patients with ultra‐low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery between March 2014 and October 2021 were enrolled in this study. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients in the posterior group and the non‐posterior group. Prognostic factors were identified using COX regression. PSM analysis was also used in the posterior tumor subgroup to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients in the hiatal ligament traditional transection (HLTT) and THLE groups. Results After PSM, OS, and DFS were comparable between the posterior and non‐posterior groups. Similarly, no difference was noted in the local recurrence rate between the two groups (p = 0.23). The prognosis of ultra‐low rectal cancer was not affected by CTL. However, the local recurrence rate was significantly lower in the THLE group compared with the HLTT group (p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis of the posterior group identified CRM, TNM stage III, and HLTT as independent risk factors for local recurrence‐free survival. Conclusions CTL is not a prognostic risk factor for low rectal cancer. In posterior wall tumors, THLE significantly reduces the local recurrence rate for low rectal cancer.

Objective To explore the value of dynamic MRI imaging in investigate the morphologic and dynamic factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after anal preservation surgery in patients with low rectal cancer. Methods Thirty-five patients who developed LARS after anal preservation surgery for low rectal cancer were prospectively collected. Subjects were underwent routine MRI and dynamic MRI of pelvis 1 week before and 3 months after surgery respectively. Routine MRI was used as the resting phase, and dynamic MRI was used to obtain the rapture phase and forceful phase. Parameters such as anal rectus angle (ARA), the length of the line connecting lower edge of pubic symphysis to the posterior wall attachment point of puborectal muscle (H-line), the vertical length from posterior wall attachment point of puborectal muscle to pubococcygeal line (M-line), thickness of puborectal muscle, and thickness of internal and external anal sphincter were measured at the three time phases. The differences between preoperative and postoperative, and moderate and severe LARS patients were compared by measuring relevant indicators. Results The preoperative and postoperative ARA, H-line length and M-line length of LARS patients were the smallest in the rapture phase, the largest in the forceful phase, and the middle in the resting phase. The postoperative thickness of puborectalis muscle and internal and external anal sphincter were the largest in the rapture phase, the smallest in the forceful phase, and the middle in the resting phase. There were significant differences between the three phases (P＜0.05). There were no significant differences between the three phases of postoperative puborectalis muscle thickness and internal and external sphincter thickness (P＞0.05). The postoperative ARA was greater than preoperative ARA in LARS patients, and the thickness of puborectalis muscle, the internal anal sphincter (resting phase and rapture phase), and the external anal sphincter were smaller than preoperative ARA, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The ARA in resting phase and rapture phase was greater in patients with severe LARS than that of patients with mild LARS, and the thickness of internal anal sphincter in resting phase was less in patients with severe LARS than that of patients with mild LARS (P＜0.05). However, the differences between the other indicators were not statistically significant (P＞0.05). Conclusion Dynamic MRI examination technology combines dynamic images with quantitative indicators can be used as an important evaluation basis for LARS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the application of rubber-coated stent (RCS) as a fecal isolation device in preventing anastomotic leakage after low rectal cancer surgery. Methods A total of 72 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer (Dixon) at Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2016 to April 2023 were studied, and 35 of them who underwent defunctioning stoma (DS) were assigned into control group, and another 37 ones receiving RCS served as the study group. Their general data, operation time, length of hospital stay, incidence of overall complications, hospitalization cost, anastomotic leakage rate, and other related clinical indicators were collected and compared between the 2 groups. Results There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups in term of general data (age, gender, BMI, NRS-2002 score, ASA score, tumor stage and distance from the tumor to the anal verge) and proportions of underlying diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, other cardiovascular diseases, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) (P>0.05). The study group had significantly shorter operation time (238.0 vs 314.1 min, P

Objective: The objective is to investigate if laparoscopic-dominant abdominoperineal resection (LDAPR) with individualised levator ani resection inhibits local recurrence (LR) and prolongs survival as compared to laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR). Materials and Methods: Rectal cancer surgery cases were retrospectively identified from September 2014 to December 2019. LDAPR-treated group (55 patients) and the APR-treated group (71 patients) were included in the study. The operation time, circumferential resection margin (CRM), intraoperative tumor surgery (ITP), post-operative complications, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and LR were compared in the two groups. Results: The CRM and ITP were significantly reduced in the LDAPR as compared to the APR group (3.6% vs. 16.9%, t = 5.522, P = 0.019; 3.6% vs. 14.1%, t = 3.926, P = 0.048). In terms of post-operative complications, the incidence of urinary retention in LDAPR was significantly reduced than the APR group (10.9% vs. 25.4%, χ2 = 4.139, P = 0.041). Similarly, perineal pain at 6 months or 1 year after surgery was significantly down-regulated in LDAPR than in the APR group (72.7% vs. 88.7%, χ2 = 5.320, P = 0.021; 18.2% vs. 43.2%, χ2 = 8.288, P = 0.004). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the post-operative complications between the LDAPR and APR groups. Finally, LDAPR led to a significantly improved 2-year OS and a reduced LR compared to APR. Conclusion: LDAPR reduces CMR, ITP and LR and simplified the perineum operation, subsequently protecting the pelvic autonomic nerves. Compared to the conventional APR, LDAPR is a promising procedure worth adopting for rectal cancer treatment.

Objective The aim of this study was to characterize the tissue involving the margin and study if this information will affect margin prediction on restaging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in low rectal adenocarcinoma (LRC) patients treated with neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT).

