Search

Utilization of novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and check-point inhibitors (CI) has increased in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL). We conducted a retrospective study of 209 patients who had ASCT for r/r cHL at our institution and compared outcomes of those who had ASCT from 2010-2018 (cohort 2, n = 110) with those who had ASCT between 2000 and 2009 (cohort 1, n = 99). The median OS was 7.6 years for cohort 1 [HR 2.08; 95% CI 1.14-3.80; p = 0.017] and not reached for cohort 2; with 4-year improved OS difference of 15% (80% vs 65%) in cohort 2 vs cohort 1. The median PFS of cohort 1 was 30 months vs 39 months for cohort 2[HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.82-1.88; p = 0.3]. This study highlights improved OS of r/r cHL patients who have received ASCT in the novel agent era due to the exposure to agents such as BV and CIs.

Limited information is available on the efficacy of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTcy) or thymoglobulin for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) transplants. We retrospectively compared outcomes of 76 adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who underwent 7/8 HLA-MMUD transplantation and received either PTcy (50 mg/kg on day 3 and 4) or thymoglobulin (total dose 4.5 mg/kg) for GVHD prophylaxis. In addition, tacrolimus and mycophenolate were used in both groups. Propensity score-based multivariable analyses (PSCA) were performed to adjust confounding effects of patient characteristics between both groups. Between January 2006 and June 2019, 25 patients received PTcy, and 51 received thymoglobulin. Median age of the population was 57 years, 78% of patients had AML, most common graft source was peripheral blood (96%), and 46% received myeloablative conditioning regimens. Median time to neutrophil (15 versus 11 days, P.001) and platelet engraftment (21 versus 15 days, P = .002) was prolonged in the PTcy group. The cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD at day 100 was similar (12% versus 19.6%, P = .38), whereas chronic GVHD at 1 year was lower with PTcy compared to thymoglobulin (16% versus 49%, P = .006). Using PSCA, no difference in survival, relapse, relapse-free survival, and GVHD-free relapse-free survival was seen between groups. However, thymoglobulin was associated with higher incidence of acute (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.63, P = .01) and chronic GVHD (HR = 4.43, P = .03), and non-relapse mortality (HR 3.38, P = .04) compared to PTcy. Our study demonstrated that PTcy resulted in significantly lower rates of acute and chronic GVHD and non-relapse mortality compared to thymoglobulin in 7/8 HLA-MMUD transplants for AML and MDS.

Limited information is available on the impact of intensity of conditioning regimens in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplant (haploPBSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTcy). We retrospectively compared outcomes of haplo-PBSCT between myeloablative (MAC) (n = 24) and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (n = 65). Propensity score-based multivariable analyses were performed to adjust confounding effects of baseline characteristics between both groups. Eighty-nine patients underwent haplo-PBSCT between January 2012 and June 2019. For MAC and RIC, the cumulative incidences of grade III--IV acute GVHD were 4.2% and 3.1%, respectively (p = 0.92), and chronic GVHD were 18.9% and 36.5%, respectively (p = 0.08). Median follow-up for overall survival (OS) after MAC and RIC was 1.86 and 2.2 years, respectively. For MAC and RIC, one-year OS was 68.8% and 67.4%, respectively (p = 0.85); one-year relapse rate was 22.4% and 18.3%, respectively (p = 0.74); one-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 56% and 59.7%, respectively (p = 0.87); and one-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 22% and 21.9%, respectively (p = 0.58). Using propensity score-based multivariable analyses, no difference in OS (HR 0.72, p = 0.51), relapse (SHR 0.63, p = 0.42), RFS (HR 0.74, p = 0.49) and NRM (SHR 1.11, p = 0.87) was noted between RIC and MAC. Our study shows no difference in outcomes between MAC and RIC regimens in haplo-PBSCT.

The use of G-CSF post allogeneic transplant has become a common practice to accelerate neutrophil engraftment. There is some controversy in its use. To further evaluate the effectiveness, we compared outcomes in patients who underwent PBSCT, either with or without the planned use of G-CSF post SCT. Among consecutive 162 patients from October 2012 to October 2014, 65 patients received G-CSF post-PBSCT, and 97 did not. More patients in G-CSF group received MAC (78% vs. 55%). Patients who received G-CSF had earlier neutrophil engraftment (median days 11 vs. 14) and shorter post-transplant hospital stay (median days 16 vs. 20

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) targets in-vivo T lymphocytes. Variations in the recipient absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) might result in a variable exposure of ATG. We hypothesized that recipient ALC on the first day of ATG might predict transplant outcomes. We evaluated 217 patients undergoing 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) between January 2005 and December 2017, and receiving rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin, total dose 4.5 mg/kg) on days -3, -2 and -1. With a median follow up of 3.68 years for survival (OS), one-year OS, relapse rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 64.7%, 15.9%, 25.8%, and 58.4%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that ALC100 k/mm

Maintenance therapy after first autologous transplant (autoSCT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM). However, efficacy of maintenance therapy after second autoSCT is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of 111 adult MM patients who underwent second autoSCT between January 2000 and December 2018. Lenalidomide up to 15 mg daily or subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m

Allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) is considered in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with chemorefractory disease or who have relapsed after autologous SCT. Here we present the first report of alloSCT using the R-BEAM (rituximab, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) conditioning regimen in DLBCL patients. We retrospectively compared long-term alloSCT outcomes of DLBCL patients who received either R-BEAM (n = 47) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (n = 23). Seventy patients (median age, 53 years) with DLBCL received alloSCT between January 2005 and December 2017. The median number of pretransplant therapies was 3, and 17 patients (24%) received prior autologous SCT. All received rituximab as a frontline or salvage therapy before alloSCT. The donor was unrelated in 42 patients (60%), and peripheral blood stem cells were commonly used (96%). The 6-month cumulative incidence of grades III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 36.2% and 8.7% for R-BEAM and RIC, respectively (P = .03). Median follow-up of surviving patients after R-BEAM and RIC was 3.1 and 5.5 years, respectively. Three-year overall survival (OS) after R-BEAM and RIC was 34.4% and 43.4%, respectively (P = .48). At 3 years, R-BEAM was associated with a similar relapse rate (25.5% versus 26.1%, P = .96), nonrelapse mortality (NRM; 39.7% versus 39.1%, P = .98), and relapse-free survival (RFS; 34.8% versus 34.7%, P = .75) compared with RIC. In multivariable analysis lower Karnofsky performance score was associated with lower OS (hazard ratio, .96; P = .05), whereas chemorefractory disease was associated with a higher relapse risk (hazard ratio, 8.8; P = .04). No difference in OS, relapse, NRM, or RFS was noticed between R-BEAM and RIC. R-BEAM regimen seems to be feasible and results in equivalent rates of long-term OS, relapse, NRM, and RFS compared with RIC. However, a significantly higher rate of severe acute GVHD was noticed.

Purpose. Women with locally advanced/high-risk triple-negative breast cancer treated with the current standard chemotherapy continue to have a poor prognosis. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant as treatment for locally advanced/high-risk breast cancer remains controversial due to a lack of survival benefit seen in previous phase III trials. However, these trials evaluated a heterogeneous group of patients with different receptor subtypes. A marginal benefit was observed in certain subgroups. We report long-term outcomes of women with stage IIB or III triple-negative breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant at our institution between 1995 and 2001. Methods. This is a retrospective analysis of stage IIB or stage III triple-negative breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant. We excluded women with hormone-positive, HER2/neu-positive/unknown, and/or metastatic disease prior to transplant as per updated AJCC 7th edition guidelines. Patients underwent surgery and either neoadjuvant or adjuvant anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy and then proceeded to high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant using carmustine 600 mg/sqm, cyclophosphamide 5.6gm/sqm, and cisplatin 165 mg/sqm (STAMP 1 regimen) for consolidation. This was followed by locoregional breast and lymph node radiation per standard of care. Results. Twenty-nine women (2 stage IIB and 27 stage III) were evaluated. The median age at diagnosis was 43 years (IQR: 40, 51). Eleven patients had 4–9 regional lymph nodes (LN) involved and 16 had 10+ involved LNs. Four patients had T4 or inflammatory breast cancer and two had ipsilateral supraclavicular LNs involved. The median follow-up time is 16 years (95% CI: 12, 19, range

Impact of Plerixafor (P) mobilized stem cells on immune reconstitution, such as absolute lymphocyte count at day 30 (ALC30), and on long-term outcomes of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has not been well established. We evaluated total of 469 patients mobilized with G-CSF (G) alone, and 141 patients mobilized with G-CSF plus plerixafor (G+ P). Patients only received plerixafor if they had peripheral blood CD34+ blood count

Liver Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is common in patients with post-transplant liver dysfunction following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Oftentimes, the diagnosis is made clinically, and liver biopsy is deferred. Our objective was to evaluate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of liver GVHD among patients who developed post-transplant liver dysfunction. Additionally, we evaluated the feasibility of liver biopsy in this population. We compared outcomes between liver GVHD and a “non-liver GVHD” group, which consisted of other etiologies of post-transplant liver dysfunction. Between January 2003 and December 2010, 249 patients developed post-transplant liver dysfunction following AHSCT: 124 patients developed liver GVHD and 125 were in the “non-liver GVHD” group. The incidence of acute and chronic liver GVHD at one year was 15.7% and 31.0%, respectively. The competing risk analysis revealed full intensity conditioning regimen (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.76; P = .008) and related donor (HR, 1.68; P = .004) as independent risk factors for liver GVHD. The time-varying covariate Cox regression analysis with competing risk event, demonstrated that liver GVHD was independently associated with higher non-relapse mortality, and adverse relapse-free and overall survival. A total of 112 liver biopsies were performed in 100 patients. No major complications were observed. Liver biopsy confirmed prebiopsy hypotheses in 49% of cases, and led to treatment modification in 49% of patients. Our study shows that liver GVHD is associated with adverse survival. Liver biopsy is safe and often helps directing care in this setting.

