Search

Genome-wide platelet transcriptomics is increasingly used to uncover new aspects of platelet biology and as a diagnostic and prognostic tool. Nevertheless, platelet isolation methods for transcriptomic studies are not standardized, introducing challenges for cross-study comparisons, data integration, and replication. In this prospective multicenter study, called "Standardizing Platelet Transcriptomics for Discovery, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics in the Thrombosis and Hemostasis Community (STRIDE)" by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committees, we assessed how 3 of the most commonly used platelet isolation protocols influence metrics from next-generation bulk RNA sequencing and functional assays. Compared with washing alone, more stringent removal of leukocytes by anti-CD45 beads or PALL filters resulted in a sufficient quantity of RNA for next-generation sequencing and similar quality of RNA sequencing metrics. Importantly, stringent removal of leukocytes resulted in the lower relative expression of known leukocyte-specific genes and the higher relative expression of known platelet-specific genes. The results were consistent across enrolling sites, suggesting that the techniques are transferrable and reproducible. Moreover, all 3 isolation techniques did not influence basal platelet reactivity, but agonist-induced integrin αIIbβ 3 activation is reduced by anti-CD45 bead isolation compared with washing alone. In conclusion, the isolation technique chosen influences genome-wide transcriptional and functional assays in platelets. These results should help the research community make informed choices about platelet isolation techniques in their own platelet studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests M.T.R. reports patents pending or issued on using platelet transcriptomics. All other authors have no conflicts to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A State of the Art lecture titled "Platelets and neurotrophins" was presented at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress in 2023. Neurotrophins, a family of neuronal growth factors known to support cognitive function, are increasingly recognized as important players in vascular health. Indeed, along with their canonical receptors, neurotrophins are expressed in peripheral tissues, particularly in the vasculature. The better-characterized neurotrophin in vascular biology is the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Its largest extracerebral pool resides within platelets, partly inherited from megakaryocytes and also likely internalized from circulation. Activation of platelets releases vast amounts of BDNF into their milieu and interestingly leads to platelet aggregation through binding of its receptor, the tropomyosin-related kinase B, on the platelet surface. As BDNF is readily available in plasma, a mechanism to preclude excessive platelet activation and aggregation appears critical. As such, binding of BDNF to α2-macroglobulin hinders its ability to bind its receptor and limits its platelet-activating effects to the site of vascular injury. Altogether, addition of BDNF to a forming clot facilitates not only paracrine platelet activation but also binding to fibrinogen, rendering the resulting clot more porous and plasma-permeable. Importantly, release of BDNF into circulation also appears to be protective against adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes, which has been reported in both animal models and epidemiologic studies. This opens an avenue for platelet-based strategies to deliver BDNF to vascular lesions and facilitate wound healing through its regenerative properties. Finally, we summarize relevant new data on this topic presented during the 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Neurodegenerative diseases are often misdiagnosed, especially when the diagnosis is based solely on clinical symptoms. The p75 neurotrophic receptor (p75 NTR ) has been studied as an index of sensory and motor nerve development and maturation. Its cleavable extracellular domain (ECD) is readily detectable in various biological fluids including plasma, serum and urine. There is evidence for increased p75 NTR ECD levels in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, age-related dementia, schizophrenia, and diabetic neuropathy. Whether p75 NTR ECD could be used as a biomarker for diagnosis and/or prognosis in these disorders, and whether it could potentially lead to the development of targeted therapies, remains an open question. In this review, we present and discuss published studies that have evaluated the relevance of this emerging biomarker in the context of various neurodegenerative diseases. We also highlight areas that require further investigation to better understand the role of p75 NTR ECD in the clinical diagnosis and management of neurodegenerative disorders., Competing Interests: None