This meta‐analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of microinvasive and open operations on postoperative wound complications in low rectal carcinoma patients. Research on limited English has been conducted systematically in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The date up to the search was in August 2023. Following review of the classification and exclusion criteria for this research and the evaluation of its quality in the literature, there were a total of 266 related papers, which were reviewed for inclusion in the period from 2004 to 2017. A total of 1774 cases of low rectal cancer were enrolled. Of these 913 cases, the laparoscopic operation was performed on 913 cases, while 861 cases were operated on low rectal carcinoma. The overall sample was between 10 and 482. Five trials described the efficacy of laparoscopy have lower risk than open on postoperative wound infection in patients with low rectal cancer (OR, 0.72;95 % CI, 0.48,1.09 p = 0.12). Three studies results showed that the anastomotic leak was not significantly different between open and laparoscopy (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58,1.26 p = 0.44). Six surgical trials in low rectal cancer patients reported haemorrhage, and five cases of surgical time were reported, with laparoscopy having fewer bleeding compared with open surgery (MD, −188.89; 95% CI, −341.27, −36.51 p = 0.02). Compared with laparoscopy, the operation time was shorter for the open operation (MD, 33.06; 95% CI, 30.56, 35.57 p < 0.0001). Overall, there is no significant difference between laparoscopy and open surgery in terms of incidence of infection and anastomosis leak. However, the rate of haemorrhage in laparoscopy is lower，and operation time in open surgery is lower. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Objective: To review oncological outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (LAP-ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.In locally advanced low rectal cancer, ELAPE which is en-bloc resection of levator muscles along with the tumor in a prone position has significantly decreased the rate of having either positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) or tumor perforation. The aim of the study was to determine the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (LAP-ELAPE) for low rectal cancer. Methods: This retrospective study was performed at Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital and Research Centre Lahore. Patients who underwent ELAPE for low rectal and anal cancer from January 2014 to December 2019 were selected. Data was collected using an electronic database through a hospital information system. Results: A total of 82 patients were included in the study having a median age of 39 years. Clinically preoperative tumor sizes were T2:2, T3:65, T4:15. Neo-adjuvant chemo radiotherapy was administered to 79 (96.3%) patients. Pathologically tumor sizes were T0:12, T2:15, T3:50, T4:5 with 79.2% (n=65) R0 resections. The mean operative time was 340.36±64.51 minutes and the mean blood loss was 99 milliliters. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.58±4.64 days. Seventeen (20.7%) cases had pathological circumferential resection margins positive (pCRM<1mm). However, tumor perforation was found in 8(9.8%) patients. Ninety days mortality was none while 36 patients experienced recurrence (local: 23, distant: 30, local + distant 17). The median survival time was 53.00±2.69 months. Conclusion: For locally advanced low rectal cancer, ELAPE has evolved as a safe oncological procedure with acceptable outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The use of sphincter-saving resection without a permanent stoma in place of abdominoperineal resection (APR) has been one of the greatest advancements in the area of surgical therapy for low rectal cancer. Aim To assess the oncological and functional outcomes of inter-sphincteric resection of low rectal cancer in order to achieve radicality and a standard of living. Patients and methods At the hospitals affiliated with Menoufia University, a retrospective analysis was done. Forty patients with rectum cancer who were undergoing general surgery at Menoufia University Hospitals were the subject of this investigation. We comprised: older than 18 years old, sexes of both genders, low rectum and anal canal, with internal sphincter or rectal wall restriction on magnetic resonance imaging, differentiated tumour, tumour diameter of 1-5, and good continence. Results Mean operative time was 261.8 (±96.6 SD), the mean blood loss was 185.8 (±156.5 SD). Mean postoperative hospital stay was 11.2 (±4.1S D), the mean pain severity 1 h postoperatively was 5.5 (±1.0 SD), the mean 1 day postoperatively was 5.9 (±1.5 SD), the mean 5 day postoperatively was 3.3 (±1.2 SD), there were three with Anastomotic leakage, two with wound infection, two with hemorrhage, one with urinary tract infection, one with ileus. Regarding complications, mean score of micturition problems was 28.2 (±4.1 SD), the mean GIT symptoms was 32.2 (±3.1 SD), the mean weight loss was 5.5 (±1.0 SD), the mean CTX side effects was 13.9 (±1.5 SD), the mean body image was 70.3±6.2. Conclusion The intersphincteric resection approach improves the rate of sphincter preservation while maintaining oncological and functional results. Symptom-specific quality of life may be adversely affected by preoperative radiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The aim of this study was to characterize the tissue involving the margin and study if this information will affect margin prediction on restaging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in low rectal adenocarcinoma (LRC) patients treated with neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT). Methods In this retrospective study of nonmetastatic LRC (distal margin <5 cm from the anal verge) treated with LCCRT followed by surgery, a radiologist blinded to outcome reread the restaging MRI and documented if the radial margin was involved by tumor, fibrosis, or mucin reaction using T2 high-resolution (HR) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The diagnostic performance of tumor-involving margin on restaging MRI was assessed using surgical histopathology as a reference. Interobserver agreement between three independent radiologists was assessed in a subset. Results We included 133 patients (80 males and 53 females) with a mean (range) age of 44.7 (21–86) years and 82% of them had well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Baseline MRI showed T3 (n = 58) or T4 (n = 60) disease in 89% of the patients. The pathological margin was positive in 21% (n = 28) cases. In restaging MRI, the circumferential resection margin (CRM) ≤1 mm in 75.1% (n = 100) cases and MRI predicted tumor, fibrosis, and mucin reaction at the margin in 60, 34, and 6%, respectively, and histopathology showed tumor cells in 33, 14.7, and 16.6% of them, respectively. LRC with tumor-involving margin and bad response (MR tumor regression grade [mr-TRG] 3–5) on restaging MRI had fourfold increased risk of positive pathological circumferential resection margin (pCRM). There was moderate and fair inter-reader agreement for the tissue type involving the CRM (κ = 0.471) and mr-TRG (κ = 0.266), p < 0.05. The use of both distance criteria and tumor-involving margins improved the diagnostic accuracy for margin prediction from 39 to 66% on restaging MRI. Conclusions Margin prediction on restaging MRI can be improved by characterizing the tissue type involving the margin in low rectal cancer patients. The inter-reader agreement was moderate for determining the tissue type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Objective: The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of patients with low rectal cancer after stoma-site approach single-port laparoscopic Miles procedure or conventional multi-port laparoscopic Miles procedure, as well as to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stoma-site approach single-port laparoscopic surgery in low rectal cancer. Methods: Between September 2020 and September 2021, 51 low rectal cancer patients scheduled for Miles procedure at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College were randomly assigned to the single-port laparoscopic surgery group (SPLS) and the multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) group. The perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: In this study, 25 patients underwent SPLS and 26 underwent MPLS. All patients completed the study, and there were no perioperative deaths in either group. Observation indicators such as intraoperative bleeding (39 mL vs. 41 mL), number of lymph nodes (20.12 ± 3.29 vs. 21.84 ± 3.74), average hospital stay (7.15 ± 1.52 vs. 7.64 ± 1.66), and time to flatulence (2.5d vs. 2.5d) showed no significant differences between the SPLS and MPLS groups (p > 0.05). However, the operation duration (180 min vs. 118 min) and perioperative complications showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (p

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of transanal local resection combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy with linear cutting stapler in the treatment of stage T2N0M0 low rectal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 57 patients with stage T2N0M0 low rectal cancer treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University from February 2017 to February 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods: transanal local resection combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy group (TAE group, 27 cases) and traditional radical surgery group (RS group, 30 cases). The general data, operation related indexes, Wexner score and QLQ-C30 score, postoperative complications and follow-up outcomes were compared between two groups. Results The operation time, postoperative hospitalization days and intraoperative bleeding volume in TAE group were significantly lower than those in RS group (P＜0.05). The postoperative Wexner score of TAE group was significantly lower than that in RS group (2.10±1.40 vs 6.60±2.10, t =9.041, P＜0.01). QLQ-C30 score in TAE group was significantly higher than that in RS group (90.31±3.32 vs 71.59±6.35, t =13.716, P＜0.01). The incidence of complications in TAE group decreased compared to RS group without significant difference (3.70% vs 23.33%, P＞0.05). Both groups were followed up for 3 years or more, with only 1 recurrence in TAE group and no recurrence in RS group. Conclusion The use of linear cutting stapler for transanal local resection combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy for low rectal cancer can shorten the operation time and postoperative hospital stay, reduce intraoperative bleeding, improve the postoperative defecation and the quality of life of patients, and it does not increase the long-term recurrence rate.