The information on the impact of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) on haploidentical donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant (haploPBSCT) outcomes is limited. We retrospectively evaluated 98 patients who underwent haploPBSCT between June 2012 and June 2019 for the onset and severity of CRS per the ASTCT guidelines. The incidence of CRS was 93% (91/98). Outcomes were compared between grade 1-2 and 3-4 CRS. Eighty-one patients developed grade 1-2 CRS (89%) and 10 (11%) developed grade 3-4 CRS. Compared to grade 1-2 CRS, grade 3-4 CRS experienced adverse survival (73.7% vs. 30%, p

Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d × 5 and melphalan 140 mg/m2 × 1 (Flu-Mel140) is a commonly used reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. We hypothesized that addition of 200cGy total body irradiation (TBI) to Flu-Mel140 may improve antitumor activity and transplant outcomes. Primary objectives was overall survival (OS) at 3 years. Secondary objectives were to assess the cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse rate, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of patients receiving Flu-Mel140-TBI followed by HLA-matched donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) using peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-one patients (median age, 58 years) underwent alloSCT between January 2008 and December 2018. Thirty-one percent of patients had a prior transplant, 32% had high or very-high disease risk index, and the donor was unrelated in 70% of patients. Grade 3 to 4 regimen-related toxicities were mucositis (37%), cardiac toxicity (17%), and renal toxicity (10%). The cumulative incidence of grade III to IV acute GVHD at day +100 was 24.7% and chronic GVHD at 1 year was 51.3%. Median follow-up for survival was 6.1 years. At 3 years, OS was 39.81%, RFS was 31.47%, and relapse rate was 30.5%. One-year NRM was 29.9%. Patients undergoing first transplantation experienced improved OS compared with second or beyond (63.08% versus 42.31%, P = .02). After adjusting for disease subtypes, age (≤55 versus 55), comorbidity index (CI), number of transplant and GVHD prophylaxis, multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any survival difference among disease subtypes. High CI (≥3) was predictive of adverse OS and NRM, whereas older age (>55 years) was associated with high NRM. Our study shows that Flu-Mel140-TBI seems feasible and provides durable disease control. Addition of TBI did not appear to improve outcomes compared to previously published reports of Flu-Mel140. Considerable NRM could result from the inclusion of patients with older age and prior transplants.

A head-to-head comparison of outcomes of unrelated donor allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for AML between reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens using thymoglobulin for GVHD prophylaxis is limited. We evaluated outcomes of 122 AML patients who received either busulfan (Bu)/fludarabine (Flu)/low-dose total body irradiation (TBI) as RIC (n = 64, 52%) or Bu/Flu as MAC (n = 58, 48%), and thymoglobulin 4.5 mg/kg total dose between day - 3 to - 1 for GVHD prophylaxis. Grades III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was lower with Bu/Flu/TBI compared with Bu/Flu (6.2% vs 26.1%, p = 0.009). At 1 year, Bu/Flu/TBI was associated with similar chronic GVHD (41.2% vs 44.8%, p = 0.75), OS (61.9% vs 56.9%, p = 0.69), relapse rate (29.9% vs 20.7%, p = 0.24), relapse-free survival (52.8% vs 50%, p = 0.80), non-relapse mortality (17.4% vs 29.3%, p = 0.41), and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (24.2% vs 27.5%, p = 0.80) compared with Bu/Flu. Multivariable analysis did not reveal any difference in outcomes between both regimens. In summary, thymoglobulin at 4.5 mg/kg did not have any adverse impact on survival when used with RIC regimen. Both Bu/Flu/TBI and Bu/Flu conditioning regimens yielded similar survival.

Introduction: CD19 directed CAR-T cell therapy has changed treatment paradigm of relapse refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). It is associated with certain unique toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), B-cell aplasia and hypogammaglobulinemia. However, the information on hematologic toxicity including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia is limited. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who received CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed refractory DLBCL to estimate incidence, risk factors and outcomes of hematological toxicity especially pancytopenia. We also evaluated the impact of prophylactic G-CSF administration on incidence and duration of neutropenia, and infectious complications. Results: Between April 2018 and December 2020, 30 adult patients received CAR-T cell therapy (AxiCel=22, TisaCel=8). Median age of the population was 57 years (range, 23-81). Median time from diagnosis to CAR-T cell therapy was 674 days. Four patients each had double expressor and double hit subtypes. Seventy percent patients had extra-nodal disease, 60% of patients received three or more lines of therapy, 27% of patients received prior autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT), and 23% patients received bridging therapy. All patients received Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide (Flu/Cy) as a lymphodepleting therapy. CRS and ICANS were noted in 83% and 37% patients, respectively. One-year progression-free and overall survival were 49.76% and 85.91%, respectively. After CAR-T cell therapy, 93% (28/30) patients developed neutropenia with 17 (57%) experiencing absolute neutrophil count (ANC) Following CAR-T cell therapy, 86% (26/30) patients developed thrombocytopenia with two (7%) experiencing platelets Univariable analyses revealed that high dose of CAR-T cell was associated with decreased incidence of neutropenia (HR, 0.63; p=0.02), while absence of extra-nodal disease was associated with increased incidence of neutropenia (HR, 3.19; p=0.02). Moreover, patients with prior autoSCT had a lower likelihood of resolution of neutropenia (HR, 0.33; p=0.03), and those with multiple prior therapies had a lower likelihood of resolution of thrombocytopenia (HR, 0.36; p=0.002). Conclusion: Our study shows that a proportion of patients experienced prolonged hematological toxicity, and prior autoSCT and multiple lines of therapy were identified as risk factors. Prophylactic G-CSF did not appear to have any benefit on the prevention of neutropenia or infectious complications. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Deol: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy. Modi: Genentech: Research Funding; Seagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, access to CAR T cell therapy remains limited as CAR T cells are routinely administered in the hospital setting. Hence, there's a growing interest in standardizing outpatient administration of CAR T cells to increase patient access and minimize costs. Here, we describe our institution's experience with outpatient administration of CAR T cells. Methods In this retrospective study, we reviewed who received CAR T cell therapy in the outpatient setting at Karmanos Cancer Center between June 2019 and June 2021.Charts were reviewed for age, disease pathology, prior lines of therapy, need for hospitalization within 30 days, development of CRS and/or neurotoxicity, need for ICU admission, need for steroids and/or tocilizumab, length of admission, and disease state at last follow up. All patients received fludarabine and cyclophosphamide as lymphodepletion (LD) therapy day -5 to -3. CAR T cells were infused on day 0. Patients subsequently followed up in clinic daily for 2 weeks and were started on allopurinol, ciprofloxacin, fluconazole, acyclovir and levetiracetam. First response was assessed by FDG PET scan 4 weeks after CAR T cell . Results A total of 12 patients received CAR T cells during the study period. All patients had a diagnosis of DLBCL and received Tisagenlecleucel. Median age at CAR T cell therapy was 69.5 years (40-78 years). Median number of prior lines of therapy was (2-3) while 2 patients had received prior stem cell transplantation. Table 1 describes patient characteristics and lines of therapy. Two patients received bridging therapy prior to LD. Overall response rate was 58.3% (complete response-3, partial response-4). Median duration of follow up was 6.7 (0.6-13.8 months). Four patients required subsequent therapy after CAR T cell for disease progression while 9 patients were alive at the time of data cut off. Figure 1 summarizes disease response and follow . Table 2 summarizes complications during follow up. Nine (75%) patients developed anemia (grade 3-4 n=4, 33.3%), 8 (66.7%) developed thrombocytopenia (grade 3-4 n= 3, 37.5%), and 8 (66.7%) developed neutropenia (grade 3-4 n=8, 66.7%). Median time to platelet recovery to >,000 and neutrophil recovery to >500 was 66 days (44-81 days) and 11.5 days (6-65 days), respectively. Three (25%) patients required platelet and red blood cell transfusion support. Six (50%) patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS) with median grade 2 (range 1-3, grade 3-4 n=1). Five (5/6) patients required hospitalization, five (5/6) required tocilizumab, and one (1/6) required steroids. One (8.3%) patient developed neurotoxicity of grade 1 severity improved without systemic therapy. Six patients required hospitalization within 30 days of CAR T cell infusion. Median day of admission from CAR T cell infusion was 4 days (range 2-12 days (range 2-12 days, admission within 3 days n=2, admission under observation n=1). Patient characteristics at admission are summarized in table 3. Of these, 5 patients were diagnosed with CRS,1 patient with colitis and none with blood stream infection. Two patients required ICU admission. Median length of hospital admission was 5.5 days (2-9 days). All patients were alive at discharge while 1 patient required subsequent admission within 30 . Conclusion Outpatient administration of Tisagenlecleucel is feasible with low risk of hospital admission within 3 days of infusion. Adoption of outpatient CAR T cell therapy may increase patient access for treatment of DLBCL and diseases such as multiple myeloma while reducing administration costs for this novel therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Modi: Genentech: Research Funding; Seagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Deol: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy.

