Search

Based on a series of basic, preclinical and clinical studies, the Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitor, olaparib, has recently been approved for use in ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. By identifying novel predictive bioma

KRAS is mutated in about 20-25% of all human cancers and especially in pancreatic, lung and colorectal tumors. Oncogenic KRAS stimulates several pro-survival pathways, but it also triggers the trans-activation of pro-apoptotic genes. In our work, we show t

CYLD, an ubiquitin hydrolase, has an expanding repertoire of regulatory roles in cell signalling and is dysregulated in a number of cancers. To dissect CYLD function we used a proteomics approach to identify CYLD interacting proteins and identified MIB2, a

We conducted a genome-wide association study of male breast cancer comprising 823 cases and 2,795 controls of European ancestry, with validation in independent sample sets totaling 438 cases and 474 controls. A SNP in RAD51B at 14q24.1 was significantly as

PARP inhibitors have been proposed as a potential targeted therapy for patients with triple-negative (ER-, PR-, HER2-negative) breast cancers. However, it is as yet unclear as to whether single agent or combination therapy using PARP inhibitors would be mo

PARP inhibition (PARPi) has anti-tumor activity against castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with homologous recombination repair (HRR) defects. However, mechanisms underlying PARPi resistance are not fully understood. While acquired mutations restoring BRCA genes are well documented, their clinical relevance, frequency, and mechanism of generation remain unclear. Moreover, how resistance emerges in BRCA2 homozygously deleted (HomDel) CRPC is unknown. Evaluating samples from patients with metastatic CRPC treated in the TOPARP-B trial, we identify reversion mutations in most BRCA2/PALB2-mutated tumors (79%) by end of treatment. Among reversions mediated by frameshift deletions, 60% are flanked by DNA microhomologies, implicating POLQ-mediated repair. The number of reversions and time of their detection associate with radiological progression-free survival and overall survival (p < 0.01). For BRCA2 HomDels, selection for rare subclones without BRCA2-HomDel is observed following PARPi, confirmed by single circulating-tumor-cell genomics, biopsy fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and RNAish. These data support the need for restored HRR function in PARPi resistance., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests J.d.B. reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Astellas, grants and personal fees from Amgen, grants and personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from BioXcel Therapeutics, personal fees from Crescendo, grants and personal fees from Daiichi, other support from Acai Therapeutics and Dark Blue Therapeutics, personal fees from Genentech/Roche, personal fees from ImCheck Therapeutics, grants from Immunic Therapeutics, grants and personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Merck Serono, grants and personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, grants and personal fees from MetaCurUm, grant from Myricx, personal fees and other support from Novartis, grant from Nurix Therapeutics, grants and personal fees from Oncternal, grants and personal fees from Orion, grants and other support from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Sanofi Aventis, and grants and other support from Takeda, outside submitted work; in addition, he has a patent for DNA damage repair inhibitors for treatment of cancer licensed to AstraZeneca and a patent for 17-substituted steroids useful in cancer treatment licensed to Janssen. J.d.B. was named as an inventor, with no financial interest for patent 8,822,438, submitted by Janssen that covers the use of abiraterone acetate with corticosteroids. He has been the CI/PI of many industry-sponsored clinical trials. J.d.B. is a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator. P.R. had received fee for advisory board/consulting activities from Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Merck, and MSD and received travel support from Ipsen. C.J.L. makes the following disclosures: receives and/or has received research funding from: AstraZeneca, Merck KGaA, Artios, and Neophore; received consultancy, SAB membership, or honoraria payments from: FoRx, Syncona, Sun Pharma, Gerson Lehrman Group, Merck KGaA, Vertex, AstraZeneca, Tango Therapeutics, 3rd Rock, Ono Pharma, Artios, Abingworth, Tesselate, Dark Blue Therapeutics, Pontifax, Astex, Neophore, GlaxoSmithKline, Dawn Bioventures, Blacksmith Medicines, and ForEx; and has stock in: Tango, Ovibio, Hysplex, and Tesselate. C.J.L. is also a named inventor on patents describing the use of DNA repair inhibitors and stands to gain from their development and use as part of the ICR “Rewards to Inventors” scheme and also reports benefits from this scheme associated with patents for PARPi paid into C.J.L.’s personal account and research accounts at the Institute of Cancer Research. A.S. is an employee of the ICR, which has a commercial interest in abiraterone, PARP inhibition in DNA repair defective cancers, and PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors (no personal income). A.S. has received travel support from Sanofi, Roche-Genentech, and Nurix and speaker honoraria from Astellas Pharma and Merck Sharp & Dohme. He has served as an advisor to DE Shaw Research, CHARM Therapeutics, Ellipses Pharma, and Droia Ventures. A.S. has been the CI/PI of industry-sponsored clinical trials. J.M. has served as advisor for AstraZeneca, Amunix/Sanofi, Daichii-Sankyo, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche. He is the PI of research grants to institution funded by AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Amgen, none of them related to this work., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

