Search

Objective: The use of adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) after primary treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer reduces the risk of recurrence and mortality. However, non-adherence is still common. Limited consideration has been given to how users deal with AET and the role of pharmaceutical care. Therefore, this study aims to obtain insight into the needs and wishes of women using AET regarding pharmaceutical care and eHealth. Methods: This is a qualitative explorative study comprising semi-structured interviews (n = 16) and a focus group (n = 5) among women who use or used AET after primary early-stage breast cancer (EBC) treatment using a thematic analysis approach. Results: Three themes emerged from the interviews and focus group: (1) experiences with AET use, (2) experiences with provided information and (3) needs and wishes regarding pharmaceutical care. Most women were highly motivated to use AET and indicated to have received useful information on AET. However, many expressed a strong need for more elaborate tailored and timely provided information on AET. They acknowledged the accessibility of pharmacists but reported that currently, pharmacists are hardly involved in AET care. Several women considered eHealth useful to obtain counselling and reliable information. Conclusion: Women need more comprehensive information and follow-up in primary setting after initial cancer treatments. A more elaborate role for the pharmacy and eHealth/mHealth, especially with regard to counselling on side effects and side effect management, could potentially improve pharmaceutical care.

IntroductionBefore admission to the insured package, the price of a medicine is usually assessed on the basis of the value of the medicine for the patient: the effect size on health and survival must be in line with the costs. That seems like a fair starting point, but the use of such ‘value-driven’ models sometimes results in unrealistic prices. These prices in turn lead to discussions about limitations within the healthcare budget and may result in delays in the accessibility of medicines. The aim of this study was to review several alternative pricing models and propose possible applications of the models.MethodsSix pricing models were selected that encompassed cost-based or cost- and value-based aspects. The models were reviewed within the context of the published group of medicines, followed by a discussion on their potential to aid in creating benchmarks for pricing negotiations.ResultsFive cost-based pricing models and one value-based model with a cost-based aspect were found with potential applications. (i) The AIM-model for innovative medicines. (ii) The adjusted AIM-model for repurposed medicines. (iii) The Cancer drug pricing model for innovative oncolytics with information about health benefit. (iv) The discounted cash flow model for orphan medicines with information about health benefit. (v) The value-based rate of return pricing for innovative orphan medicines with information about health benefit. (vi) The P-quad model for drugs with a high budget impact for which there is no generic competition after intellectual property an regulatory exclusivity end.ConclusionsWe argue that it would be more logical for different categories of medicines to base prices on average costs, possibly combined with a bonus for innovation: the cost-based pricing method. The next step is to discuss the possible application of cost-plus methods with stakeholders including patients, industry, payers, and healthcare professionals.

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in deep molecular remission may discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment without relapse. The present study aims to gain insight into the views of CML patients on TKI treatment discontinuation and identify factors that are associated with their willingness to discontinue treatment. A cross-sectional study, among adult Dutch CML patients was conducted to assess willingness and their views on benefits of and concerns about discontinuation. A total of 185 patients participated of whom 76% were willing to discontinue TKI-treatment. Patients considered the absence of side effects the most important benefit whereas fear of disease recurrence was their most prominent concern. Adequate monitoring was the most important prerequisite for TKI-treatment discontinuation. However, ambiguity with respect to perquisites indicate that patients on long-term TKI treatment should be adequately informed both on the possibility to discontinue treatment and on its benefits, risks, and measures that address risks.