Objective: To investigate the feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 95 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection and skin bridge loop ileostomy between August 2018 and August 2022, including 44 patients with specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy (experimental group) and 51 patients with specimen extraction via an abdominal incision (control group). Following the application of propensity score matching (PSM), 34 pairs of data were successfully matched. Subsequently, a comparative analysis was conducted on the clinical data of the two groups. Results: The experimental group exhibited significantly better outcomes than the control group in various aspects. Specifically, the experimental group had lower values for average operative time (P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), median length of visible incision after surgery (P < 0.001), median VAS pain score on the first day after surgery (P = 0.015), and average postoperative hospitalization (P = 0.001). There was no statistical significance observed in the incidence of stoma-related complications in both groups (P > 0.05). Within each group, the stoma-QOL scores before stoma closure surgery were significantly higher than those at one month and two months after the surgery, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Specimen extraction via a U-Plus skin bridge loop ileostomy is a safe and feasible method that shortens operation time and postoperative visual incision length, decreases estimated blood loss, and reduces patient postoperative pain compared with specimen extraction via an abdominal incision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although previous studies have demonstrated that tumor deposits (TDs) are associated with worse prognosis in colon cancer, their clinical significance in rectal cancer has not been fully elucidated, especially in the lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) area. This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of TDs, focusing on the number of metastatic foci, including lymph node metastases (LNMs) and TDs, in the LPLN area. Methods: This retrospective study involved 226 consecutive patients with cStage II/III low rectal cancer who underwent LPLN dissection. Metastatic foci, including LNM and TD, in the LPLN area were defined as lateral pelvic metastases (LP-M) and were evaluated according to LP-M status: presence (absence vs. presence), histopathological classification (LNM vs. TD), and number (one to three vs. four or more). We evaluated the relapse-free survival of each model and compared them using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's concordance index (c-index). Results: Forty-nine of 226 patients (22%) had LP-M, and 15 patients (7%) had TDs. The median number of LP-M per patient was one (range, 1–9). The best risk stratification power was observed for number (AIC, 758; c-index, 0.668) compared with presence (AIC, 759; c-index, 0.665) and histopathological classification (AIC, 761; c-index, 0.664). The number of LP-M was an independent prognostic factor for both relapse-free and overall survival, and was significantly associated with cumulative local recurrence. Conclusion: The number of metastatic foci, including LNMs and TDs, in the LPLN area is useful for risk stratification of patients with low rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of patients with low rectal cancer after stoma-site approach single-port laparoscopic Miles procedure or conventional multi-port laparoscopic Miles procedure, as well as to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stoma-site approach single-port laparoscopic surgery in low rectal cancer. Between September 2020 and September 2021, 51 low rectal cancer patients scheduled for Miles procedure at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College were randomly assigned to the single-port laparoscopic surgery group (SPLS) and the multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) group. The perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. In this study, 25 patients underwent SPLS and 26 underwent MPLS. All patients completed the study, and there were no perioperative deaths in either group. Observation indicators such as intraoperative bleeding (39 mL vs. 41 mL), number of lymph nodes (20.12 ± 3.29 vs. 21.84 ± 3.74), average hospital stay (7.15 ± 1.52 vs. 7.64 ± 1.66), and time to flatulence (2.5d vs. 2.5d) showed no significant differences between the SPLS and MPLS groups (p > 0.05). However, the operation duration (180 min vs. 118 min) and perioperative complications showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.05). In addition, patients in the SPLS group had significantly higher satisfaction scores than those in the MPLS group (p < 0.05). For patients with low rectal cancer requiring Miles surgery, stoma-site approach single-port laparoscopic surgery has comparable safety and efficacy to multi-port laparoscopic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of anorectal malignancy is often reported assuming low rectal adenocarcinoma (LRC). The biopsy may, however, reveal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Thus, the aim was to compare the imaging findings of SCC and LRC.

Abstract Introduction This study aimed to compare the short-term and survival outcomes in laparoscopic low rectal cancer surgery with three different specimen extraction techniques, and whether it affects loop ileostomy closure. Materials and methods A consecutive series of patients with low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection plus protective loop ileostomy (LAR-PLI) were enrolled. Three main techniques, namely specimen extraction through auxiliary incision (EXAI), specimen extraction through stoma incision (EXSI), and specimen eversion and extra-abdominal resection (EVER), were employed. The postoperative short-term and survival outcomes of the three techniques and the impact on loop ileostomy closure were compared. Results In all, 254 patients were enrolled in this study: 104 (40.9%) in the EXAI group, 104 (40.9%) in the EXSI group, and 46 (18.1%) in the EVER group. For primary surgery, EXAI group had significantly longer operative time (P