Background: In hemophilia and von Willebrand disease, the degree of alteration of laboratory assays correlates with bleeding manifestations. Few studies have assessed the predictive value for bleeding of laboratory assays in patients with inherited platelet function disorders (IPFDs)., Objectives: To assess whether there is an association between platelet function assay results and bleeding history, as evaluated by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) bleeding assessment tool (BAT)., Methods: Centers participating in the international ISTH-BAT validation study were asked to provide results of the diagnostic assays employed for the patients they enrolled, and the association with the individual patients' bleeding score (BS) was assessed., Results: Sixty-eight patients with 14 different IPFDs were included. Maximal amplitude of platelet aggregation was significantly lower in patients with a pathologic BS and correlated inversely with the BS, a finding largely driven by the subgroup of patients with Glanzmann thrombasthenia and CalDAG-GEFI deficiency; after their exclusion, TRAP-induced aggregation remained significantly lower in patients with a pathologic BS. Bleeding time was significantly more prolonged in patients with a high BS than in those with a normal BS (27.1 ± 6.2 minutes vs 15.1 ± 10.6 minutes; P  < .01). Reduced α-granule content was significantly more common among patients with a pathologic BS than among those with a normal BS (80% vs 20%; P  < .05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a significant discriminative ability of all the aforementioned tests for pathologic BS ( P  < .001), also after exclusion of patients with Glanzmann thrombasthenia and CalDAG-GEFI deficiency., Conclusion: This study shows that altered platelet laboratory assay results are associated with an abnormal ISTH-BAT BS in IPFD., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Platelets display unexpected roles in immune and coagulation responses. Emerging evidence suggests that STING is implicated in hypercoagulation. STING is an adaptor protein downstream of the DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) that is activated by cytosolic microbial and self-DNA during infections, and in the context of loss of cellular integrity, to instigate the production of type-I IFN and pro-inflammatory cytokines. To date, whether the cGAS-STING pathway is present in platelets and contributes to platelet functions is not defined. Using a combination of pharmacological and genetic approaches, we demonstrate here that megakaryocytes and platelets possess a functional cGAS-STING pathway. Our results suggest that in megakaryocytes, STING stimulation activates a type-I IFN response, and during thrombopoiesis, cGAS and STING are transferred to proplatelets. Finally, we show that both murine and human platelets contain cGAS and STING proteins, and the cGAS-STING pathway contributes to potentiation of platelet activation and aggregation. Taken together, these observations establish for the first time a novel role of the cGAS-STING DNA sensing axis in the megakaryocyte and platelet lineage., (© 2023 El-Mortada et al.)

Background: Platelet count alone does not reliably predict bleeding risk, suggesting platelet function is important to monitor in patients with thrombocytopenia. There is still an unmet need for improved platelet function diagnostics in patients with low platelet count in many clinical situations. Flow cytometry is a promising tool allowing reliable platelet function study in this setting., Objectives: The goal of this joint project between the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Scientific Standardization Committee (SSC) Subcommittees on Platelet Physiology and Platelet Immunology is to provide expert consensus guidance on the use of flow cytometry for the evaluation of platelet function, particularly activation, in patients with low platelet counts., Methods: A literature review was performed to identify relevant questions and areas of interest. An electronic expression of interest form was thereafter announced on the ISTH webpage, followed by a survey encompassing 37 issues regarding preanalytical, analytical, postanalytical, and performance aspects. Areas of disagreement or uncertainty were identified and formed the basis for 2 focus group discussions., Results: Consensus recommendations relative to patient sample collection, preanalytical variables, sample type, platelet-count cutoff, any potential specific modification of the standard flow cytometry protocol, and results expression and reporting are proposed based on the current practices of experts in the field as well as on literature review., Conclusion: The proposed consensus recommendations would allow standardization of protocols in upcoming clinical studies. The clinical utility of platelet function testing using flow cytometry to predict bleeding risk still needs rigorous multicenter outcome studies in patients with thrombocytopenia., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests M.L. has received speaker fees from Bayer and Diagnostica Stago; has participated in industry-funded trials from Idorsia; has served on advisory boards for Servier and JAMP/Orimed Pharma; and has received in-kind support for investigator-initiated grants from Fujimori Kogyo. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Light transmission aggregation (LTA) is used widely by the clinical and research communities. Although it is a gold standard, there is a lack of interlaboratory harmonization., Objectives: The primary objective was to assess whether sources of activators (mainly adenosine diphosphate [ADP], collagen, arachidonic acid, epinephrine, and thrombin receptor activating peptide6) and ristocetin contribute to poor LTA reproducibility. The secondary objective was to evaluate interindividual variability of results to appreciate the distribution of normal values and consequently better interpret pathologic results., Methods: An international multicenter study involving 28 laboratories in which we compared LTA results obtained with center-specific activators and a comparator that we supplied., Results: We report variability in the potency (P) of activators in comparison with the comparator. Thrombin receptor activating peptide 6 (P, 1.32-2.68), arachidonic acid (P, 0.87-1.43), and epinephrine (P, 0.97-1.34) showed the greatest variability. ADP (P, 1.04-1.20) and ristocetin (P, 0.98-1.07) were the most consistent. The data highlighted clear interindividual variability, notably for ADP and epinephrine. Four profiles of responses were observed with ADP from high-responders, intermediate-responders, and low-responders. A fifth profile corresponding to nonresponders (5% of the individuals) was observed with epinephrine., Conclusion: Based on these data, the establishment and adoption of simple standardization principles should mitigate variability due to activator sources. The observation of huge interindividual variability for certain concentrations of activators should lead to a cautious interpretation before reporting a result as abnormal. Confidence can be taken from the fact that difference between sources is not exacerbated in patients treated with antiplatelet agents., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests M.L. has received speaker fees from Bayer, participated in industry-funded trials from Idorsia, served on advisory boards for Servier and JAMP/Orimed Pharma, and received in-kind support for investigator-initiated grants from Fujimori Kogyo. M.C.A. has received fees from Novo Nordisk, participated in industry-funded trials from Agrobio, participated in PIA-funded project in collaboration with Stago and Agrobio, and served on advisory boards for Novo Nordisk. U.J.S. has received research grants from Octapharma; consulting fees from Bayer, SOBI, CSL Behring, and Pfizer; and travel support from Bayer, SOBI, CSL Behring, Biotest, Takeda, and Leo Pharma. D.F. has received honorarium and travel support from Viatris. S.V. has received travel support from Stago. F.M. has received speaker fees from Fresenius, Technoclone, and Werfen. P.F. has received travel support from SOBI and Novo Nordisk. A.G. reports personal fees from Aspen, Bayer Vital, Chromatec, Instrumentation Laboratory, Portola, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, and GTH e.V.; grants from Ergomed, Boehringer Ingelheim, Rovi, Sagent, Biokit, Fa. Blau Farmaceutics, Prosensa/Biomarin, DRK-BSD Baden-Würtemberg/Hessen, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Robert-Koch-Institut, Dilaflor, and GIZ Else-Körner-Stiftung; grants and personal fees from Macopharma; grants and other fee from DRK-BSD NSTOB; and nonfinancial support from Veralox, Vakzine Projekt Management GmbH, AstraZeneca, and Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V. outside the submitted work. In addition, A.G. has a patent—screening methods for transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI)—with royalties paid to EP2321644, 18.05.2011. M.C. has received research grant from Agios Pharmaceuticals, Genentech Inc, and Novartis Inc; consulting fees from Novo Nordisk; and honoraria for board participation with Novo Nordisk, Takeda Inc, Genentech Inc, BPL Inc, CSL Behring Inc, and Genzyme Corp Agios Pharmaceuticals. C.P. has received research grant from Stago. I.D. has received travel support from Sobi, Takeda, and Novonordisk and speaker fees from Novonordisk. A.B. has received fees from Aguettant, Alexion, and Viatris. J.R. has received support from Instituto de Salud Carlos (PI20/00926 [ISCIII&Feder], PMP21/00052 [ISCIII&NG EU], and CB15/00055) and Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hemostasia (Ayuda a Grupo Español de Alteraciones Plaquetarias Congénitas). P.G. has received speaker’s fees from Sanofi and Roche, and honoraria for board participation with Viatris. M.R.C., M.C., C.L.