Item does not contain fulltext

IntroductionConducting a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is resource consuming, and therefore the Dutch National Health Care Institute (ZIN) only performs those for interventions with a high budget impact. Sometimes, cost-effectiveness (CE) estimates are clearly below or far above reference values, which makes full cost-effectiveness assessments less vital. The objective of this study was to develop an efficient and simplified method to identify interventions that are clearly cost-(in)effective.MethodsThe method makes use of headroom analysis. Several HTA experts and other relevant stakeholders have been asked to provide feedback on a preliminary version of the CE signal.ResultsThe method consists of five steps. In the first step (i) the relevant willingness-to-pay threshold is determined. Reference values are used by ZIN for the maximum willingness-to-pay per incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY), depending on burden of disease.In next step (ii) the health gain that can realistically be obtained with the new treatment is estimated. Hereby the effect of the intervention on the clinical outcomes, quality of life and gained life years is determined to estimate the number of QALYs gained, including uncertainty. Then (iii) the societal cost maximum (SCM) of the new treatment is calculated by multiplying step 2 with step 1. In step four (iv) the incremental treatment costs are estimated looking at both the costs and savings for both treatments options for the average patient. In the final step (v) the incremental treatment costs are compared to the SCM to determine if the intervention is probably cost effective, probably not cost-effective or if a conclusion cannot be drawn.ConclusionsThis method has proven to be feasible and could be a valuable addition to the current cost-effectiveness assessment toolbox. The CE-signal is being validated against performing a full cost-effectiveness analysis.

IntroductionConducting joint health technology assessments (HTA) is one of the main goals of the Beneluxa Initiative. To strengthen this collaboration, this study aimed to assess similarities and differences between past assessments of Beneluxa Initiative member countries (Austria, Belgium, Ireland and the Netherlands).MethodsA retrospective comparative analysis was performed that investigated the similarities and differences in drug assessments in the period 2016 to 2020 in (i) the number and type of assessed indications; (ii) the conclusions within assessments performed by at least two member countries; and (iii) the main arguments leading to the conclusions through a qualitative analysis of selected cases, looking into the patient population, the intervention, comparator, outcome, timing, and included evidence.ResultsThe scope of HTA differs between the countries, with Belgium and Ireland assessing most, the Netherlands focusing on drugs above a budget impact threshold and Austria on outpatient drugs. Furthermore, indications might slightly differ between countries. Therefore, only 44 (10%) of the 444 included drug-indication combinations were assessed through a full HTA by all four countries. Between any pair of countries, the overlap was higher, from 63 (Austria-the Netherlands) to 188 (Belgium-Ireland). Added benefit conclusions matched exactly in 62 to 76 percent of the indications, depending on the compared countries. In the remaining cases, often a difference of one added benefit level was observed (e.g., higher versus equal relative effect). Contradictory outcomes were very rare. Differences were observed with regards to whether a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. When assessing the underlying arguments within the reports for nine cases with different outcomes, it became clear that organizations agree on almost all aspects, and that differences are mostly attributable to slight differences in weighing of some aspects and uncertainties.ConclusionsOverall, which indications are assessed differs, but for those indications that are assessed by multiple member countries, considerations and assessment outcomes are similar.

IntroductionOn a regular basis, new and innovative medicines come to the market; with uncertainties surrounding their exact effect in patients. To address these uncertainties, disease-specific registries are commonly being used. The Dutch National Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Netherland [ZIN]) started, in collaboration with stakeholders, a national program on the management and coordination of disease-specific registries. The main goal is to improve the quality and consistency of these registries and thereby increase the value of the data in monitoring innovative, expensive medicines. As a starting point for this program, we performed a study on the current state of these registries in the Netherlands.MethodsUsing an initial list of 114 registries, we sent out questionnaires to 58 disease-specific registries that collected information on medicine use. Thirty registries responded and their registries were used for the analysis.ResultsOf 30 registries that responded, 15 registries collect information on orphan medicinal products. Most registries are in the field of internal medicine (n = 8), oncology (n = 6), and rheumatology (n = 5). The size of the registries ranged between 250 patients (orphan diseases) and more than 10,000 patients (oncology). Only 13 registries collect information on patient reported outcomes. Data collection is mostly performed manually and standard coding systems such as Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED), Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes (LOINC), and The International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) are not routinely used. Finally, our results show that most registries are (partly) dependent on the funding of pharmaceutical companies.ConclusionsOur assessment shows variation in the type, goal of, governance, and funding of the disease-specific registries investigated. We believe that these results show the importance of further national coordination of the disease-specific registries to increase the usability of their data to address the uncertainties surrounding these innovative, expensive medicines.