Background: Anus-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer has always been a serious difficulty for surgeons. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) are commonly used Anus-preserving surgeries for low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical use of two surgical methods. Methods: A total of 152 patients with low rectal cancer were treated with taTME in 75 cases and ISR in 77 cases. After propensity score matching, 46 patients in each group were included in the study. Perioperative outcomes, anal function scores (Wexner incontinence score) and quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ CR38) at least 1 year after surgery were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of surgical outcomes, pathological examination of surgical specimens, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications, except for patients in the taTME group who had their indwelling catheters removed later. Anal Wexner incontinence score was lower in taTME group than ISR group (P < 0.05). On the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale, the physical function and role function scores in the ISR group were lower than those in the taTME group (P < 0.05), while the fatigue, pain symptoms, and constipation scores in the ISR group were higher than those in the taTME group (P < 0.05). On the EORTC QLQ-CR38 scale, the scores of gastrointestinal symptoms and defecation problems in the ISR group were higher than those in the taTME group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with ISR surgery, taTME surgery is comparable in terms of surgical safety and short-term efficacy, and has better long-term anal function and quality of life. From the perspective of long-term anal function and quality of life, taTME surgery is a better surgical method for the treatment of low rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is still a valuable option in the presence of cancer recurrences or salvage surgery. Primary perineal closure after conventional APR curries a high rate of wound complications. A multidisciplinary approach with perineal soft tissue reconstruction surgical time improves the immediate and long-term prognosis of these patients. The aim of the study is to report our experience with the use of the internal pudendal artery perforator flap in perineal region reconstruction after APR. We performed 11 perineal region reconstructions after conventional APR between September 2016 and December 2020. In 8 cases the reconstruction was performed on previously irradiated tissues while in 2 cases the radiotherapy was carried out on the perineal tissues solely for adjuvant therapy. A rotation perforating flap was harvested in 8 cases, an advance island flap in 2 cases, and a propeller type in one case. All 11 flaps survived with no immediate postoperative major complications. Only one case showed dehiscence of the donor site wound healed with conservative treatment. Average hospitalization time was 11 days internal pudendal artery perforator flap represents a valid and reliable reconstructive solution after APR showing low complication rates and minimal donor site morbidity even in patients with previous radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (APE) for rectal carcinoma has been described in order to improve pathological and oncological results compared to standard APE. To obtain the same oncological advantages as extralevator APE, we have previously described a new procedure starting by a perineal approach: the supine bottom-up APE. Our objective is to compare oncological and surgical outcomes between the supine bottom-up APE and the standard APE. Methods: All patients with low rectal adenocarcinoma requiring APE were retrospectively included and divided into 2 groups: supine bottom-up APE (Group A) and standard APE (Group B). Results: From 2008 to 2016, 61 patients were divided into Groups A (n = 30) and B (n = 31). Postoperative outcomes and median length of stay were similar between groups. Patients from Group A had a significantly longer distal margin (30 [8–120] vs. 20 [1.5–60] mm, p = 0.04) and higher number of harvested lymph nodes (14.5 [0–33] vs. 11 [5–25], p = 0.03) than those from Group B. Circumferential resection margin involvement was similar between groups (28 vs. 22%, p = 0.6), whereas tumors from Group A were significantly larger and more frequently classified as T4 than those from Group B. Operative time was significantly shorter in Group A (437.5 [285–655] minutes) than in Group B (537.5 [361–721] minutes, p = 0.0009). At the end of follow-up, local recurrence occurred in 7 and 16% of patients from Groups A and B (p = 0.68). Three-year overall and disease-free survival rates were similar between groups (87 vs. 90%, p = 0.62 and 61 vs. 63%, p = 0.88, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that supine bottom-up APE doesn't impair surgical outcomes, pathological results, overall and disease-free survivals in comparison with standard APE. This new procedure may be thus safely performed and decrease the operative time. Further randomized multicentric studies are required to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The study was performed to verify the results of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) through the ileostomy site for low rectal cancer compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). Materials and Methods: From January 2019 to November 2021, 133 patients with low rectal cancer underwent single-incision (n = 27) or conventional (n = 106) methods of low anterior rectal resection surgery with ileostomy. All patients were balanced by propensity score matching for basic information in a ratio of 1:2, resulting in 27 and 54 in SILS and CLS groups, respectively. Results: Relative to the CLS group, the SILS group exhibited fewer leucocyte changes, shorter time to first exhaust and first bowel sounds, shorter length of hospital stay and lower Visual Analogue Score on post-operative days (POD2) and POD3. Intraoperative or post-operative complications or readmissions were comparable between the two groups. The oncologic results remained consistent between the two groups other than the number of lymph nodes dissected in group no. 253. Conclusions: Single-incision laparoscopic low rectal resection surgery through the ileostomy site has advantages in terms of reduced post-operative pain, shorter post-operative exhaust time and length of hospital stay while also achieving oncologic outcomes similar to those of conventional laparoscopy. It can be an alternative procedure for patients with low rectal cancer who require ileostomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Regarding low rectal cancer (RC) low anterior resection (LAR), a specific consensus regarding the optimal level of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation does not exist. Objectives. To systematically evaluate the effects of different IMA ligation methods on the prognosis of patients with low RC, so as to further guide clinical treatment. Materials and methods. Between January 2013 and December 2018, 158 patients with low RC underwent LAR. According to the IMA ligation method used, the cases were divided into the low-ligation group (LL group; n = 66) and the high-ligation group (HL group; n = 92). The basic information, operation indicators, postoperative data, and long-term survival in the 2 groups were compared. Results. Sixty cases in the HL group and 60 cases in the LL group were successfully matched using propensity score matching (PSM). There were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative time, postoperative hospital stay, harvested lymph nodes (LNs), postoperative complications (including urinary retention, urinary incontinence, anastomotic leaks, bowel obstruction, incisional infection, and anal function 3 months after surgery), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence, and distant metastasis between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Compared with the HL group, the time to first flatus and the time to fluid intake were shorter in the LL group (p < 0.05). Conclusions. In general, the different IMA ligation methods have no significantly different effects on the prognosis of patients with low RC, but the LL group showed restored intestinal motility earlier. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME), usually assisted with laparoscopy, is a new surgical technique for low rectal cancer resection. The preoperative evaluation, postoperative complication, robot assisted taTME, short prognosis and present dispute were included in this review, based on looking back of development history. Minimally invasive technology of taTME still located in explored stage. High-grade evidence-based medicine and the international multicenter clinical study were needed for the demonstration of long-term prognosis and effect of oncology.

