Search

Abstract Background US nursing homes were ground zero for COVID-19 and nursing home leaders faced multiple challenges to keep residents and staff safe. Understanding the leader’s role and their use of external resources to rapidly respond to the pandemic is important to better prepare for the next infectious disease outbreak emergency. The purpose of this study is to describe Missouri nursing home leaders’ use of external resources to manage challenges encountered during the pandemic. Methods This qualitative descriptive study uses data from semi-structured interviews conducted with leaders from 24 Midwestern nursing homes between March 2022 and March 2023. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Dedoose software. Directed content analysis, guided by Donabedian’s Structure, Process, Outcome framework, was used for analysis. Interviews were conducted as part of a larger mixed-methods study focused on developing knowledge and recommendations to improve US nursing homes’ capacity to respond to infectious disease outbreaks. Results Forty-three interviews were conducted across the 24 homes. Participants included administrators (n = 24), nurse leaders (n = 19), and infection preventionists (n = 16). Six sub-categories of external resources/support were used by leaders to manage challenges during the pandemic:1) corporate support and communications, 2) statewide resources, 3) community-based resources, 4) health care coalitions focused on emergency response planning, 5) existing affiliations with local organizations i.e., hospitals, and 6) community members and families. Corporate support was a primary resource; however, it was limited to chain-based homes. Leaders from standalone homes seemed most reliant on statewide agencies, existing affiliations, and other community-based resources due to their lack of corporate connections. Health care coalitions were few, but when available, helped nursing homes prepare for the pandemic onset. Family and community members were vital despite being off-site from nursing homes at the pandemic onset. Conclusion Leaders played a pivotal role in accessing and using external resources to manage challenges during the pandemic. Statewide and community-based agencies and existing affiliations were particularly critical for standalone homes who otherwise had little to no means of support. Federal, state and local agencies must consider opportunities to build multi-agency regional collaborations, local health care coalitions and community-based partnerships that include nursing homes as member. Finally, community members and family were important in providing support, thus closing visitation is a double-edged sword that needs careful, future consideration.

Background: Nursing homes (NHs) have high prevalence of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) with rates exceeding those in hospitals. This study proposes quantifying patients’ risk of MDRO colonization and creating a risk profile for the NH patient populations to assist in reducing MDRO burden in health care facilities. Methods: We assessed a risk classification model using data from a prospective cohort study (2018 Pathways study). Patient sample included 783 newly admitted patients followed for up to 180 days and 9,587 samples collected from patients during 2,089 visits. Individual risk factors of MDRO colonization were assessed using unadjusted logistic regression, and patients were risk classified based on number of risk factors. Multivariate regression was performed to obtain odds of MDRO colonization for patient risk groups adjusting for patient age, sex, race, and length of NH stay (LOS). The risk classification tool developed using Pathways data was also tested among a sample of NH residents from Veterans Administration (N=190). Results: The patient sample (Pathways data) was 43.2% male, 37.2% Black with a mean age 74 years. 69.3% were colonized with a MDRO during the study. In unadjusted regression, recent antibiotic use (p