-B., M.I.K., L.G., B.H., A.S., C.C., A.N.S., M.B., M.F., K.D., W.H., M.F.H., A.N.M., J.P.F., P.S., F.P., A.C., N.B., J.R., and D.L. have no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been recently shown to have activating effects in isolated platelets. However, BDNF circulates in plasma and a mechanism to preclude constant activation of platelets appears necessary. Hence, we investigated the mechanism regulating BDNF bioavailability in blood. Protein-protein interactions were predicted by molecular docking and validated through immunoprecipitation. Platelet aggregation was assessed using light transmission aggregometry with washed platelets in response to classical agonists or BDNF, in the absence or presence of alpha-2-macroglobulin (α 2 M), and in platelet-rich plasma. BDNF signaling was assessed with phospho-blots. As little as 25% autologous plasma was sufficient to completely abolish platelet aggregation in response to BDNF. Docking predicted two forms of BDNF binding to native or activated α 2 M, in parallel and perpendicular arrangements, and the model suggested that the BDNF-α 2 M complex cannot bind to the high-affinity BDNF receptor, tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB). Experimentally, native and activated α 2 M formed stable complexes with BDNF preventing BDNF-induced TrkB activation and signal transduction. Both native and activated α 2 M inhibited BDNF induced-platelet aggregation in a concentration-dependent manner with comparable half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC 50 ≈ 125-150 nM). Our study implicates α 2 M as a physiological regulator of BDNF bioavailability, and as an inhibitor of BDNF-induced platelet activation in blood., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest ML has received speaker honoraria from Bayer; has received research grants to the institution from Idorsia; has served on a national advisory board for Servier; and has received in-kind and financial support for investigator-initiated grants from Fujimori Kogyo. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Since the publication of the 2010 Canadian antiplatelet guidelines, several large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the role of aspirin (ASA) use in primary prevention. We evaluated the effect of ASA use, compared with no ASA, on ischemic and bleeding events in patients without known atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases., Methods: We updated a published systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL for the period up to March 2023. We included RCTs that enrolled patients for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases, and compared use of ASA to no ASA. We assessed risk of bias (RoB) using the Cochrane RoB tool, and certainty of evidence using the grading recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, or stroke). The primary safety outcomes were intracranial hemorrhage and extracranial major bleeding events. We used a random-effects model to generate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)., Results: We included 14 RCTs (n = 167,587) at overall low RoB, with a median follow-up of 5 years. Compared to no ASA, ASA use reduced the incidence of MACE (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.94), with a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.13-1.56) and extracranial major bleeding (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.36-2.06). In prespecified subgroups of age, sex, and diabetes, effect estimates were consistent., Conclusions: ASA use in primary prevention is associated with a consistent reduction in MACE, but at the expense of major bleeding events. Patient values and preferences should be taken into account when considering ASA use for primary prevention., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: Procoagulant platelets are a subpopulation of highly activated platelets that promote coagulation through surface-exposed, negatively charged phospholipids, especially phosphatidylserine. Procoagulant platelets are important for clot stabilization during hemostasis, and an increased number of these platelets is associated with thrombotic risk. There is a need for harmonization in this area since many of the markers and methods used to assess procoagulant platelets are not specific when used in isolation but are also associated with platelet apoptosis., Objectives: We initiated this project to identify a minimum set of markers and/or methods that can detect and distinguish procoagulant platelets from apoptotic platelets., Methods: The study design involved a primary panel with 27 international experts who participated in an online survey and moderated virtual focus group meetings. Primary and secondary panel members were then invited to provide input on themes and statements generated from the focus groups., Results: This led to a recommendation to use flow cytometry and a combination of the following 3 surface markers to differentiate procoagulant platelets from apoptotic platelets: P-selectin (CD62P), phosphatidylserine (recognized by annexin V), and the platelet-specific receptor GPIX (CD42a) or α IIb integrin (CD41, GPIIb)., Conclusion: Procoagulant