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the short-term and survival outcomes in laparoscopic low rectal cancer surgery with three different specimen extraction techniques, and whether it affects loop ileostomy closure. Materials and methods: A consecutive series of patients with low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection plus protective loop ileostomy (LAR-PLI) were enrolled. Three main techniques, namely specimen extraction through auxiliary incision (EXAI), specimen extraction through stoma incision (EXSI), and specimen eversion and extra-abdominal resection (EVER), were employed. The postoperative short-term and survival outcomes of the three techniques and the impact on loop ileostomy closure were compared. Results: In all, 254 patients were enrolled in this study: 104 (40.9%) in the EXAI group, 104 (40.9%) in the EXSI group, and 46 (18.1%) in the EVER group. For primary surgery, EXAI group had significantly longer operative time (P < 0.001), more intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.001), longer length of abdominal incision (P<0.001), longer time to first flatus (P < 0.001), longer time to first defecation (P < 0.001), longer time to first eat (P < 0.001), and longer postoperative hospital stays (P = 0.005) than the EXSI and EVER groups. The primary postoperative complication rate in the EXAI and EVER group was significantly higher than in the EXSI group (P = 0.005). In loop ileostomy closure, EXAI group had significantly longer operative time (P = 0.001), more bleeding volume, and longer postoperative hospital stays (P < 0.001) than the EXSI and EVER groups. For survival outcomes, the 3-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) is 92.6% for all patients. The 3-year LRFS for patients in EXAI, EXSI, and EVER were 90.1%, 95.4%, and 92.7%, with P = 0.476. Conclusions: Our single-center results found that in LAR-PLI surgery for low rectal cancer, the short-term outcomes of specimen extraction through the stoma incision or anus were better than that through the auxiliary incision, but the 3-year LRFS was no statistically different. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of anorectal malignancy is often reported assuming low rectal adenocarcinoma (LRC). The biopsy may, however, reveal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Thus, the aim was to compare the imaging findings of SCC and LRC. Methods This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent staging MRI for anorectal malignancy (<5 cm from the anal verge) for adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma between 2016 and 2021. Two radiologists blinded to biopsy reviewed MRI. Imaging findings and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were compared between SCC and LRC. Results We studied 137 patients (n = 60 SCC, n = 77 LRC) with a mean age of 50.4 (standard deviation: 12.4) years and tumor length of 5.6 ± 1.9 cm. SCC patients were older, and their distal tumor margin was closer to the anal verge (5.3 vs. 22 mm for LRC; p <0.001). T2 intermediate signal and diffusion restriction was seen in 97 and 98.2% of SCC and 75.3 and 77% of LRC, respectively. SCC had lower ADC values (0.910 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s) than LRC (1.126 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s; p < 0.001). But there was no difference in the ADC values when T2 hyperintense tumors were excluded (p = 0.132). Extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) was more frequent in LRC (35.1 vs. 16.7%; p = 0.013). A combination of distance from the anal verge of less than 11 mm, absent EMVI, and the presence of internal iliac and inguinal nodes had an area under the curve (95% confidence interval) of 0.810 (0.737–0.884). Conclusion ADC values are unhelpful in differentiating SCC and LRC. Tumors closer to anal verge, absence of EMVI, and the presence of inguinal and internal-iliac nodes may point towards SCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In recent years, intersphincteric resection (ISR) has been increasingly used to replace abdominoperineal resection (APR) in the surgical treatment of ultra-low rectal cancer. Aim: This study was to compare the clinical efficacy of ISR and APR. Methods: Between 2012 and 2018, 74 consecutive patients with ultra-low rectal cancer underwent ISR or APR in our medical center. A retrospective comparison of these 2 procedures was performed. Results: A total of 43 patients underwent ISR and 31 underwent APR were included in the study. No significant differences were found between 2 groups in gender, age, BMI, and ASA score. Intersphincteric resection group showed shorter operative time (P =.02) and less blood loss (P =.001). Hospital stays, time to soft diet, and postoperative 30-day complications were not significantly different between the 2 groups. R0 resection achieved 100% in both the groups. As for the long-term outcomes, the survival and recurrence rate were similar between 2 groups. Moreover, the LARS and Wexner score showed that the postoperative anal function after ISR were satisfactory. Conclusion: This study suggested that ISR was feasible and safe for selected patients with ultra-low rectal cancer, with clinically superior outcomes in select patients (small tumors/further from the anal verge) and similar oncological outcomes to APR, and the anal functional outcomes after ISR were acceptable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the mesorectal fat area (MFA) has an impact on the histopathology metrics of the specimen in male patients undergoing robotic total mesorectal excision (rTME) for cancer in the distal third of the rectum. Prospectively collected data of patients undergoing rTME for resectable rectal cancer by five surgeons during 3 years were extracted from the REgistry of Robotic SURgery for RECTal cancer (RESURRECT). MFA was measured at preoperative MRI. Distal rectal cancer was defined as within 6 cm from the anal verge. Specimen metrics included circumferential resection margin (CRM) measured by pathologists as involved if < 1 mm, distal resection margin (DRM) and TME quality. Of 890 patients who underwent rTME for rectal cancer, a subgroup analysis compared 116/581 (33.4%) with MFA > 20 cm2 to 231/581 (66.6%) with MFA ≤ 20 cm2. The mean CRM in patients with MFA > 20 cm2 was neither statistically nor clinically significantly different from patients with MFA ≤ 20 m2 (6.8 ± 5.6 mm vs. 6.0 ± 7.5 mm; p = 0.544). The quality of TME did not significantly differ: complete TME 84.3% vs. 80.3%; nearly complete TME 12.9% vs. 10.1%; incomplete TME 6.8% vs. 5.6%. The DRM was not significantly different: 1.9 ± 1.9 cm vs. 1.9 ± 2.5 cm; p = 0.847. In addition, the intraoperative complication rate was not significantly different: 4.3% (n = 5) vs. 2.2% (n = 5) (p = 0.314). This prospective multicenter study did not find any evidence to support that larger MFA would result in poorer histopathology metrics of the specimen when performing rTME in male patients with distal rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of simple TaTNE in the treatment of low rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic transabdominal TME.MethodsWe collected patients with low rectal cancer admitted to our hospital between January 2019 and November 2021 who received simple TaTME or laparoscopic transabdominal TME. The main outcome was the integrity of the TME specimen. Secondary outcomes were the number of lymph nodes dissected, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, surgical conversion rate, Specimen resection length, circumferential margin (CRM), and distal resection margin (DRM), complication rate. In addition, the Wexner score and LARS score of fecal incontinence were performed in postoperative follow-up.ResultsPathological tissues were successfully resected in all patients. all circumferential margins of the specimen were negative. Specimen resection length was not statistically significant (9.94 ± 2.85 vs. 8.90 ± 2.49, P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in group A (n = 0) was significantly lower than that in group B (n = 3) (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time between group A and group B (296 ± 60.36 vs. 305 ± 58.28, P > 0.05). Among the patients with follow-up time less than 1 year, there was no significant difference in Wexner score and LARS score between group A and group B (P > 0.05). However, in patients who were followed up for more than 1 year, the Wexner score in group A (9.25 ± 2.73) was significantly lower than that in group B (17.36 ± 10.95) and was statistically significant (P

Abstract Background Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) has been recommended for treating low rectal cancer due to its potential advantages in improving surgical safety and oncologic outcomes as compared to conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE). In ELAPE, however, whether the benefits of intraoperative position change to a prone jackknife position outweighs the associated risks remains controversial. This study is to introduce a modified position change in laparoscopic ELAPE and evaluate its feasibility, safety and the long-term therapeutic outcomes. Methods Medical records of 56 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic ELAPE from November 2013 to September 2016 were retrospectively studied. In the operation, a perineal dissection in prone jackknife position was firstly performed and the laparoscopic procedure was then conducted in supine position. Patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, pathologic and 5-year oncologic outcomes were analyzed. Results The mean operation time was 213.5 ± 29.4 min and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 152.7 ± 125.2 ml. All the tumors were totally resected, without intraoperative perforation, conversion to open surgery, postoperative 30-day death, and perioperative complications. All the patients achieved pelvic peritoneum reconstruction without the usage of biological mesh. During the follow-up period, perineal hernia was observed in 1 patient, impaired sexual function in 1 patient, and parastomal hernias in 3 patients. The local recurrence rate was 1.9% and distant metastasis was noted in 12 patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 76.4% and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 70.9%. Conclusions Laparoscopic ELAPE with modified position change is a simplified, safe and feasible procedure with favorable outcomes. The pelvic peritoneum can be directly closed by the laparoscopic approach without the application of biological mesh.