CDK4/6 inhibition in combination with endocrine therapy is the standard of care for estrogen receptor (ER+) breast cancer, and although cytostasis is frequently observed, new treatment strategies that enhance efficacy are required. Here, we perform two independent genome-wide CRISPR screens to identify genetic determinants of CDK4/6 and endocrine therapy sensitivity. Genes involved in oxidative stress and ferroptosis modulate sensitivity, with GPX4 as the top sensitiser in both screens. Depletion or inhibition of GPX4 increases sensitivity to palbociclib and giredestrant, and their combination, in ER+ breast cancer models, with GPX4 null xenografts being highly sensitive to palbociclib. GPX4 perturbation additionally sensitises triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) models to palbociclib. Palbociclib and giredestrant induced oxidative stress and disordered lipid metabolism, leading to a ferroptosis-sensitive state. Lipid peroxidation is promoted by a peroxisome AGPAT3-dependent pathway in ER+ breast cancer models, rather than the classical ACSL4 pathway. Our data demonstrate that CDK4/6 and ER inhibition creates vulnerability to ferroptosis induction, that could be exploited through combination with GPX4 inhibitors, to enhance sensitivity to the current therapies in breast cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is an aggressive sarcoma subtype that is driven by the EWS-WT1 chimeric transcription factor. The prognosis for DSRCT is poor, and major advances in treating DSCRT have not occurred for over two decades. To identify effective therapeutic approaches to target DSRCT, we conducted a high-throughput drug sensitivity screen in a DSRCT cell line assessing chemosensitivity profiles for 79 small-molecule inhibitors. DSRCT cells were sensitive to PARP and ATR inhibitors (PARPi, ATRi), as monotherapies and in combination. These effects were recapitulated using multiple clinical PARPi and ATRi in three biologically distinct, clinically-relevant models of DSRCT, including cell lines, a patient-derived xenograft (PDX)-derived organoid model, and a cell line-derived xenograft mouse model. Mechanistically, exposure to a combination of PARPi and ATRi caused increased DNA damage, G2/M checkpoint activation, micronuclei accumulation, replication stress, and R-loop formation. EWS-WT1 silencing abrogated these phenotypes and was epistatic with exogenous expression of the R-loop resolution enzyme RNase H1 in reversing the sensitivity to PARPi and ATRi monotherapies. The combination of PARPi and ATRi also induced EWS-WT1-dependent cell-autonomous activation of the cGAS/STING innate immune pathway and cell surface expression of PD-L1. Taken together, these findings point towards a role for EWS-WT1 in generating R-loop-dependent replication stress that leads to a targetable vulnerability, providing a rationale for the clinical assessment of PARPi and ATRi in DSRCT.

Biallelic loss of cyclin-dependent kinase 12 (CDK12) defines a metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) subtype. It remains unclear, however, whether CDK12 loss drives prostate cancer (PCa) development or uncovers pharmacologic vulnerabilities. Here, we show Cdk12 ablation in murine prostate epithelium is sufficient to induce preneoplastic lesions with lymphocytic infiltration. In allograft-based CRISPR screening, Cdk12 loss associates positively with Trp53 inactivation but negatively with Pten inactivation. Moreover, concurrent Cdk12/Trp53 ablation promotes proliferation of prostate-derived organoids, while Cdk12 knockout in Pten-null mice abrogates prostate tumor growth. In syngeneic systems, Cdk12/Trp53-null allografts exhibit luminal morphology and immune checkpoint blockade sensitivity. Mechanistically, Cdk12 inactivation mediates genomic instability by inducing transcription-replication conflicts. Strikingly, CDK12-mutant organoids and patient-derived xenografts are sensitive to inhibition or degradation of the paralog kinase, CDK13. We therein establish CDK12 as a bona fide tumor suppressor, mechanistically define how CDK12 inactivation causes genomic instability, and advance a therapeutic strategy for CDK12-mutant mCRPC., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests A.M.C. co-founded and serves on scientific advisory boards (SABs) of Lynx Dx, Flamingo Therapeutics, Medsyn Pharma, Oncopia Therapeutics, and Esanik Therapeutics. A.M.C. is an advisor to Aurigene Oncology Limited, Proteovant, Tempus, Rappta, and Ascentage. C.J.L. received research funding from AstraZeneca, Merck KGaA, Artios, and NeoPhore and consultancy, SAB membership, or honoraria payments from FoRx, Syncona, Sun Pharma, Gerson Lehrman Group, Merck KGaA, Vertex, AstraZeneca, Tango, 3rd Rock, Ono Pharma, Artios, Abingworth, Tesselate, Dark Blue Therapeutics, Pontifax, Astex, NeoPhore, Glaxo Smith Kline, and Dawn Bioventures. C.J.L. has stock in Tango, Ovibio, Hysplex, and Tesselate. C.J.L. is named inventor on patents describing use of DNA repair inhibitors and stands to gain from their development and use. J.C. is an advisor for Exai Bio. F.Y.F. has served on SAB or received consulting fees from Astellas, Bayer, Celgene, Clovis Oncology, Janssen, Genentech Roche, Myovant, Roivant, Sanofi, and Blue Earth Diagnostics. F.Y.F. is also an SAB member for Artera, ClearNote Genomics, Serimmune, and BMS (Microenvironment Division). K.D. is an advisor for Kinoteck Therapeutics and has received financial support from Livzon Pharmaceutical Group. Patents for CDK12/13 degraders/inhibitors used here have been filed by the University of Michigan and Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, with A.M.C., K.D., X.W., J.Y., Y. Chang, and J.C.T. as co-inventors., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Anti-EGFR antibodies show limited response in breast cancer, partly due to activation of compensatory pathways. Furthermore, despite the clinical success of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive tumors, aggressive triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) are largely resistant due to CDK2/cyclin E expression, whereas free CDK2 inhibitors display normal tissue toxicity, limiting their therapeutic application. A cetuximab-based antibody drug conjugate (ADC) carrying a CDK inhibitor selected based on oncogene dysregulation, alongside patient subgroup stratification, may provide EGFR-targeted delivery., Experimental Design: Expressions of G1/S-phase cell cycle regulators were evaluated alongside EGFR in breast cancer. We conjugated cetuximab with CDK inhibitor SNS-032, for specific delivery to EGFR-expressing cells. We assessed ADC internalization and its antitumor functions in vitro and in orthotopically grown basal-like/TNBC xenografts., Results: Transcriptomic (6,173 primary, 27 baseline, and matched post-chemotherapy residual tumors), single-cell RNA sequencing (150,290 cells, 27 treatment-naïve tumors), and spatial transcriptomic (43 tumor sections, 22 TNBCs) analyses confirmed expression of CDK2 and its cyclin partners in basal-like/TNBCs, associated with EGFR. Spatiotemporal live-cell imaging and super-resolution confocal microscopy demonstrated ADC colocalization with late lysosomal clusters. The ADC inhibited cell cycle progression, induced cytotoxicity against high EGFR-expressing tumor cells, and bystander killing of neighboring EGFR-low tumor cells, but minimal effects on immune cells. Despite carrying a small molar fraction (1.65%) of the SNS-032 inhibitor, the ADC restricted EGFR-expressing spheroid and cell line/patient-derived xenograft tumor growth., Conclusions: Exploiting EGFR overexpression, and dysregulated cell cycle in aggressive and treatment-refractory tumors, a cetuximab-CDK inhibitor ADC may provide selective and efficacious delivery of cell cycle-targeted agents to basal-like/TNBCs, including chemotherapy-resistant residual disease., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