Performance-based managed entry agreements (PB-MEAs) might allow patient access to new medicines, but practical hurdles make competent authorities for pricing and reimbursement (CAPR) reluctant to implement PB-MEAs. We explored if the feasibility of PB-MEAs might improve by better aligning regulatory postauthorization requirements with the data generation of PB-MEAs and by active collaboration and data sharing. Reviewers from seven CAPRs provided structured assessments of the information available at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Web site on regulatory postauthorization requirements for fifteen recently authorized products. The reviewers judged to what extent regulatory postauthorization studies could help implement PB-MEAs by addressing uncertainty gaps. Study domains assessed were: patient population, intervention, comparators, outcomes, time horizon, anticipated data quality, and anticipated robustness of analysis. Reviewers shared general comments about PB-MEAs for each product and on cooperation with other CAPRs. Reviewers rated regulatory postauthorization requirements at least partly helpful for most products and across domains except the comparator domain. One quarter of responses indicated that public information provided by the EMA was insufficient to support the implementation of PB-MEAs. Few PB-MEAs were in place for these products, but the potential for implementation of PB-MEAs or collaboration across CAPRs was seen as more favorable. Responses helped delineate a set of conditions where PB-MEAs may help reduce uncertainty. In conclusion, PB-MEAs are not a preferred option for CAPRs, but we identified conditions where PB-MEAs might be worth considering. The complexities of implementing PB-MEAs remain a hurdle, but collaboration across silos and more transparency on postauthorization studies could help overcome some barriers. ispartof: International Journal Of Technology Assessment In Health Care vol:37 issue:e83 pages:1-11 ispartof: location:England status: Published online

Objectives Mexiletine is a long-known drug used for the treatment of arrhythmias and repurposed in the 1980s for patients with nondystrophic myotonia (NDM). Recently, the price of mexiletine in Europe increased significantly after registration as an orphan drug for NDM. This led to international discussions on affordability and willingness to reimburse mexiletine in the absence of background information that would justify such a price. Our objective was to calculate a cost-based price for mexiletine for adult patients with NDM based on detailed information on development costs. Methods We calculated a fair price based on a cost-based pricing model for commercial mexiletine to treat adults with NDM using a recent European drug-pricing model as a framework to include actual costs incurred. Three scenarios were applied: 1 with minimum estimated costs, 1 with maximum estimated costs, and 1 with costs as if mexiletine was innovative. Results The calculated fair price of mexiletine per patient per year (PPPY) is €452 for the minimum scenario and €1996 for the maximum scenario. By using hypothetical R&D costs used for innovative drugs, the price would be €6685 PPPY. In Europe, the list price of mexiletine ranges from €30 707-60 730 PPPY, based on 600 mg daily. Conclusions The current list price for mexiletine in Europe is manifold higher than any scenario of the cost-based models. Accounting for the reduced costs for clinical development in a repurposing scenario, the cost-based pricing model provides a fair commercial price range, which can be used as benchmark for pricing negotiations and/or reimbursement decisions.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a chronic myeloproliferative disease, consistently associated with the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome coding for the BCR-ABL oncoprotein. The standard tre...

PURPOSE To obtain insight into the feasibility of, and the patients' perspective on, dried blood spot (DBS) self-sampling by patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) using nilotinib. METHODS Sixty-eight patients with CML using nilotinib participated in this multicenter observational study. Patients were asked to perform blood sampling by means of the DBS method at home just before drug intake (trough level) and to complete a questionnaire including demographics and five questions on their experience with DBS self-sampling. RESULTS Sixty-one patients (57.5 ± 15.0 years, 49% female) provided 178 DBS samples of which 137 (77%) proved useful in clinical practice. Twenty percent of the samples were rejected because the spot size was too small for analysis. A further 3% were taken at the wrong time. Unsuitable DBS samples were provided by 23 patients. Their educational level was significantly lower than that of patients whose samples were all suitable (p = 0.041). Patients considered DBS self-sampling easy and not painful, and three quarters of the patients performed DBS sampling without additional assistance. Patients' belief in the reliability of DBS self-sampling was moderate to high. It was preferred over venous sampling by 37% of the patients, whereas 39% had no preference. CONCLUSION DBS self-sampling by CML patients is feasible in clinical practice provided that patients, particularly those with a lower educational level, are adequately instructed about sample collection with emphasis on timing and volume of sample collection.

Introduction This comprehensive observational study aimed to gain insight into adherence to nilotinib and the effect of (non)adherence on exposure (Cmin) and treatment outcomes. Methods Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients using nilotinib were followed for 12 months. Adherence was measured by Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), pill count, and Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5). Nilotinib Cmin and patient-reported outcomes (i.e., quality of life, side effects, beliefs, satisfaction) were measured at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results Sixty-eight patients (57.5 ± 15.0 years, 49% female) participated. Median adherence to nilotinib (MEMS and pill count) was ≥ 99% and adherence < 90% was rare. Self-reported nonadherence (MARS-5) increased in the first year of treatment to a third of patients. In line with the strong beliefs in the necessity of taking nilotinib, forgetting to take a dose was more prevalent than intentionally adjusting/skipping doses. Nilotinib Cmin were generally above the therapeutic target in 95% of patients. Patients reported a variety of side effects, of which fatigue was most frequent. The mean Cmin was higher in patients who reported severe itching and fatigue. The overall 1-year MMR rate ranged from 47 to 71%. Conclusion Substantial nonadherence (< 90%) to nilotinib was rare and nilotinib Cmin were generally above the therapeutic target. Lack of response in our group of patients was not related to nonadherence or inadequate Cmin. Nevertheless, a considerable number of patients experienced difficulties in adhering to the twice daily fasted dosing regimen, emphasizing the importance of continuous support of medication adherence in CML. Clinical trial registration NTR3992 (Netherlands Trial Register, www.trialregister.nl)

OBJECTIVES: To obtain insight into patients' reasons for medication (non-)adherence in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and needs and wishes regarding information and communication.METHODS: A mixed-method study on the basis of a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. The CML patient advocacy group asked patients to participate.RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (54±12 years, 43% male) using imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib participated. Fifteen patients (25%) reported to miss an intake at least once a month. Most were not worried about missing an intake and did not discuss missed intakes with their healthcare provider (HCP). Social activities disturbing daily routines and the wish to avoid side-effects resulted in non-adherence. Patients wanted extensive and understandable information provided timely on all aspects of CML treatment, in particular on side-effects, and a more supportive HCP attitude.CONCLUSIONS: Non-adherence to CML medication does not cause concern in all patients and is not discussed pro-actively. HCP have a clear role in supporting medication adherence in CML and must be aware that social activities disturbing daily routines contribute to non-adherence. HCP should discuss (non-)adherence in a direct manner, motivate patients to play an active role in managing their medication, and timely provide extensive and understandable information on all aspects of CML. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

In recent years, the number of oral anticancer agents (OACA), protein kinase inhibitors (PKI or “nibs”), in particular, has sharply increased. In the near future, the rise is likely to continue. OACA are used in the treatment of both common cancer types and a wide variety of less commonly occurring cancers and hematological malignancies. Due to the spreading use of OACA in cancer treatment pharmacists (and staff) of outpatient pharmacies are becoming more closely involved in the disease’s main treatment and directly interact with predominantly older cancer patients and other caregivers. Providing pharmaceutical care for cancer outpatients requires specific knowledge of cancer (drug) therapy, pharmacogenomics, contraindications, interactions of OACA with other drugs and food, side effects, and their management and patient education.Within the framework of a multidisciplinary team effort, the pharmacist dispensing OACA must assess the suitability of its use for the patient and address eventual problems that the treatment entails, notably with respect to supportive and current medication for chronic diseases. The pharmacist is also responsible for adequate patient counseling. Adherence to OACA treatment and effects brought about by OACA and co-medication require careful monitoring of the patient and his/her use of medication. Close collaboration with other healthcare providers, both in the case of prescribing OACA and co-medication and with respect to events occurring during the course of treatment as the result of disease progression, side effects or incorrect medication use, is the most appropriate way to resolve eventual problems and adequately adjust treatment. In the present chapter, the various steps of the pharmaceutical care process, conditions for its successful completion and the role of the pharmacist in it, are lined out and the main topics that have to be addressed during this process including the detection and management of drug interactions, the reporting and management of side effects, (non-) adherence and adherence supportive care, and last but not least, patient counseling are discussed. The basic approach is that pharmacists are partners of (primary care) physicians as they collaborate on a wide variety of care activities including the optimization of treatment, medication reconciliation, patient education, and medication safety.

