1. Inter-rater reliability for assessing intracranial collaterals in patients with acute ischemic stroke: comparing 29 raters and an artificial intelligence-based software
- Author
-
Wolff, L., Su, J., Loon, D. van, Es, A. van, Doormaal, P.J. van, Majoie, C., Zwam, W. van, Dippel, D., Jenniskens, S.F.M., Lugt, A. van der, Walsum, T. van, Radiology and nuclear medicine, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neurology, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ACS - Microcirculation, Amsterdam Neuroscience - Neurovascular Disorders, Beeldvorming, MUMC+: DA BV Medisch Specialisten Radiologie (9), RS: Carim - B05 Cerebral small vessel disease, and RS: Carim - B06 Imaging
- Subjects
Reproducibility of results ,OUTCOMES ,Collateral circulation ,Consensus ,Ischemic stroke ,Other Research Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 0] ,Brain Ischemia ,Cerebral Angiography ,Stroke ,Artificial Intelligence ,PERFUSION ,SCORE ,CT-ANGIOGRAPHY ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Neurology (clinical) ,BURDEN ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Software ,Algorithms ,INTRAARTERIAL TREATMENT - Abstract
Purpose Outcome of endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients is depending on the collateral circulation maintaining blood flow to the ischemic territory. We evaluated the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of raters and an automated algorithm for assessing the collateral score (CS, range: 0–3) in acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods Baseline CTA scans with an intracranial anterior occlusion from the MR CLEAN study (n=500) were used. For each core lab CS, ten CTA scans with sufficient quality were randomly selected. After a training session in collateral scoring, all selected CTA scans were individually evaluated for a visual CS by three groups: 7 radiologists, 13 junior and 9 senior radiology residents. Two additional radiologists scored CS to be used as reference, with a third providing a CS to produce a 2 out of 3 consensus CS in case of disagreement. An automated algorithm was also used to compute CS. Inter-rater agreement was reported with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Accuracy of visual and automated CS were calculated. Results 39 CTA scans were assessed (1 corrupt CTA-scan excluded). All groups showed a moderate ICC (0.689-0.780) in comparison to the reference standard. Overall human accuracy was 65± 7% and increased to 88± 5% for dichotomized CS (0–1, 2–3). Automated CS accuracy was 62%, and 90% for dichotomized CS. No significant difference in accuracy was found between groups with different levels of expertise. Conclusion After training, inter-rater reliability in collateral scoring was not influenced by experience. Automated CS performs similar to residents and radiologists in determining a collateral score.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF