Search

Background: Biomechanical muscle properties, such as stiffness, can be valuable indicators of tissue health and show promise as a diagnostic and treatment measure for chronic low back pain (CLBP). The development of accessible assessment technologies, such as the MyotonPRO portable device, allows for the convenient quantification of muscle tone and stiffness changes. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability of lumbar erector spinae muscle stiffness with the MyotonPRO in healthy adults and to compare stiffness changes between prone and sitting position., Methods: Thirty asymptomatic participants ( N = 15 women and N = 15 men) aged between 18 and 65 years were recruited to participate in this study. Two examiners tested muscle stiffness at the palpable muscle belly, one finger away from the spinous process at the level of the L4 vertebra, first from the left and then from the right side, both in prone position and after in sitting position. For inter-rater reliability, all participants were tested by two examiners on the same day, and intra-rater reliability was calculated using the same examiner's assessment results with an exact 24-h interval. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error measures (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) with a 95% confidence interval were calculated to assess intra-rater and inter-rater reliability., Results: Statistical analysis revealed good intra-rater reliability with an ICC of 0.88 (95% CI [0.76-0.94]) for the stiffness of the left erector spinae and excellent intra-rater reliability with an ICC of 0.91 (95% CI [0.82-0.95]) for the right erector spinae, both in the prone position. Intra-rater reliability in the sitting position was excellent to very good with an ICC of 0.91 (95% CI [0.82-0.96]) for the left side and an ICC of 0.89 (95% CI [0.78-0.95]) for the right side. The results for the left-sided prone position showed good inter-rater reliability with an ICC of 0.87 (95% CI [0.73-0.94]). The prone position on the right side also showed good inter-rater reliability with an ICC of 0.84 (95% CI [0.68-0.92]). The inter-rater reliability for the left and right side in the sitting position was excellent with an ICC of 0.96 (95% CI [0.92-0.98]) for the left side and an ICC of 0.95 (95% CI [0.90-0.97]) for the right side., Conclusion: This study demonstrated high reliability in measuring lumbar erector spinae muscle stiffness with the MyotonPRO in healthy adults and the ability of the device to detect even small changes in erector spinae muscle stiffness, testing both the right and left sides and measuring in both prone and sitting positions. The use of the sitting position to assess lumbar tissue tension in individuals may serve as a valuable substitute for the prone position, particularly for patients who experience discomfort in the prone position, and could have additional practical significance in clinical settings., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© 2024 Valenti et al.)

Background: We currently lack clear definitions for structural and symptomatic spinal osteoarthritis (OA). To define spinal OA and create diagnostic criteria for this condition, it is necessary to determine the relationship between clinical signs and symptoms of back pain and radiographic features of OA. Notably, recent studies suggest a defining sign of spinal OA could be a limited or painful spinal range of motion (ROM). Therefore, our objective was to assess the association between restricted or painful active spinal ROM, and multilevel structural features of lumbar disc degeneration (LDD) (i.e., disc space narrowing, osteophytes) on radiographs., Methods: We used the baseline data from the'Back Complaints in Older Adults' (BACE) study. The association between a limited or painful active spinal ROM, and multilevel disc space narrowing or osteophytes was assessed using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, mean pain intensity in the previous week, sex, BMI, and the Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire score. Primary analyses were performed on imputed datasets., Results: We included 675 patients with a mean age of 66.52 years (SD 7.69). Limited latero-flexion (fingertip that at best reached halfway up the upper leg) was associated with increased odds of having multilevel osteophytes (OR 1.85; 95% CI: 1.13 to 3.01). However, a limited or painful ROM in other directions (i.e., rotation, ante-flexion) was not associated with multilevel osteophytes, and a limited or painful active ROM in any direction was found to have no association with multilevel disc space narrowing., Conclusions: Our study indicates that a restricted ROM in latero-flexion could potentially be a defining sign in future definitions of symptomatic spinal OA. However, since our results partially differ from previous studies, further research is needed to explore the association between active ROM and LDD., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate All participants provided their consent to participate in the study. The BACE study was approved by the Erasmus MC medical ethical committee (registration no.: NL24829.078.08) on March 23, 2009. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether improvements in forward bending were related to improvements in pain and disability in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who were undergoing Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT). DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-one participants with CLBP received CFT. Forward bending was assessed at each treatment session over 13 weeks (an average of 4.3 timepoints per participant [range, 1-8]). Spinal range of motion (ROM) and velocity were recorded using 2 inertial measurement units located at T12 and S2. Participants reported (1) average pain intensity (0-10 scale) (pain) and (2) pain-related activity limitation (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [disability]) via online questionnaires at 0, 3, 6, and 13 weeks. Multivariate multilevel models were used to evaluate associations between individual rates of change over time for 3 spinal movement measures (trunk velocity, trunk ROM, lumbar ROM) and pain/disability. RESULTS: Strong correlations were observed for increased trunk velocity with reduced pain ( r = -0.81; 95% CI: -0.98, -0.05) and with reduced disability ( r = -0.77; 95% CI: -0.95, -0.22). Moderate correlations were observed between increased trunk ROM with reduced pain ( r = - 0.37; 95% CI: -0.67, 0.04) and with reduced disability ( r = - 0.32; 95% CI: -0.6, 0.03). There was no evidence of association between changes in lumbar ROM and pain ( r = - 0.46; 95% CI: -0.90, 0.44) or disability ( r = - 0.01; 95% CI: -0.56, 0.55). CONCLUSION: Reductions in pain and disability were strongly correlated with increased trunk velocity in people with CLBP who were undergoing CFT. These findings are consistent with CFT that explicitly trains "nonprotective" spinal movement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(11):721-731. Epub 7 October 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12727 .

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common disorder worldwide, affecting young and old adults alike. Kinematic studies of lumbar-pelvic mobility allied with surface electromyogram (sEMG) can assist in the assessment and management of CLBP. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the evidence relating to the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the surface electromyogram in chronic low back pain patients during flexion-extension-relaxation tasks. Five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and CINAHL) were searched for eligible studies from inception to March 2024. The risk of bias assessment for the included studies was conducted using the QUADAS-2 tool. Studies included adults (≥18 years) with CLBP > 3 months, reported diagnostic accuracy or reliability measures for sEMG during flexion-extension-relaxation tasks. Eleven studies were included in our systematic review. The risk of bias was found to be high for patient selection, reference standard and flow and timing domains with low risk of bias for the index test domain in most of the included studies. For diagnostic accuracy, six studies reported values ranging between 56-99 % indicating poor to excellent accuracy levels. Four studies reported values between 76-100 % for sensitivity and 65-100 % for specificity indicating sufficient to excellent accuracy levels. Seven studies reported moderate to excellent reliability levels, ranging between 0.66-0.99. This systematic review found the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of sEMG in CLBP patients to range from poor to excellent levels. This systematic review adds knowledge for practitioners and clinicians regarding the use of sEMG during forward, flexion and relaxation tasks/movements., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Quantitative in vivo biomechanical assessments are typically performed with optoelectronic motion capture (MoCap) using retroreflective markers attached to skin. This technique inherently contains measurement errors from both marker placement on palpated bony landmarks and skin motion relative to the underlying bone (i.e., soft tissue artifact (STA)). Research on lumbar spine STA is scarce and limited to young, healthy participants in static positions. This study aimed to evaluate static placement errors, lumbar spine STA from MoCap marker clusters (MMC), and linear relationships between STA and patient characteristics. Thirty-nine participants with cLBP performed three trials each of flexion/extension and lateral bending while imaged simultaneously by MoCap (120 Hz) and dynamic biplane radiography DBR (20 Hz). MMCs were placed 29.5 ± 18.0 mm and 27.1 ± 13.4 mm superior to the most prominent aspect of the L1 and L5 spinous process, respectively. L1 relative to L5 STA was larger during flexion/extension (8.6 ± 5.7°) than lateral bending (4.5 ± 2.1°) (p < 0.001). After correcting for marker placement errors, components of the L1 and L5 STA averaged as much as 16.3 mm and 11.4° during flexion/extension, but only 4.0 mm and 4.8° or less during lateral bending. On average, STA for individual L1 and L5 vertebrae increased as participants moved away from the upright neutral position. STA was participant-dependent, however, age and BMI did not model STA well. Given the inaccuracy in marker placement and wide range of patterns of STA, caution is urged when making clinical decisions or when using computational models to estimate spine tissue loading based upon lumbar spine kinematics obtained from skin-mounted markers., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