Introduction: Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare hematopoietic stem cell disorder characterized by hypocellular marrow and pancytopenia. Multiple factors play an important role in treatment approach include age, comorbidities, degree of pancytopenia and availability of stem cell donor to either immunosuppression irrespective (IST) or allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). The use of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen has improved the outcomes, however the choice for post-transplant GVHD prophylaxis remain a topic of debate. The use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used as an alternative for methotrexate (MTX) as has shown to be associated with lower incidence of mucositis and shorter time to engraftment. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive adult patients with SAA who underwent alloSCT at Karmanoc Cancer Institute. All patients received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte globulin for conditioning regimen with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. MMF was started at day -3 at 15 mg/kg three times daily and stopped at day +30 in the absence of active GVHD. The primary objectives were to estimate cumulative incidence of acute (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives were to evaluate time to engraftment, days of hospitalization and incidence of mucositis. Results: From January 2005 and May 2019, 33 patients with SAA underwent alloSCT. Patient characteristics are detailed in Table 1. Median age was 36 years (range, 18-71). Twenty-seven patients received bone marrow stem cells (82%) and six patients received peripheral blood stem cells (18%). Thirty patients (91%) received 8/8 HLA matched donor and three patients (9%) received 7/8 HLA matched donor. Sixteen patients (48%) received stem cells from sibling donor and 17 patients (52%) received stem cells from unrelated donor. Thirteen patients (39%) had received IST prior to alloSCT, and 20 patients (61%) received upfront alloSCT. For GVHD prophylaxis all patients received MMF and CNI (tacrolimus=32, and cyclosporine=1). Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 15.8 months for patients who received IST prior to alloSCT and 2 months for patients who received upfront alloSCT. Median time to platelet engraftment was 13.5 days and neutrophil engraftment was 12 days, while one patient experienced graft failure. The median number of days for hospital stay were 25 days. Four patients (11%) developed grade I-II mucositis, no grade III-IV mucositis was observed in the first 30 days and 6 patients had CMV reactivation. The 100-day cumulative incidence rate of grade II-IV aGVHD was 21.2% (95% CI, 9.2 - 36.5), grade III-IV aGVHD was 9.1% (2.3-21.9) and 1-year CIR of cGVHD was 21.2% (95% CI, 9.2-36.5). Comparing patients who received IST prior to alloSCT versus upfront alloSCT, the 100-day CIR of grade II-IV aGVHD was 30.8% (95% CI, 8.2 - 56.5) and 15% (95% CI, 3.6 - 34.0), respectively, (Gray p=0.26) and the 3-year CIR of cGVHD was 39.6% (95% CI, 13.1 - 65.5) and 27.8% (95% CI, 9.2 - 50.3), respectively, (Gray p=0.37). Comparing patients who received alloSCT from related versus unrelated donor, 100-day CIR of II-IV aGVHD was 12.5% (95% CI, 1.9 - 33.6) and 29.4% (95% CI, 10.2 - 51.9), respectively, (Gray p=0.26), and the 3-year CIR of cGVHD was 34.2% (95% CI, 11.4 - 58.9) and 29.4% (95% CI, 10.1 - 52.0), respectively (Gray p=0.90). Median follow up of surviving patient was 5 years (95% CI, 3.1-6.8). Three-year OS was 87% (95% CI, 75.7- 99.9) and median OS was not reached. Six patients died by the time of the analysis, one patient died from graft failure (86 days after transplant from 8/8 HLA MUD), two patients died due infectious complications (808 days and 1637 days after transplant), three patients died due to multiorgan failure (215, 297 and 1097 days after transplant). Conclusion: Our data with use of CNI and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis for SAA following alloSCT with nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen showed that the rate of mucositis was low, engraftment time was rapid, and hospitalization was short, while OS, rates of acute and chronic GVDH were comparable to previously published rates with CNI and MTX-based GVHD prophylaxis. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Modi: Genentech: Research Funding; Seagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Deol: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy.

PURPOSE: Although fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is frequently utilized in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) patients, its impact on morbidity and mortality is uncertain. This study investigates the role of quinolone prophylaxis after AHSCT in recent years. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 291 consecutive adult patients who underwent AHSCT for malignant disorders, between June 2013 and January 2015. Outcomes were compared between patients who received norfloxacin prophylaxis and those who did not. The endpoints were mortality during prophylaxis and at 100 days after transplant, frequency of ICU admissions, and incidence and type of bacteremia. RESULTS: Of 291 patients, 252 patients received norfloxacin prophylaxis and 39 patients did not. The mortality during prophylaxis and at 100 days as well as the median number of days of hospitalization following AHSCT did not differ between the two groups. No differences were noted in the frequency of ICU admission, incidence of septic shock, and duration of ICU stay. Patients who did not receive prophylaxis had a significantly higher rate of neutropenic fever (97%) than patients who received prophylaxis (77%) (p = 0.005). The patients with prophylaxis demonstrated a significantly higher rate of gram-positive bacteremia as compared to those without prophylaxis (p = 0.002). Frequency of Clostridium difficile infection was similar during and post-prophylaxis. More antibiotic use was noted among patients without prophylaxis [97%; median 9 (range, 5–24) days] compared to patients with prophylaxis [79%; median 7 (range, 3–36) days, p = 0.04]. CONCLUSION: Although fluoroquinolone prophylaxis reduced the incidence of neutropenic fever and antibiotic use in AHSCT, it did not alter mortality or morbidity.

Introduction: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare aggressive form of breast cancer. It is well known that the long-term survival and progression-free survival of IBC are worse than that of non-IBC. We report the long term outcomes of patients with IBC and non-IBC who had undergone high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). Methods: All 3387 patients with IBC or non-IBC who underwent HDC with AHCT between1990-2002 and registered with CIBMTR were included in this analysis. Transplant-related mortality (TRM), disease relapse/progression, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two cohorts. Multivariate Cox regression model was used to determine the independent impact of stage on outcomes. Results: 527 patients with IBC and 2,860 patients with non-IBC were included; the median age at transplantation (47 vs 46 years old) and median follow-up period in the 2 groups (167 vs 168 months) were similar. The most common conditioning regimen was cyclophosphamide and carboplatin based in both groups (54% in IBC and 50% in non-IBC). AHCT was well tolerated in both groups. TRM was similar in both groups (one year TRM was 2% for IBC and 3% for non-IBC, p=0.16). The most common cause of death was disease progression or relapse (81% in IBC and 75% in non-IBC). The median survival for both IBC and non-IBC was the same at 40 months. The PFS at 10 years was 27% (95% CI: 23-31%) for IBC and 24% (95% CI: 22-26%) for non-IBC (p=0.21), and the OS at 10 years was 31% (95% CI: 27-35%) for IBC and 28% (95% CI: 26-30%) for non-IBC (p=0.16). In univariate analysis, patients with stage III IBC and no active diseases at transplantation had lower PFS and OS than that in non-IBC. In multivariate analysis, controlling for age, disease status at AHCT, hormonal receptor status, time from diagnosis to AHCT, and performance status at AHCT, patients with stage III IBC had higher mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 1-1.34, p= 0.0459), worse PFS (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01-1.36, p= 0.0339) and higher risk of disease relapse/progression (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.45, p= 0.0082) as compared to stage III non-IBC. Amongst all patients a higher stage disease was associated with worse PFS, OS and disease relapse/progression. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes of stage III IBC patients who underwent AHCT were poorer than that in non-IBC patients confirming that the poor prognosis of IBC even in the setting of HDC with AHCT.