BACKGROUNDClinical trials have suggested antitumor activity from PARP inhibition beyond homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). RNASEH2B loss is unrelated to HRD and preclinically sensitizes to PARP inhibition. The current study reports on RNASEH2B protein loss in advanced prostate cancer and its association with RB1 protein loss, clinical outcome, and clonal dynamics during treatment with PARP inhibition in a prospective clinical trial.METHODSWhole tumor biopsies from multiple cohorts of patients with advanced prostate cancer were interrogated using whole-exome sequencing (WES), RNA-Seq (bulk and single nucleus), and IHC for RNASEH2B and RB1. Biopsies from patients treated with olaparib in the TOPARP-A and TOPARP-B clinical trials were used to evaluate RNASEH2B clonal selection during olaparib treatment.RESULTSShallow codeletion of RNASEH2B and adjacent RB1 - colocated at chromosome 13q14 - was common, deep codeletion infrequent, and gene loss associated with lower mRNA expression. In castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) biopsies, RNASEH2B and RB1 mRNA expression correlated, but single nucleus RNA-Seq indicated discordant loss of expression. IHC studies showed that loss of the 2 proteins often occurred independently, arguably due to stochastic second allele loss. Pre- and posttreatment metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) biopsy studies from BRCA1/2 WT tumors, treated on the TOPARP phase II trial, indicated that olaparib eradicated RNASEH2B-loss tumor subclones.CONCLUSIONPARP inhibition may benefit men suffering from mCRPC by eradicating tumor subclones with RNASEH2B loss.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicaltrials.gov NCT01682772.FUNDINGAstraZeneca; Cancer Research UK; Medical Research Council; Cancer Research UK; Prostate Cancer UK; Movember Foundation; Prostate Cancer Foundation.

Background: Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC) is a morphologically distinct breast cancer subtype that represents up to 15% of all breast cancers. Compared to Invasive Breast Carcinoma of No Special Type (IBC-NST), ILCs exhibit poorer long-term outcome and a unique pattern of metastasis. Despite these differences, the systematic discovery of robust prognostic biomarkers and therapeutically actionable molecular pathways in ILC remains limited., Methods: Pathway-centric multivariable models using statistical machine learning were developed and tested in seven retrospective clinico-genomic cohorts (n = 996). Further external validation was performed using a new RNA-Seq clinical cohort of aggressive ILCs (n = 48)., Results and Conclusions: mRNA dysregulation scores of 25 pathways were strongly prognostic in ILC (FDR-adjusted P < 0.05). Of these, three pathways including Cell-cell communication, Innate immune system and Smooth muscle contraction were also independent predictors of chemotherapy response. To aggregate these findings, a multivariable machine learning predictor called PSILC was developed and successfully validated for predicting overall and metastasis-free survival in ILC. Integration of PSILC with CRISPR-Cas9 screening data from breast cancer cell lines revealed 16 candidate therapeutic targets that were synthetic lethal with high-risk ILCs. This study provides interpretable prognostic and predictive biomarkers of ILC which could serve as the starting points for targeted drug discovery for this disease., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Resistance to therapies that target homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in breast cancer limits their overall effectiveness. Multiple, preclinically validated, mechanisms of resistance have been proposed, but their existence and relative frequency in clinical disease are unclear, as is how to target resistance., Patients and Methods: Longitudinal mutation and methylation profiling of circulating tumour (ct)DNA was carried out in 47 patients with metastatic BRCA1-, BRCA2- or PALB2-mutant breast cancer treated with HRD-targeted therapy who developed progressive disease-18 patients had primary resistance and 29 exhibited response followed by resistance. ctDNA isolated at multiple time points in the patient treatment course (before, on-treatment and at progression) was sequenced using a novel >750-gene intron/exon targeted sequencing panel. Where available, matched tumour biopsies were whole exome and RNA sequenced and also used to assess nuclear RAD51., Results: BRCA1/2 reversion mutations were present in 60% of patients and were the most prevalent form of resistance. In 10 cases, reversions were detected in ctDNA before clinical progression. Two new reversion-based mechanisms were identified: (i) intragenic BRCA1/2 deletions with intronic breakpoints; and (ii) intragenic BRCA1/2 secondary mutations that formed novel splice acceptor sites, the latter being confirmed by in vitro minigene reporter assays. When seen before commencing subsequent treatment, reversions were associated with significantly shorter time to progression. Tumours with reversions retained HRD mutational signatures but had functional homologous recombination based on RAD51 status. Although less frequent than reversions, nonreversion mechanisms [loss-of-function (LoF) mutations in TP53BP1, RIF1 or PAXIP1] were evident in patients with acquired resistance and occasionally coexisted with reversions, challenging the notion that singular resistance mechanisms emerge in each patient., Conclusions: These observations map the prevalence of candidate drivers of resistance across time in a clinical setting, information with implications for clinical management and trial design in HRD breast cancers., Competing Interests: Disclosure ANJT is/has been a consultant for AstraZeneca, Merck KGaA, Artios, Pfizer, Vertex, GE Healthcare, Inbiomotion, Prime Oncology, Medscape Education, EMPartners, VJ Oncoclogy, Gilead and MD Anderson Cancer Centre; has received grant/research support from AstraZeneca, Myriad, Medivation and Merck KGaA; is a stockholder in Inbiomotion; is also a named inventor on patents describing the use of DNA repair inhibitors and stands to gain from their development and use as part of the ICR ‘Rewards to Inventors’ scheme and also reports benefits from this scheme associated with patents for PARP inhibitors paid to ANJT research accounts at the Institute of Cancer Research. CJL receives and/or has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Merck KGaA and Artios; received consultancy, SAB membership or honoraria payments from Syncona, Sun Pharma, Gerson Lehrman Group, Merck KGaA, Vertex, AstraZeneca, Tango, 3rd Rock, Ono Pharma, Artios, Abingworth, Tesselate, Dark Blue Therapeutics, Pontifax, Astex, Neophore, Glaxo Smith Kline; has stock in Tango, Ovibio, Hysplex and Tesselate; is also a named inventor on patents describing the use of DNA repair inhibitors and stands to gain from their development and use as part of the ICR ‘Rewards to Inventors’ scheme and also reports benefits from this scheme associated with patents for PARP inhibitors paid into CJL’s personal account and research accounts at the Institute of Cancer Research. AY, JY, MD, and LD are employees and stockholders of Guardant Health. JY is a former full-time employee at Guardant Health and a current full-time employee at Exai Bio. SJP is a named inventor on patents relating to targeting PARPi resistance and stands to gain from their development and use as part of the ICR ‘Rewards to Inventors’ scheme. VS has research grants and receives honoraria from AstraZeneca. ALG and VS are co-inventors of the patent PCT/EP2018/086759 (WO2019122411A1). VS and ALG received funding from Fundació La Marató de TV3 (654/C/2019), FERO-GHD and AECC (INVES20095LLOP). NL is employed by AstraZeneca and owns AstraZeneca stock. The other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7 (FBXW7) tumour suppressor gene encodes a substrate-recognition subunit of Skp, cullin, F-box (SCF)-containing complexes. The tumour-suppressive role of FBXW7 is ascribed to its ability to drive ubiquitination and degradation of oncoproteins. Despite this molecular understanding, therapeutic approaches that target defective FBXW7 have not been identified. Using genome-wide clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 screens, focussed RNA-interference screens and whole and phospho-proteome mass spectrometry profiling in multiple FBXW7 wild-type and defective isogenic cell lines, we identified a number of FBXW7 synthetic lethal targets, including proteins involved in the response to replication fork stress and proteins involved in replication origin firing, such as cell division cycle 7-related protein kinase (CDC7) and its substrate, DNA replication complex GINS protein SLD5 (GINS4). The CDC7 synthetic lethal effect was confirmed using small-molecule inhibitors. Mechanistically, FBXW7/CDC7 synthetic lethality is dependent upon the replication factor telomere-associated protein RIF1 (RIF1), with RIF1 silencing reversing the FBXW7-selective effects of CDC7 inhibition. The delineation of FBXW7 synthetic lethal effects we describe here could serve as the starting point for subsequent drug discovery and/or development in this area., (© 2023 The Authors. Molecular Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies.)