The management of low rectal cancer is a perennial challenge for colorectal surgeons. The benefits of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in low rectal cancer are to secure the distal margin and avoid surgical space constraints within the deep pelvis. However, anastomotic leak remains an important concern. We report our technique and results combining TaTME with delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) without bowel diversion. First, the splenic flexure, left colon and rectum are laparoscopically mobilized to mid-rectum. TaTME is performed to complete the distal rectal mobilization, and the specimen is delivered transanally and transected. The abdominoperineal colonic pull-through is secured to the anal canal and hypertonic dressing is applied regularly in the ward. The handsewn DCAA is performed one week later. An accompanying video demonstrates this technique. Five consecutive patients with low rectal cancer underwent TaTME with DCAA. All had upfront surgical resection except one who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy. Mean operative duration, blood loss, and length of hospital stay was 290 (250–375) min, 142 (10–200) ml and 11.6 (10–14) days respectively. One patient (20%) suffered a postoperative complication of persistent urinary retention, requiring an indwelling urinary catheter on discharge. There were no cases of open conversion and no instances of anastomotic leakage. Two patients (40%) had minor low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and one (20%) had major LARS. TaTME and DCAA without stoma are complimentary techniques that augment the minimally invasive effects of laparoscopic sphincter-sparing low rectal cancer surgery, with good perioperative outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the feasibility and advantages of wedge resection plus transverse suture without mesentery detached approach applied to loop ileostomy closure by analyzing the surgical data and the incidence of postoperative complications of patients undergoing this procedure. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the hospitalization data of patients who underwent ileostomy closure surgery and met the research standards from January 2017 to April 2021 in Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital; all surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. The perioperative data were statistically analyzed by grouping. Results In total, 65 patients were enrolled in this study, with 12 in the wedge resection group, 35 in the stapler group, and 18 in the hand suture group. There was no significant difference in operation time between the wedge resection group and stapler group (P > 0.05), but both groups had shorter operation time than that in the hand suture group (P

Abstract Objective The present study comparatively analyzed short-term clinical effectiveness and long-term follow-up endpoints associated with robotic-assisted sphincter-preserving surgery (RAS) and laparoscopic-assisted sphincter-preserving surgery (LAS) when used to treat low rectal cancer. Method Within such a single-center retrospective cohort analysis, low rectal cancer patients that underwent RAS (n=200) or LAS (n=486) between January 2015 and beginning of July 2018 were enrolled. Results The mean operative durations in the RAS and LAS cohorts were 249±64 min and 203±47 min, respectively (P 6 months post-surgery (P

Colorectal cancer is one of the top three malignant tumors in the world. With the rapid development of medical technology and the strengthening of national awareness of cancer screening, rectal cancer has been diagnosed and treated timely. At present, the application of low rectal tumor preservation operation is becoming more and more common. Anastomotic leakage and anterior resection syndrome are the most common complications of low rectal cancer. How to preserve anal and reduce the incidence of complications has always been the concern of scholars at home and abroad. In order to improve the survival time and quality of life of patients with low rectal cancer, this paper expounds five key problems: fully preoperative evaluation of anorectal function and staging, reasonable neoadjuvant therapy, safe distal margin, the selection of surgical methods and the timing of preventive stoma.

Abstract Background The operative results of different approaches for the laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LAISR) of low rectal cancer vary, and the patient characteristics associated with the best outcomes for each procedure have not been reported. We compared the efficacy of different approaches for LAISR of low rectal cancer and discussed the surgical indications for each approach. Methods We retrospectively reviewed data from 235 patients with low rectal cancer treated via LAISR from October 2010 to September 2016. Patients underwent either the transabdominal approach for ISR (TAISR, n = 142), the transabdominal perineal approach for ISR (TPAISR, n = 57), or the transanal pull-through approach for ISR (PAISR, n = 36). Results The PAISR and TAISR groups exhibited shorter operation times and less intraoperative blood loss than the TPAISR group. The anastomotic distance was shorter in the PAISR and TPAISR groups than in the TAISR group. No differences in the ability to perform radical resection, overall complications, postoperative recovery, Wexner score recorded 12 months after ostomy closure, 3-year disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, or overall survival (OS) were observed among the three groups. Conclusions TAISR, TPAISR, and PAISR have unique advantages and do not differ in terms of operation safety, patient outcomes, or anal function. TPAISR requires a longer time to complete and is associated with more bleeding and a slower recovery of anal function. PAISR should be considered when TAISR cannot ensure a negative distal margin and the tumor and BMI are relatively small; otherwise, TPAISR is required.

Objective: To investigate the application effect and safety of modified Bacon operation combined with laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (Lap-ISR) in sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer. Methods: From October 2019 to May 2021, 78 cases of patients with low rectal cancer who were diagnosed and treated in our hospital were selected as the research subjects. All the cases were divided into the modified group and the control group with 39 cases in each groups accorded to the 1:1 random allocation principle. The control group were given laparoscopic intersphincterectomy, and the modified group were given modified Bacon technique combined with laparoscopic intersphincterectomy, and the therapeutic effect and safety status of the two groups were recorded. Results: There were no difference in the operation time compared between the modified group and the control group (P>0.05). The amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative normal eating time, postoperative anal exhaust time, and postoperative hospital stay in the modified group were less than those in the control group. group (P<0.05). The incidence rates of complications such as anastomotic leakage, pelvic abscess, incision bleeding, urinary retention, and venous thrombosis in the modified group at 14 days after operation were 5.1 %, which were lower than 30.8 % in the control group (P<0.05). The Williams grade of anal function in the modified group at 3 months after operation were better than that in the control group(P<0.05). The Wexner score of anal defecation in the modified group at 1 month and 3 months after operation were lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The physical function, emotional function, social function, symptoms and signs and other quality of life scores of the improved group were higher than those of the control group at 3 months after operation (P<0.05). Conclusion: The application of modified Bacon technique combined with laparoscopic intersphincterectomy in sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer can promote the recovery of patients' anal function, reduce trauma to patients, promote patient recovery, and reduce postoperative complications. In order to continuously improve the quality of life of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study explored postoperative outcomes for patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection (LAR) or intersphincteric resection (ISR). A total of 49 patients (33 LAR, 16 ISR) were followed using anorectal manometry and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires over a year, pre- and post surgery. The primary aim of this study is to clarify differences in anal manometry, sphincter function, fecal incontinence, and QOL between the two surgical arms. The secondary aim was to identify indicators suitable for assessing relationships between anorectal manometry measurements, fecal incontinence, and QOL. Anorectal manometry elements (AMEs), such as atmospheric maximum mean squeeze pressure (aMSP), maximum tolerable volume (MTV), and incremental maximum mean squeeze pressure (iMSP), showed no significant differences during the observation period. However, maximum resting pressure (MRP), high-pressure zone length (HPZ), and threshold volume (TV) were significantly worse in the ISR group. Fecal incontinence, measured by Wexner and Kirwan scores, was significantly better in the LAR group. We observed no differences in SF36 between the two groups. Multi-correlation analysis revealed positive and negative correlations among these factors, with inverse correlations between anorectal manometry measurements and incontinence assessments decreasing post-surgery. We found no correlation between SF36 and anorectal manometry at any time. The findings indicate that surgical technique affects postoperative anal function, fecal incontinence, and SF36. However, combined assessment methods should be used with caution when deriving relationships between anal function and SF36.