Introduction: Haploidentical donor transplant (HIDT) with high dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTcy) has shown promising results in terms of GVHD and survival. PTcy when given on day +3 and +4 is associated with considerable morbidity. In our previous analysis, we demonstrated that when compared to matched donor allogeneic stem cell transplant, HIDT with PTcy was associated with significantly higher rates of hypoxia, grade 3-4 mucositis and hemorrhagic cystitis (Modi et al, JCO 2020). PTcy is known to cause cardiomyopathy. However, a comprehensive analysis of cardiac toxicity occurring from PTcy is limited. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated adult patients (pt) who underwent HIDT with PTcy to evaluate incidence and risk factors of cardiac toxicities. Source of stem cell was peripheral blood in all patients, and all received PTcy-based GVHD prophylaxis. We aimed to evaluate impact of cardiac toxicity on NRM and OS. We compared outcomes between two groups: cardiac toxicity and no-cardiac toxicity. Results: Between June 2012 and June 2019, 98 pt underwent HIDT. Of these, 21 (21.4%) developed cardiac toxicity and 77 (78.6%) did not. Median day to onset of cardiac toxicity from HIDT was 7 days, and median duration of cardiac toxicity was 14 days. Fourteen pt (67%) had resolution of the cardiac toxicity. Median age of the patient was significantly higher in the cardiac toxicity than no-cardiac toxicity (65 vs 57 years, p=0.007). Following cardiac toxicities were observed: systolic heart failure (n=7, 34%), diastolic heart failure (n=2, 10%), atrial fibrillation (n=10, 48%), pericardial effusion (n=2, 9%) one of which required pericardial window, pericarditis (n=1, 5%) and supraventricular tachycardia (n=1, 5%). In patients with congestive heart failure, the median LVEF was 45% (range, 20-60). Majority of the cardiac toxicities were de-novo in origin, while sepsis-induced cardiac toxicity was present in one pt. The proportion of male patients was higher in the cardiac toxicity than no-cardiac toxicity (81% vs 55%, p=0.04). Median KPS was marginally lower (70% vs 80%, p=0.08) and median donor age was marginally higher (59 vs 51 years, p=0.08) in the cardiac toxicity group compared to no-cardiac toxicity. Median Co-morbidity index was 1 for both groups. Patients in the cardiac toxicity had higher rate of pre-transplant coronary artery disease compare to no-cardiac toxicity group (24% vs 6%, p=0.03). No difference in the pre-transplant cardiac function was noted between both groups (LVEF 55% vs 60%, p=0.76). Six pt (29%) in the cardiac toxicity and 30 pt (39%) in the no-cardiac toxicity received myeloablative conditioning regimen (p=0.45). Grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome was higher in the cardiac toxicity compared to the other group (20% vs 6%, p=0.04). Median follow-up of surviving patients was 1.9 years in both groups. For cardiac toxicity and no-cardiac toxicity, 1-year OS was 38.1% and 76.4% (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.48, p≤0.001), respectively; and 1-year NRM was 57.1% and 13.1%, respectively (P≤0.001). Multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors associated with cardiac toxicity, and older age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.10, p=0.08) and male sex (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.08-1.13, p=0.096) were marginally associated with higher risk of cardiac toxicity. No impact of intensity of conditioning regimen was noted. Multivariable analysis revealed adverse OS (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.43, p Conclusion: Cardiac toxicity was associated with worse OS and higher NRM. Older age and male sex may have higher risk of developing cardiac toxicity. Early supportive care and aggressive cardiac management may help improve outcomes. Figure Disclosures Deol: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Modi:MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare subtype of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for approximately 6% of all NHL. Currently, there is no standard first line induction therapy and initial therapy is based on patient age, performance status and physician preference. Limited information is available comparing outcomes of patients who achieve first complete remission (CR1) with low intensity regimens versus high intensity regimens followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult MCL patients who underwent ASCT in CR1. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the induction regimens: low intensity regimens ((R-CHOP, BR) versus high intensity regimens (Hyper-CVAD, Nordic Regimen, R-CHOP alternating with R-DHAP, R-DHAP). The primary objective was to compare relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and NRM (non-relapse mortality) between both groups. Results: Between January 2005 and December 2016, 66 patients with CR1 received R-BEAM conditioning regimen followed by ASCT. Twenty-five patients (38%) received low intensity regimens: R-CHOP (n=21, 84%) and BR (n=4; 16%). Forty one patients (62%) received high intensity regimens: Hyper-CVAD (n=28, 68%), Nordic regimen (n=9, 22%), R-CHOP alternating with R-DHAP (n=1, 2%) and Hyper-CVAD that was changed due to intolerability (1 changed to R-CHOP and 1 to BR, n=2, 4%). Patient characteristics are summarized in the table below. Twenty-three patients (92%) in the low intensity group and 39 patients (95%) in the high intensity group had stage 4 at diagnosis. Twenty-one patients (84%) in the low intensity group and 37 patients (90%) in the high intensity group had bone marrow involvement. Three patients (12%) in the low intensity group required G-CSF plus plerixafor versus 13 patients (32%) in high intensity gr group for stem cell mobilization (p=0.1). Median day for neutrophil engraftment was 11 days in both groups, and median day for platelet engraftment was 12 days and 18 days in low intensity and high intensity regimen groups, respectively (P=0.001). Median follow-up of surviving patients was 4.18 and 4.93 years for low intensity and high intensity regimen, respectively. For low intensity regimen and high intensity regimen groups, 1-year OS was 95.7% and 97.4%, respectively (P=0.59); 1-year RFS was 92% and 89.6%, respectively (P=0.88); 1-year relapse rate was 4% and 10.4%, respectively (P=0.25); and 1-year NRM was 4% and 0%, respectively (P=0.15). Multivariable analysis identified that older age was associated with worse OS (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21, P=0.004), KPS < 80% was associated with higher NRM (HR 25.1, 95% CI 8.51-74.16, P Conclusion: Our data showed no significant difference in transplant outcomes for patients who achieve CR1 with low intensity regimens when compared to high intensity regimens. Patients who received high intensity induction regimen required plerixafor more frequently for stem cell mobilization, but no difference in neutrophil or platelet engraftment was noted in the two groups. Disclosures Modi: MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Deol:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Introduction: Peri-transplant radiation (XRT) in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been associated with improved local control. However, this has not been well established with increased use of novel agents in peri-transplant setting. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of HL patients who underwent their first ASCT between 2000 and 2018 at Karmanos Cancer Institute in Detroit, Michigan. Peri-transplant radiation was defined as XRT within 3-month window of autologous transplant. Novel agents included brentuximab, check-point inhibitors (CIs), and other targeted agents. The primary endpoint was to compare overall survival (OS) based on utilization of peri-transplant XRT and novel agents with standard salvage chemotherapy. Secondary endpoint was to assess the OS benefit of novel agent use in the post-transplant setting. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit to assess associations between OS and nine prior chosen predictors (bulky relapse, pulmonary or bone marrow relapse, extranodal disease, CT/PET response [CR vs less than CR], novel salvage [anytime], peri-transplant XRT, site of relapse [local vs systemic], maintenance brentuximab, relapse after initial diagnosis [>1 year vs ≤1 year]). Results: From 2000-2018, there were total of 220 patients who underwent ASCT for HL. Patients underwent ASCT median of 575 days after initial diagnosis. 65 (30%) patients had XRT during initial treatment and XRT was utilized less frequently in all patients (13% vs 35%) and stage I-II patients (29% vs 46%) who were diagnosed after 2010. Peri-transplant XRT was used in 30 (14%) patients and was utilized similarly in patients who had ASCT before or after 2010 (13% vs 14%) (Figure 1). There was no difference in baseline characteristics (bulky relapse, local vs systemic relapse, etc.) of patients who did or did not receive peri-transplant XRT (Table 1). Novel salvage was used in 32 (15%) patients at any time before transplant (Figure 1). Median OS of all the patients who had ASCT was 11 years [7.6-NR] and PFS was 4.3 years [2.3-7.4]. Median OS of patients who had peri-transplant XRT was not reached [9.4-NR] compared to 7.7 [5.3-NR] years for those without peri-transplant XRT [HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.96; p=0.033] (Figure 2); on the contrary, there was no difference in PFS between the two groups. Median OS of patients who had novel salvage at any time was not reached [4.3-NR] compared to 11 [7.6-NR] years for those without novel salvage [HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.43-2.72; p=0.877]. Median OS of patients who had either novel salvage (anytime) or peri-transplant XRT was not reached [9.4-NR] compared to 11 years [6.5-NR] for those who had chemotherapy salvage only [HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.32-1.26; p=0.193]. In the multivariable analysis, less than CR to salvage therapy and lack of peri-transplant XRT use were associated with worse OS. There were total of 85 (39%) patients who progressed after ASCT. Median OS for those patients was 3.5 years [2.3-8.8] and PFS was 1 year [0.8-1.5] after relapse from ASCT. The median OS for patients who received novel agents (brentuximab 61%, CI 14%) during first progression after ASCT was 6.9 years [2.3-NR] after relapse from ASCT compared to 2.9 years [2.3-NR] for those that did not [HR 1.47; 95% CI 0.72-3; p=. 288]. In addition, the median OS for patients who received novel agent at any time after transplant was 6.9 years [2.6-NR] after relapse from ASCT compared to 2.5 years [2.2-7] for those who did not [HR 1.96; 95% CI 1-3.86; p=0.048] (Figure 3). Lastly, OS after relapse from ASCT was better if patients progressing on novel agent post-transplant received another novel agent for their successive therapy rather than any other treatment [HR 4.87; 95% CI 1.14-20.8; p=0.018]. Conclusions: We show that there was a lack of standardized patient selection for utilization of peri-transplant XRT and its use was similar before and after the novel agent era. Peri-transplant XRT was possibly used in patients who had residual disease or other high -risk features that could not be identified due to retrospective nature of this study and, despite this, use of peri-transplant XRT was associated with modest survival benefit. Surprisingly, use of novel agent at any time during salvage was not associated with survival benefit. Utilization of novel agents at any time after post-transplant progression was associated with OS benefit. Disclosures Deol: Kite: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Agios: Other: Advisory board.