Background: Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is known to cause frequent and severe infections in community living centers, potentially resulting in significant mortality for elderly patients. More research is needed to understand how to utilize genomic and epidemiological data to understand characteristics that may lead to increased transmission. We hypothesized that combining genomic and epidemiological information to sample patients and their environments during long-term stays, we will be able to capture a diverse set of MRSA strains. Method: This work included genome sequencing of patient and environmental samples from 11 patients within the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System from May 4, 2021- November 16, 2022. All 11 patients tested positive for MRSA during their stay (mean days = 31). Patient and environmental samples were taken throughout their stays, screened for MRSA, and whole-genome sequenced. Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were identified by mapping reads and calling variants against strain-specific reference genomes. We used ape v5.6-2 in R v4.2.2 to analyze and infer evolution, acquisition, and transmission events based on pairwise SNV distances. Genomic clusters were determined using stats v3.6.2, with a SNV distance threshold of 20. Result: Samples that were collected from patient bodily sites were able to reveal 20 distinct genomic clusters of MRSA (patient hands: n = 10, nares: n = 7, groin: n = 3). Environmental samples from patient environments also revealed distinct genomic MRSA clusters (tv remote: n = 9, toilet seat and bed rail: n = 6, table top, bed control, and call button: n = 5, bed curtain: n = 4, pulse ox = 2, cell phone, tray, pulse ox, mat, body hoist wrap, and bed: n = 1). Conclusion: The identification of various genomic clusters from patients and their environmental reservoirs suggests intrahost variation that can only be captured by using a more holistic approach of integrating epidemiology and genomic sequencing. Developing studies that incorporate genomic data, various environmental sources, and multiple isolates over time within community living centers can increase our understanding of strains that are more likely to transmit, survive on living and non-living surfaces and therefore lead to improved recommendation for infection prevention interventions and drivers of endemicity.

Background: Nursing home (NH) residents are at high risk of COVID-19 from exposure to infected staff and other residents. Understanding SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA kinetics in residents and staff can guide testing, isolation, and return to work recommendations. We sought to determine the duration of antigen test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity in a cohort of NH residents and staff. Methods: We prospectively collected data on SARS-CoV-2 viral kinetics from April 2023 through November 2023. Staff and residents could enroll prospectively or upon a positive test (identified through routine clinical testing, screening, or outbreak response testing). Participating facilities performed routine clinical testing; asymptomatic testing of contacts was performed within 48 hours if an outbreak or known exposure occurred and upon (re-) admission. Enrolled participants who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were re-tested daily for 14 days with both nasal antigen and nasal PCR tests. All PCR tests were run by a central lab with the same assay. We conducted a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis on time to first negative test restricted to participants who initially tested positive (day zero) and had at least one test ≥10 days after initially testing positive with the same test type; a participant could contribute to both antigen and PCR survival curves. We compared survival curves for staff and residents using the log-rank test. Results: Twenty-four nursing homes in eight states participated; 587 participants (275 residents, 312 staff) enrolled in the evaluation, participants were only tested through routine clinical or outbreak response testing. Seventy-two participants tested positive for antigen; of these, 63 tested PCR-positive. Residents were antigen- and PCR-positive longer than staff (Figure 1), but this finding is only statistically significant (p=0.006) for duration of PCR positivity. Five days after the first positive test, 56% of 50 residents and 59% of 22 staff remained antigen-positive; 91% of 44 residents and 79% of 19 staff were PCR-positive. Ten days after the first positive test, 22% of 50 residents and 5% of 22 staff remained antigen-positive; 61% of 44 residents and 21% of 19 staff remained PCR-positive. Conclusions: Most NH residents and staff with SARS-CoV-2 remained antigen- or PCR-positive 5 days after the initial positive test; however, differences between staff and resident test positivity were noted at 10 days. These data can inform recommendations for testing, duration of NH resident isolation, and return to work guidance for staff. Additional viral culture data may strengthen these conclusions.