The concept of synthetic lethality has been widely applied to identify therapeutic targets in cancer, with varying degrees of success. The standard approach normally involves identifying genetic interactions between two genes, a driver and a target. In reality, however, most cancer synthetic lethal effects are likely complex and also polygenic, being influenced by the environment in addition to involving contributions from multiple genes. By acknowledging and delineating this complexity, we describe in this article how the success rate in cancer drug discovery and development could be improved., (© 2023. Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Although PARP inhibitors (PARPi) now form part of the standard-of-care for the treatment of homologous recombination defective cancers, de novo and acquired resistance limits their overall effectiveness. Previously, overexpression of the BRCA1-∆11q splice variant has been shown to cause PARPi resistance. How cancer cells achieve increased BRCA1-∆11q expression has remained unclear. Using isogenic cells with different BRCA1 mutations, we show that reduction in HUWE1 leads to increased levels of BRCA1-∆11q and PARPi resistance. This effect is specific to cells able to express BRCA1-∆11q (e.g. BRCA1 exon 11 mutant cells) and is not seen in BRCA1 mutants that cannot express BRCA1-∆11q, nor in BRCA2 mutant cells. As well as increasing levels of BRCA1-∆11q protein in exon 11 mutant cells, HUWE1 silencing also restores RAD51 nuclear foci and platinum salt resistance. HUWE1 catalytic domain mutations were also seen in a case of PARPi resistant, BRCA1 exon 11 mutant, high grade serous ovarian cancer. These results suggest how elevated levels of BRCA1-∆11q and PARPi resistance can be achieved, identify HUWE1 as a candidate biomarker of PARPi resistance for assessment in future clinical trials and illustrate how some PARPi resistance mechanisms may only operate in patients with particular BRCA1 mutations., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