In patients with low back pain (LBP), a visually identified retrospective pain trajectory often mismatches with a trajectory derived from prospective repeated measures. To gain insight into the clinical relevance of the 2 trajectory types, we investigated which showed a higher association with clinical outcomes. Participants were 724 adults seeking care for LBP in Danish chiropractic primary care. They answered weekly short-message-services on pain intensity and frequency over 52 weeks, which we translated into 8 trajectory classes. After 52 weeks, participants selected a retrospective visual pain trajectory from the same 8 trajectory classes. Clinical outcomes included disability, back/leg pain intensity, back beliefs, and work ability. The patient-selected pain trajectory classes were more strongly associated with clinical outcomes than the short-message-service trajectory classes at baseline, at follow-up, and with outcome changes between baseline and follow-up. This held across all 5 clinical outcomes, with the strongest associations observed at week 52 and the weakest at baseline. Patients' retrospective assessment of their LBP is more strongly associated with their clinical status than their prospective assessments translated into trajectory classes. This suggests that retrospective assessments of pain trajectories may provide valuable information not captured by prospective assessments. Researchers collecting prospective pain data should know that the captured pain trajectories are not strongly reflected in patients' perceptions of clinical status. Patients' retrospective assessments seem to offer an interpretation of their pain course that is likely more clinically relevant in understanding the perceived impact of their condition than trajectories based on repeated measures. PERSPECTIVE: Prospective pain data inadequately reflect patients' clinical status. Retrospective assessments provide a more clinically valuable understanding of the impact of their condition., (Copyright © 2024 United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: Competitive swimmers are at high risk of overuse musculoskeletal injuries due to their high training volumes. Spine injuries are the second most common musculoskeletal injury in swimmers and are often a result of the combination of improper technique, high loads on the spine in strokes that require hyperextension, and repetitive overuse leading to fatigue of the supporting trunk muscles. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current evidence regarding swimming biomechanics, stroke techniques, and common injuries in the lumbar spine to promote a discussion on the prevention and rehabilitation of lower back injuries in competitive swimmers., Evidence Acquisition: From a PUBMED/MEDLINE search, 16 articles were identified for inclusion using the search terms "swimming," "low back" or "lumbar," and "injury" or "injuries.", Study Design: Narrative review., Level of Evidence: Levels 4 and 5., Results: The trunk muscles are integral to swimming stroke biomechanics. In freestyle and backstroke, the body roll generated by the paraspinal and abdominal muscles is integral to efficient stroke mechanics by allowing synergistic movements of the upper and lower extremities. In butterfly and breaststroke, the undulating wave like motion of the dolphin kick requires dynamic engagement of the core to generate repetitive flexion and extension of the spine and is a common mechanism for hyperextension injuries. The most common lower back injuries in swimming were determined to be lumbar strain, spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis, facet joint pain, and disc disease. Most overuse swimming injuries can be treated conservatively with physical therapy and training adjustments., Conclusion: Managing swimmers with low back pain requires a basic knowledge of swimming technique and a focus on prevention-based care. Since most swimming injuries are secondary to overuse, it is important for providers to understand the mechanisms underlying the swimming injury, including an understanding of the biomechanics involved in swimming and the role of spine involvement in the 4 strokes that assist in stabilization and force generation in the water. Knowledge of the biomechanics involved in swimming and the significant demands placed on the spinal musculoskeletal system will aid the clinician in the diagnosis and management of injuries and assist in the development of a proper rehabilitation program aimed at correction of any abnormal swimming mechanics, treatment of pain, and future injury prevention., Strength of Recommendations: B. Recommendation based on limited quality or inconsistent patient-oriented evidence., Competing Interests: The authors report no potential conflicts of interest in the development and publication of this article.

Background Context: The Oswestry disability index (ODI) is widely utilized as a patient reported outcome (PRO) tool to assess patients presenting with low back pain (LBP) and following thoracolumbar spine surgery. No primary study has calculated the baseline range of ODI values in the diverse American population. Establishing age-adjusted normative values for ODI in the American population is crucial for assessing the utility of treatment strategies., Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the baseline range of functional low back disability as measured by the ODI in an American population., Study Design/setting: Cross-sectional observational study., Patient Sample: A total of 1214 participants were recruited from the United States in January 2024 using a combination of the Connect and PrimePanel platforms by CloudResearch to complete a survey administered on a RedCap online database. The survey consisted of 10 demographic questions and the 10 ODI survey questions. The distribution of the survey was designed to obtain approximately 100 respondents in each of the following age groups: 18-29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, 70 to 79, and 80 to 89. The distribution of the sample was similarly designed to match the United States Census racial data with 78.1% White, 13.9% Black, and 7.9% other., Outcome Measures: Oswestry disability index (ODI)., Methods: A crowd-sourcing platform called Cloudresearch was used to collect a representative sample of the US population by answering questions of the Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ), a 10-question survey., Results: The final sample size was 797 participants including 386 (48.4%) males and 411 (51.6%) females; 169 participants were excluded that did not complete the survey and an additional 248 were excluded for failing attention check questions. The overall mean ODI score for the combined age groups was 14.35 (95% CI [13.33, 15.37]). The mean ODI scores increased with age, with the highest mean ODI in ages 70 to 79 at 18.0 (95% CI [14.76, 21.24]). Female participants reported higher mean ODI scores than their male counterparts in the 18 to 29 age group (p=.01), 50 to 59 age group (p=.01), and 60 to 69 age group (p=.02). Additionally, a weak positive correlation was found between Body Mass Index (BMI) and ODI scores (r = 0.22, p<.001)., Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate a clear trend of increased disability with age. This study describes the baseline range of functional low back pain disability in the United States population. By defining these parameters, healthcare professionals can better tailor age and sex-specific interventions to manage disability in the aging US population, ultimately improving patient care and both operative and nonoperative treatment plans for LBP-related thoracolumbar pathology., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest One or more of the authors declare financial or professional relationships on ICMJE-TSJ disclosure forms., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To investigate the neural mechanism underlying functional reorganization and motor coordination strategies in patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP)., Design: A case-control study based on data collected during routine clinical practice., Setting: This study was conducted at a university hospital., Participants: Fifteen patients with cLBP and 15 healthy controls., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: Whole brain blood oxygen level-dependent signals were measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) method to identify pain-induced changes in regional spontaneous brain activity. A novel approach based on the surface electromyogram (EMG) system and fine-wire electrodes was used to record EMG signals in the deep multifidus, superficial multifidus, and erector spinae., Results: In cLBP, compared with healthy groups, ALFF was higher in the medial prefrontal, primary somatosensory, primary motor, and inferior temporal cortices, whereas it was lower in the cerebellum and anterior cingulate and posterior cingulate cortices. Furthermore, the decrease in the average EMG activity of the 3 lumbar muscles in the cLBP group was positively correlated with the ALFF values of the primary somatosensory cortex, motor cortex, precuneus, and middle temporal cortex but significantly negatively correlated with the ALFF values of the medial prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices. Interestingly, the correlation between the functional activity in the cerebellum and the EMG activity varied in the lumbar muscles., Conclusions: These findings suggest a functional association between changes in spontaneous brain activity and altered voluntary neuromuscular activation patterns of the lumbar paraspinal muscles, providing new insights into the mechanisms underlying pain chronicity as well as important implications for developing novel therapeutic targets of cLBP., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Administration of spinal cord stimulation to individuals with PSPS-T1/2 may induce supraspinal descending activation. Similarly, exercise is recognized as a fundamental aspect of spinal pain management. Studies have demonstrated its impact on neurophysiological factors, including the release of spinal and supraspinal beta-endorphins, which activate μ-opioid receptors. Therefore, the purpose of this study will be to examine the effect of SCS in combination with lumbo-pelvic stability core training on perceived low back pain, quality of life and disability in PSPS-T2 patients., Methods/materials: A double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) has been designed. All participants will be randomized from a pre-set sequence. The intervention design has been elaborated from the CONSORT guidelines. This study has been registered at Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT06272539). Sample size was calculated using G Power® Sample size software (University of Düsseldorf). The calculation was based on a moderate effect size of 0.7 (partial η2 = 0.70, α = .05, power = 0.95), resulting in a total of 40 patients. Assuming a 30% dropout rate, 52 participants will be recruited in total. Two sessions per week will be scheduled for 8 weeks with a total of 16 sessions. Each work session will have a duration of 60 minutes. The exercise will be adapted according to the phases based on the results already published, limiting in each phase the degrees of flexion and extension of the spine to avoid the risk of electrode migration. Primary outcomes will be functionality, satisfaction, strength, psychosocial variables, quality of life and pain perception., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Vicente-Mampel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background and Objective: Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is a prevalent condition causing significant disability and functional impairment. Whole-body vibration exercise (WBVE) has emerged as a new treatment method, but additional research is necessary to determine the optimal parameters of WBVE that would be beneficial for patients experiencing chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study aims to investigate the effects of two type of WBVE (constant vs progressive) on pain, disability, functional performance, and muscle activity in patients with NSCLBP., Methods: Thirty-two individuals diagnosed with chronic low back pain (CLBP) without any specific causes were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups: a constant/fixed protocol WBVE group or a progressive protocol WBVE group. Participants underwent WBVE sessions for around 30 min, thrice weekly over a period of 8 weeks. Primary outcomes assessed included pain intensity, functional disability, functional performance, and electromyographic activity of core musculature, measured at baseline and upon completion of the intervention period. Temporal changes of each outcome variable across different periods and between groups were measured with repeated measures 2×2 mixed ANOVA. Further, the paired t -test was performed to compare pre- and post-treatment values within each group., Results: Significant improvements were observed in both the constant and progressive WBVE protocol groups. Pain intensity decreased by 64.2% ( p  < 0.001) in the constant group and by 61.1% ( p  < 0.001) in the progressive group. Functional disability decreased by 48.1% ( p  < 0.001) in the constant group and by 53.3% ( p  < 0.001) in the progressive group. Functional performance improved by 16.5% ( p  < 0.001) in the constant group and by 16.9% ( p  < 0.001) in the progressive group. Electromyography (EMG) demonstrated significant improvements across all measured variables except % maximum voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC) of external obliques (EO) in both intervention groups with time ( p  < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the magnitude of improvement between the constant and progressive WBVE protocols ( p  > 0.05), indicating both modalities' effectiveness in ameliorating CLBP symptoms and associated functional impairments., Conclusion: The study demonstrates that both progressive and constant WBVE protocols are equally effective in reducing pain and disability in NSCLBP patients. These findings support the inclusion of progressive WBVE in clinical practice, offering a flexible treatment option that can be tailored to individual patient needs, ensuring both tolerability and effectiveness. This contributes valuable evidence towards optimizing WBVE protocols for managing NSCLBP., Competing Interests: The authors declare there are no competing interests., (©Zafar 2024 et al.)