platelets are expected to be positive for all 3 markers, while apoptotic platelets are positive for annexin V and the platelet-specific surface receptor(s) but negative for P-selectin., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests J.H. is an adviser of Synapse Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands. T.B. has a pending patent on using flow cytometry to detect procoagulant platelets in heparin induced thrombocytopenia. The work of L.A. and his research group on procoagulant collagen and thrombin platelets is currently supported by grants from Dr Henri Dubois-Ferrière Dinu Lipatti Foundation, Novartis Foundation for Medical-Biological Research (#18B074), the Swiss Heart Foundation (FF19117), and the Swiss National Science Foundation (320030-197392). The other authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This year's Congress of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) took place in person in Montréal, Canada, from June 24-28, 2023. The conference, held annually, highlighted cutting-edge advances in basic, translational, population and clinical sciences relevant to the Society. As for all ISTH congresses, we offered a special, congress-specific scientific theme; this year, the special theme was immunothrombosis. Certainly, over the last few years, COVID-19 infection and its related thrombotic and other complications have renewed interest in the concepts of thromboinflammation and immunothrombosis; namely, the relationship between inflammation, infection and clotting. Other main scientific themes of the Congress included Arterial Thromboembolism, Coagulation and Natural Anticoagulants, Diagnostics and Omics, Fibrinolysis and Proteolysis, Hemophilia and Rare Bleeding Disorders, Hemostatic System in Cancer, Inflammation and Immunity, Pediatrics, Platelet Disorders, von Willebrand Disease and Thrombotic Microangiopathies, Platelets and Megakaryocytes, Vascular Biology, Venous Thromboembolism and Women's Health. Among other sessions, the program included 28 State-of-the-Art (SOA) sessions with a total of 84 talks given by internationally recognized leaders in the field. SOA speakers were invited to prepare brief illustrated reviews of their talks that were peer reviewed and are included in this article. These illustrated capsules highlight the major scientific advances with potential to impact clinical practice. Readers are invited to take advantage of the excellent educational resource provided by these illustrated capsules. They are also encouraged to use the image in social media to draw attention to the high quality and impact of the science presented at the Congress., (© 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Platelet function testing is critical in the diagnosis of bleeding disorders and allows monitoring of antiplatelet therapy. The gold standard assay, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), was developed 60 years ago and remains widely used worldwide. It requires, however, access to expensive equipment and is time-consuming, and the interpretation of results requires evaluation by an experienced investigator. It also suffers from a lack of standardization, resulting in widely variable results between laboratories. 96-well plate-based Optimul aggregometry utilizes the same principles of LTA and aims to standardize agonist concentrations with the development of 96-well plates which are precoated with 7 concentrations of each lyophilized agonist (arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, collagen, epinephrine, TRAP-6 amide, and U46619) and stored at ambient room temperature (20-25 °C) for up to 12 weeks. For platelet function testing, 40 μL of platelet-rich plasma is added to each well, and the plate is placed onto a plate shaker, after which platelet aggregation is determined by changes in light absorbance. This method reduces the blood volume required and allows for in-depth platelet function analysis without specialist training, or the need to purchase expensive, dedicated equipment., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Patients with established coronary artery disease remain at elevated risk of major adverse cardiac events. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1-positive platelet-derived extracellular vesicles as a biomarker for major adverse cardiac events and to explore potential underlying mechanisms. Our study suggests these extracellular vesicles as a potential biomarker to identify and a therapeutic target to ameliorate neointimal formation of high-risk patients., Competing Interests: This project was supported by the Innovation Fund of the Alternative Funding Plan for the Academic Health Sciences Centres of Ontario and the Canadian Foundation of Innovation. Dr Jung was funded by the Vanier Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada Graduate Scholarship for his graduate studies. Dr Duchez was supported by the Cardiac Endowment Fund at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2022 The Authors.)