SF3B1 hotspot mutations are associated with a poor prognosis in several tumor types and lead to global disruption of canonical splicing. Through synthetic lethal drug screens, we identify that SF3B1 mutant (SF3B1 MUT ) cells are selectively sensitive to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), independent of hotspot mutation and tumor site. SF3B1 MUT cells display a defective response to PARPi-induced replication stress that occurs via downregulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase 2 interacting protein (CINP), leading to increased replication fork origin firing and loss of phosphorylated CHK1 (pCHK1; S317) induction. This results in subsequent failure to resolve DNA replication intermediates and G 2 /M cell cycle arrest. These defects are rescued through CINP overexpression, or further targeted by a combination of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated and PARP inhibition. In vivo, PARPi produce profound antitumor effects in multiple SF3B1 MUT cancer models and eliminate distant metastases. These data provide the rationale for testing the clinical efficacy of PARPi in a biomarker-driven, homologous recombination proficient, patient population., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The PSMC3IP-MND1 heterodimer promotes meiotic D loop formation before DNA strand exchange. In genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis and interference screens in mitotic cells, depletion of PSMC3IP or MND1 causes sensitivity to poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) used in cancer treatment. PSMC3IP or MND1 depletion also causes ionizing radiation sensitivity. These effects are independent of PSMC3IP/MND1's role in mitotic alternative lengthening of telomeres. PSMC3IP- or MND1-depleted cells accumulate toxic RAD51 foci in response to DNA damage, show impaired homology-directed DNA repair, and become PARPi sensitive, even in cells lacking both BRCA1 and TP53BP1. Epistasis between PSMC3IP-MND1 and BRCA1/BRCA2 defects suggest that abrogated D loop formation is the cause of PARPi sensitivity. Wild-type PSMC3IP reverses PARPi sensitivity, whereas a PSMC3IP p.Glu201del mutant associated with D loop defects and ovarian dysgenesis does not. These observations suggest that meiotic proteins such as MND1 and PSMC3IP have a greater role in mitotic DNA repair., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests C.J.L. makes the following disclosures: receives and/or has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Merck KGaA, and Artios; received consultancy, SAB membership, or honoraria payments from Syncona, Sun Pharma, Gerson Lehrman Group, Merck KGaA, Vertex, AstraZeneca, Tango, 3rd Rock, Ono Pharma, Artios, Abingworth, Tesselate, and Dark Blue Therapeutics; has stock in Tango, Ovibio, Enedra Tx., Hysplex, and Tesselate. C.J.L. is also a named inventor on patents describing the use of DNA repair inhibitors, stands to gain from their development and use as part of the ICR “Rewards to Inventors” scheme, and also reports benefits from this scheme associated with patents for PARP inhibitors paid into C.J.L.’s personal account and research accounts at the Institute of Cancer Research. A.N.J.T. reports personal honoraria from Pfizer, Vertex, Prime Oncology, Artios, MD Anderson, Medscape Education, EM Partners, GBCC conference, Cancer Panel, and Research to Practise; honoraria to either the Institute of Cancer Research or King’s College research accounts from SABCS, VJ Oncology, GE Healthcare, Gilead, AZ ESMO symposium, IBCS conference, and AstraZeneca Ad boards; received honoraria and stock in InBioMotion; honoraria and financial support for research from AstraZeneca, Medivation, Myriad Genetics, and Merck Serono; and travel expenses covered by AstraZeneca for any trial-related meetings or trial commitments abroad. A.N.J.T. reports benefits from ICR’s Inventors Scheme associated with patents for PARP inhibitors in BRCA1/2-associated cancers, paid into research accounts at the Institute of Cancer Research and to A.N.J.T.’s personal account. J.V.F., M.O.C., and B.R.D. are full-time employees and shareholders at AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Approximately 5% to 10% of all breast cancers are hereditary; many of which are caused by pathogenic variants in genes required for homologous recombination, including BRCA1 and BRCA2. Here we discuss systemic treatment for such breast cancers, including approved chemotherapeutic approaches and also targeted treatment approaches using poly-(ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We also discuss experimental approaches to treating hereditary breast cancer, including new small molecule DNA repair inhibitors and also immunomodulatory agents. Finally, we discuss how drug resistance emerges in patients with hereditary breast cancer, how this might be delayed or prevented, and how biomarker-adapted treatment is molding the future management of hereditary breast cancer., Competing Interests: Disclosure E.H.-J. is a clinical PhD fellow funded by Cancer Research UK and AstraZeneca. A.T. is a consultant for AstraZeneca, Merck KGaA, Artios, Pfizer, Vertex, GE Healthcare, Inbiomotion, MD Anderson Cancer Centre; has received grant/research support from AstraZeneca, Myriad, Medivation, and Merck KGaA; and is a stockholder in Inbiomotion. Stands to gain from the use of PARP inhibitors as part of the ICR's “rewards to inventors” scheme. C.J.L. makes the following disclosures: receives and/or has received research funding from: AstraZeneca, Merck KGaA, Artios. Received consultancy, SAB membership or honoraria payments from: Syncona, Sun Pharma, Gerson Lehrman Group, Merck KGaA, Vertex, AstraZeneca, Tango, 3rd Rock, Ono Pharma, Artios, Abingworth, Tesselate, Dark Blue Therapeutics. Has stock in: Tango, Ovibio, Enedra Tx., Hysplex, Tesselate. C.J.L. is also a named inventor on patents describing the use of DNA repair inhibitors and stands to gain from their development and use as part of the ICR “Rewards to Inventors” scheme., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

PARP inhibitors now have proven utility in the treatment of homologous recombination (HR) defective cancers. These drugs, and the synthetic lethality effect they exploit, have not only taught us how to approach the treatment of HR defective cancers but have also illuminated how resistance to a synthetic lethal approach can occur, how cancer-associated synthetic lethal effects are perhaps more complex than we imagine, how the better use of biomarkers could improve the success of treatment and even how drug resistance might be targeted. Here, we discuss some of the lessons learnt from the study of PARP inhibitor synthetic lethality and how these lessons might have wider application. Specifically, we discuss the concept of synthetic lethal penetrance, phenocopy effects in cancer such as BRCAness, synthetic lethal resistance, the polygenic and complex nature of synthetic lethal interactions, how evolutionary double binds could be exploited in treatment as well as future horizons for the field., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