Objective: People commonly cope with chronic low back pain (cLBP) by ignoring and distraction. Can mindful interoceptive exposure to the pain sensation itself and its phenomenological components be an alternative approach?, Methods: Single-arm feasibility study in patients with cLBP using a 2-minute attention exercise guided by a smartphone app several times per day over 8 weeks. We assessed feasibility, pre/post pain, function, and psychological parameters using mixed methods: standard questionnaires, ecological momentary assessment, and exit interviews that included micro-phenomenology technique and subsequent reflexive thematic qualitative analysis., Results: We enrolled 31 participants, mostly female, mean age 48, the majority had pain for >5 years; 29 completed. Mean pain intensity [0-10] improved from 4.8 ±1.7 to 3.1 ±1.9 (p < .0001); mean PEG scores (intensity and interference with daily life; range 0-30) improved from 13.7 ±6.2 to 8.4 ±6.6 (p < .0001); pain impact (9 items incl physical function) 22.3 ±8.7 to 19.7 ±8.1 (p = .0010). Twenty-one of 29 improved PEG score ≥30%. There were significant improvements in PCS Rumination and MAIA Not-Worrying. Participants became aware of their usual habit of avoidance and the challenge of and resistance to focusing on pain. They were surprised how pain sensations varied over time, and that pain intensity and the threat value of pain could diminish by focusing on it. They described a variety of 3D pain shapes (e.g., football, pool ball, rod, nail, brick, stars) with a range of colors, transparency, temperature, and density that for some changed with mindful attention. Most struggled to find appropriate words for sensory awareness and attention regulation and found that the threat value of their pain diminished., Conclusions: Mindful interoceptive exposure to the sensations of their cLBP using a 2-minute attention exercise with a phone app-rather than ignoring and distracting from it-may be a beneficial intervention for cLBP., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT06186193., Competing Interests: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute Of Arthritis And Musculoskeletal And Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U19AR076737. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) Research Program is administered by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)., (Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.)

Objective: Altered Postural control could increase the risk of falling in older adults. Factors such as low back pain and fear of falling can be contributing factors to postural control instability. This study aimed to investigate the effect of chronic low back pain (CLBP) and fear of falling (FOF) on postural control of older adults., Method: Forty-one older adults were included (27 LBP and 14 control). Among the participants, 22 people had high FOF, and 19 had low FOF based on Falls efficacy scale cut-off of ≥ 26. For postural control evaluation Center of pressure parameters (COP) of Standard deviation (Sd) of velocity, Sd of amplitude, path length and mean velocity in both Medial-lateral (ML) and Anterior-Posterior (AP) directions were measured. Mixed-model anova with two between group factor (Health status; with and without CLBP, and with high and low FES-I groups) and one within factor postural condition (four conditions with and without vision and Achill tendon vibration) was used., Result: No significant interaction between groups (health status and FES-I) and group with condition (health status and condition or FES-I and condition) was observed for all COP parameters in both AP and ML direction. There was main effect of FES-I for all COP parameters in ML direction, with greater Sd of velocity, Sd of amplitude, path length and mean velocity in older adults with high FES-I compared to low FES-I in the ML direction., Conclusion: High levels of FOF influenced static postural control in the ML direction. Therefore, paying attention to the lateral stability of older adults is of great importance., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Low back pain affects 619 million people worldwide and is commonly provoked by sitting. Current assessment methods constrain task variability, removing real-world, task-switching behaviors. This study utilized accelerometers to provide an original validated method of in vivo real-world assessment of lumbar sitting behavior throughout a full day. A three-stage study design was used, which involved (1) blinded verification of our sitting detection algorithm, (2) full-day data collection from participants with low back discomfort, quantifying lumbar angles, and end-user acceptability explored, (3) case study application to two clinical low back pain (LBP) patients, incorporating measurement of provocative sitting. Focus group discussions demonstrated that data collection methods were acceptable. Sitting 'windows' were created and analyzed using novel histograms, amplitude probability distribution functions, and variability, demonstrating that sitting behavior was unique and varied across individuals. One LBP patient demonstrated two frequent lumbar postures (<15% flexion and ~75% flexion), with pain provocation at 62% lumbar flexion. The second patient demonstrated a single dominant posture (~90% flexion), with pain provoked at 86% lumbar flexion. Our in vivo approach offers an acceptable method to gain new insights into provocative sitting behavior in individuals with LBP, allowing individualized unconstrained data for full-day postures and pain provocation behaviors to be quantified, which are otherwise unattainable.

Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder and is often accompanied by functional leg length inequality (FLLI). However, little was known about the effects of gluteal muscle control training in patients with LBP and FLLI. This study was designed to investigate the effects of gluteal control training in patients with LBP and FLLI. This is a double-blinded, randomized controlled study design. Forty-eight LBP patients with FLLI were randomized to the gluteal control training (GT) (47.58 ± 9.42 years) or the regular training (RT) (47.38 ± 11.31 years) group and received allocated training for six weeks. The outcome measures were pelvic inclination (PI), ilium anterior tilt difference (IATD), FLLI, visual analogue scale (VAS), patient specific-functional scale (PSFS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), hip control ability, global rating of change scale (GRoC), and lower extremity strength and flexibility. The intervention effects were compared using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance and chi-square tests with α = 0.05. The results indicated that the GT group showed greater improvement (P < 0.01) in PI (1.03 ± 0.38∘ vs. 1.57 ± 0.51∘), IATD (0.68 ± 0.66∘ vs. 2.31 ± 0.66∘), FLLI (0.3 ± 0.22 vs. 0.59 ± 0.13 cm), VAS (1.41 ± 1.32 vs. 3.38 ± 1.51), hip control ability (2.20 ± 0.45 vs. 0.89 ± 0.74), GRoC at 3rd and 6th week as compared to the RT group. Hip strength and flexibility also improved more in the GT group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, gluteal control training was more effective in improving low back pain and dysfunctions, and should be integrated in the management plan in patients with LBP and FLLI., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) is characterized by the reduction of paraspinal muscle activity at maximum trunk flexion. FRP is reported to be altered (persistence of spinal muscle activity) in more than half of nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) patients. Little is known about how the multi-segmental spine affects FRP. The aim of this observational study was to investigate the relationship between FRP and kinematic parameters of the multi-segmental spine in NSCLBP patients. Forty NSCLBP patients and thirty-five asymptomatic participants performed a standing maximal trunk flexion task. Surface electromyography was recorded along the erector spinae longissimus. The kinematics of the spine were assessed using a 3D motion analysis system. The investigated spinal segments were upper thoracic, lower thoracic, thoracolumbar, upper lumbar, lower lumbar, and lumbopelvic. Upper lumbar ROM, anterior sagittal inclination of the upper lumbar relative to the lower lumbar in the upright position, and ROM of the upper lumbar relative to the lower lumbar during full trunk flexion were significantly correlated with the flexion relaxation ratio (Rho 0.42 to 0.58, p < 0.006). The relative position and movement of the upper lumbar segment seem to play an important role in the presence or absence of FRP in NSCLBP patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Low back pain (LBP) is a global issue involving biological, psychological, and social factors. Pain-related fear has been shown to influence movement behavior, however, its association with some measures of movement behavior, such as spinal movement variability, remains inconclusive. To further investigate this, spinal kinematics during various activities of daily living (i.e., walking, running, lifting, and stair climbing) of 49 patients with chronic LBP and a group of 51 sex-, age-, and BMI-matched healthy controls were used to calculate lumbar spine movement variability which was quantified using different indices (i.e., coefficient of variation, coupling angle variability in vector coding, deviation phase of the continuous relative phase and an angle-angular velocity variability). General and task-specific pain-related fear was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and the Photograph Series of Daily Activities-Short Electronic Version, respectively. Linear regression analyses showed no significant association between movement variability and pain-related fear, however, the sample consisted of younger individuals with moderate disability and with low levels of pain and pain-related fear. In addition, the different variability indices were weakly correlated and varied greatly depending on the method used and the task performed. Therefore, comparisons between studies with different movement variability calculation methods or different activities should be treated with caution., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Lower back pain (LBP) is a disability that affects a large proportion of the population and treatment for this condition has been shifting towards a more individualized, patient-centered approach. There has been a recent uptake in the utilization and implementation of wearable sensors that can administer biofeedback in various industrial, clinical, and performance-based settings. Despite this, there is a strong need to investigate how wearable sensors can be used in a sensorimotor (re)training approach, including how sensory biofeedback from wearable sensors can be used to improve measures of spinal motor control and proprioception., Research Question: The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the wide range of wearable sensor-mediated biofeedback frameworks currently being utilized to enhance spine posture and motor function., Methods: A comprehensive scoping review was conducted in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guidelines extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) across the following databases: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and IEEEXplore. Articles related to wearable biofeedback and spine movement were reviewed dated from 1980 - 2020. Extracted data was collected as per a predetermined checklist including the type, timing, trigger, location, and magnitude of sensory feedback being applied to the body., Results: A total of 23 articles were reviewed and analysed. The most used wearable sensor to inform biofeedback were inertial measurement units (IMUs). Haptic (vibrotactile) feedback was the most common sensory stimulus. Most studies used an instantaneous online trigger to initiate sensory feedback derived from information pertaining to gross lumbar angles or the absolute orientations of the thorax or pelvis., Conclusions: This is the first study to review wearable sensor-derived sensory biofeedback to modulate spine motor control. Although the type of wearable sensor and feedback were common, this study highlights the lack of consensus regarding the timing and structure of sensory feedback, suggesting the need to optimize any sensory feedback to a specific use case. The findings from this study help to improve the understanding surrounding the ecological utility of wearable sensor-mediated biofeedback in industrial, clinical, and performance settings to enhance the sensorimotor control of the lumbar spine., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) predominantly affects women aged 40-80 years. Physical exercise is a primary treatment form, with functional training (FT) and dual-task training (DT) emerging as potential modalities due to their distinct characteristics. However, limited information exists regarding the effects of these exercise modalities on CLBP., Objective: To compare the FT and DT effects on trunk function and functional fitness in CLBP older women., Methodology: This was a randomized clinical trial with two training groups (FT and DT) and CLBP and non-CLBP individuals. We assessed the trunk stability, maximum isometric strength, endurance of trunk muscles, and functional fitness before and after 16 weeks of training RESULTS: We found only time effects for circular stability and instability (p <.001), flexors (p =.006), and extensors endurance (p <.001). For the lateral flexors, there was an average reduction of 17.3 units in lateral flexor endurance in the FT compared to the DT in CLBP individuals. For the strength of the flexor, CLBP individuals exhibited an increase of 69.3 units compared to non-CLBP. For the strength of extensors, CLBP individuals showed a decrease of 75.1 units compared to non-CLBP individuals. We identified a time effect for all functional fitness measures (p <.050) CONCLUSION: FT and DT increase trunk stability, maximum isometric strength, and endurance of trunk muscles, besides the functional fitness of CLBP older women SIGNIFICANCE: Professionals can choose either training type, as there are no differences in the initial 16 weeks of intervention., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: People with low back pain (LBP) exhibit altered coordination, possibly indicating guarded movement. The connection between these changes and pain-related threat remains unclear. We aimed to determine if pain-related threat was related to spinal coordination and variability, during a lifting task, in people with chronic LBP., Methods: Participants were adults with chronic LBP (n = 47). Upper lumbar, lower lumbar, and hipkinematics were measured during 10crate lifting/lowering repetitions. Coordination and variability of the Hip-Lower Lumbar, and Lower Lumbar-Upper Lumbar joint pairs were calculated. Pain-related threat was measured using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and task-specific fear. Linear regression analyses tested the relationship between pain-related threat and coordination., Results: Adding catastrophizing to our base model (sex) explained variance in Hip-Lower lumbar coordination (r 2 change = 0.125, p = 0.013). General and task specific measures of fear were unrelated to coordination and variability at both joint pairs (r 2 change < 0.064, p > 0.05). Exploratory t-tests revealed subgroups aligned with phenotypes of "tight" and "loose" control, where "tight" control was characterized by greater catastrophizing and disability., Conclusion: Pain catastrophizing, but not measures of fear, was related to more in-phase ("tight") Hip-Lower Lumbar coordination during lifting/lowering. Considering this relationship based on subgroups may add clarity., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to compare the pain intensity, spine structure, and body composition according to functional disability levels in patients with acute discogenic lumbar radiculopathy (DLR)., Methods: A total of 118 women (n = 83) and men (n = 35) patients with acute DLR (mean age: 51.87 ± 13.38 years) were included in the study. The function ability was measured with the Oswestry Disability Index, pain intensity was measured with the Visual Analogue Scale, spine structure was measured with the Spinal Mouse® device, and body composition was measured with the Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis System., Results: Patients with mild functional disability levels had significantly lower activity (p˂.001) and night pain intensity (p = 0.001) than patients with moderate, severe, and completely functional disability levels, and patients with completely functional disability levels had significantly higher rest pain intensity (p = 0.005) than patients with mild, moderate, and severe functional disability levels. Patients with mild functional disability levels had significantly better spine check scores (p = 0.001), posture (p = 0.005), and mobility (p = 0.003) than patients with moderate, severe, and completely functional disability levels. Patients with mild functional disability levels had significantly lower fat percentage (p = 0.032), and higher basal metabolic rate (p = 0.024) than patients with moderate, severe, and completely functional disability levels., Conclusion: Pain intensity, spinal structure, and body composition of acute DLR patients differ greatly according to their functional disability levels. Although it is known that the level of functional disability of patients is a result of the severity or prognosis of the disease, performing different treatment methods aimed at decreasing the functional disability level of patients by health professionals may be important in terms of coping with the disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no potential conflict of interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Despite the widespread research about the effects of attentional focus on balance control in different populations, to the best of our knowledge, no study has yet investigated the effects of attentional focus instructions on balance control in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Therefore, this study was aimed to compare the effects of internal focus (IF) and external focus (EF) of attention on quiet standing balance control between individuals with CLBP and healthy controls. Twenty individuals with CLBP and 20 healthy controls were enrolled in this quasi-experimental study. The participants were asked to stand still with eyes open and eyes closed while performing three tasks: baseline standing with no focus instructions, internally focusing on their feet, and externally focusing on two markers were placed on the force platform. Statistical analyses showed a significant main effect of group for mean total velocity (p = 0.02), area (p = 0.01), and displacement in mediolateral (ML) direction (p = 0.003). Moreover, a significant main effect of vision was observed for mean total velocity (p < 0.001), area (p < 0.001), and displacement in anteroposterior (AP) (p < 0.001) and ML directions (p < 0.001). Also, the results revealed a significant main effect of attentional focus for mean total velocity (p < 0.001), area (p < 0.001), and displacement in AP (p < 0.001) and ML directions (p = 0.01). Our results showed that in both healthy controls and individuals with CLBP, EF led to improve quiet standing balance control compared to IF and control conditions. From a clinical perspective, it may be useful for physical therapists to consider the use of instruction cues that direct performer's attention away from the body for improving quiet standing balance control in individuals with CLBP., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None declared., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability, which is exacerbated in some by repeated lifting. Electromyography (EMG) assessments of isolated erector spinae (ES) regions during lifting identified conflicting results. Here, high-density EMG comprehensively assesses the lumbar and thoracolumbar ES activity in people with and without LBP performing a multiplanar lifting task., Methods: Four high-density EMG grids (two bilaterally) and reflective markers were affixed over the ES and trunk to record muscle activity and trunk kinematics respectively. The task involved cyclical lifting of a 5 kg box for ∼7 min from a central shelf to five peripheral shelves, returning to the first between movements, while monitoring perceived exertion., Results: Fourteen LBP (26.9 ± 11.1 years) and 15 control participants (32.1 ± 14.6 years) completed the study. LBP participants used a strategy characterised by less diffuse and more cranially-focussed ES activity (P < 0.05). LBP participants also exhibited less variation in ES activity distribution between sides during movements distal to the central shelf (P < 0.05). There were few consistent differences in kinematics, but LBP participants reported greater exertion (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: In the presence of mild LBP, participants used a less variable motor strategy, with less diffuse and more cranially-focussed ES activity; this motor strategy occurred concomitantly with increased exertion while completing this dynamic task., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish the interrater reliability of measures obtained with a novel Modified Prone Instability Test (mPIT), which, like the original Prone Instability Test (PIT), is proposed to identify lumbar segmental instability. The mPIT has clinical feasibility advantages to the PIT, but its psychometric properties are yet to be determined., Design: Repeated measures (test-retest) design, methods study., Methods: The mPIT was administered by two blinded testers, an orthopedic physical therapy resident with < 1 year experience and board-certified orthopedic specialist physical therapist with >25 years' experience. Procedures were administered at an outpatient physical therapy clinic of a tertiary Medical Center. Participants included 50 adults (≥18 years old) with mechanical low back pain and no radicular (below the knee) symptoms (mean age 50.7 years, 66% female, 76% reported previous episodes of low back pain). Interrater reliability was measured via Fleiss' kappa coefficient., Results: Assessments of the mPIT had moderate interrater agreement (κ = .579 [95% CI = .302 to .856], p  < .001.)., Conclusion: Measures obtained using the mPIT demonstrated moderate interrater reliability between a new graduate and an experienced clinician, which aligns with several studies examining interrater reliability of the original PIT. Further study examining comparative validation of the mPIT with other lumbar instability measures is warranted.

