Search

Background: Daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique are recommended for locoregional RT of breast cancer. The optimal workflow for a combination of surface-guided RT (SGRT) with DIBH technique is of current clinical interest. Materials and methods: The setup accuracy at three hospitals was evaluated using different SGRT workflows. A total of 150 patients (2269 image pairs) were analyzed in three groups: patient setup with the AlignRT® SGRT system in Tampere (Site 1, n = 50), the Catalyst™ SGRT system in Turku (Site 2, n = 50) and the Catalyst™ SGRT system in Jönköping (Site 3, n = 50). Each site used their routine workflow with SGRT-based setup and IGRT positioning. Residual errors of the bony chest wall, thoracic vertebra (Th 1) and humeral head were evaluated using IGRT images. Results: Systematic residual errors in the cranio-caudal (CC) direction and in pitch were generally larger at Site 2 than those at Sites 1 and 3 (p = 0.01-0.7). With daily IGRT, only a small difference (p = 0.01-0.9) was observed in residual random errors of bony structures in other directions between sites. Conclusion: The introduction of SGRT and the use of daily IGRT lead to small residual errors when combining the best work- flow practices from different hospitals. Our multicenter evaluation led to improved workflow by tightening the SGRT tolerances on Site 2 and fixation modification. Because of mainly small random errors, systematic posture errors in the images need to be corrected after posture correction with new setup surfaces. We recommend tight SGRT tolerances, good fixation and correction of systematic errors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The high heterogeneity of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (dmNPC) makes its prognosis and treatment challenging. We aimed to accurately stage dmNPC and assess the patterns of treatment strategies for different risk groups. Methods The study enrolled a total of 562 patients, 264 from 2007 to 2013 in the training cohort and 298 from 2014 to 2017 in the validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the independent variables for overall survival (OS). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was applied to establish a novel risk-stratifying model based on these variables. Results After pairwise comparisons of OS, three risk groups were generated: low-risk (involved lesions ≤ 4 without liver involvement), intermediate-risk (involved lesions ≤ 4 with liver involvement or involved lesions > 4 with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-DNA 4 with EBV-DNA > 62,000 copies/ml). The 3-year OS rate differed significantly between groups (80.4%, 42.0%, and 20.4%, respectively, all P

Background: The high heterogeneity of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (dmNPC) makes its prognosis and treatment challenging. We aimed to accurately stage dmNPC and assess the patterns of treatment strategies for different risk groups. Methods: The study enrolled a total of 562 patients, 264 from 2007 to 2013 in the training cohort and 298 from 2014 to 2017 in the validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the independent variables for overall survival (OS). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was applied to establish a novel risk-stratifying model based on these variables. Results: After pairwise comparisons of OS, three risk groups were generated: low-risk (involved lesions ≤ 4 without liver involvement), intermediate-risk (involved lesions ≤ 4 with liver involvement or involved lesions > 4 with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-DNA < 62,000 copies/ml), and high-risk (involved lesions > 4 with EBV-DNA > 62,000 copies/ml). The 3-year OS rate differed significantly between groups (80.4%, 42.0%, and 20.4%, respectively, all P < 0.05). Adding locoregional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (LRRT) followed by palliative chemotherapy (PCT) resulted in a significant OS benefit over PCT alone for the low- and intermediate-risk groups (P = 0.0032 and P = 0.0014, respectively). However, it provided no survival benefits for the high-risk group (P = 0.6). Patients did not benefit from concurrent chemotherapy during LRRT among the three subgroups (P = 0.12, P = 0.13, and P = 0.3, respectively). These results were confirmed with the validation cohort. Conclusions: The novel RPA model revealed superior survival performance in subgroup stratification and could facilitate more effective treatment strategies for dmNPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of the present meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of adjuvant locoregional radiation therapy (LRRT) in breast cancer patients with clinical lymph node metastatic disease achieving ypN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Materials and methods: A systematic review of studies on PubMed was performed. A meta-analysis was conducted by computing extracted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) into a fixed-effects model. Results: Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Adjuvant LRRT significantly reduced the risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with N+ at diagnosis and ypN0 (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.42–0.81). However, no statistically significant difference on disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) was found. Conclusions: LRRT significantly reduced the risk of LRR in patients with ypN0 after NACT whereas no impact on DFS or OS was observed. The low level of evidence should be considered when interpreting the results in clinical practice.