Background and objectives: Patients with functional disabilities are at higher risk of adverse outcomes, including infections. Although healthcare worker hand contamination has long been recognized as an important source of pathogen acquisition, the role of patient hands has been less clearly defined. We sought to determine whether the presence of functional disabilities is correlated with patient hand contamination by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and thus a potential target for patient hand hygiene (PHH) interventions. Methods: Case–control study of hand contamination with methicillin-resistant S. aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and gram-negative bacilli resistant to cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and/or carbapenems in 2 acute-care hospitals in southeastern Michigan. Cases (n = 40) and controls (n = 359) were defined as patients with or without hand contamination by MDROs, respectively. We assigned 3 exposure categories based on Katz activities of daily living scores: no functional disabilities (independent, reference group), 1–3 functional disabilities (partially dependent), and 4+ functional disabilities (dependent). We used stepwise logistic regression to identify confounding variables. Logistic regression was then used to establish the relationship between a patient’s functional dependence level and their hand contamination by MDROs. Results: The distribution of hand contamination of each target MDRO by level of patient dependence is shown in the Table. Overall, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most represented, followed by resistant gram-negatives and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Hospital site, sex, and history of MDROs were included in the model based on stepwise regression. The odds ratio (OR) of MRSA hand contamination in the dependent category was 3.19 (95% CI, 1.18–5.54) compared to the independent category, and for any MDRO the OR was 2.77 (95% CI, 1.22–6.32) (Fig. 1). The OR of MRSA hand contamination in the partially dependent category was 1.38 (95% CI, 0.27–7.07) compared to the independent group, and for any MDRO the OR was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.24–3.10) (Fig. 1). Feeding dependence had the highest single association with hand contamination (OR, 3.79, 95% CI, 1.26–11.43), with dressing dependence having the second highest association with hand contamination (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.31–6.05) (Fig. 2). Conclusions: Patients with more functional dependencies were more likely to have MDRO hand contamination. This finding suggests a need for targeted PHH interventions in patients with functional disabilities to help prevent the spread of MDROs in the acute-care setting.

Background: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) community living centers (CLCs) provide postacute and long-term care. CLC veterans visit myriad locations outside their rooms (eg, rehabilitation, dialysis). Pathogen transmission during out-of-room visits is unknown. Methods: We recruited newly admitted veterans at 3 CLCs. After obtaining informed consent, we cultured nares, groin, hands, and 7 surfaces in the patient rooms. We accompanied veterans to up to 5 out-of-room visits and cultured patients’ hands and surfaces they touched. We tested for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and quinolone, carbapenem, and/or ceftazidime-resistant gram-negative bacteria (R-GNB). We defined transmission as a positive culture following an initial negative culture during the same visit. Results: We enrolled 137 veterans (median follow-up, 29 days; mean, 5.9 visits); 97% were postacute patients. We conducted 539 patient-room sampling visits (mean, 3.9 per veteran; 5,490 swabs) and accompanied 97 veterans to 266 out-of-room sampling visits (mean, 2.7 per veteran; 2,360 swabs). Of 137 patients, 47 (35%) were colonized with an MDRO at enrollment and 74 (58%) of 128 patients were colonized on any follow-up patient-room visits. Of 133 patients, 55 (41%) acquired a new MDRO, most often VRE (31 of 97, 32%). In patient rooms, toilet seats [114 (21%) of 538], curtains [101 (19%) of 530] and bedrails [98 (18%) of 539] were most frequently contaminated. Among 266 out-of-room visits, 17% had surfaces contaminated with MDROs, most commonly involving dialysis [4 (31%) of 13], radiology [2 (25%) of 8], and rehabilitation therapy [29 (18%) of 159] (Fig. 1).Transmission of MDROs during out-of-room visits was common and occurred in 18% of visits with 8% (9 MRSA and 12 VRE) acquiring a new MDRO on their hands and 12% (9 MRSA and 23 VRE) of MDRO transmission occurring from hands to a surface that the patient touched (Fig. 1). In 18 (58%) of 31 cases, the organism transmitted to a surface was on patient hands at the start of the visit. Transmission was most common during visits to dialysis (3 to patients and 2 to surfaces), radiology (1 to a patient and 2 to surfaces), and rehabilitation therapy (13 to patients and 21 to surfaces) (Fig. 2). Conclusions: New MDRO acquisition during VHA CLC stay was common, and nearly one-fifth of out-of-room visits resulted in MDRO transmission. Our analyses suggest that veterans’ hands may shed MDROs (MRSA and VRE) to surfaces. Interventions to reduce MDRO transmission during visits for rehabilitation, dialysis, and other therapies are needed.