Adequate information on oral anticancer agent (OACA) use is an essential element of optimal cancer care. The present study aimed to get insight into the experiences of patients with information on OACA treatment and their characteristics regarding information dissatisfaction. Patients of four Dutch university hospitals using OACA participated in this observational study and completed the Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS), EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire‐C30, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, and Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire‐Specific. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with dissatisfaction with information. Patients (n = 208) using capecitabine (35%), lenalidomide (15%), imatinib (14%), temozolomide (12%), sunitinib (11%), thalidomide (5%), dasatinib (4%), erlotinib (2%), and nilotinib (2%) participated. Information on the following SIMS‐items was inadequate: how OACA elicit their effect, how long it takes before treatment works, how to conclude that treatment is effective, the risk of side effects and its management, interference with sex life, drowsiness, interference with other medication and alcohol and what to do in case of a missed dose. Younger age, hematological malignancy, dyspnoea, positive perception of consequences of the cancer, low perception of treatment control, and indifferent attitude towards OACA were associated with dissatisfaction with information. In conclusion, a considerable number of patients would have appreciated receiving more information on specific issues relating to the consequences of OACA treatment such as the effects and side effects of OACA and the interference of treatment with various aspects of their daily life. Oncologists, hematologists, lung‐oncologists and pharmacists may reconsider the provision of information on OACA treatment.

Purpose Erlotinib is an orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Understanding actual use of medication is essential for optimizing treatment conditions. Methods In this multicentre prospective observational study, patients starting erlotinib treatment were followed for 4 months. Adherence was assessed using a medication event monitoring system (MEMS). Area under the curve (AUC) was determined after 1, 2 and 4 months. Before start and at monthly intervals, patients filled out questionnaires about attitude towards medication and disease, quality of life, symptoms and use in daily practice. Results Sixty-two patients (median age 63.5 years, 53 % male) were included of whom 15 were still on treatment after 4 months. MEMS data of 55 patients revealed a mean adherence of 96.8 +/- 4.0 %. Over one-third of patients had an adherence rate < 95 %. At 1 month, 21 % of patients did not always correctly take erlotinib without food. Associated risk factors were older age, suboptimal adherence, ocular symptoms and stomatitis (all p < 0.05). After 1 month of treatment, fatigue (91 %) and rash (86 %) were the most common symptoms reported. AUCss of erlotinib was higher in patients with rash and patients with moderate-severe anorexia (both p < 0.05). Conclusion Though adherence to erlotinib treatment is generally high, non-adherence might be an issue in a considerable number of patients. To support optimal erlotinib intake, clinicians need to take adequate measures to ameliorate symptoms and to address adherence and correct intake without food. Especially older patients and those who experience stomatitis may need extra attention.