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is the ultimate anus-sparing technique for low rectal cancer and is considered an oncologically safe alternative to abdominoperineal resection. The application of the robotic approach to ISR (RISR) has been described by few specialized surgical teams with several differences regarding approach and technique. This review aims to discuss the technical aspects of RISR by evaluating point by point each surgical controversy. Moreover, a systematic review was performed to report the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of RISR. Postoperative morbidities after RISR are acceptable. RISR allows adequate surgical margins and adequate oncological outcomes. RISR may result in severe bowel and genitourinary dysfunction affecting the quality of life in a portion of patients.

BackgroundOver the last 2 decades, patients with low rectal cancer have had better outcomes from improvements in surgical techniques in sphincter preservation. We aimed to quantify the trends in sphincter-preserving surgeries for low rectal cancer over 20 years in a top tertiary hospital in China.MethodsBetween 1999 and 2021, a cohort of patients with primary malignant rectal tumor ≤5cm from the anal verge and who received elective surgeries at Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China, was identified. Data were extracted from electronic medical records. A Joinpoint Regression Model was used to analyze trends in surgical procedures by average annual percentage change (AAPC). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess overall survival.ResultsAmong a total of 4,172 patients during the study period, 3,111 (74.6%) underwent a sphincter-preserving surgery and 1,061 (25.4%) received APR. Sphincter-preserving surgery increased 3.6% per year (95%CI, 2.3-4.9). Low anterior resection was the most performed procedure (86.3%) and maintained a steady trend, while intersphincteric resection increased 49.4% annually (95%CI, 19.5-86.7) after initiation. Laparoscopic techniques increased 15.1% per year (95%CI, 8.4-43.4) after initiation. Sphincter-preserving surgery increased annually for tumors ≤2cm, 2-≤3cm and 3-≤4cm from the anal verge (AAPC 7.1, 4.5-9.8; 4.7, 3.1-6.3; 2.7, 1.7-3.6, respectively). Furthermore, patients with sphincter-preserving surgery had a better overall survival than abdominoperineal resection (APR) patients (adjusted HR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.65-0.93, p=.01).ConclusionsUtilization of sphincter-preserving surgeries increased significantly over the last 20 years. Patients with low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter preservation had better survival than similar patients who underwent APR.

ObjectiveAnus-preserving surgery in overweight patients with low rectal cancer has been a challenge due to the narrow operating space. Intersphincteric resection (ISR) was once a standard therapeutic option for low rectal cancer. The effectiveness of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in treating this group of patients remains uncertain as a new surgical strategy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term effects of taTME with ISR in overweight patients with low rectal cancer.MethodsA total of 53 patients with low rectal cancer were treated with taTME in 31 cases and ISR in 22 cases. The surgery-related data, pathological manifestations of surgical specimens, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications were compared.ResultsPatients in both groups completed the surgery successfully. There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, anastomotic distance from the anal verge and ileostomy between the two groups (P > 0.05). TaTME group performed or virtually finished resection of the rectal mesentery, and no positive cases of Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM) or Distal Resection Margin (DRM) were detected in either group. The number of lymph nodes found in surgical specimens did not change significantly between the two groups (P = 0.391). In the subgroup analysis, however, more lymph nodes were detected in female patients undergoing taTME than in male patients (P = 0.028). The ISR group took less time to remove the drainage tubes (P = 0.013) and the same results were obtained in both groups of male patients in the subgroup analysis (P = 0.011). There were no statistically significant differences in time to start liquid diet, time to remove catheters, time to start flatus, time to begin ambulation, postoperative hospital stay, and readmission within 30 days after surgery between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, female patients in the taTME group were initiated ambulation earlier than males in the subgroup analysis (P = 0.034). The difference was insignificant in the occurrence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusiontaTME is safe and feasible for the treatment of overweight patients with low rectal cancer.