Abstract Multiple room occupancy is common in Nursing Homes (NHs), and its role in transmission of antibiotic-resistant pathogens is unclear. We investigated prevalence of patient colonization and environmental contamination with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in NH roommates, compared it with expected prevalence, and determined specific body and environmental sites that may act as sources of roommate colonization. Roommate contamination was associated with index patient’s colonization (relative risk (RR): 2.57 (95% CI 1.04–6.37)) for MRSA, and index patient’s immediate environment contamination for VRE (RR: 3.60 (95% CI 1.59–8.12)). When specific index patient sites associated with roommate colonization were investigated, the side table (Fisher’s p = 0.029 and 0.047 for VRE and MRSA, respectively) and the nurse call button (p = 0.001 and 0.052) stood out, together with patient hands in the case of VRE (p = 0.026). Future studies should be carried out to establish whether these sites should be a specific target of infection prevention campaigns in NHs with multiple occupancy rooms.

Background: SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19 infection, can significantly contaminate environmental surfaces and can remain viable on surfaces for up to 9 days. Although respiratory route remains the most significant mode of transmission, fomites and environmental sources of infection remain a concern for healthcare personnel who are working in dedicated COVID-19 units. We investigated the extent of detectable SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the environment of COVID-19 patients at a single VA hospital, with the intent of identifying potential high-touch surfaces at risk for viral contamination, which could be used to inform the development of simple COVID-19 prevention strategies. Methods: We conducted a cohort study at 1 VA hospital in a unit housing adult veterans admitted with COVID-19 between October and December 2020. In total, 11 swab specimens were collected for PCR analysis (SARS-CoV-2 env gene) from environmental surfaces inside and just outside the rooms of COVID-19 patients one time. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted to provide the SARS-CoV-2 epidemiologic context for environmental detection. Results: In total, 297 swabs were collected from the unit and environmental areas surrounding 27 hospitalized patients: average age, 72.5 years (range, 34–94); 100% male; 92% non-Hispanic white; average comorbidities, 1.8 (SD, 1.1). Of 297 swabs, 80 (27%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 and 19 (70%) of 27 patients had at least 1 positive site. The most contaminated site was the floor just outside the patient room (78% positive samples), followed by the patient’s bedrail (37%) and chair handle (37%) (Fig. 1). Traditionally high-touch surfaces, such as the door handle (outside patient room) and the light switch, did not have high positivity rates (

Background: Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) is of special concern among frail patients in nursing homes. To understand environmental contamination patterns in this setting, we screened a suitable section of a nursing home over time and assessed MRSA and VRE prevalence in patients and their rooms. We were especially interested in assessing whether MRSA and VRE strains persist in rooms during changes of occupancy after patient discharge. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of MRSA and VRE colonization and contamination among successive patients in a cluster of 9 single-occupancy rooms. Using flocked swabs, 5 high-touch surfaces were screened 3 times a week for 34 weeks. Patients were also screened (ie, nares, groin, and hands), if they agreed to participate. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on 67 nonredundant MRSA and VRE strains. Single-nucleotide polymorphism heatmaps and similarity trees were generated to evaluate strain diversity and persistence the facility. Results: Overall, 146 distinct occupancy events were captured during the study (16.5 average per room; range, 11–22), with 387 study visits and 4,670 total swabs collected. All rooms were contaminated with VRE, and 8 of 9 were contaminated with MRSA at least once during the study period. New contamination of a room with MRSA or VRE was observed in 43 (23%) of 185 opportunities, with potential persistence during occupancy changes in 25 (32.9%) of 76 opportunities. Sequencing of 67 nonredundant isolates identified at least 6 enterococcal clades and 10 MRSA clades (6 USA100 and 4 USA300), indicating a high degree of diversity and probably multiple introductions in the facility during the study time. In 3 separate cases, whole-genome sequencing confirmed persistence of a specific MRSA strain during a change of room occupancy, including 1 case of a MRSA strain persisting in a clean room before admission of the next patient. For VRE, 2 cases of persistence during room occupancy changes were confirmed, along with 6 cases of possible persistence (contamination across noncontiguous room occupancy events). Conclusions: Active surveillance screening and a recurring evaluation of terminal cleaning procedures should be considered due to high levels of circulation and persistence of MRSA and VRE in the nursing home setting.