Background Healthcare provider (HCP) activities and attitudes towards patients strongly influence medication adherence. The aim of this study was to assess current clinical practices to support patients in adhering to treatment with oral anticancer agents (OACA) and to explore clues to improve the management of medication adherence. Methods A cross-sectional, observational study among HCPs in (haemato-)oncology settings in Belgium and the Netherlands was conducted in 2014 using a composite questionnaire. A total of 47 care activities were listed and categorised into eight domains. HCPs were also asked about their perceptions of adherence management on the items: insight into adherence, patients’ communication, capability to influence, knowledge of consequences and insight into causes. Validated questionnaires were used to assess beliefs about medication (BMQ) and shared decision making (SDM-Q-doc). Results In total, 208 HCPs (29% male) participated; 107 from 51 Dutch and 101 from 26 Belgian hospitals. Though a wide range of activities were reported, certain domains concerning medication adherence management received less attention. Activities related to patient knowledge and adverse event management were reported most frequently, whereas activities aimed at patient’s self-efficacy and medication adherence during ongoing use were frequently missed. The care provided differed between professions and by country. Belgian physicians reported more activities than Dutch physicians, whereas Dutch nurses and pharmacists reported more activities than Belgian colleagues. The perceptions of medication adherence management were related to the level of care provided by HCPs. SDM and BMQ outcomes were not related to the care provided. Conclusions Enhancing the awareness and perceptions of medication adherence management of HCPs is likely to have a positive effect on care quality. Care can be improved by addressing medication adherence more directly e.g., by questioning patients about (expected) barriers and discussing strategies to overcome them, by asking for missed doses and offering (electronic) reminders to support long-term medication adherence. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended in which the role of the pharmacist could be expanded. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3110-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Contains fulltext : 170850.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Background Little is known about healthcare providers' (HCPs) perceptions of adherence management of oral anticancer agents (OACA). The study aims to explore HCPs perceptions of OACA and adherence. Methods A cross-sectional, multi-center observational study among HCPs in hemato-oncology settings in Belgium and the Netherlands was conducted. Physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses and pharmacists were asked to complete questionnaires on their perception of patient adherence and its management (PAMQ) and their beliefs about OACA (BMQ-Specific). Physicians were also asked to complete a questionnaire on their perception of shared decision making (SDM-Q-Doc). Results The sample consisted of 254 HCPs. Variations were found between HCPs on the PAMQ: 56%, 50%, 28% and 23% of, respectively, physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses and pharmacists reported to know the level of adherence of their patients and 59%, 53%, 43% and 10% of, respectively, physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses and pharmacists think that patients discuss adherence with them. 70%, 82%, 63% and 62% of, respectively, physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses and pharmacists reported to have knowledge of causes of non-adherence, while 78%, 87%, 76% and 80% of them reported to have knowledge of consequences of non-adherence. 81%, 92%, 83% and 67% of, respectively, physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses and pharmacists felt able to influence adherence. Lower concerns beliefs were associated with a higher total score on the PAMQ [beta (SE)=-0.85 (0.24); CI -1.33--0.38]. Physicians scored a mean of 75 on the SDM-scale. Conclusions A considerable part of the HCPs states they do not know the adherence of their patients, nor do they think patients discuss adherence with them. However, they feel to have knowledge of adherence and perceive to be able to influence adherence of their patients.