Background: Motor control exercise is commonly applied in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP), but possibly not all people with CLBP have motor control impairments. We suggest movement precision as measure to identify motor control impairments. Movement precision has been operationalized as trunk movement variability (TMV) and as trunk tracking error(s) (TTE)., Objectives: To compare the known-group validity and the responsiveness of TMV and TTE., Design: We used a case-control comparison (Healthy controls (n = 30) vs CLBP (n = 60)) to assess the known-group validity. A cohort study, (measurements in week 3 and week 12 of treatment), was used to assess responsiveness., Methods: TMV (temporal (CyclSD) and spatial (MeanSD)) was analyzed during standing, repetitive flexion and rotation tasks (35x). TTE was measured during movement target tracking tasks, again in flexion and rotation. Participants with CLBP followed a multidisciplinary intervention and both measures were assessed in week 3 and week 12 of treatment. 2-way MANOVA and 2-way ANOVA were used to assess the effect of Group (CLBP vs healthy controls) and direction (flexion vs rotation) on TMV and TTE. For responsiveness, 2-way MANOVA and 2-way ANOVA were used to assess the effect of treatment and direction on both measures., Findings: At baseline, TMV was not different between groups, while TTE was higher in the people with CLBP (p = 0.005, n p 2  = 0.09). Treatment strongly decreased temporal TMV (p = 0.025, n p 2  = 0.33) and TTE (p < 0.001, n p 2  = 0.844)., Conclusions: These results demonstrate that TTE is more sensitive to CLBP and more responsive to treatment than TMV., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic pain involves communication between neural and immune systems. Recent data suggest localization of glial (brain immune cells) activation to the sensorimotor regions of the brain cortex (S1/M1) in chronic low back pain (LBP). As glia perform diverse functions that impact neural function, activation might contribute to sensorimotor changes, particularly in LBP maintained by increased nervous system sensitivity (i.e., nociplastic pain). This preliminary proof-of-concept study aimed to: (i) compare evidence of neuroinflammatory activation in S1/M1 between individuals with and without LBP (and between nociceptive and nociplastic LBP phenotypes), and (ii) evaluate relationships between neuroinflammatory activation and sensorimotor function., Methods: Simultaneous PET-fMRI measured neuroinflammatory activation in functionally defined S1/M1 in pain-free individuals (n = 8) and individuals with chronic LBP (n = 9; nociceptive: n = 4, nociplastic: n = 5). Regions of S1/M1 related to the back were identified using fMRI during motor tasks and thermal stimuli. Sensorimotor measures included single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and quantitative sensory testing (QST). Sleep, depression, disability and pain questionnaires were administered., Results: Neuroinflammatory activation was greater in the lower back cortical representation of S1/M1 of the nociplastic LBP group than both nociceptive LBP and pain-free groups. Neuroinflammatory activation in S1/M1 was positively correlated with sensitivity to hot (r = 0.52) and cold (r = 0.55) pain stimuli, poor sleep, depression, disability and BMI, and negatively correlated with intracortical facilitation (r = -0.41)., Conclusion: This preliminary proof-of-concept study suggests that neuroinflammation in back regions of S1/M1 in individuals with nociplastic LBP could plausibly explain some characteristic features of this LBP phenotype., Significance Statement: Neuroinflammatory activation localized to sensorimotor areas of the brain in individuals with nociplastic pain might contribute to changes in sensory and motor function and aspects of central sensitization. If cause-effect relationships are established in longitudinal studies, this may direct development of therapies that target neuroinflammatory activation., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC ®.)

Purpose: Patients frequently complain of low back pain and sacroiliac joint pain (SIP) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesized that patients with SIP would display different pelvic incidence (PI) values between standing and relaxed sitting positions, indicative of increased motion in the sacroiliac joints., Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 94 patients who underwent unilateral THA and experienced SIP were compared with 94 control patients without SIP. SIP was confirmed through clinical tests and investigated using biplanar imaging in both standing and sitting positions. The key parameters analyzed included PI, sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and limb length discrepancy (LLD)., Results: Patients without SIP showed a mean difference in PI of -1.5° (-8°-5°) between standing-to-sitting positions, whereas those with SIP showed a difference of -3.3° (-12°-0°)(P < 0.0001), indicating more motion in the sacroiliac joint during daily activities in the latter group. Patients with SIP showed smaller change in LL between standing-to-sitting positions (mean:6.3°; range:-8°-27°) compared with those without SIP (mean:9.5°; range:-12°-28°)(P = 0.006). No significant differences were noted in functional leg length between patients with (mean:7 mm; range:0-12 mm) and without SIP (mean:7 mm; range:0-11 mm)(P = 0.973)., Conclusions: This study revealed significant sacroiliac joint motion in patients with SIP post-THA, as indicated by PI changes, increased posterior pelvic tilt, and reduced change in the LL. Contrary to common belief, SIP did not correlate with LLD., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.)