Background: Persistent colonization with resistant gram-negative bacteria (R-GNB) increases risk of clinical infection and intra-facility transmission among nursing home (NH) patients. Limited data exist on the roles of age and function on duration of R-GNB colonization. Methods: Secondary data analysis was performed from a cohort study of patients admitted to 6 Michigan NHs between November 2013 and May 2018. Swabs obtained upon enrollment, day 14, day 30, then monthly until NH discharge from 6 anatomical sites were cultured for GNB. R-GNB were defined as resistant to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, or imipenem. Positive R-GNB culture from a single visit followed by negative cultures for the same organism from ≥2 subsequent visits were defined as transient R-GNB colonization. All other patients with positive R-GNB cultures from multiple visits were considered persistently colonized. Demographic data, antibiotic use, device use, and physical self-maintenance scales (PSMSs) were obtained upon enrollment. Characteristics were compared between patients with transient versus persistent R-GNB and uncolonized patients using multinomial logistic regression. Results: We recruited 896 patients (median age, 75 years; 41% male; 46% nonwhite) and followed them for 2,437 total visits. Of 896 patients, 407 (45.4%) were colonized with ≥1 R-GNB during their stay. Of 171 patients with ≥ 2 follow-up visits after R-GNB detection, 94 (55%) remained persistently colonized with the same R-GNB (Table 1). Escherichia coli (30%) and Proteus mirabilis (22%) were the most frequently identified R-GNB. The most common anatomical colonization sites were perirectal (368 [24.3%] of 1,147) groin (340 [14.3%] of 2,046), and hands (115 [4.8%] of 2283). Compared to uncolonized patients, patients with persistent (1.09; 95% CI, 1.00–1.19, P = .048) and transient R-GNB colonization (1.13; 95% CI, 1.04–1.23; P = .003) had lower PSMS (Tables 2 and 3). Compared to uncolonized and transiently colonized patients, patients with persistent R-GNB colonization had prolonged lengths of NH stay (1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.01; P = .003). Conclusions: R-GNB colonization in vulnerable NH patients is common (407 [45.5%] of 896 and often persistent (94 [55%] of 171 patients with sufficient follow-up to assess persistence). Patients with persistent R-GNB had lower functional status, longer LOS, and higher readmission rates than those without. R-GNB decolonization should be investigated as a strategy to potentially improve outcomes among NH patients.

Background: Postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) include fatigue, dyspnea, anxiety, and cognitive impairment. Few studies have explored the prevalence or presentation of PASC among nursing home (NH) residents. Method: A case–control study was conducted at 1 NH in Michigan in December 2021. Cases were defined as residents with SARS-CoV-2 infection between November 2, 2020, and October 8, 2021. Controls lived at the same NH during this interval and never tested positive for SARS CoV-2. Patient characteristics were compared between cases and controls using the Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Primary outcomes were functional decline, cognition, and adverse health outcomes. Outcomes were assessed by comparing measures on last observation to observations before COVID-19 diagnosis (cases) or to earliest observation (controls). Multivariable logistic regression assessed correlation between COVID-19 diagnosis and outcomes. Results: In total, 152 residents were identified for inclusion (147 included in final analyses, 76 cases, 71 controls); 5 were excluded due to insufficient data. We collected the following resident characteristics: 66% were aged ≥80 years; 73% were female; 95% were non-Hispanic white; 82% were long-stay residents; median of 3 comorbidities (IQR, 2–4). The mean number of follow-up observations was 2.60 (SD, 1.25). No significant differences in population characteristics were detected between cases and controls. Moreover, 106 patients (46 cases and 60 controls) had at least 1 follow-up visit and were thus included in the analyses to evaluate long-term outcomes. Among them, cases experienced significant declines in completing transfers (OR 5.65, p Conclusions: Nursing home residents with COVID-19 are more likely to enter hospice and have a higher mortality rate in the year following infection. Survivors experience significant functional decline in basic activities of daily living, specifically in the ability to transfer and dress. Larger studies are needed to further characterize our findings and to design interventions that can help overcome these long-term sequelae from COVID-19.