Purpose In recent years, the number of oral anticancer agents has increased substantially. Although these agents have quickly been incorporated in the treatment of a variety of malignancies, data on their incidence, prevalence and costs are lacking. The objective of the present study was to obtain insight into the use and the costs of oral anticancer agents (with Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system (World Health Organisation) code L01) in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2008. Methods Incidence and prevalence were determined using community pharmacy dispensing records obtained from the PHARMO Record Linkage System database. The data of costs were provided by the Genees- en hulpmiddelen Informatie Project of the Dutch Health Care Insurance Board (CVZ, Diemen, The Netherlands). Results In the years 2000–2008, the use of oral anticancer agents has more than doubled from 64 to 140 users per 100 000 inhabitants. The increase is mainly caused by the prescription of capecitabine for various indications. There was a 50-fold rise in costs on oral anticancer agents from €2 m in 2000 to approximately €100 m in 2008. The share in the costs of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in 2008 was 67% (€70 m) with the oldest TKI, imatinib, having a share of more than 50% within the group of TKIs. Conclusions The increased use of oral anticancer agents is mainly due to the frequent prescription of capecitabine. The increased costs are caused by the registration of a variety of TKIs, in particular imatinib. The costs of new agents with an orphan drug status are very high as compared with those of capecitabine, a newer agent for which there are alternative treatment options. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Contains fulltext : 127631.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) A rapidly growing number of oral anticancer agents has become available in oncology and hematology. Though these introductions have several benefits, medication adherence is an issue of concern. Little is known about the factors influencing adherence to treatment with oral anticancer agents in daily practice. Material and methods. In this observational, multicenter study including 216 patients, carried out between October 2010 and March 2012, the use of oral anticancer drugs was assessed by means of a telephonic pill count, a questionnaire and a review of the patient's medical file and pharmacy medication records. Parameters collected were patients' demographics, treatment characteristics, beliefs and attitude towards disease and medicines, self-reported adherence, side effects, quality of life and satisfaction about information. Patients off treatment filled out a questionnaire about the reasons for discontinuation. Optimal adherence was defined as >/= 95%- 105%) consisting both of under- and over-adherence. Multivariate analyses showed that being on a cyclic dosing regimen (rather than a continuous regimen), not living alone and being highly educated increased the chances of optimal adherence (ORs = 4.88, 4.59 and 2.53, respectively). In addition, optimal adherence was found to be less common in patients reporting treatment control (OR = 0.77). One third of 79 patients off treatment reported their experienced side effects as one of the reasons for discontinuation. Discussion. Although most patients are fully adherent to oral anticancer agents, there is a substantial number tending to non-adherence. Patients living alone and those on a continuous dosing regimen are most likely to adhere sub-optimally. Interventions to improve adherence should specifically address these patients and be tailored to the needs of the individual patient.

Background The antitumor drug nilotinib has a large inter- and intra individual variability in pharmacokinetics. Adherence to treatment may substantially influence plasma levels and has been recognized as the most important determinant of treatment failure in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A better understanding of the various factors contributing to the efficacy of treatment is essential for the development of interventions to optimize the treatment of chronic phase CML (CP-CML) with a protein kinase inhibitor like nilotinib. Methods/Design In this multicenter prospective observational cohort study 70 adult patients with CP-CML starting treatment with nilotinib will be followed up for at least 12 months. Response to treatment is evaluated after 3, 6 and 12 months. Adherence is primarily assessed by counting the daily intake of nilotinib capsules by means of a medication event monitoring system (MEMS). Before the start of nilotinib treatment and after 3, 6 and 12 months, patients are asked to fill in a comprehensive questionnaire including topics on quality of life, side effects, attitude towards disease and medication, the patients’ appreciation of information received about the medication, and discontinuation, and trough plasma levels of nilotinib are measured. Discussion The present study aims to get more insight into the efficacy of treatment with nilotinib and the various aspects that govern optimal response, of which adherence is a primary endpoint. We hypothesize that patients who experience inadequate response levels to nilotinib are less adherent. In addition, their plasma levels of nilotinib may be lower. We expect that our findings will be useful for health care professionals to support patients with the use of nilotinib in order to derive optimal benefit from their medication. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Registry NTR3992.