Introduction Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as a salvage option in patients (pts) with late relapse (≥18 months after upfront ASCT) represents an effective therapy and can prolong response in Multiple Myeloma (MM). Presence of comorbidities such as renal dysfunction can limit treatment options and impact ASCT eligibility. Efficacy and safety data supporting a second ASCT in pts with renal dysfunction for relapsed disease are limited. Methods All adult pts with MM with renal dysfunction undergoing a non-tandem second ASCT at our institution between January 2006 and January 2019 were identified. Renal dysfunction was defined as pre-transplant creatinine clearance ≤ 60 ml/min. Demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment history were compiled. Relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), relapse rate, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) outcomes were assessed. RFS durations after both the first and second ASCTs for each pt were compared using a paired log-rank test and corresponding hazard ratios (HR) was estimated using a paired cox proportional hazards regression model through mixed-effects models. Results Thirty six pts with renal dysfunction underwent a second ASCT at our institution. Fourteen pts (39%) had progressive disease (PD) and 9 pts (25%) had very good partial response or better. Median time between first and second ASCT was 57.05 months (18.98-103.25). Conditioning regimens included: ≤140 mg/m2 Melphalan (MEL) (61%; n=22), >140 mg/m2 MEL (28%; n=10) and BEAM (8.3%; n=3). Median length of hospitalization during second ASCT was 18 days (Range, 11-74). Median time to granulocyte and platelet engraftment was 12 (9-16) and 19 (0-61) days, respectively. In hospital events included: treatment-requiring infections in 15 pts (41.7%) and cardiac complications in 5 pts (13.9%). Four pts (11.1%) required intensive/critical care admission. By day 100 (d100) assessment, 30 of 34 surviving pts (83% by ITT) had stable disease or better, and 4 pts (11%) had PD. Twenty pts (58.8%) had an improvement in disease status compared to their pre-ASCT status, while 8 pts (23.5%) maintained their pre-ASCT disease status. Five pts (14%) were readmitted by d100, with 2 pts requiring intensive care. One of 2 pts on dialysis pre-second ASCT became dialysis independent. From second ASCT, median RFS was 1.04 yrs (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.67) and median OS was 3.34 yrs (95% CI, 3.30 to 7.99; median follow up 4.31 yrs); respectively. The cumulative incidence rates for relapse and NRM at 1 yr after second ASCT were 37.1% and 5.6%, respectively. By MVA, light chain MM was associated with higher relapse rate (p=0.03) and lower NRM (p=0.01). Conclusion Our data suggests that second ASCT is well tolerated with low complication /readmission rates in patients with renal dysfunction. Second ASCT as salvage can provide disease control for more than a year for these patients who may have limited treatment options.

NCT01246206. The study was approved by Wayne State University Institutional Review Board.

Information on the use of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) as a pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy in MDS is limited. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of 172 adult MDS patients, who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between January 2000 and December 2016. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 − pre-transplant blasts

Pleural effusion is a known entity in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); however, the incidence, risk factors, and morbidity-mortality outcomes associated with pleural effusions remain unknown. We retrospectively evaluated pleural effusions in 618 consecutive adult patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT from January 2008 to December 2013 at our institution. Seventy one patients developed pleural effusion at a median of 40 days (range, 1 - 869) post-HSCT with the cumulative incidence of 9.9% (95% CI, 7.7 - 12.5%) at 1 year. Infectious etiology was commonly associated with pleural effusions followed by volume overload and serositis type chronic GVHD. In multivariate analysis, higher comorbidity index (P = 0.03) and active GVHD (P = 0.018) were found to be significant independent predictors for pleural effusion development. Higher comorbidity index, very high disease risk index, ≤7/8 HLA matching, and unrelated donor were associated with inferior overall survival (OS) (P < 0.03). More importantly, patients with pleural effusion were noted to have poor OS in comparison to patients without pleural effusion (P

7546 Background: Haploidentical transplant (HIDT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (pCY) is being increasingly used because of the universal availability of donor and rapid graft acquisition time. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is one of the commonly occurring complications in this population. The information on the impact of CRS on the post-HIDT outcomes is limited. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 91 patients who underwent HIDT between June 2012 and June 2019 for the onset and severity of CRS. CRS was graded per ASTCT guidelines. The primary objective was to compare RFS (relapse-free survival), NRM (non-relapse mortality), OS (overall survival) and GVHD in patients with no CRS, CRS grade 1-2 and 3-4. Results: All received peripheral blood stem cells and pCY/tacrolimus/mycophenolate as GVHD prophylaxis. Fifty-six (62%) received reduced intensity and 35 (38%) received full intensity conditioning regimen. Ten (10.9%) had no CRS, 74 (81.3%) developed grade 1-2 CRS and seven (7.7%) experienced grade 3-4 CRS. Median time to onset of CRS was one day post-transplant. The most common symptoms were fever (87%), fatigue (30%), nausea/vomiting (24%), rigors (24%), diarrhea (20%) and rash (11%). Fifteen (20%) with grade 1-2 and six (85%) with grade 3-4 CRS received tocilizumab. Day +100 cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD for no CRS, grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 CRS was 0%, 2.7%, and 14.3%, respectively (P = 0.36). One-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD for no CRS, grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 CRS was 30%, 31.9% and 14.3%, respectively (P = 0.70). One-year NRM for no CRS, grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 CRS was 30%, 16.5%, and 57.1%, respectively (P = 0.002). One-year RFS for no CRS, grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 CRS was 48%, 63.4% and 28.6%, respectively (p = 0.03). OS at 1-year for no CRS, grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 CRS was 60%, 73.9%, and 28.6%, respectively (P = 0.008). Multivariable analysis revealed that grade 3-4 CRS was associated with significantly higher NRM (HR 5.54, P = 0.002), worse RFS (HR 3.41, P = 0.011) and worse OS (HR 4.91, P = 0.001). Conditioning regimen, degree of HLA match and disease risk index did not affect post-transplant outcomes and were not predictors for developing CRS. Conclusions: Our study showed that grade 3-4 CRS was associated with inferior post-transplant outcomes. However, no impact on acute or chronic GVHD was noted. Therefore, early recognition and prompt management of CRS may help improve outcomes.

7545 Background: Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (pCY) when given at 50mg/kg on day +3 and +4 in haploidentical donor transplants (HIDT) leads to considerable morbidity. Information on its toxicity and impact on outcomes is limited. Methods: We analyzed 91 patients (pt) undergoing HIDT with pCY to estimate incidence and risk factors of mucositis, hemorrhagic cystitis, renal and cardiac toxicities during the first 6 months after transplant and its impact on overall survival (OS). We compared these complications with 91 pt who were matched for age, disease, disease status at transplant, conditioning regimen and received 8/8 HLA-matched transplants without pCY (non-pCY cohort). Results: Fourteen pt (15%) in non-pCY and 28 (31%) in pCY experienced hypoxia requiring oxygen (p = 0.03). Ten pt (11%) in non-pCY and 21 (23%) in pCY developed clinically significant hypotension (p = 0.05). Day +100 cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of mucositis was 59.3% for non-pCY and 84.6% for pCY (p < 0.001). Seven pt (13%) in non-pCY cohort and 39 (51%) in pCY developed grade 3-4 mucositis (p < 0.001). Two pt (2%) in non-pCY and 22 (24%) in pCY developed gross hematuria (p = 0.05). Day +180 CIR of hemorrhagic cystitis was 13.2% for non-pCY and 29.7% for pCY (p = 0.005). Hemorrhagic cystitis did not have an adverse impact on non-relapse mortality (NRM) and OS. Day +180 CIR of renal toxicities was 17.6% for non-pCY and 28.6% for pCY (p = 0.10). The CIR of cardiac toxicities at day +180 was 9.9% for non-pCY and 14.3% for pCY (p = 0.34). Congestive heart failure (59%) and atrial fibrillation (36%) were the most common cardio-toxicities. One-year NRM was 38.5% in pt developing cardio-toxicity in the pCY cohort compared to no cardio-toxicity (15.3% in non-pCY and 18.3% in pCY, p = 0.004). OS was inferior in pt with cardio-toxicity in non-pCY (HR 5.49, p < 0.001) and pCY (HR 2.3, p = 0.03) compared to pt without cardio-toxicity. In multivariable analysis, pCY was associated with an increased risk of mucositis (HR 1.48, p = 0.03), and hemorrhagic cystitis (HR 2.67, p = 0.004). The number of infused CD34 cells was associated an increased risk of cardiac toxicity (HR 1.13, p = 0.005). pCY was not associated with higher cardiac complications, and no impact of the number of infused CD34 cells, conditioning regimen and prior transplant was observed on hemorrhagic cystitis and mucositis. Conclusions: pCY was associated with significant morbidity compared to HLA-matched non-pCY cohort. Although cardio-toxicities were similar between both groups, it was associated with worse survival.

e13094 Background: The role of High Dose Chemotherapy (HDC) with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in treatment of high risk locally advanced breast cancer remains unclear. This modality stopped being used for breast cancer treatment when trials in early 2000s reported Disease Free Survival (DFS) benefit but no Overall survival (OS) benefit. However, subgroup analyses of these studies reported OS benefit in young and Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). We report very long-term outcomes of high risk locally advanced TNBC treated with HDC-ASCT at our institution between 1995 and 2001. Methods: We reviewed our BMT database for women with stage IIB or III TNBC treated with HDC-ASCT. We excluded women with hormone positive, Her2/Neu positive/Unknown and metastatic disease prior to transplant per updated AJCC 7th edition. The majority of patients underwent surgery followed by adjuvant Anthracycline and Taxane based induction chemotherapy followed by HDC-ASCT for consolidation. The HDC regimen consisted of Carmustine 600 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide 5.6gm/ m2 and Cisplatin 165mg/ m2 (STAMP 1 regimen). Four patients received induction regimen as neoadjuvant and HDC-ASCT as adjuvant treatment per the same protocol. All patients received loco-regional radiation after ASCT. Results: 29 patients had locally advanced TNBC treated with HDC-ASCT. Median age at diagnosis was 43 years (IQR 40-51). 28 had at least 4 positive lymph nodes. Median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 5 months. Median overall survival was 17 years (95% CI, 3-19 years), and median DFS was 14 years (95% CI, 1-19). There was no treatment related mortality (TRM) at 30- and 100-days post ASCT. 12 patients (41%) were alive at median of 16 years (95% CI, 12-19) post ASCT. Conclusions: This single institution study of locally advanced high risk TNBC patients who received HDC-ASCT as part of treatment demonstrates a high long term OS exceeded historical controls. This supports a potential role for HDC-ASCT in this cohort of high risk TNBC. Considering the low TRM associated with this approach, prospective evaluation of this strategy is warranted.

Introduction Failure to achieve morphological complete remission occurs in 30% AML patients resulting in dismal outcomes. Data addressing influence of pre-transplant PDL-1 status on post-transplant outcomes is limited. We hypothesize that PDL-1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) prior to transplantation may predict a poor outcome. Methods This was a retrospective, observational single center pilot study involving refractory AML patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) at Karmanos Cancer Institute from 01/01/2012 to 01/01/2018. A planned sample size of 24 patients were selected and assigned to two cohorts based on their respective responses to ASCT: a) poor responders: persistent leukemia by bone marrow biopsy within 30 days of ASCT, and b) good responders: no evidence of leukemia at 1-year post-transplant. Descriptive analyses evaluated differences in demographic, disease and treatment variables. FISH assay was used to evaluate PDL-1 alterations in the pre-transplant archival, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded bone marrow biopsy specimens including frequency and magnitude of 9p24.1 alterations— low-level disomy, polysomy, copy gain, and amplification. The expression of PD-L1 was evaluated by IHC in a semi-quantitative (0 through +3) manner. Results Of the total 24 patients, 12 patients were poor responders and 12 were good responders; among poor responders, median age was 58 years (range, 31- 72) and gender distribution was 1:1. Seven patients (58%) had prior MDS, Myelofibrosis or CMML, while five patients had de-novo AML. Treatment information is provided in table 1. At pre-transplant bone marrow biopsy assessment, median number of bone marrow and peripheral blood blast counts were 8.1% (1.7-37) and 2% (0-37), respectively. Bone marrow cytogenetics assessed prior to transplant included intermediate risk in 2 (17%) and high risk disease in 9 (75%) patients and one patient without cytogenetic evaluation. PD-L1 expression was negative by IHC in all samples, but FISH testing was positive in 3 of 12 (25%) poor responders, characterized by copy gain. In good responders, median age was 59 years (range, 43-70) with a 3:2 male predominance. Four patients (25%) had prior MDS or Myelofibrosis and 8 had de-novo AML. Five patients (42%) had intermediate risk and 7 (58%) had high-risk cytogenetics. At pre-transplant bone marrow biopsy assessment, median number of bone marrow and peripheral blast counts were 6% (1-40) and 1% (0-7), respectively. PD-L1 expression was negative by both IHC and FISH examination in this cohort. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that PDL-1 expression by FISH was specifically detected in 25% of patients with poor responders following ASCT, which could possibly provide an insight into the poor outcome. A larger sample will be required to validate this observation in this population.

Introduction The outcomes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients failing autologous transplant (autoSCT) are poor. Moreover, patients with high risk DLBCL and refractory disease have lower chances of remission to autoSCT. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) could be a viable option in these circumstances. Here we report outcomes of DLBCL patients who received alloSCT in upfront settings or following failed autoSCT. Methods The objectives were to determine GVHD, overall survival (OS), relapse rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) of adult DLBCL patients following alloSCT. Results Between January 2005 and December 2017, 81 patients underwent alloSCT. Of these, 73 patients had de novo, 7 had transformed and one had testicular DLBCL. The median age at transplant was 52 years (range, 21-68). The median number of treatments prior to alloSCT was 3 (range, 1-6). Twenty-four patients (30%) had prior failed autoSCT, and 57 (70%) underwent upfront alloSCT. Disease status at transplant were: complete remission in 22 patients (27%), partial remission in 6 (7%), relapse in 31 (38%) and refractory in 22 (27%). Thirty-three patients (41%) underwent matched related and 48 (59%) had matched unrelated alloSCT. CNS and bone marrow involvement at the time of transplant was noted in 10% and 47% of patients, respectively. Patients received following conditioning regimens: R-BEAM (58%), BU-FLU-TBI (27%), BU-FLU (2%), CY-TBI (2%), BU-CY (2%), CY-FLU-TBI (2%), and others (5%). With a median follow-up of 5 years (95% CI, 4.01-9.89), the 1-year cumulative incidences of grade III-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD were 27.2% (95% CI, 18-37.2%) and 37% (95% CI, 26.5-47.6%), respectively. At 1-year, OS was 48% (95% CI, 38.4-60.3%), PFS was 43.2% (95% CI, 33.6-55.4%) and GRFS was 13.5% (95% CI, 7.8-23.5%). One-year relapse rate was 24.7% (95% CI, 15.9-34.5%), and NRM was 32.1% (95% CI, 22.2-42.4%). Sixteen patients (20%) patients were alive without chronic GVHD and relapse. Relapse disease at the time of transplant was associated with higher post-transplant relapse rate, and poor performance status was adversely associated with OS and PFS. No effect of prior autoSCT, conditioning regimen or type of donor was found in multivariable analysis on OS, PFS, relapse and NRM. Twenty-seven out of 81 patients (33%) were alive at the time of data analysis. Causes of death included relapse (37%), infection (31%), acute GVHD (13%) and multiorgan failure (11%). Conclusion Our study indicates that alloSCT provides long-term survival in these high-risk patients indicating graft-verus-lymphoma effect with low relapse rate; although non-relapse mortality was high in this group where about a third had failed prior autoSCT.