Background: In locoregional radiotherapy of breast cancer with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), setup accuracy may depend on hospital protocol. At present, comparison between different positioning devices is challenging due to differing hospital protocols. The aim of this study was to evaluate the setup accuracy obtained with surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT; AlignRT®, Catalyst™) or with lasers and real-time position management (RPM™) in DIBH. Materials and methods: A total of 1692 image pairs were analyzed in three groups: positioning using AlignRT® surface guidance system (Group A, n = 45), Catalyst™ (Group C, n = 50) and conventional lasers and tattoos (Group L, n = 46). We evaluated residual errors for the bony chest wall, th1 and humeral head in KV images with laser- or SGRT-based setup with and without daily image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Results: Less isocenter variance was found in Group A than in Group L or C (p ≤ 0.05) and in Group C than in L (p = 0.02--0.6). With SGRT only, the smallest random rotation error was found in Group A (p = 0.01). With daily IGRT, only a small difference was found for residual errors between the groups. Conclusion: setup with SGRT improves the isocenter reproducibility compared to lasers and RPM™. Only small differences were found in setup accuracy between the SGRT devices. Due to improved isocenter accuracy, daily orthogonal IGRT is suggested in all the groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To establish a risk classification of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) patients based on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) radiomics parameters to identify suitable candidates for locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT). Methods: In all, 586 de novo mNPC patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT prior to palliative chemotherapy (PCT) were involved. A Cox regression model was performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Candidate PET-CT parameters were incorporated into the PET-CT parameter score (PPS). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was applied to construct a risk stratification system. Results: Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that total lesion glycolysis of locoregional lesions (LRL-TLG), the number of bone metastases (BMs), metabolic tumor volume of distant soft tissue metastases (DSTM-MTV), pretreatment Epstein–Barr virus DNA (EBV DNA), and liver involvement were independent prognosticators for OS. The number of BMs, LRL-TLG, and DSTM-MTV were incorporated as the PPS. Eligible patients were divided into three stages by the RPA-risk stratification model: M1a (low risk, PPSlow + no liver involvement), M1b (intermediate risk, PPSlow + liver involvement, PPShigh + low EBV DNA), and M1c (high risk, PPShigh + high EBV DNA). PCT followed by LRRT displayed favorable OS rates compared to PCT alone in M1a patients (p < 0.001). No significant survival difference was observed between PCT plus LRRT and PCT alone in M1b and M1c patients (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The PPS-based RPA stratification model could identify suitable candidates for LRRT. Patients with stage M1a disease could benefit from LRRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignancy predominantly associated with infection by the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Approximately 12,900 new cases of NPC occur each year, with more than 70% of cases occurring in the east and southeast Asia. NPC is different from ordinary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma due to its particular biological properties and it is highly sensitive to radiotherapy. With the development of RT technology, the 3-year local control rate and survival rates of non-metastatic NPC reached 80–90% in the intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) era. However, whether distant metastatic NPC (de novo mNPC, dmNPC) should receive locoregional RT (LRRT) needs to be clarified. Results Multivariate analysis identified three independent prognostic factors: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA, number of metastatic lesions, and number of metastatic organs. Through these factors, all patients were successfully divided into 3 subgroups: low-risk (single metastatic organ, EBV DNA ≤ 25,000 copies/ml, and ≤ 5 metastatic lesions), intermediate-risk (single metastatic organ, EBV DNA > 25,000 copies/ml, and ≤ 5 metastatic lesions), and high-risk (multiple metastatic organs or > 5 metastatic lesions or both). By comparing LRRT and non-LRRT groups, statistical differences were found in OS in the low-risk and intermediate-risk subgroups (p = 0.039 and p = 0.010, respectively) but no significant difference was found in OS in the high-risk subgroup (p = 0.076). Further multivariate analysis of different risk stratifications revealed that LRRT can improve OS of low- and intermediate-risk subgroups. Conclusions The risk stratification of dmNPC may be used as a new prognostic factor to help clinicians organize individualized LRRT treatment to improve the survival outcomes of dmNPC patients.

Background: To evaluate the value of locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT) in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (dmNPC) and identify predictive factors for additional LRRT after palliative chemotherapy (PCT). Methods: Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Patients who underwent PCT and LRRT were categorized as the PCT+LRRT group; patients who only received palliative chemotherapy were categorized as the PCT group. Oligometastatic diseases (OMD) was defined as ≤5 metastatic lesions and ≤2 metastatic organs. Results: A total of 168 patients were included for this study. The median OS of patients in the PCT+LRRT group was significantly higher than those in the PCT group (57 months vs. 22 months, P

