Search

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a life-threatening disorder characterized by extremely elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Untreated, severe atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), including aortic valve stenosis (AVS), may already occur in childhood. Another important genetic risk factor for ASCVD and AVS is elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], which is highly prevalent in the general paediatric population. However, data on Lp(a) in children with HoFH are scarce. Therefore, we performed a cross-sectional study to evaluate Lp(a) levels in children with HoFH and compared them to children with heterozygous FH (HeFH) and unaffected children. Adjusted least-square mean (95% CI) Lp(a) levels in HoFH (n=29), HeFH (n=101) and unaffected children (n=102) were 18.7 (12.0-29.1), 15.3 (11.8-19.8) and 10.5 (8.3-13.2) mg/dL, respectively (p-for-trend=0.007). Lp(a) levels in children with HoFH were higher than in children with HeFH and in unaffected children. Given the very high ASCVD risk with HoFH, identifying other risk factors such as elevated Lp(a) in these children is important. Therefore, Lp(a) levels should be measured at least once in all children with HoFH.

Background and aims: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In clinical practice, Lp(a) is mostly measured only once assuming that it does not change with age nor vary within individuals. This is mainly based on adult data and data on Lp(a) levels during childhood is scarce. Therefore, we evaluated whether Lp(a) levels changed with age and determined the intra-individual variation of Lp(a) in a large cohort of children. Methods: We collected all Lp(a) measurements of children referred to the pediatric lipid clinic of the Amsterdam UMC between 1989 and 2017. The association between Lp(a) and age, as well as the intra-individual variation of Lp(a), was assessed using mixed models. We stratified for lipid-lowering medication use. Results: In total, we included 2740 children. From the age of 8 years onwards, mean Lp(a) increased with 22% in children that reached adulthood without lipid-lowering medication (n = 2254). In statin-users (n = 418) and children that used ezetimibe additionally (n = 65), Lp(a) increased with 43% and 9%, respectively. The intra-individual variation of Lp(a) was 70%. Conclusions: Lp(a) levels increase with age and exhibit considerable variation within children referred to a lipid clinic. Measuring Lp(a) only once during childhood might therefore lead to substantial over- or underestimation and possibly result in over- or under treatment in the future. Thus, to more accurately assess the Lp(a) level, we suggest measuring Lp(a) more than once during childhood and to repeat this in adulthood if a patient only has childhood assessment of Lp(a).

Aims Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal and independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). People with elevated Lp(a) are often prescribed statins as they also often show elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. While statins are well-established in lowering LDL-C, their effect on Lp(a) remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of statins compared to placebo on Lp(a) and the effects of different types and intensities of statin therapy on Lp(a). Methods and results We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with a statin and placebo arm. Medline and EMBASE were searched until August 2019. Quality assessment of studies was done using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2). Mean difference of absolute and percentage changes of Lp(a) in the statin vs. the placebo arms were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. We compared effects of different types and intensities of statin therapy using subgroup- and network meta-analyses. Certainty of the evidence was determined using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Overall, 39 studies (24 448 participants) were included. Mean differences (95% confidence interval) of absolute and percentage changes in the statin vs. the placebo arms were 1.1 mg/dL (0.5–1.6, P Conclusion Statin therapy does not lead to clinically important differences in Lp(a) compared to placebo in patients at risk for CVD. Our findings suggest that in these patients, statin therapy will not change Lp(a)-associated CVD risk.

Introduction: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). With the advent of the antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeted at LPA, that are highly effective for lowering Lp(a) levels, this risk factor might be managed in the near future. Given that Lp(a) levels are mostly genetically determined and once elevated, present from early age, we have evaluated future directions for the treatment of children with high Lp(a) levels. Areas covered: In the current review, we discuss different pharmacological treatments in clinical development and provide an in-depth overview of the effects of ASOs and siRNAs targeted at LPA. Expert opinion: Since high Lp(a) is an important risk factor for ASCVD and given the promising effects of both ASOs and siRNAs targeted at apo(a), there is an urgent need for well-designed prospective studies to assess the impact of elevated Lp(a) in childhood. If the Lp(a)-hypothesis is confirmed in adults, and also in children, the rationale might arise for treating children with high Lp(a) levels. However, we feel that this should be limited to children with the highest cardiovascular risk including familial hypercholesterolemia and potentially pediatric stroke.

Background: Statins are the primary therapy in patient with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). Non-adherence to statin therapy is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Objective: We constructed a dynamic prediction model to predict statin adherence for an individual HeFH patient for each upcoming statin prescription. Methods: All patients with HeFH, identified by the Dutch Familial Hypercholesterolemia screening program between 1994 and 2014, were eligible. National pharmacy records dated between 1995 and 2015 were linked. We developed a dynamic prediction model that estimates the probability of statin adherence (defined as proportion of days covered >80%) for an upcoming prescription using a mixed effect logistic regression model. Static and dynamic patient-specific predictors, as well as data on a patient's adherence to past prescriptions were included. The model with the lowest AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) value was selected. Results: We included 1094 patients for whom 21,171 times a statin was prescribed. Based on the model with the lowest AIC, age at HeFH diagnosis, history of cardiovascular event, time since HeFH diagnosis and duration of the next statin prescription contributed to an increased adherence, while adherence decreased with higher untreated LDL-C levels and higher intensity of statin therapy. The dynamic prediction model showed an area under the curve of 0.63 at HeFH diagnosis, which increased to 0.85 after six years of treatment. Conclusion: This dynamic prediction model enables clinicians to identify HeFH patients at risk for non-adherence during statin treatment. These patients can be offered timely interventions to improve adherence and further reduce cardiovascular risk.

Aims Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) predisposes children to the early initiation of atherosclerosis and is preferably diagnosed by DNA analysis. Yet, in many children with a clinical presentation of FH, no mutation is found. Adult data show that high levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] may underlie a clinical presentation of FH, as the cholesterol content of Lp(a) is included in conventional LDL cholesterol measurements. As this is limited to adult data, Lp(a) levels in children with and without (clinical) FH were evaluated. Methods and results Children were eligible if they visited the paediatric lipid clinic (1989–2020) and if Lp(a) measurement and DNA analysis were performed. In total, 2721 children (mean age: 10.3 years) were included and divided into four groups: 1931 children with definite FH (mutation detected), 290 unaffected siblings/normolipidaemic controls (mutation excluded), 108 children with probable FH (clinical presentation, mutation not detected), and 392 children with probable non-FH (no clinical presentation, mutation not excluded). In children with probable FH, 32% were found to have high Lp(a) [geometric mean (95% confidence interval) of 15.9 (12.3–20.6) mg/dL] compared with 10 and 10% [geometric means (95% confidence interval) of 11.5 (10.9–12.1) mg/dL and 9.8 (8.4–11.3) mg/dL] in children with definite FH (P = 0.017) and unaffected siblings (P = 0.002), respectively. Conclusion Lp(a) was significantly higher and more frequently elevated in children with probable FH compared with children with definite FH and unaffected siblings, suggesting that high Lp(a) may underlie the clinical presentation of FH when no FH-causing mutation is found. Performing both DNA analysis and measuring Lp(a) in all children suspected of FH is recommended to assess possible LDL cholesterol overestimation related to increased Lp(a).