Search

Purpose: To investigate whether an autologous intraparenchymal blood patch (IPB) reduces the rate of pneumothorax-related complications associated with computed tomography (CT)-guided lung biopsies., Materials and Methods: This study included 834 patients: 482 who received an IPB and 352 who did not. Retrospective review was performed of all CT-guided lung biopsies performed at a single institution between August 2006 and September 2013. Patients were excluded if no aerated lung was crossed. The rate of pneumothorax, any associated intervention (eg, catheter placement, aspiration), chest tube placement, and chest tube replacement requiring hospital admission were compared by linear and multiple regression analysis., Results: Patients who received an IPB had a significantly lower rate of pneumothorax (145 of 482 [30%] vs 154 of 352 [44%]; P < .0001), pneumothorax-related intervention (eg, catheter aspiration, pleural blood patch, chest tube placement; 43 of 482 [8.9%] vs 85 of 352 [24.1%]; P < .0001), and chest tube placement along with other determinants requiring hospital admission (18 of 482 [3.7%] vs 27 of 352 [7.7%]; P < .0001). No complications related to the IPB were noted in the study group., Conclusions: Autologous IPB placement is associated with a decreased rate of pneumothorax and associated interventions, including chest tube placement and hospital admission, after CT-guided lung biopsies, with no evidence of any adverse effects. These results suggest that an IPB is safe and effective and should be considered when aerated lung is traversed while performing a CT-guided lung biopsy., (Copyright © 2016 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Trauma patients imaged at community hospitals often receive duplicate computed tomographic (CT) imaging after transfer to regional trauma centers (RTCs). CT scanning is expensive, is resource intensive, and has acknowledged radiation risk to the patient. The objective of this study was to review and evaluate the frequency, indications, impact on patient management, as well as associated radiation and charges for duplicate CT imaging of trauma patients transferred to our RTC from outside hospitals (OSH)., Methods: Patients transferred to our RTC between September 2009 and August 2010 were evaluated prospectively. The OSH patients' charts and provider interviews were used to determine the reasons for repeated scans. The primary outcome was frequency of duplicate CT scan, defined as a repeated CT image of the same body part within 24 hours. The reason for duplicate imaging and impact on patient management was categorized. Radiation exposure and charges for duplicate scans were also determined., Results: Of the 185 patients transferred to our facility, 177 were eligible. CT examinations at the OSH were performed on 137 patients (77%). A duplicate CT examination occurred in 38 patients (28%). The most common reason for duplicate CT scanning was lack of thin-section multiplanar data, on images sent via CD-ROM (37%). There was a change in management in 16 patients (42%). The patients with duplicate scanning received a median of 10.2 mSv (interquartile range, 6.6-15.7 mSv) of additional radiation, with a median charge of $409 (interquartile range, $307-$734)., Conclusion: More than one third of duplicated scans performed on transferred trauma patients were potentially avoidable, primary owing to inadequate transfer of data from the OSH CT scan. The capacity of a single CD-ROM is insufficient to contain full imaging data from a trauma scan, and establishing direct links to imaging data from OSHs would decrease the number of repeated CT scans performed on transferred trauma patients., Level of Evidence: Care management study, level III.