Multiple reports have shown that low absolute lymphocyte count at day 30 (ALC30) after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (AHSCT) is associated with higher risk of disease relapse and worse OS. However, these reports included heterogeneous populations with different grafts and GVHD prophylaxis. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the association of ALC30 with transplant outcomes in a cohort of 381 consecutive patients who underwent AHSCT between 2005 and 2010 and received T-replete PBSC grafts and Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate combination as GVHD prophylaxis. Median follow-up was 57 months. Lower ALC30 (⩽400 × 10(6)/L) was associated with lower OS and increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM) for the whole cohort as well as for recipients of SD and UD grafts separately. Lower ALC30 was associated with more severe acute GVHD (aGVHD; III-IV) for the entire cohort as well as for the SD and UD groups. No association was found between lower ALC30 and relapse. Pretransplant factors associated with lower ALC30 were: unrelated donors; HLA mismatch; older donors; lower recipient age; and lower CD34+ cell dose. In this large retrospective study, ALC30⩽400 × 10(6)/L was associated with worse OS, increased NRM and severe aGVHD.

Gastrointestinal (GI) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. In addition, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of the gastrointestinal tract can complicate the post-transplantation course of these patients and it can be difficult to differentiate the 2 diagnoses given that they can present with similar symptoms. We retrospectively analyzed 252 patients who were diagnosed with GI GVHD to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of CMV viremia and CMV gastroenteritis in these patients. The median age at the time of transplantation was 51 years, 35% were related donor transplantations, and 65% were unrelated donor transplantations. A total of 114 (45%) patients developed CMV viremia at a median of 34 days (range, 14 to 236 days) after transplantation. Only recipient CMV IgG serostatus was significantly associated with development of CMV viremia (P

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) outcomes data of older AML/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients are limited. We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients ⩾60 years old with AML/MDS who underwent AHSCT between January 2005 and December 2014. The primary objectives were to determine nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse, relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1 year post AHSCT. A total of 159 patients underwent AHSCT with a median age of 64 (range, 60–75) years. Of these, 103 patients (65%) had AML and 56 patients (35%) had MDS. At 1 year post AHSCT, grade III–IV acute GvHD and chronic GvHD occurred in 20.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 14.9–27.5%) and 54.1% (95% CI, 46.0–61.5%) of patients, respectively. NRM, RFS, relapse rate and OS at 1 year post AHSCT were 25.3% (95% CI, 18.8–32.3%), 53.3% (95% CI, 46.1–61.7%), 21.4% (95% CI, 15.4–28.1%) and 56.4% (95% CI, 49.2–54.7%), respectively. High disease risk index was associated with poor RFS, OS and higher relapse rate (P < 0.03), whereas non-thymoglobulin-based GvHD prophylaxis, higher comorbidity index (⩾3) and MDS were associated with higher NRM (P < 0.03). Importantly, age did not have an adverse effect on NRM, relapse, RFS and OS. AHSCT was well tolerated. Hence, older age alone should not be considered a contraindication to AHSCT.

We performed a retrospective analysis of the outcome of 197 consecutive unrelated donor transplant recipients who received GVHD prophylaxis either TM regimen (tacrolimus and mycophenolate) (121 patients) or TM/ATG-G regimen (TM with low-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG) of 4.5 mg/kg, ATG-G, Genzyme) (76 patients). Cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD for the TM and TM/ATG-G cohorts were 49% and 61% (P = 0.11) and grade III-IV acute GVHD for the TM and TM/ATG-G cohorts were 27% and 14% (P = 0.02), respectively. There was no difference in the incidence of relapse or disease progression between TM and TM/ATG-G—16% and 23% (P = 0.64). TM/ATG-G cohort had lower incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM; 37% vs 20%, P = 0.01), chronic GVHD (56% vs 43%, P

Both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). The optimal pharmacological regimen for GVHD prophylaxis is unclear, but combinations of a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporin or tacrolimus [Tac]) and an antimetabolite (methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]) are typically used. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of 414 consecutive patients who underwent AHSCT from sibling (SD) or unrelated donors (UD) with Tac/MMF combination, between January 2005 and August 2010. The median follow-up was 60 months. Less than one third of the patients received a reduced-intensity chemoregimen. The incidence of grades III and IV acute GVHD was 22.3% and 36.5% in SD and UD groups, respectively (P = .0007). The incidence of chronic GVHD was 47.1% and 52.7% in the SD and UD groups, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 60 months was 33.3% and 46.5% in the SD and UD groups, respectively (P = .0016). The incidence of relapse was 22.4% for UD and 28.8% for SD. Five-year overall survival was 43% and 34% in the SD and UD groups, respectively (P = .0183). GVHD was the leading cause of death for the entire cohort. Multivariable analysis showed that 8/8 HLA match, patient's age < 60, and low-risk disease were associated with better survival. The use of Tac/MMF for GVHD prophylaxis was associated with a relatively high incidence of severe acute GVHD and NRM in AHSCT from sibling and unrelated donors.

We report our experience of collecting stem cells in patients who failed to mobilize sufficient hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) using plerixafor (P) in the initial mobilization attempt. Twenty four patients were identified who failed a first mobilization attempt using P. Of these, 22 patients received granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and two patients received cyclophosphamide (CY) + G-CSF in combination with P for the initial attempt. The agents used for second collection attempt were granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) + G-CSF (19 patients), G-CSF + P (three patients), CY + G-CSF (one patient), and bone marrow harvest (one patient). A median of 0.6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 0–1.97) were collected in the initial attempt. A second collection was attempted at a median of 22 days (range 15–127) after the first failed mobilization. The median CD34+ cell dose collected with the second attempt was 1.1 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 0–7.2). A third collection was attempted in six patients at median of 51 days (range 34–163) after the first failed mobilization. These patients collected a median of 1.1 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 0–6.5). Total of 16 patients (67%) collected sufficient cells to undergo autologous stem cell transplant and eight patients (33%) were able to collect ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in a single subsequent attempt. Our experience suggests that a majority of patients who fail primary mobilization despite use of P can collect sufficient HSC with a subsequent attempt using combination of G-CSF with either P or GM-CSF. J. Clin. Apheresis 29:293–298 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Introduction: Post-transplant relapse and GVHD are two major barriers of success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for AML. These outcomes are often dependent on the complex interaction between the post-transplant immunosuppression and the conditioning regimen. We as well as others have used rabbit thymoglobulin for the reduction of both acute and chronic GVHD in unrelated transplant in AML. The interaction between different conditioning regimens and thymoglobulin may play an important role in the outcomes, but it has not been fully investigated. In this study, we compared outcomes of patients undergoing unrelated donor AHSCT for AML using thymoglobulin with either a myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning regimen. Patients received busulfan/fludarabine (Bu/Flu)-based myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen with 4 days of busulfan or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen using 2 days of busulfan with fludarabine. Since 2 days of busulfan as RIC may have a higher relapse rate, we added low dose TBI (200cGY) to the RIC regimen (Bu/Flu/TBI). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of adult AML patients who underwent unrelated donor AHSCT utilizing tacrolimus, mycophenolate (MMF) and thymoglobulin as GVHD prophylaxis. All patients received either a Bu/Flu/TBI-based RIC or a Bu/Fu-based MAC regimen. Thymoglobulin was administered at a total dose of 4.5mg/kg in divided fashion (0.5mg/kg on day-3, 1.5mg/kg on day -2, 2.5mg/kg on day -1). Tacrolimus and MMF were started on day -3. The objectives were to determine the rates of acute and chronic GVHD, overall survival (OS), relapse free survival (RFS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) using Cox proportional hazard regression and competing risk models. Results: One hundred twenty-two patients with AML received unrelated donor AHSCT between January 2005 and December 2017. Of these, 88 (72%) patients had de-novo and 34 (28%) had secondary AML. Sixty-four patients received Bu/Flu/TBI-based RIC, and 58 received Bu/Flu as MAC regimen. All patients received peripheral blood stem cells. The patients receiving RIC regimen were older (median age 66 vs 53 years, p The 6-month cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of grade III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was 6% in RIC and 26% in MAC regimen (p=0.004). The 2-year CIR of chronic extensive GVHD was 35% and 29% in RIC and MAC regimen, respectively (p=0.50). Median follow-up of surviving patients after RIC and MAC regimen was 4.4 years and 4 years, respectively. Two-year OS after RIC and MAC regimen was 50% and 49%, respectively (p=0.69). Two-year relapse rate with RIC and MAC was 37% and 24%, respectively (p=0.25), whereas two-year NRM with RIC and MAC was 21% and 31%, respectively (p=0.41). Two-year RFS was 43% with RIC and 45% with MAC regimen (p=0.80). In all, CMV and EBV reactivation rates were 34% and 7%, respectively. Eight patients (7%) developed gastrointestinal CMV disease. Multivariable analysis revealed that relapsed and refractory AML at AHSCT was associated with adverse OS (HR 1.71, p=0.04), RFS (HR 1.84, p=0.01) and higher NRM (SHR 2.96, p=0.006) compared to first complete remission. Secondary AML was associated with higher NRM (HR 2.44, p=0.02). No impact of HLA matching and conditioning regimen on OS, relapse, NRM and RFS was observed. Subgroup analysis showed that HLA matching had an interaction with the conditioning regimen for RFS (p=0.03). Otherwise, none of the factors appeared to have any significant interaction with the conditioning regimen for survival outcomes. Conclusion: Our study shows that thymoglobulin when used with lower dose of busulfan (in the form of Bu/Flu/TBI-based RIC regimen) provided significantly lower rate of acute GVHD compared to Bu/Flu-based MAC in AML patients undergoing unrelated donor AHSCT without affecting leukemia-free and overall survival. Disease status at transplant remains a significant predictor of post-transplant outcomes. Disclosures Deol: Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Kite: Other: Advisory board; Agios: Other: Advisory board.