Background: Colonization is the main precursor to infection, which may lead to adverse clinical outcomes among older adults in nursing homes (NHs). Understanding seasonal changes in the local burden of common bacterial pathogens is key to implementing appropriate and cost-effective infection prevention measures in this resource-constrained healthcare environment. It is thus surprising that seasonal trends in patient and environmental colonization with major bacterial pathogens are presently unknown in the expanding NH setting.Methods: We examined the seasonal incidence of four major pathogens among 640 nursing home patients and high-touch surfaces within their rooms over 2 years. In cases where a significant number of antimicrobial-resistant strains was found, incidence in antimicrobial-susceptible and antimicrobial-resistant isolates was compared, along with antibiotic use trends.Results: We observed spring peaks in the incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (1.70 peak to trough ratio for both patient and environmental isolates) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (1.95 peak to trough ratio for patient isolates, 1.50 for environmental isolates). We also observed summer peaks in Klebsiella pneumoniae (1.83 and 1.82 peak to trough ratio for patient and environmental isolates, respectively), and ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli. Susceptible S. aureus and E. coli did not follow seasonal patterns.Conclusions: A meaningful seasonal pattern may be present in the NH setting for several significant pathogens, and especially antimicrobial-resistant ones. Whether such patterns are consistent across geographic areas and over longer periods of time should be a key focus of investigation, in order to better inform timing of surveillance and infection prevention efforts in this setting.

We conducted a cross-sectional, survey study of 764 volunteers to gain insight into patients’ perceptions of physician qualities of compassion and competence. Among 651 (85% response rate) survey participants, mean age was 52.4 (SD 21.4) years, 70.8% (n = 458) were female, and 84% (n = 539) identified as white. Predictors of compassion over competence included female gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.04-1.89) and whether the respondent had a personal connection to the vignette (aOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.0-1.53). Thematic analysis demonstrated that preferences were influenced by: (a) explicit beliefs regarding the value of physician compassion and physician competence; (b) impact of emotional and mental health on medical experiences; (c) the type and frequency of health care exposure; and (d) perceived role of the physician in various clinical vignettes. Patients had wide-ranging, complex opinions on the qualities they valued in their physicians. These findings suggest that patients are engaged and can provide critical thoughtful feedback on the practice and delivery of health care.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: We investigated the association between gut microbiota features in newly admitted nursing facility (NF) patients and the acquisition of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) and/or resistant Gram-negative bacteria (rGNB) within 14 days. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Patients were recruited at 6 Michigan NFs from 09/16-08/18. VRE or rGNB colonization status was determined by culture swabs collected from multiple body sites at enrolment, day 7, and day 14. Our analysis focused on patients with no colonization at baseline, a perirectal swab collected at baseline, and at least one follow-up visit. The V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene from bacterial DNA in each sample was PCR-amplified and sequenced on the MiSeq platform. Sequencing results were then processed with the mothur bioinformatics pipeline to classify bacterial taxa present in each sample. Taxa typically associated with the skin microbiota were removed. The primary outcome was acquisition of VRE and/or rGNB within 14 days. Exposures of interest included patient and microbiota characteristics. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Among 61 patients, 18 (30%) acquired AROs within 14 days of enrolment (3 VRE, 13 rGNB, 2 both) (Table 1). The baseline microbiota features differed significantly in those who acquired a new ARO. Of the major 8 phyla found across samples, patients who acquired an ARO were depleted in the number of phyla present (5.74 ± 1.20 vs 5.06 ± 1.43; p = 0.037) (Fig. 1). The log10-transformed relative abundance of Enterococcus was enriched in patients who acquired an ARO (−0.32 ± 1.47) compared to those who did not (−1.68 ± 1.76; p = 0.021) (Fig. 2). Patients who did not acquire an ARO tended to harbour more butyrate-producing bacterial taxa and strict anaerobes, although the differences were not statistically significant (relative abundance of butyrate producer: 29.49 ± 22.09 vs 22.05 ± 17.76; anaerobes: 64.78 ± 23.54 vs 53.68 ± 27.61). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Microbiota metrics calculated from perirectal samples are predictive of ARO acquisition. The clinical utility of perirectal samples thus warrants further assessment.