Jacqueline G Hugtenburg,1 Lonneke Timmers,1 Petra JM Elders,2 Marcia Vervloet,3 Liset van Dijk31EMGO+ Institute and Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, 2ANH-VUmc, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, 3NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The NetherlandsBackground: Nonadherence with medication is a complex and multidimensional health care problem. The causes may be related to the patient, treatment, and/or health care provider. As a consequence, substantial numbers of patients do not benefit optimally from pharmacotherapy, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality as well as increased societal costs. Several interventions may contribute to improved adherence. However, most interventions have only a modest effect. Thus, despite the many efforts made, there has been little progress made as yet in tackling the problem of nonadherence.Methods: This paper summarizes the definitions and taxonomy of adherence with medication, as well as types and causes of nonadherence. In addition, interventions aimed at improvement of adherence are discussed.Conclusion: There is not just one solution for the nonadherence problem that fits all patients. Most interventions to improve adherence are aimed at all patients regardless of whether they are adherent or not. Recently, a number of tailored interventions have been described in the literature. Modern techniques are useful. Electronic pill boxes combined with Short Message Service reminders are specifically designed to improve unintentional adherence and have resulted in an increase in refill adherence in diabetic patients with suboptimal adherence. Tailored Internet interventions are a possibility for influencing patient drug-taking behavior and show promising results. Tailored counseling interventions targeted at the underlying causes of nonadherence seem an attractive method for supporting patients with their use of drugs. However, despite the plausible theoretical framework, data on long-term health effects of the various interventions are not available. To improve adherence effectively, there is a need for a tailored approach based on the type and cause of nonadherence and the specific needs of the patient.Keywords: adherence, compliance, concordance, tailored intervention

Background Adherence to pharmacological therapy is a complex and multi-factorial issue that can substantially alter the outcome of treatment. It has been shown that cancer patients, especially when using long-term medication, have similar adherence rates to those of patients with other diseases. The consequences of poor adherence are poor health outcomes and increased health care costs. Only few studies have focused on the use of oral anticancer agents in daily practice. Information about the reasons for non-adherence is essential for the development of interventions that may increase adherence. This paper presents the CAPER-erlotinib protocol, which is designed to study the relationship between adherence to erlotinib and both the plasma concentration and side-effects in patients with NSCLC. Further, the relationships between patient characteristics, disease characteristics, side-effects, quality of life, patient beliefs and attitude towards disease and medication, dose adjustments, reasons for discontinuation and plasma concentration of erlotinib will be explored. Methods/Design In this prospective observational cohort study 65 NSCLC patients of 18 years or older starting treatment with erlotinib will be followed for a period up to 16 weeks. The main study parameters are adherence, the plasma concentration of erlotinib and the number and grade of side-effects. At baseline and on erlotinib treatment in weeks 3-4, 8-9, 12 and 15-16, patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire. In weeks 3-4, 8-9 and 15-16 blood samples are collected, which will be analysed for plasma concentration of erlotinib. Adherence will be measured using a medication event monitoring system. Discussion The present study aims to get more insight into patients' experiences with the use of erlotinib in daily practice and the various aspects that govern adherence. We hypothesize that side-effects play an important role in the way patients use erlotinib. We expect that the present study will provide valuable knowledge which will be useful for health care professionals to develop interventions to support patients. This approach will improve the adherence and persistence with the use of erlotinib in order to derive optimal benefit from the medication. Trial Registration NTR1830

In recent years, the number of oral anticancer agents has increased substantially. Although these agents have quickly been incorporated in the treatment of a variety of malignancies, data on their incidence, prevalence and costs are lacking. The objective of the present study was to obtain insight into the use and the costs of oral anticancer agents (with Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system (World Health Organisation) code L01) in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2008.Incidence and prevalence were determined using community pharmacy dispensing records obtained from the PHARMO Record Linkage System database. The data of costs were provided by the Genees- en hulpmiddelen Informatie Project of the Dutch Health Care Insurance Board (CVZ, Diemen, The Netherlands).In the years 2000-2008, the use of oral anticancer agents has more than doubled from 64 to 140 users per 100 000 inhabitants. The increase is mainly caused by the prescription of capecitabine for various indications. There was a 50-fold rise in costs on oral anticancer agents from €2 m in 2000 to approximately €100 m in 2008. The share in the costs of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in 2008 was 67% (€70 m) with the oldest TKI, imatinib, having a share of more than 50% within the group of TKIs.The increased use of oral anticancer agents is mainly due to the frequent prescription of capecitabine. The increased costs are caused by the registration of a variety of TKIs, in particular imatinib. The costs of new agents with an orphan drug status are very high as compared with those of capecitabine, a newer agent for which there are alternative treatment options.