Purpose: This study analyzed the prevalence and factors influencing the history of chronic anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Furthermore, the treatment of a persisting presacral sinus and the impact of stoma reversal on outcome were evaluated. Methods: The institutional database was scanned for all patients with anastomotic leakage, who were primarily treated for low rectal cancer between January 1995 and December 2019. Patients with rectovaginal and rectovesical fistula or an inadequate follow-up were excluded (n = 5). After applying the exclusion criteria, 71 patients remained for analysis. Results: A total of 39 patients out of 71 patients with anastomotic leakage (54.9%) developed a persisting presacral sinus. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or chemotherapy showed a significant impact on the formation of a chronic anastomotic leakage (radiochemotherapy: p = 0.034; chemotherapy: p = 0.050), while initial surgical treatment showed no difference for anastomotic healing (p = 0.502), but a significantly better overall survival (p = 0.042). Multiple therapies and surgical revision had a negative impact on patients' rate of natural bowel continuity (p = 0.006/ < 0.001). In addition, the stoma reversal cohort showed improved overall 10-year survival (p = 0.004) and functional results (bowel continuity: p = 0.026; pain: p = 0.031). Conclusion: Primary surgical therapy for chronic anastomotic leakage should consist of surgical treatment. Furthermore, the reversal of a protective stoma should be considered a viable option in treating chronic presacral sinus to improve pain symptoms and bowel continuity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: In low rectal cancers without sphincter involvement a permanent stoma can be avoided without compromising oncological safety. Functional outcomes following coloanal anastomosis (CAA) compared to abdominoperineal excision (APR) may be significantly different. This study examines all available comparative quality of life (QoL) data for patients undergoing CAA versus APR for low rectal cancer. Methods: Published studies with comparative data on QoL outcomes following CAA versus APR for low rectal cancer were extracted from electronic databases. The study was registered with PROSPERO and adhered to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses) guidelines. Data was combined using random‐effects models. Results: Seven comparative series examined QoL in 527 patients. There was no difference in the numbers receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy in the APR and CAA groups (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.78–1.81, p = 0.43). CAA was associated with higher mean scores for physical functioning(std mean diff −7.08, 95% CI: −11.92 to −2.25, p = 0.004) and body image (std. mean diff 11.11, 95% CI: 6.04–16.18, p < 0.0001). Male sexual problems were significantly increased in patients who had undergone APR compared to CAA (std. mean diff −16.20, 95% CI: −25.76 to −6.64, p = 0.0009). Patients who had an APR reported more fatigue, dyspnoea and appetite loss. Those who had a CAA reported higher scores for both constipation and diarrhoea. Discussion: It is reasonable to offer a CAA to motivated patients where oncological outcomes will not be threatened. QoL outcomes appear to be superior when intestinal continuity is maintained, and permanent stoma avoided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Identifying lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) metastasis in low rectal cancer is crucial before treatment. Several risk factors and prediction models for LPN metastasis have been reported. However, there is no useful tool to accurately predict LPN metastasis. Therefore, we aimed to construct a nomogram for predicting LPN metastasis in rectal cancer. Methods: We analyzed the risk factors for potential LPN metastasis by logistic regression analysis in 705 patients who underwent primary resection of low rectal cancer. We included patients at 49 institutes of the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery between June 2010 and February 2012. Clinicopathological factors and magnetic resonance imaging findings were evaluated. The nomogram performance was assessed using the c-index and calibration plots, and the nomogram was validated using an external cohort. Results: In the univariable logistic regression analysis, age, sex, carcinoembryonic antigen, tumor location, clinical T stage, tumor size, circumferential resection margin (CRM), extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), and the short and long axes of LPN and perirectal lymph node (PRLN) were nominated as risk factors for potential LPN metastasis. We identified a combination of the short axis of LPN, tumor location, EMVI, and short axis of PRLN as optimal for predicting potential LPN metastasis and developed a nomogram using these factors. This model had a c-index of 0.74 and was moderately calibrated and well-validated. Conclusions: This is the first study to construct a well-validated nomogram for predicting potential LPN metastasis in rectal cancer, and its performance was high. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeAnalysis of the clinical efficacy of the application of the NOSES I-type E method combined with 3D laparoscopy in sphincter-preserving surgery of low rectal cancer.MethodA retrospective analysis of 109 patients who underwent laparoscopic low rectal cancer surgery for anus preservation without preventive stoma admitted to the Department of Colorectal Surgery in Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital between January 2017 and May 2019. The 109 cases comprised 52 cases treated with the NOSES I-type E method (NOSES I-type E group) and 57 cases treated with the Dixon method (Dixon group). In the NOSES I-type E group, 25cases underwent 3D laparoscopic surgery (group A) and 27 cases underwent 2D laparoscopic surgery (group B). The general clinical data, perioperative indicators, three-day postoperative pain score, postoperative pathological conditions, complications, return visit to assess the 1-year postoperative anal function, 3-year local recurrence and distant metastasis, and survival were compared among the groups.ResultThe distance between the tumor and the anal verge was significantly different between NOSES I-type E group and the Dixon group (P 0.05). The exhaust time, eating time, drainage tube removal time, hospitalization costs, hospitalization time, and the number of days of analgesic administration were significantly different between NOSES I-type E group and the Dixon group (P 0.05). There were significant differences in difficulty urinating between group A and B (P 0.05). Anastomotic leakage in NOSES I-type E group were significantly lower than those in the Dixon group (P 0.05). Anal stenosis, rectal Prolapse and colon retraction in NOSES I-type E group were significantly higher than those in Dixon group (P 0.05). Anastomotic bleeding in Dixon group occurred in higher frequency than in NOSES I-type E group (P 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative pathology, 1-year postoperative anal function score, 3-year recurrence rate and overall survival rate among the groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionThe NOSES I-type E method is a safe and effective sphincter-preserving operation for low rectal cancer and its combination with 3D laparoscopy may have better neurological protection which is worth of clinical application.

PurposeTo investigate the safety and efficacy of a reverse puncture device (RPD) and specimen eversion of the rectum for resection in total laparoscopic proctectomy.MethodsIn a prospective study from August 2019 to March 2021, 40 patients underwent a procedure with an RPD and specimen eversion of the rectum for total laparoscopic low rectal cancer resection, that is natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES), were included in the NOSES group. Forty patients in the control group underwent conventional laparoscopic radical resection for low rectal cancer and were included in the LAP group. Intraoperative- and postoperative-related indicators, recovery and inflammatory factors, quality of life (QOL) and mental health were compared.ResultsAll operations were successfully completed. Compared with the LAP group, the NOSES group showed better short-term outcomes, such as time to eating, postoperative pain, and especially postoperative incision-related complications. At the same time, postoperative inflammatory factor levels, psychological trauma, life-related anxiety and depression scores, and QOL were better in the NOSES group than in the LAP group.ConclusionsThe application of an RPD and specimen eversion of the rectum for total laparoscopic low rectal cancer resection is a technically feasible and safe approach with a short-term curative effect.

Zhongbo Han, Chunxia Yang, Qingfeng Wang, Meng Wang, Xi Li, Chao Zhang Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zibo Central Hospital, Shandong University, Zibo, Shandong, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Chao ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zibo Central Hospital, Shandong University, 54 West Gongqingtuan Road, Zibo, Shandong, 255000, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86 05333570671Fax +86 05333570672Email zhangchao20202021@163.comPurpose: High rate of perineal surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common complication following abdominoperineal resection (APR), especially for extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of continuous negative pressure drainage combined with intermittent irrigation (CNPDCII) in the presacral space on the perineal SSI following laparoscopic ELAPE for low rectal cancer.Patients and Methods: The clinical data of 99 patients with low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic ELAPE surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 99 patients, 46 patients received CNPDCII and 53 patients received conventional drainage in the presacral space after ELAPE. Self-made irrigation drainage tube: took a silicone drainage tube, cut 3 side holes at every 2cm intervals at the front end, and fixed a flexible tube of an intravenous needle at the front end of the silicone drainage tube. The conventional drainage tube or self-made irrigation drainage tube was placed in the presacral space and poked out from the inside of the ischial tuberosity. The incidence of SSI and other perioperative indicators between the two groups was compared within 30 days after surgery.Results: There was no statistical difference in clinicopathological features between the two groups of patients (p> 0.05). A statistically lower rate of SSI was found in CNPDCII group (17.4%, 8/46) than the conventional drainage group (35.8%, 19/53). The drainage tube retention time (7.8± 1.2 d VS 9.4± 1.6 d) and the postoperative hospital stay (9.7± 1.4 d VS 11.9± 2.3 d) in CNPDCII group were significantly shortened than the conventional drainage group. There was no statistical difference in operating theatre time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed that CNPDCII was an independent protective factor for SSI after ELAPE.Conclusion: CNPDCII can effectively reduce the incidence of SSI following laparoscopic ELAPE, which is simple, safe and effective.Keywords: low rectal cancer, extralevator abdominoperineal excision, negative pressure drainage, surgical site infection