Low back pain (LBP) is a highly prevalent disease. Among the various causes of LBP, one of the most frequent is myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) which affects the spinal stabilizer muscles. The aims of this study were to compare the differences in muscular electrical activity and biomechanical properties between the painful and non-painful sides in patients with unilateral MPS and to verify the feasibility of surface electromyography (sEMG) and MyotonPRO for assisting in MPS assessment. Forty patients with unilateral lumbar MPS were recruited via the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Center of West China Hospital Sichuan University from October 2022 to October 2023. The electrical properties of the bilateral erector spinae muscles were characterized by sEMG signals during a trunk extension task. The following four time-domain features of sEMG were extracted: root mean square (RMS), mean absolute value (MAV), integrated EMG (iEMG), and waveform length (WL). And two frequency domain features were extracted: the median frequency (MDF) and mean power frequency (MPF). The mechanical properties of the muscles were assessed by MyotonPRO at rest. The following biomechanical parameters were acquired: oscillation frequency [Hz], dynamic stiffness [N/m], logarithmic decrement, relaxation time [ms], and Creep. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain severity, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to evaluate the severity of disability and disruption to lifestyle activities caused by LBP pain. The outcome measures were obtained prior to the Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment and repeated two weeks after treatment. (1) Prior to the PRP treatment, all sEMG time-domain features on the painful side were significantly higher than those on the non-painful side (RMS, p < 0.001; MAV, p < 0.001; iEMG, p < 0.001; WL, p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the sEMG frequency-domain features (MPF, p = 0.478; MDF, p = 0.758). On the mechanical side, there were significant differences in oscillation frequency (p = 0.041) and logarithmic decrement (p = 0.022) between the painful side and non-painful side, but no significant differences in dynamic stiffness, relaxation time, and creep (both p > 0.05). (2) Two weeks after the PRP treatment, statistically significant decreases were observed in both post-treatment VAS (p < 0.001) and ODI scales (p < 0.001), indicating the PRP treatment clinically significantly reduced the level of. MPS. This change coincided with all sEMG time-domain features, in which the values at the painful side decreased significantly (RMS, p = 0.001; MAV, p = 0.001; iEMG, p = 0.001; WL, p = 0.001). However, no significant difference in the sEMG frequency-domain features (MPF, p = 0.620; MDF, p = 0.850) was found. On the mechanical side, only logarithmic decrement on the painful side increased significantly (p < 0.001). Our combined MyotonPRO and sEMG results indicated that MPS likely leads to increased muscle tone and decreased muscle elasticity, manifested by abnormal time-domain features of sEMG and biomechanical properties. The changes in these objective measurements were agreed with the changes in subjective outcome measures of pain and function currently assessed in the patients with MPS. A single PRP treatment may alleviate muscle dysfunction caused by MPS. These preliminary results demonstrated the potential feasibility of using sEMG and MyotonPRO as tools for assessing the neuromuscular function of MPS., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Studies reported the existence of instability catch (IC) during trunk flexion in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, different movement speeds can cause different neuromuscular demands resulting in altered kinematic patterns. In addition, kinematic characterization corresponding to clinical observation of IC is still limited. Therefore, this study aimed to determine (1) the association between movement speed and kinematic parameters representing IC during trunk flexion and (2) the differences in kinematic parameters between individuals with and without CLBP. Fifteen no low back pain (NoLBP) and 15 CLBP individuals were recruited. Inertial measurement units (IMU) were attached to T3, L1, and S2 spinous processes. Participants performed active trunk flexion while IMU data were simultaneously collected. Total trunk, lumbar, and pelvic mean angular velocity (T&#95;MV, L&#95;MV, and P&#95;MV), as well as number of zero-crossings, peak-to-peak, and area of sudden deceleration and acceleration (Num, P2P, and Area), were derived. Pearson's correlation tests were used to determine the association between T&#95;MV and L&#95;MV, P&#95;MV, Num, P2P, and Area. An ANCOVA was performed to determine the difference in kinematic parameters between groups using movement speed as a covariate. Significant associations (P < 0.05) were found between movement speed and other kinematic parameters, except for Area. Results showed that L&#95;MV significantly differed from the P&#95;MV (P = 0.002) in the CLBP group, while a significant between-group difference (P = 0.037) was found in the P&#95;MV. Additionally, significant between-group differences (P < 0.05) in P2P and Area were observed. The associations between movement speed and kinematic parameters suggest that movement speed changes can alter kinematic patterns. Therefore, clinicians may challenge lumbopelvic neuromuscular control by modifying movement speed to elicit greater change in kinematic patterns. In addition, the NoLBP group used shared lumbar and pelvic contributions, while the CLBP group used less pelvic contribution. Finally, P2P and Area appeared to offer the greatest sensitivity to differentiate between the groups. Overall, these findings may enhance the understanding of the mechanism underlying IC in CLBP., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Chronic low back pain represents a leading cause of global disability, but can often be complex in etiology, with multiple pain generators contributing to patient discomfort. Anterior column low back pain involves the vertebral bodies and discs, with the vertebral body endplates now known to be a significant pain generator. Vertebrogenic low back pain secondary to irritation of the basivertebral nerve presents as axial discomfort, worse with forward flexion, and with concomitant Type I or II Modic changes on MRI. Minimally invasive basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation has emerged as an effective intervention for managing anterior column back pain. In this article, the authors present a comprehensive approach to identifying and treating vertebrogenic low back pain through image guided basivertebral nerve ablation. We outline the patient presentation and diagnostic workup, followed by a detailed procedural guide including equipment requirements, technique execution, and potential technical challenges and complications., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest John Smirniotopoulos, M.D. has been a consultant for Relievant, Boston Scientific, Avanos, and Zimvie., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is the largest diarthrodial joint in the human body and accounts for approximately 20% of all low back pain, which is commonly seen in patients with lumbosacral fusions. Despite this, SIJ dysfunction often poses a challenging diagnosis depending on clinical evaluation, imaging, and image-guided joint injection. SIJ fusion is an effective and safe method of treatment, with minimally invasive approaches fitting well within the armamentarium of interventional radiologists treating chronic pain and other musculoskeletal conditions. Contemporary technical approaches and clinical considerations are discussed., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Evidence shows that lack of physical activity and sedentary time are associated with higher prevalence of low back pain (LBP)., Objective: To investigate the association between replacing sedentary time and light physical activity with a higher physical activity level with the prevalence of LBP., Methods: Two hundred and sixty-six individuals from a city in southeastern Brazil were recruited to this cross-sectional study. Sedentary behavior and physical activity level were evaluated using an ActiGraph GT3X tri-axial accelerometer during 7 days. The prevalence of LBP was assessed using the Nordic questionnaire. Isotemporal substitution using logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between replacing an activity with another in the prevalence of LBP., Results: Replacing time spent in sedentary behavior with moderate physical activity slightly reduced the prevalence of LBP (odds ratio [OR]= 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95, 0.98). In addition, replacing time spent in light physical activity with moderate physical activity also slightly reduced the prevalence of LBP (OR= 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95, 0.98). There was no association for replacing sedentary time and light or moderate physical activity with vigorous physical activity on the prevalence of LBP., Conclusions: The results suggest a small protective effect for LBP when replacing time in sedentary activities or light physical activity with moderate physical activity., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The author declares no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives : In patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (LBP), their pain and problem sides can differ. Clinical Pilates assessment provides an approach to identify the problem side, but this approach requires experience and can be subjective. This study aimed to investigate if objective measures of single-leg squat postural control and hamstrings flexibility could identify the problem side in adults with non-specific chronic LBP. Materials and Methods : Forty adults with non-specific chronic LBP were tested on single-leg squat postural control and hamstrings flexibility. The problem side of participants was assessed with the Clinical Pilates method. Paired t -tests were used to compare the postural sway parameters of the single-leg squat and hamstrings flexibility between the problem and non-problem sides. Cohen's kappa was then used to assess the agreement of postural sway and flexibility measures with the Clinical Pilates method. Results : The problem side showed smaller vertical force variance, larger sway path distances, lower peak vertical force, smaller terminal knee flexion angle, longer time to complete the five single-leg squats, and tighter hamstrings as compared to the non-problem side. However, only the overall and anteroposterior sway path distances, terminal knee flexion angle, total squat duration, and hamstrings flexibility yielded moderate to strong agreement with the Clinical Pilates method. Conclusions : Single-leg squat postural sway parameters and hamstrings flexibility can objectively identify the problem side in adults with non-specific chronic LBP.

Purpose: Gait disturbances are common in human low back pain (LBP) patients, suggesting potential applicability to rodent LBP models. This study aims to assess the influence of disc-associated LBP on gait in female Sprague Dawley rats and explore the utility of the open-source Gait Analysis Instrumentation and Technology Optimized for Rodents (GAITOR) suite as a potential alternative tool for spontaneous pain assessment in a previously established LBP model., Materials and Methods: Disc degeneration was surgically induced using a one-level disc scrape injury method, and microcomputed tomography was used to assess disc volume loss. After disc injury, axial hypersensitivity was evaluated using the grip strength assay, and an open field test was used to detect spontaneous pain-like behavior., Results: Results demonstrated that injured animals exhibit a significant loss in disc volume and reduced grip strength. Open field test did not detect significant differences in distance traveled between sham and injured animals. Concurrently, animals with injured discs did not display significant gait abnormalities in stance time imbalance, temporal symmetry, spatial symmetry, step width, stride length, and duty factor compared to sham. However, comparisons with reference values of normal gait reported in prior literature reveal that injured animals exhibit mild deviations in forelimb and hindlimb stance time imbalance, forelimb temporal symmetry, and hindlimb spatial symmetry at some time points., Conclusions: This study concludes that the disc injury may have very mild effects on gait in female rats within 9 weeks post-injury and recommends future in depth dynamic gait analysis and longer studies beyond 9 weeks to potentially detect gait.