Introduction: Rabbit thymoglobulin, an in-vivo T-cell depleting agent, is widely used as a part of GVHD prophylaxis regimen. Current dosing of thymoglobulin is often weight based and does not consider patient related factors. This results in highly variable exposure of thymoglobulin. Although higher doses (>7mg/kg) of thymoglobulin have shown to reduce the risk of GVHD, it is associated with increased rate of opportunistic infections and disease recurrence. Conversely, lower dose (2.5mg/kg) of thymoglobulin is associated with increased risk of GVHD. Thus, optimum dosing of thymoglobulin remains undefined. We hypothesized that recipient peripheral blood ALC on the first day of thymoglobulin infusion would interact with the dose of thymoglobulin administered and predict post-transplant outcomes. We plan to identify association of thymoglobulin dose with the ALC on the first day of thymoglobulin. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes of adult patients (pts) who underwent matched unrelated donor AHSCT and received tacrolimus, mycophenolate (cellcept) and thymoglobulin as GVHD prophylaxis. Thymoglobulin was given at a total dose of 4.5mg/kg in divided fashion (0.5mg/kg on day -3, 1.5mg/kg on day -2 and 2.5mg/kg on day -1). The objectives were to determine rate of GVHD, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse rate and non-relapse mortality (NRM) following AHSCT using Cox proportional hazard regression and competing risk models. Results: Between January 2005 and December 2017, 217 pts underwent AHSCT. The most common indications for AHSCT were AML (n=95, 44%), MDS (n=57, 26%), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=23, 11%), and ALL (n=22, 10%). Median age of pts was 60 years (range, 18-79). All pts received peripheral blood stem cells. Ninety-eight pts (45%) received full intensity conditioning regimen and 119 pts (55%) received reduced intensity regimen. The median ALC on the first day of thymoglobulin administration was 200 K/cubic millimeter. The 6-month cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of grade III-IV acute GVHD was 14.8% and the 2-year CIR of chronic extensive GVHD was 35.4%. With a median follow up of 3.82 years for surviving patients, the 2-year RFS, OS, relapse and NRM were 50%, 57.1, 20.1%, and 30.2%, respectively. CMV and EBV reactivation rates were 37% and 11%, respectively. Four pts developed CMV disease. By our lowest ALC cutoff of 100 K/cubic millimeter, pts were divided into two groups (ALC ≤ 100 vs. ALC > 100). Multivariable analysis revealed that ALC > 100 was associated with significantly superior OS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.79, p=0.002), RFS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.33-0.74, p=0.001) and lower NRM (SHR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.97, p=0.038) and marginally lower relapse rate (SHR 0.57, 95% CI 0.31-1.05, p=0.070). In addition, higher infused total nucleated cells was associated with higher NRM (SHR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02-2.83, p=0.041). No impact of disease risk index, KPS, conditioning regimen, infused CD34 cells on NRM, relapse, RFS or OS was observed. Conclusion: Our study indicates that ALC ≤ 100 is associated with adverse post-transplant outcomes when thymoglobulin dose of 4.5mg/kg is used for in-vivo T cell depletion. This finding may indicate that in pts with lower ALC, thymoglobulin dose may need to be adjusted to optimize its efficacy and avoid toxicities. In the future prospective studies, which evaluate dose reduction of thymoglobulin in pts with low ALC need to be planned to confirm these results. Disclosures Deol: Agios: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Kite: Other: Advisory board.

Introduction: Low dose lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy after the first autologous transplant (autoSCT) has been shown to improve progression free survival (PFS) and possibly overall survival (OS) in standard-risk multiple myeloma (MM). Proteasome inhibitor-based maintenance therapy provides an alternative to lenalidomide and offers PFS and OS advantage in high-risk MM. Most recently oral ixazomib as a maintenance therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of progression by 28%. Despite the advances in maintenance therapy after first autoSCT, no prospective or retrospective studies exist evaluating efficacy of maintenance therapy after second autoSCT. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the impact of maintenance therapy after second autoSCT. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes of adult MM patients (pts) who received maintenance therapy following second autoSCT. Lenalidomide dose up to 15mg daily and subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 every 2 weeks were considered maintenance therapy. The pts who received higher doses or combinational therapy as maintenance were excluded. We compared outcomes between pts who did and did not receive maintenance therapy following second autoSCT. The objectives were to determine OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse rate and non-relapse mortality (NRM) with maintenance therapy following second autoSCT using Cox regression and competing risk models. Results: Between January 2000 and December 2018, 117 pts underwent second autoSCT and met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 39 received maintenance therapy and 78 did not. Median time between first and second autoSCT was 57 months (range, 4.9-124.2) in the maintenance group and 46 months (range, 3.7-193.5) in the no-maintenance group (p=0.32). Disease status at second autoSCT was complete response (CR) (n=7, 6%), very good partial response (VGPR) (n=22, 19%), partial response (PR) (n=30, 26%), stable (n=21, 18%) and progressive disease (n=32, 27%). Melphalan-based preparative regimen was used in 87% of pts, and BEAM was used in 13% of pts. All pts successfully engrafted and median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 11 and 19 days, respectively. Maintenance therapy after second autoSCT was started at a median day of 105 (range, 62-317). Lenalidomide-based maintenance therapy was commonly used in 23 (59%) pts, and bortezomib as maintenance was used in 16 (41%) pts. Sixteen pts received maintenance therapy after both first and second autoSCT, and 23 received second maintenance only. Median duration of second maintenance therapy was 16 months (range, 8.7-26.5). The best response during maintenance was CR (n=8, 21%), VGPR (n=20, 51%), PR (n=9, 23%), and stable disease (n=2, 5%). Median follow-up for OS was 48 and 60 months in the maintenance and no-maintenance group, respectively. Median OS was not reached in the maintenance group and was 40.8 months in the no-maintenance group (HR 2.32, p=0.02). At 3-year, maintenance group had superior RFS (18% vs 12%; HR 1.65, p=0.03), lower relapse rate (69 vs 81%; SHR 0.58, p=0.02). Median time to progression was 24 months in the maintenance group and 14 months in the no-maintenance group (p=0.04). Although limited by small numbers, we did not observe any impact of cytogenetics at diagnosis on OS and RFS after second autoSCT. RFS was superior with lenalidomide-based maintenance compared to bortezomib-based maintenance (HR 2.17, p=0.05). However, OS was not different. The multivariable analysis revealed that maintenance after second autoSCT was associated with significantly superior OS (HR 0.38, p=0.01), RFS (HR 0.59, p=0.03) and lower relapse rate (SHR 0.63, p=0.04). The common reasons for maintenance therapy discontinuation were disease progression (n=20, 51%), side effects (n=7, 18%), and unknown (n=12, 31%). A total of 10/39 pts who received maintenance therapy and 44/77 pts who did not receive maintenance have died. Conclusion: This is the first study showing efficacy of maintenance therapy after second autoSCT. Maintenance therapy after second autoSCT significantly improved overall and relapsed-free survival and should be considered in all pts after second transplant. Our study also reveals real world practice pattern of using variable dose of maintenance therapy among physicians. Disclosures Deol: Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Kite: Other: Advisory board; Agios: Other: Advisory board.