The use of the antiplatelet agent aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) was previously routinely recommended for the primary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with diabetes, but recent large-scale randomized trials have failed to demonstrate a sizeable net clinical benefit with a once-daily, low-dose (81-100 mg) regimen in this population. Previous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies have suggested that the aspirin formulation (enteric-coated) and dosing schedule (once daily) studied in randomized trials for primary prevention of CV events defining contemporary clinical practice may not leverage the full potential of the drug, particularly in patients with diabetes. Indeed, the diabetic platelets bear characteristics that increase their thrombotic potential and alter their pharmacologic response to the drug. Consequently, the appropriateness of studying a uniform aspirin regimen in landmark primary prevention trials needs to be revisited. In this review, we present the evidence showing that diabetes not only increases baseline platelet reactivity, but also alters platelet response to aspirin through different mechanisms including a faster platelet turnover rate. Obesity, which is frequently associated with diabetes, also impacts its pharmacokinetics via an increase in distribution volume. Small-scale pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies have suggested that the relative aspirin resistance phenotype observed in patients with diabetes may be reversed with a twice-daily dosing schedule, and with nonenteric-coated aspirin formulations. Properly powered randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy and safety of aspirin dosing schedules and formulations tailored to the population of patients with diabetes are urgently required to optimize patient care., Competing Interests: M.L. has received speaker honoraria from Bayer; has received research grants to the institution from Idorsia; has served on a national advisory board for Servier; and has received in-kind and financial support for investigator-initiated grants from Leo Pharma, Roche Diagnostics, Aggredyne, and Fujimori Kogyo. G.M-.G. has received speaker honoraria from the Canadian Heart Research Center, the Population Health Research Institute, JAMP Pharma, and Novartis; has served on a national advisory board for Servier, JAMP, and Bayer; and has received research grants from Bayer, the Montreal Heart Institute Foundation, the Canadian Institute of Health Research, Université de Montréal, and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. J-.C.T. has received grant support from Amarin, AstraZeneca, Ceapro, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Esperion, Ionis, Novartis, Pfizer, RegenXBio, and Sanofi; honoraria from AstraZeneca, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, HLS Pharmaceuticals, Pendopharm, and Sanofi; minor equity interest in DalCor Pharmaceuticals; and patents were submitted on pharmacogenomics-guided CETP inhibition and use of colchicine after myocardial infarction in which he is mentioned as an author. There are no other conflicts of interest to disclose., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Assessment of platelet secretion is crucial for diagnosing suspected inherited platelet function disorders (IPFD). A previous survey of the SSC on Platelet Physiology of the ISTH and a comprehensive review highlighted that most of the platelet secretion assays (PSAs) lack standardization and validation. The aim of this study was to provide expert consensus guidance on the use of PSAs for IPFD diagnosis. We surveyed 26 experts from 10 different countries using the RAND/UCLA methodology, to attain a consensus on sensitivity, specificity, feasibility, time to readout, and cost of most PSAs. Answers were then graded in three categories: appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate. Equivocal or misinterpretable statements required a second and third round survey involving 14 of the original 26 experts. We report here the consolidated results of the entire procedure. There was uniform agreement on several general statements, including that PSAs should be performed in hemostasis laboratories as first line diagnostic tests even in patients with normal platelet aggregation, and should include a δ-granule secretion marker. Among the specific assays examined, lumiaggregometry, other luciferin/luciferase-based assays, high-performance liquid chromatography methods, radiolabeled-serotonin based assays, and whole-mount transmission electron microscopy were rated as appropriate for the measurement