Background: Postural control can be challenged by breathing., Research Question: What is the effect of an acute increase in respiratory demand on postural control compared to quiet breathing?, Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Electronic databases were systematically searched until October 18, 2022 on studies reporting changes in center of pressure (CoP) motion related to an acute manipulation of respiratory demand compared to quiet breathing during upright standing in healthy participants and/or participants with a clinical condition., Results: Twenty-one studies in healthy participants showed that voluntary (not metabolic-induced) hyperventilation or inspiratory resistive loading significantly increased CoP motion, while breath-holding decreased CoP motion, compared to quiet breathing (p< 0.05). Manipulating respiratory rate or breathing patterns did not reveal consistent results. Four studies showed that people with low back pain showed similar CoP responses to increasing respiratory demand (p> 0.05), except for breathing at different rates, whereas they showed greater CoP motion during quiet breathing., Significance: The extent of postural disturbance depended on the breathing mode and how it was quantified (i.e., CoP coupled with breathing movement or overall CoP measures). Voluntary hyperventilation and inspiratory resistive loading increased postural sway. For voluntary hyperventilation, this could be explained by CoP motion being directly coupled to chest wall movements whereas metabolic-induced hyperventilation did not increase CoP motion or CoP coupling with breathing. Breath-holding decreased postural sway. Patients with low back pain show greater postural sways than pain-free individuals during quiet breathing, although they exhibit similar postural adaptations to respiratory-related challenges as controls., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is an understudied condition among runners, and it is unclear what biomechanical features could be targeted for gait retraining to mitigate pain., Research Question: How do running biomechanics differ between healthy individuals and those with running-related LBP?, Methods: This was a case-controlled, comparative study design of community runners: running-related LBP (n=52) and healthy controls (n=52). All runners completed running history forms and performed a 3-dimensional gait analysis. Kinematic data were collected using a motion capture system and normalized to a gait cycle, while participants ran on a level grade at self-selected speed on an instrumented treadmill. Current running volume, temporal-spatial, kinetic and kinematic features were compared between groups., Results: The LBP group had 39.5 % lower weekly distance and 15.4 % fewer were currently training for a race (all p<.05). Runners with LBP demonstrated lower cadence (166±10 step/min vs. 171±9 step/min; p=.05), greater center of gravity lateral displacement (1.4±0.5 cm vs. 1.2 ±.3 cm; p=.044) and greater stride width variability (1.3±0.4 cm versus 1.0 ± 0.04 cm; p=.008). Runners with LBP had a greater Vertical Average Loading Rate ([VALR] 67.7±22.2 bodyweights [BW]/s vs. 62.2±21.5 BW/s; p=.022), and higher joint moments (N*m/(kg*m)) at the knee in the sagittal plane (2.13±0.50 vs. 1.87±0.56; p <.001), frontal plane (1.44±0.39 vs. 1.29±0.29; p=.013), and at the hip in the frontal plane (2.04±0.51 vs. 1.84±0.41; p=.024). No differences were found between groups in the pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle joint excursions in any plane of motion during a typical gait cycle., Significance: These collective motion signature may reflect challenges with control of motion and VALR in the presence of back pain. Cadence training to increase step rate, coupled with core/hip muscle activation, may be an important strategy to reduce motion variability, impact loading rate and pain symptoms while running., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of trunk position and experimental lumbar pain location on lumbar extensor muscle recruitment strategies. Nineteen healthy participants (10 men and 9 women), aged 25.3 ± 4.7 yr, performed isometric back extension contractions in three positions (neutral, 45°, and 90° trunk flexion) and under three conditions (no pain, caudal pain, and cranial pain). Lumbar muscle activation strategies were recorded using high-density surface electromyography. The effect of position and pain condition on muscle activity amplitude and spatial redistributions was assessed. Muscle activity amplitude was 43% higher in 45° trunk flexion than in neutral position on both sides ( P < 0.05). In the 90° trunk flexion, participants showed a more lateral spatial distribution than in the 45° trunk flexion on the left side ( P < 0.01, 5.4 mm difference) and the neutral position on both sides ( P < 0.05, 8.2 mm difference). In the 45° trunk flexion, participants exhibited a more lateral spatial distribution compared with the neutral position on the right side ( P < 0.05, 3.7 mm difference). A lateral spatial redistribution of muscle activity was observed in the caudal pain condition compared with the no pain condition on the right side ( P < 0.05, 3.0 mm difference). Individual responses to pain varied across all variables. Different trunk positions result in different distributions of activation within the lumbar extensor muscles, possibly based on regional mechanical advantage. No clear indication of location-specific pain adaptation and no effect of task-dependent pain adaptation were found, whereas individual-specific adaptations were observed. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Changes in muscle activity amplitude and spatial redistribution of lumbar extensor muscles were observed in different trunk positions, potentially due to changes in their mechanical advantage. The results complement the current pain-adaptation theory by illustrating individual spatial redistributions of activation within lumbar extensor muscles during pain. The study found no clear indication of location-specific pain adaptation and no effect of task-dependent pain adaptation.

Background: The evidence supporting the application of pain neuroscience education (PNE) in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) remains some arguments., Objective: This review aims to investigate the effect of PNE alone and combined with physical therapy or exercise for chronic LBP., Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane databases were searched from establishment to June 3, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the effect of PNE in patients with chronic LBP were considered eligible. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model (I 2 >50%) or a fixed-effects model (I 2 <50%) and trials were appraised using the Cochrane ROB tool. Meta-regression was conducted to assess the moderator factors., Results: Seventeen studies (1078 participants) were included in this review. PNE plus exercise and PNE plus physiotherapy both showed a reduction of short-term pain (mean differences [MD] -1.14 [-1.55, -0.72]; MD -1.15 [-1.67, -0.64]) and disability (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.80 [-1.13, -0.47]; SMD -0.85 [-1.29, -0.40]) than physiotherapy or exercise alone. Meta-regression showed that only single PNE session duration was associated with a greater reduction in pain ( P  < .05). Subgroup results showed that a single PNE session exceeding 60 minutes (MD -2.04), 4 to 8 sessions (MD -1.34), intervention for 7 to 12 weeks (MD -1.32), and a group-based approach (MD -1.76) may be more beneficial., Conclusion: This review indicates that adding PNE to treatment programs would lead to more efficacious effects for chronic LBP. Additionally, we preliminarily extracted dose-effect relationships for PNE intervention, providing guidance for clinicians to design effective PNE sessions.

Background: Pain catastrophization (PC) is related to motor control changes in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). However, differences in dynamic balance control based on the level of PC still remain unclear in these individuals., Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the dynamic balance control between healthy controls and individuals with NSCLBP with high and low PC., Methods: Forty individuals with NSCLBP and 20 healthy participants were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Individuals with NSCLBP were classified into two groups of high and low PC. Dynamic balance control was assessed using the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test (MSEBT), Five-Time Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST), and Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT)., Results: Statistical analyses showed that mean values of reach distances in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions of the MSEBT were significantly lower in individuals with NSCLBP with high PC compared to low PC ( p  = .04, p  = .01, and p  = .04, respectively) and healthy controls ( p  < .001, p  = .001, and p  = .006, respectively). In addition, for both the FTSS and TUG tests, the mean time was significantly greater in individuals with NSCLBP with high PC compared to low PC ( p  < .001 and p  = .004, respectively) and healthy controls ( p  < .001)., Conclusions: Our results showed poor dynamic balance control in individuals with NSCLBP with high PC. This suggests that PC could contribute to the impaired dynamic balance control in individuals with NSCLBP. Combining balance exercises and cognitive-behavioral treatments targeting PC may be useful for the improvement of dynamic balance control in individuals with NSCLBP with high PC.

Dynamic sitting may mitigate low back pain during prolonged seated work. The current study compared pelvis and lumbar spine kinematics, pain, and work productivity, in traditional and dynamic sitting. Sixteen participants completed three 20-min blocks of computer work and activity guided tasks in a traditional office chair or backless and multiaxial rotating seat pan while kinematics were measured from accelerometers on the low back. Pain ratings were recorded on a visual analogue scale every 10 min. Similar pelvis and lumbar kinematics emerged when performing computer work in traditional and dynamic sitting. Pelvis and lumbar sagittal and frontal plane shifts and fidgets were largest for dynamic sitting in the activity guided tasks. Buttocks pain was higher in dynamic sitting, but low back pain and work productivity were unaffected. Dynamic sitting increased spine movement during activity guided tasks, without negatively impacting lumbar kinematics, low back pain, or productivity during seated computer work., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Pain hypersensitivity is present in some people with acute low back pain (LBP) and thought to be involved in the development of chronic LBP. Early evidence suggests that pain hypersensitivity in acute LBP precedes poor long-term outcome. We aimed to examine whether the presence of pain hypersensitivity in acute LBP influenced recovery status at 6 months and differentiated how pain and disability changed over time. Participants with acute nonspecific LBP (<6 weeks after pain onset, N = 118) were included in this longitudinal study. Quantitative sensory testing, including pressure and heat pain thresholds, and conditioned pain modulation and questionnaires were compared at baseline and longitudinally (at 3 and 6 months) between recovered and unrecovered participants. Using k-means clustering, we identified subgroups based on baseline sensory measures alone, and in combination with psychological factors, and compared pain and disability outcomes between subgroups. Sensory measures did not differ at baseline or longitudinally between recovered (N = 50) and unrecovered (N = 68) participants. Subgrouping based on baseline sensory measures alone did not differentiate pain or disability outcomes at any timepoint. Participants with high psychological distress at baseline (N = 19) had greater disability, but not pain, at all timepoints than those with low psychological distress, regardless of the degrees of pain sensitivity. Our findings suggest that pain hypersensitivity in acute LBP does not precede poor recovery at 6 months or differentiate how pain and disability change over time. High psychological distress during acute LBP is associated with unremitting and pronounced disability, while pain severity is unaffected. PERSPECTIVE: Pain hypersensitivity is thought to be involved in the transition to chronic LBP. Contradictory to prevailing hypothesis, our findings suggest pain hypersensitivity alone in acute LBP does not precede poor recovery. High psychological distress in acute LBP has a stronger influence than pain hypersensitivity on long-term disability, but not pain outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training and physical therapy interventions in patients with low back pain., Data Sources: The Ovid-Medline, Ovid-Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PEDro databases were searched for randomised, controlled trials published in English or Korean between database inception and September 2024., Review Methods: Studies providing pelvic floor muscle training in individuals with low back pain were included. The risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the grading of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software 5.4., Results: Nineteen studies were included in this review. Pelvic floor muscle training showed low certainty evidence for improving pain (standardised mean difference = -0.73, 95% CI [-1.10, -0.36]) and reflected a clinically meaningful reduction in pain. The evidence for disability improvement had a low certainty (mean difference = -5.21, 95% CI [-7.15, -3.26]) due to high heterogeneity. Substantial improvements in pain and disability were observed when pelvic floor muscle training was added to standard physical therapy, with low certainty of evidence supporting these findings. Whereas pelvic floor muscle training substantially improved pain compared to other interventions, there was no marked improvement in disability., Conclusion: Pelvic floor muscle training is potentially beneficial in addition to physical therapy for reducing low back pain, particularly in pregnancy-related cases. However, the evidence should be interpreted considering the quality and risk of bias., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Patients with low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction have an impaired quality of life, due to reported pain, disability and activity limitations. There is increasing evidence that minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MISJF) results in improvement in pain, disability and quality of life in these patients. Some studies have reported improvements in daily physical activity following MISJF but based on bias-prone self-reports. Our aim was to provide objective data on daily physical activity in patients with SIJ dysfunction. Daily physical activity in daily life of participants was measured using a triaxial accelerometer for seven consecutive days, before surgery and 3 months after surgery. Recorded daily activities were the daily number of events and total time spent sitting or lying, standing, walking, cycling, high-activity and number of steps and sit-to-stand transfers. The quality of life was assessed by the validated Dutch EQ-5D-5 L-questionnaire. No statistical differences were observed between daily physical activity in patients with SIJ dysfunction before and 3 months after MISJF. As compared to matched controls, high-intensity physical activity was lower in both the pre- and postoperative period ( p  = 0.007) for patients with SIJ dysfunction. The quality of life improved significantly in patients after MSIJF, from 0.418 to 0.797 ( p  = 0.021) but did not reach the level of controls (1.000). Daily physical activity in patients with postpartum SIJ dysfunction does not improve 3 months following MISJF, while quality of life does improve significantly. The discrepancy between these two observations is food for new research.

