Search

Abstract Background RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) has emerged as one of the most sensitive tool for gene expression analysis. Among the library preparation methods available, the standard poly(A) + enrichment provides a comprehensive, detailed, and accurate view of polyadenylated RNAs. However, on samples of suboptimal quality ribosomal RNA depletion and exon capture methods have recently been reported as better alternatives. Methods We compared for the first time three commercial Illumina library preparation kits (TruSeq Stranded mRNA, TruSeq Ribo-Zero rRNA Removal, and TruSeq RNA Access) as representatives of these three different approaches using well-established human reference RNA samples from the MAQC/SEQC consortium on a wide range of input amounts (from 100 ng down to 1 ng) and degradation levels (intact, degraded, and highly degraded). Results We assessed the accuracy of the generated expression values by comparison to gold standard TaqMan qPCR measurements and gained unprecedented insight into the limits of applicability in terms of input quantity and sample quality of each protocol. We found that each protocol generates highly reproducible results (R 2 > 0.92) on intact RNA samples down to input amounts of 10 ng. For degraded RNA samples, Ribo-Zero showed clear performance advantages over the other two protocols as it generated more accurate and better reproducible gene expression results even at very low input amounts such as 1 ng and 2 ng. For highly degraded RNA samples, RNA Access performed best generating reliable data down to 5 ng input. Conclusions We found that the ribosomal RNA depletion protocol from Illumina works very well at amounts far below recommendation and over a good range of intact and degraded material. We also infer that the exome-capture protocol (RNA Access, Illumina) performs better than other methods on highly degraded and low amount samples.

Background: RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) has emerged as one of the most sensitive tool for gene expression analysis. Among the library preparation methods available, the standard poly(A) + enrichment provides a comprehensive, detailed, and accurate view of polyadenylated RNAs. However, on samples of suboptimal quality ribosomal RNA depletion and exon capture methods have recently been reported as better alternatives. Methods: We compared for the first time three commercial Illumina library preparation kits (TruSeq Stranded mRNA, TruSeq Ribo-Zero rRNA Removal, and TruSeq RNA Access) as representatives of these three different approaches using well-established human reference RNA samples from the MAQC/SEQC consortium on a wide range of input amounts (from 100 ng down to 1 ng) and degradation levels (intact, degraded, and highly degraded). Results: We assessed the accuracy of the generated expression values by comparison to gold standard TaqMan qPCR measurements and gained unprecedented insight into the limits of applicability in terms of input quantity and sample quality of each protocol. We found that each protocol generates highly reproducible results (R² > 0.92) on intact RNA samples down to input amounts of 10 ng. For degraded RNA samples, Ribo-Zero showed clear performance advantages over the other two protocols as it generated more accurate and better reproducible gene expression results even at very low input amounts such as 1 ng and 2 ng. For highly degraded RNA samples, RNA Access performed best generating reliable data down to 5 ng input. Conclusions: We found that the ribosomal RNA depletion protocol from Illumina works very well at amounts far below recommendation and over a good range of intact and degraded material. We also infer that the exomecapture protocol (RNA Access, Illumina) performs better than other methods on highly degraded and low amount samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We propose a modified RNA-Seq method for small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA)-based microbial community analysis that depends on the direct ligation of a 5' adaptor to RNA before reverse-transcription. The method requires only a low-input quantity of RNA (10-100 ng) and does not require a DNA removal step. Using this method, we could obtain more 16S rRNA sequences of the same regions (variable regions V1-V2) without the interference of DNA in order to analyze OTU (operational taxonomic unit)-based microbial communities and diversity. The generated SSU rRNA sequences are also suitable for the coverage evaluation for bacterial universal primer 8F ( Escherichia coli position 8 to 27), which is commonly used for bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplification. The modified RNA-Seq method will be useful to determine potentially active microbial community structures and diversity for various environmental samples, and will also be useful for identifying novel microbial taxa., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.)