of δ-granule release, and platelet P-selectin expression by flow cytometry and released proteins by ELISA for α-granule release. For most of the other PSAs, the expert opinions were widely dispersed. Lack of expert consensus on many PSAs clearly indicates an unmet need for rigorous standardization, multicenter comparison of results, and validation of PSAs for clinical laboratory practice., (© 2022 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Antiplatelet therapy, mainly consisting of aspirin and P2Y 12 receptor antagonists, is the cornerstone of the pharmacological treatment and prevention of atherothrombotic diseases. Its use, especially in secondary cardiovascular prevention, has significantly improved patient clinical outcomes in the last decades. Primary safety endpoint (i.e., bleeding complications) remain a major drawback of antiplatelet drugs. National and international societies have published and regularly updated guidelines for antiplatelet therapy aiming to provide clinicians with practical recommendations for a better handling of these drugs in various clinical settings. Many recommendations find common ground between international guidelines, but certain strategies vary across the countries, particularly with regard to the choice of molecules, dosage, and treatment duration. In this review, we detail and discuss the main antiplatelet therapy indications in the light of the different published guidelines and the significant number of recently published clinical trials and meta-analyses and highlight the areas that deserve further investigation in order to improve antiplatelet therapy in patients with atherothrombotic diseases., Competing Interests: ML has received speaker fees from Bayer; has participated in industry-funded trials from Idorsia; has served on advisory boards for Servier and JAMP/Orimed Pharma; and has received in-kind and financial support for investigator-initiated grants from Leo Pharma, Roche Diagnostics, Aggredyne and Fujimori Kogyo. GM-G reports consulting and/or speaker fees from Pharmascience, Bayer, KYE, JAMP Pharma, Novartis, Population Health Research Institute, and Canadian Heart Research Center; and research funding from Bayer, FRQS, University de Montreal (department of medicine), and Montreal Heart Institute Foundation. AG has received honoraria and travel fees from Bayer-Healthcare, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb/Pfizer and Sanofi. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Jourdi, Marquis-Gravel, Martin, Lordkipanidzé, Godier and Gaussem.)

Purpose: Cetirizine is a less sedative alternative to diphenhydramine for the prevention of infusion-related reactions (IRR) to paclitaxel. However, its use remains controversial. In this study, we assessed feasibility for a future definitive non-inferiority trial comparing cetirizine to diphenhydramine as premedication to prevent paclitaxel-related IRR., Methods: This was a single-center randomized prospective feasibility study. Participants were paclitaxel-naive cancer patients scheduled to start paclitaxel chemotherapy. They were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous diphenhydramine 50 mg + oral placebo (control) or intravenous placebo + oral cetirizine 10 mg (intervention) for their first two paclitaxel treatments. The percentage of eligible patients completing a first paclitaxel treatment and the recruitment rate were assessed (feasibility outcomes). Drowsiness was measured at baseline and at selected time points using the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) (safety outcome). IRR events were also documented (efficacy outcome)., Results: Among 37 eligible patients, 27 were recruited and randomized (control 13; intervention 14) and 25 completed the study. The recruitment rate was 4.8 participants/month, meeting the primary feasibility target. Drowsiness was the main adverse effect associated with the premedication. The increase in drowsiness compared to baseline (ΔSSS) was greater in the diphenhydramine group compared to the cetirizine group (median ΔSSS 2 (IQR 3.25) vs median ΔSSS 0 (IQR 1), p < 0.01) when measured one hour after the premedication administration. One participant had an IRR and no unexpected serious adverse event occurred., Conclusion: The trial methods were feasible in terms of recruitment, retention, and safety. Cetirizine was significantly less sedating than diphenhydramine. IRR were infrequent and a larger trial is warranted to confirm non-inferiority for IRR prevention., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04237090 (22.01.2020)., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)