ABSTRACT Nursing home residents are at a greater risk of developing pressure injuries that develop into an open wound, which can become colonized with bacteria. Understanding the factors that influence microbial colonization of open wounds can lead to the prevention of infections. The relationship between bacteria found in urine and those in open wounds is currently unknown. To determine if bacterial species colonizing open wounds are also found in the urine, we conducted a pilot study with nursing home residents, comparing bacterial species present in the urine with those present in wounds between the umbilicus and mid-thigh. To identify microbial species that were present in both urine and open wound at one time point in one patient, standard clinical bacteriologic culture techniques followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) were used, as well as 16S rRNA-encoding gene amplicon sequencing. We found some bacterial species detected in urine were also detected in open wounds in one individual at one time point, using both culture-dependent and -independent techniques. Bacterial species that were more often detected, using culture-dependent and -independent methods, at both sites included Enterococcus faecalis, Proteus mirabilis, Escherichia coli, and Providencia stuartii. This pilot study provides evidence that bacterial species identified within the urine can also be identified in open wounds in the same patient at one point in time. Further studies are needed to investigate if these species are of the same lineage and if the urinary microbiota are able to seed colonization of open wounds below the umbilicus. IMPORTANCE Older adults, specifically those in nursing facilities, are more susceptible to developing chronic open nonhealing wounds. Chronic open nonhealing wounds severely impact an individual’s quality of life and can lead to other comorbidities, such as infection. Recent evidence suggests that the open wound bacterial community can influence wound healing and repair. It is important to understand all sources of open wound contamination to improve preventative infection measures and treatment protocols. In this pilot study, we investigated if bacterial species isolated from urine can also be isolated from open wounds located between the levels of the umbilicus and mid-thigh in the same patient at the same point in time. A growing body of evidence suggests that urine can harbor a microbial community, even in asymptomatic individuals, and older adults are more prone to urinary incontinence. This is the first study to investigate bacterial species concordance between these two anatomical sites. We found, using both culture-dependent and -independent methods, that the same bacterial species can colonize both the urine and wound in one patient at one point in time. Further studies are needed to investigate if these species are of the same lineage and if the urinary microbiota are able to seed colonization of these types of open wounds.

Introduction Compared with younger populations, adults 65 years and older are more likely to suffer infection-related morbidity and mortality, experience antibiotic-related adverse events, and acquire multidrug-resistant organisms. We developed a series of case-based discussions that stressed antibiotic stewardship while addressing management of common infections in older adults. Methods Five 1-hour case-based discussions address recognition, diagnosis, and management of infections common in older adults, including those living in long-term care settings: urinary tract infections, upper respiratory tract infections, lower respiratory tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and Clostridium difficile infection. The education was implemented at the skilled nursing centers at 15 Veterans Affairs medical centers. Participants from an array of disciplines completed an educational evaluation for each session as well as a pre- and postcourse knowledge assessment. Results The number of respondents to the educational evaluation administered following each session ranged from 68 to 108. Learners agreed that each session met its learning objectives (4.80–4.89 on a 5-point Likert scale, 5 = strongly agree) and that they were likely to make changes (2.50–2.89 on a 3-point scale, 3 = highly likely to make changes). The average score on the five-question knowledge assessment increased from 3.6 (72%) to 3.9 (78%, p = .06). Discussion By stressing recognition of atypical signs and symptoms of infection in older adults, diagnostic tests, and antibiotic stewardship, this series of five case-based discussions enhanced clinical training of learners from several disciplines.