ADP-ribosylation, a modification of proteins, nucleic acids, and metabolites, confers broad functions, including roles in stress responses elicited, for example, by DNA damage and viral infection and is involved in intra- and extracellular signaling, chromatin and transcriptional regulation, protein biosynthesis, and cell death. ADP-ribosylation is catalyzed by ADP-ribosyltransferases (ARTs), which transfer ADP-ribose from NAD + onto substrates. The modification, which occurs as mono- or poly-ADP-ribosylation, is reversible due to the action of different ADP-ribosylhydrolases. Importantly, inhibitors of ARTs are approved or are being developed for clinical use. Moreover, ADP-ribosylhydrolases are being assessed as therapeutic targets, foremost as antiviral drugs and for oncological indications. Due to the development of novel reagents and major technological advances that allow the study of ADP-ribosylation in unprecedented detail, an increasing number of cellular processes and pathways are being identified that are regulated by ADP-ribosylation. In addition, characterization of biochemical and structural aspects of the ARTs and their catalytic activities have expanded our understanding of this protein family. This increased knowledge requires that a common nomenclature be used to describe the relevant enzymes. Therefore, in this viewpoint, we propose an updated and broadly supported nomenclature for mammalian ARTs that will facilitate future discussions when addressing the biochemistry and biology of ADP-ribosylation. This is combined with a brief description of the main functions of mammalian ARTs to illustrate the increasing diversity of mono- and poly-ADP-ribose mediated cellular processes., (© 2021 The Authors. The FEBS Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies.)

Gastric cancer represents the third leading cause of global cancer mortality and an area of unmet clinical need. Drugs that target the DNA damage response, including ATR inhibitors (ATRi), have been proposed as novel targeted agents in gastric cancer. Here, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of ATRi in preclinical models of gastric cancer and to understand how ATRi resistance might emerge as a means to identify predictors of ATRi response. A positive selection genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen identified candidate regulators of ATRi resistance in gastric cancer. Loss-of-function mutations in either SMG8 or SMG9 caused ATRi resistance by an SMG1-mediated mechanism. Although ATRi still impaired ATR/CHK1 signaling in SMG8/9-defective cells, other characteristic responses to ATRi exposure were not seen, such as changes in ATM/CHK2, γH2AX, phospho-RPA, or 53BP1 status or changes in the proportions of cells in S- or G2-M-phases of the cell cycle. Transcription/replication conflicts (TRC) elicited by ATRi exposure are a likely cause of ATRi sensitivity, and SMG8/9-defective cells exhibited a reduced level of ATRi-induced TRCs, which could contribute to ATRi resistance. These observations suggest ATRi elicits antitumor efficacy in gastric cancer but that drug resistance could emerge via alterations in the SMG8/9/1 pathway., Significance: These findings reveal how cancer cells acquire resistance to ATRi and identify pathways that could be targeted to enhance the overall effectiveness of these inhibitors., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

The DNA damage response (DDR) represents a complex network of proteins which detect and repair DNA damage, thereby maintaining the integrity of the genome and preventing the transmission of mutations and rearranged chromosomes to daughter cells. Faults in the DDR are a known driver and hallmark of cancer. Furthermore, inhibition of DDR enzymes can be used to treat the disease. This is exemplified by PARP inhibitors (PARPi) used to treat cancers with defects in the homologous recombination DDR pathway. A series of novel DDR targets are now also under pre-clinical or clinical investigation, including inhibitors of ATR kinase, WRN helicase or the DNA polymerase/helicase Polθ (Pol-Theta). Drug resistance is a common phenomenon that impairs the overall effectiveness of cancer treatments and there is already some understanding of how resistance to PARPi occurs. Here, we discuss how an understanding of PARPi resistance could inform how resistance to new drugs targeting the DDR emerges. We also discuss potential strategies that could limit the impact of these therapy resistance mechanisms in cancer., (© 2022 The Authors. Molecular Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies.)

Purpose: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) induce synthetic lethality in homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient tumors and are used to treat breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers. Multiple PARPi resistance mechanisms exist, most resulting in restoration of HRR and protection of stalled replication forks. ATR inhibition was highlighted as a unique approach to reverse both aspects of resistance. Recently, however, a PARPi/WEE1 inhibitor (WEE1i) combination demonstrated enhanced antitumor activity associated with the induction of replication stress, suggesting another approach to tackling PARPi resistance., Experimental Design: We analyzed breast and ovarian patient-derived xenoimplant models resistant to PARPi to quantify WEE1i and ATR inhibitor (ATRi) responses as single agents and in combination with PARPi. Biomarker analysis was conducted at the genetic and protein level. Metabolite analysis by mass spectrometry and nucleoside rescue experiments ex vivo were also conducted in patient-derived models., Results: Although WEE1i response was linked to markers of replication stress, including STK11/RB1 and phospho-RPA, ATRi response associated with ATM mutation. When combined with olaparib, WEE1i could be differentiated from the ATRi/olaparib combination, providing distinct therapeutic strategies to overcome PARPi resistance by targeting the replication stress response. Mechanistically, WEE1i sensitivity was associated with shortage of the dNTP pool and a concomitant increase in replication stress., Conclusions: Targeting the replication stress response is a valid therapeutic option to overcome PARPi resistance including tumors without an underlying HRR deficiency. These preclinical insights are now being tested in several clinical trials where the PARPi is administered with either the WEE1i or the ATRi., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

PARP1 rapidly detects DNA strand break damage and allosterically signals break detection to the PARP1 catalytic domain to activate poly(ADP-ribose) production from NAD + . PARP1 activation is characterized by dynamic changes in the structure of a regulatory helical domain (HD); yet, there are limited insights into the specific contributions that the HD makes to PARP1 allostery. Here, we have determined crystal structures of PARP1 in isolated active states that display specific HD conformations. These captured snapshots and biochemical analysis illustrate HD contributions to PARP1 multi-domain and high-affinity interaction with DNA damage, provide novel insights into the mechanics of PARP1 allostery, and indicate how HD active conformations correspond to alterations in the catalytic region that reveal the active site to NAD + . Our work deepens the understanding of PARP1 catalytic activation, the dynamics of the binding site of PARP inhibitor compounds, and the mechanisms regulating PARP1 retention on DNA damage., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests C.J.L. makes the following disclosures: received research funding from Astra Zeneca, Merck KGaA, Artios; received consultancy, SAB membership, or honoraria payments from Syncona, Sun Pharma, Gerson Lehrman Group, Merck KGaA, Vertex, Astra Zeneca, Tango, 3rd Rock, Ono Pharma, Artios, Abingworth; and has stock in Tango and Ovibio. C.J.L. and S.J.P. are also named inventors on patents describing the use of DNA repair inhibitors and stand to gain from the development as part of the ICR “Rewards to Inventors” scheme. J.M.P. is a co-founder of Hysplex LLC with interests in PARPi development., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