Introduction: Soldiers on the battlefield are affected by heavy body armor and excessive march load. It is well known, but the long-term effects of this extra weight on the musculoskeletal system of military veterans, specifically the lumbar spine, are unclear. In Iraq and Afghanistan, most body armors weighed over 33 pounds (15 kg). These armors were 3 times heavier than those used in Vietnam. Chiropractors at the Fargo VA Hospital are seeing more young veterans with non-traumatic lower back pain. This article presents a perspective on the impact of body armor weight and excessive carry load on lumbosacral disc herniation with radicular pain in military veterans., Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective case series. We used a convenient sampling method. We selected the first 10 military veterans who came to a Fargo VA chiropractor in late fall 2023. Each veteran filled out a VA Form 10-5345 to give us permission to access their electronic health records. All 10 veterans also completed a survey. The survey asked about their active combat status, the type and weight of their body armor, how long they wore the armor each day, how much weight they carried, and their opinion on the cause of their lower back pain (service related or not). The Fargo VA does not require an institutional review board for a case series., Results: This study found that military veterans experience lower back pain at an average age of 35 years. This is at least 5 years earlier than non-service men. Lower back pain with disc herniation typically occurs at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc levels. All 10 veterans in the study believe that their lower back pain is related to their service. Sixty percent of the participants in the study have a service-connected disability because of back pain., Conclusions: For military veterans, onset of lower back pain from a disc herniation at a young age may be linked to carrying heavy body armor and loads. However, the small sample size of this case series limits causal relationship inferences., (© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site–for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Reduced shear strain and deformability of the thoracolumbar fascia has been linked to low back pain. A number of ultrasound examination methods have been developed for laboratory rather than clinical practice. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and discriminative validity (patients vs. healthy individuals) of an ultrasound (US) measurement method for the quantification of thoracolumbar fascia deformation (TLFD). A cross-sectional study with US assessment and rater blinding was conducted in a manual therapy clinic and a university laboratory. 16 acute low back pain (aLBP) patients and 15 healthy individuals performed a standardized trunk extension task. US measurements of TLFD were carried out independently by two raters by imaging the TLF in the starting and ending positions of the movement. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and minimal detectable changes (MDC) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off for TLFD to discriminate the study groups. Kappa statistics were performed to assess rater agreement in discrimination. Intra-rater reliability was excellent (ICC: .92, MDC: 5.54 mm, p < .001) and inter-rater reliability was good (ICC: .78, MDC: 8.70 mm, p < .001). The cut-off for TLFD was 6 mm with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 93.75% and the raters agreed moderately (κ = 0.74, p < .001) when distinguishing patients and controls. The reliability of the US method for assessing TLFD is moderate to excellent, and the ability to discriminate aLBP patients from healthy individuals is moderate. The method could be used to capture an additional parameter in morphological aLBP screenings., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Trunk control involves integration of sensorimotor information in the brain. Individuals with chronic low back pain (cLBP) have impaired trunk control and show differences in brain structure and function in sensorimotor areas compared with healthy controls (HC). However, the relationship between brain structure and trunk control in this group is not well understood. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare seated trunk control and sensorimotor white matter (WM) structure in people with cLBP and HC and explore relationships between WM properties and trunk control in each group. Thirty-two people with cLBP and 35 HC were tested sitting on an unstable chair to isolate trunk control; performance was measured using the 95% confidence ellipse area (CEA95) of center-of-pressure tracing. A WM network between cortical sensorimotor regions of interest was derived using probabilistic tractography. WM microstructure and anatomical connectivity between cortical sensorimotor regions were assessed. A mixed-model ANOVA showed that people with cLBP had worse trunk control than HC (F = 12.96; p < .001; ηp2 = .091). There were no differences in WM microstructure or anatomical connectivity between groups (p = 0.564 to 0.940). In the cLBP group, WM microstructure was moderately correlated (|r| = .456 to .565; p ≤ .009) with trunk control. Additionally, the cLBP group demonstrated stronger relationships between anatomical connectivity and trunk control (|r| = .377 to .618 p < .034) compared to the HC group. Unique to the cLBP group, WM connectivity between right somatosensory and left motor areas highlights the importance of interhemispheric information exchange for trunk control. Parietal areas associated with attention and spatial reference frames were also relevant to trunk control. These findings suggest that people with cLBP adopt a more cortically driven sensorimotor integration strategy for trunk control. Future research should replicate these findings and identify interventions to effectively modulate this strategy., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Gilliam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Assessing physical activity is important in the treatment of chronic conditions, including chronic low back pain (cLBP). ActiGraph™, a widely used physical activity monitor, collects raw acceleration data, and processes these data through proprietary algorithms to produce physical activity measures. The purpose of this study was to replicate ActiGraph™ algorithms in MATLAB and test the validity of this method with both healthy controls and participants with cLBP. MATLAB code was developed to replicate ActiGraph™'s activity counts and step counts algorithms, to sum the activity counts into counts per minute (CPM), and categorize each minute into activity intensity cut points. A free-living validation was performed where 24 individuals, 12 cLBP and 12 healthy, wore an ActiGraph™ GT9X on their non-dominant hip for up to seven days. The raw acceleration data were processed in both ActiLife™ (v6), ActiGraph™'s data analysis software platform, and through MATLAB (2022a). Percent errors between methods for all 24 participants, as well as separated by cLBP and healthy, were all less than 2%. ActiGraph™ algorithms were replicated and validated for both populations, based on minimal error differences between ActiLife™ and MATLAB, allowing researchers to analyze data from any accelerometer in a manner comparable to ActiLife™.

This paper presents an analysis of trunk movement in women with postnatal low back pain using machine learning techniques. The study aims to identify the most important features related to low back pain and to develop accurate models for predicting low back pain. Machine learning approaches showed promise for analyzing biomechanical factors related to postnatal low back pain (LBP). This study applied regression and classification algorithms to the trunk movement proposed dataset from 100 postpartum women, 50 with LBP and 50 without. The Optimized optuna Regressor achieved the best regression performance with a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.000273, mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0039, and R2 score of 0.9968. In classification, the Basic CNN and Random Forest Classifier both attained near-perfect accuracy of 1.0, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 1.0, precision of 1.0, recall of 1.0, and F1-score of 1.0, outperforming other models. Key predictive features included pain (correlation of -0.732 with flexion range of motion), range of motion measures (flexion and extension correlation of 0.662), and average movements (correlation of 0.957 with flexion). Feature selection consistently identified pain, flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and average movement as influential across methods. While limited to this initial dataset and constrained by generalizability, machine learning offered quantitative insight. Models accurately regressed (MSE < 0.01, R2 > 0.95) and classified (accuracy > 0.94) trunk biomechanics distinguishing LBP. Incorporating additional demographic, clinical, and patient-reported factors may enhance individualized risk prediction and treatment personalization. This preliminary application of advanced analytics supported machine learning's potential utility for both LBP risk determination and outcome improvement. This study provides valuable insights into the use of machine learning techniques for analyzing trunk movement in women with postnatal low back pain and can potentially inform the development of more effective treatments.Trial registration: The trial was designed as an observational and cross-section study. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee in Deraya University, Faculty of Pharmacy, (No: 10/2023). According to the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study complies with the principles of human research. Each patient signed a written consent form after being given a thorough description of the trial. The study was conducted at the outpatient clinic from February 2023 till June 30, 2023., (© 2024. The Author(s).)