HORMAD1 expression is usually restricted to germline cells, but it becomes mis-expressed in epithelial cells in ~60% of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs), where it is associated with elevated genomic instability (1). HORMAD1 expression in TNBC is bimodal with HORMAD1-positive TNBC representing a biologically distinct disease group. Identification of HORMAD1-driven genetic dependencies may uncover novel therapies for this disease group. To study HORMAD1-driven genetic dependencies, we generated a SUM159 cell line model with doxycycline-inducible HORMAD1 that replicated genomic instability phenotypes seen in HORMAD1-positive TNBC (1). Using small interfering RNA screens, we identified candidate genes whose depletion selectively inhibited the cellular growth of HORMAD1-expressing cells. We validated five genes (ATR, BRIP1, POLH, TDP1 and XRCC1), depletion of which led to reduced cellular growth or clonogenic survival in cells expressing HORMAD1. In addition to the translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerase POLH, we identified a HORMAD1-driven dependency upon additional TLS polymerases, namely POLK, REV1, REV3L and REV7. Our data confirms that out-of-context somatic expression of HORMAD1 can lead to genomic instability and reveals that HORMAD1 expression induces dependencies upon replication stress tolerance pathways, such as translesion synthesis. Our data also suggest that HORMAD1 expression could be a patient selection biomarker for agents targeting replication stress., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer after invasive breast cancer of no special type (NST), representing up to 15% of all breast cancers., Design: Latest data on ILC are presented, focusing on diagnosis, molecular make-up according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) guidelines, treatment in the early and metastatic setting and ILC-focused clinical trials., Results: At the imaging level, magnetic resonance imaging-based and novel positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based techniques can overcome the limitations of currently used imaging techniques for diagnosing ILC. At the pathology level, E-cadherin immunohistochemistry could help improving inter-pathologist agreement. The majority of patients with ILC do not seem to benefit as much from (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy as patients with NST, although chemotherapy might be required in a subset of high-risk patients. No differences in treatment efficacy are seen for anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies in the adjuvant setting and cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in the metastatic setting. The clinical utility of the commercially available prognostic gene expression-based tests is unclear for patients with ILC. Several ESCAT alterations differ in frequency between ILC and NST. Germline BRCA1 and PALB2 alterations are less frequent in patients with ILC, while germline CDH1 (gene coding for E-cadherin) alterations are more frequent in patients with ILC. Somatic HER2 mutations are more frequent in ILC, especially in metastases (15% ILC versus 5% NST). A high tumour mutational burden, relevant for immune checkpoint inhibition, is more frequent in ILC metastases (16%) than in NST metastases (5%). Tumours with somatic inactivating CDH1 mutations may be vulnerable for treatment with ROS1 inhibitors, a concept currently investigated in early and metastatic ILC., Conclusion: ILC is a unique malignancy based on its pathological and biological features leading to differences in diagnosis as well as in treatment response, resistance and targets as compared to NST., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been demonstrated to exhibit profound anti-tumour activity in individuals whose cancers have a defect in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway. Here, we describe the current consensus as to how PARPi work and how drug resistance to these agents emerges. We discuss the need to refine the current repertoire of clinical-grade companion biomarkers to be used with PARPi, so that patient stratification can be improved, the early emergence of drug resistance can be detected and dose-limiting toxicity can be predicted. We also highlight current thoughts about how PARPi resistance might be treated.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors elicit antitumour activity in homologous recombination-defective cancers by trapping PARP1 in a chromatin-bound state. How cells process trapped PARP1 remains unclear. Using wild-type and a trapping-deficient PARP1 mutant combined with rapid immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry of endogenous proteins and Apex2 proximity labelling, we delineated mass spectrometry-based interactomes of trapped and non-trapped PARP1. These analyses identified an interaction between trapped PARP1 and the ubiquitin-regulated p97 ATPase/segregase. We found that following trapping, PARP1 is SUMOylated by PIAS4 and subsequently ubiquitylated by the SUMO-targeted E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF4, events that promote recruitment of p97 and removal of trapped PARP1 from chromatin. Small-molecule p97-complex inhibitors, including a metabolite of the clinically used drug disulfiram (CuET), prolonged PARP1 trapping and enhanced PARP inhibitor-induced cytotoxicity in homologous recombination-defective tumour cells and patient-derived tumour organoids. Together, these results suggest that p97 ATPase plays a key role in the processing of trapped PARP1 and the response of tumour cells to PARP inhibitors., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

It is often the case that when an investigational cancer drug first enters clinical development, its precise mechanism of action is unclear. This was the case for PARP inhibitors (PARPi) used to treat homologous recombination-defective cancers. In 2012, nearly a decade after the first PARPi entered clinical development, work from Murai and colleagues demonstrated that clinical PARPi not only inhibit the catalytic activity of PARP1, PARylation, but also "trap" PARP1 on DNA; this latter effect being responsible for much of the tumor cell cytotoxicity caused by these drugs. We discuss how this work not only changed our understanding about how PARPi work, but also stimulated subsequent dissection of how PARP1 carries out its normal function in the absence of inhibitor. See related article by Murai and colleagues, Cancer Res 2012;72:5588-99 ., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

PARP enzymes utilise NAD + as a co-substrate for their enzymatic activity. Inhibition of PARP1 is synthetic lethal with defects in either BRCA1 or BRCA2. In order to assess whether other genes implicated in NAD + metabolism were synthetic lethal with BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene defects, we carried out a genetic screen, which identified a synthetic lethality between BRCA1 and genetic inhibition of either of two sirtuin (SIRT) enzymes, SIRT1 or SIRT6. This synthetic lethal interaction was replicated using small-molecule SIRT inhibitors and was associated with replication stress and increased cellular PARylation, in contrast to the decreased PARylation associated with BRCA-gene/PARP inhibitor synthetic lethality. SIRT/BRCA1 synthetic lethality was reversed by genetic ablation of either PARP1 or the histone PARylation factor-coding gene HPF1, implicating PARP1/HPF1-mediated serine ADP-ribosylation as part of the mechanistic basis of this synthetic lethal effect. These observations suggest that PARP1/HPF1-mediated serine ADP-ribosylation, when driven by SIRT inhibition, can inadvertently inhibit the growth of BRCA-gene mutant cells., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

PARP inhibitors are approved for treating advanced prostate cancers (APC) with various defective DNA repair genes; however, further studies to clinically qualify predictive biomarkers are warranted. Herein we analyzed TOPARP-B phase II clinical trial samples, evaluating whole-exome and low-pass whole-genome sequencing and IHC and IF assays evaluating ATM and RAD51 foci (testing homologous recombination repair function). BRCA1/2 germline and somatic pathogenic mutations associated with similar benefit from olaparib; greater benefit was observed with homozygous BRCA2 deletion. Biallelic, but not monoallelic, PALB2 deleterious alterations were associated with clinical benefit. In the ATM cohort, loss of ATM protein by IHC was associated with a better outcome. RAD51 foci loss identified tumors with biallelic BRCA and PALB2 alterations while most ATM - and CDK12 -altered APCs had higher RAD51 foci levels. Overall, APCs with homozygous BRCA2 deletion are exceptional responders; PALB2 biallelic loss and loss of ATM IHC expression associated with clinical benefit. SIGNIFICANCE: Not all APCs with DNA repair defects derive similar benefit from PARP inhibition. Most benefit was seen among patients with BRCA2 homozygous deletions, biallelic loss of PALB2 , and loss of ATM protein. Loss of RAD51 foci, evaluating homologous recombination repair function, was found primarily in tumors with biallelic BRCA1/2 and PALB2 alterations. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2659 ., (©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: ARID1A (AT-rich interactive domain containing protein 1A) loss-of-function mutations have been reported in gynecological cancers, including rarer subtypes such as clear cell carcinoma. Preclinical studies indicate that ARID1A mutant cancers display sensitivity to ATR inhibition while tumors without ARID1A mutations may be sensitive to Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) inhibitors in combination with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors., Primary Objective: To determine whether the ATR inhibitor, ceralasertib, has clinical activity as a single agent and in combination with the PARP inhibitor, olaparib, in patients with ARID1A 'loss' and 'no loss' clear cell carcinomas and other relapsed gynecological cancers., Study Hypothesis: ARID1A deficient clear cell carcinoma of the ovary or endometrium is sensitive to ATR inhibition, while the combination of ATR and PARP inhibition has activity in other gynecological tumors, irrespective of ARID1A status., Trial Design: ATARI (ENGOT/GYN1/NCRI) is a multicenter, international, proof-of-concept, phase II, parallel cohort trial assessing ceralasertib activity as a single agent and in combination with olaparib in ARID1A stratified gynecological cancers. Patients with relapsed ovarian/endometrial clear cell carcinoma with ARID1A loss will receive ceralasertib monotherapy (cohort 1A). Relapsed ovarian/endometrial clear cell carcinoma patients with no ARID1A loss (cohort 2) or patients with other histological subtypes (endometrioid, carcinosarcoma, cervical) (cohort 3) will receive combination therapy (olaparib/ceralasertib). Treatment will continue until disease progression., Major Inclusion/exclusion Criteria: Patients with histologically confirmed recurrent clear cell (ovarian, endometrial, or endometriosis related), endometrioid (ovarian, endometrial, or endometriosis related), cervical (adenocarcinomas or squamous), or carcinosarcomas (ovarian or endometrial) are eligible. Patients progressing after ≥1 prior platinum with evidence of measurable (RECIST v1.1) radiological disease progression since last systemic anticancer therapy and prior to trial entry are eligible. Previous ATR or PARP inhibitor treatment is not permissible., Primary Endpoint: Best overall objective response rate (RECIST v1.1)., Sample Size: A minimum of 40 and a maximum of 116., Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting Results: Accrual is anticipated to be complete by the second quarter of 2022, with reporting of results by the fourth quarter of 2022. Overall accrual targets and reporting timelines are dependent on individual cohort progression to stage 2., Trial Registration Number: NCT0405269., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SB, NP, CT, AL, SL, and JB report that their institutional departments have received grants from AstraZeneca for costs or consumables to support the research relating to this manuscript. SB reports grants and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Tesaro, and GSK outside of this manuscript, and non-financial support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Epsilogen, GSKm Genmab, Immunogen, Mersana, MSD, Merck Serono, Oncxerna, Pfizer, Roche, Tesaro, Clovis, and Takeda outside of this manuscript. AL reports grants and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Tesaro, Clovis, MSD, Biocad, Ability, Merck Serono, Seattle Genetics, GSK, and Zentalis, outside of this manuscript. SL reports grants and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, GSK, Roche, Refeneron, Merck, Repare, Eisai, and Movocure outside of this manuscript. CJL reports grants and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Merck KGaA, Artios, Suncona, Sun Pharma, Gerson Lehrman Group, Vertex, Tano, 3rd Rock, Ono Pharma, and Abingworth outside of this manuscript. CJL also reports stock in Tango, Ovibio, and is a named inventor on patents describing the use of DNA repair inhibitors. JB reports grants and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Puma Biotechnology, Clovis Oncology, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Roche, and Eli Lilley, outside of this manuscript., (© IGCS and ESGO 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)