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used preoperatively in breast cancer patients to achieve disease downstaging, reduce distant dissemination, and assess chemosensitivity. While NAC indications are expanding, knowledge of its impact on subsequent locoregional treatment with surgery and radiation therapy (RT) decisions is evolving. Radiation oncologists are often called upon to estimate locoregional recurrence (LRR) risks and provide recommendations for adjuvant RT to the breast/chest wall and regional lymph nodes postoperatively. In the non-NAC setting, adjuvant RT decisions are guided by the pathology findings after definitive surgery. In the NAC setting, decisions for or against adjuvant RT are complex, particularly in patients who achieve complete pathologic response (pCR).Areas covered: This review will examine contemporary data on NAC in patients with breast cancer and discuss its impact on surgical and RT decisions. We will also evaluate controversies in the role of LRRT for these patients, focussing on prognostic factors that include biological subtypes and pCR after NAC.Expert opinion: Advances in personalized medicine and diagnostic techniques have shifted paradigms and increased complexities in locoregional treatment decisions, particularly in the setting of NAC. Despite the challenges, our goals while we await prospective data remain focused on improving survival, minimizing toxicity, and optimizing function and cosmesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignancy predominantly associated with infection by the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Approximately 12,900 new cases of NPC occur each year, with more than 70% of cases occurring in the east and southeast Asia. NPC is different from ordinary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma due to its particular biological properties and it is highly sensitive to radiotherapy. With the development of RT technology, the 3-year local control rate and survival rates of non-metastatic NPC reached 80-90% in the intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) era. However, whether distant metastatic NPC (de novo mNPC, dmNPC) should receive locoregional RT (LRRT) needs to be clarified.Results: Multivariate analysis identified three independent prognostic factors: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA, number of metastatic lesions, and number of metastatic organs. Through these factors, all patients were successfully divided into 3 subgroups: low-risk (single metastatic organ, EBV DNA ≤ 25,000 copies/ml, and ≤ 5 metastatic lesions), intermediate-risk (single metastatic organ, EBV DNA > 25,000 copies/ml, and ≤ 5 metastatic lesions), and high-risk (multiple metastatic organs or > 5 metastatic lesions or both). By comparing LRRT and non-LRRT groups, statistical differences were found in OS in the low-risk and intermediate-risk subgroups (p = 0.039 and p = 0.010, respectively) but no significant difference was found in OS in the high-risk subgroup (p = 0.076). Further multivariate analysis of different risk stratifications revealed that LRRT can improve OS of low- and intermediate-risk subgroups.Conclusions: The risk stratification of dmNPC may be used as a new prognostic factor to help clinicians organize individualized LRRT treatment to improve the survival outcomes of dmNPC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectivesTo investigate the optimal treatment pattern in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).MethodsWe assessed 502 consecutive and unselected de novo metastatic NPC patients in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) from November 2006 to October 2016 in our study. All patients were treated with palliative chemotherapy (PCT) and 308 patients received locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT) subsequently. Our primary study endpoint was overall survival (OS).ResultsThe patients treated with LRRT were associated with improved survival on univariate analysis (3-year OS rate 63.7% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.40–0.68, P < 0.001). The overall survival benefit of more than 4 PCT cycles was significant in female (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24–0.86, P = 0.016) and patients with multiple metastatic sites (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26–0.66, P < 0.001). The application of concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) was not associated with better survival among patients receiving LRRT (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.92–1.86, P = 0.141).ConclusionLRRT prolonged survival in de novo metastatic NPC. For patients treated with multiple metastatic sites, more than 4 cycles of PCT is necessary. CCT does not improve survival in de novo metastatic NPC patients.

• Immunochemotherapy plus radiotherapy prolonged the survival of metastatic NPC. • A scoring model could facilitate individualized treatment in the era of immunotherapy. • The toxicities of patients receiving combination therapy were tolerable. To demonstrate whether the benefit of locoregional radiotherapy in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma remains in the immunotherapy era and which patients can benefit from radiotherapy. A total of 273 histopathology-confirmed de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma was enrolled between May 2017 and October 2021 if receiving immunochemotherapy with or without subsequent intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the nasopharynx and neck. We compared the progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety between the two groups. Additionally, subgroup analysis was conducted and a scoring model was developed to identify suitable patients for radiation. There were 95 (34.8 %) patients with immunochemotherapy alone, and 178 (65.2 %) with immunochemotherapy plus subsequent locoregional radiotherapy. With a median follow-up time of 18 months, patients with immunochemotherapy plus subsequent radiotherapy had higher 1-year progression-free survival (80.6 % vs. 65.1 %, P < 0.001) and overall survival (98.3 % vs. 89.5 %, P = 0.001) than those with immunochemotherapy alone. The benefit was retained in multivariate analysis and propensity score-matched analysis. Mainly, it was more significant in patients with oligometastases, EBV DNA below 20,200 copies/mL, and complete or partial relapse after immunochemotherapy. The combined treatment added grade 3 or 4 anemia and radiotherapy-related toxicities. Immunochemotherapy plus subsequent locoregional radiotherapy prolonged the survival of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma with tolerable toxicities. A scoring model based on oligometastases, EBV DNA level, and response after immunochemotherapy could facilitate individualized management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We aimed to investigate the efficacy of locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT) in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (dmNPC) receiving chemotherapy combined with anti-programmed cell death receptor-1 monoclonal antibodies (anti-PD-1 mAbs) as first-line treatment and identify optimal candidates for LRRT., Materials and Methods: We enrolled patients with dmNPC receiving platinum-based palliative chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 mAbs followed or not followed by LRRT from four centers. The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). We used the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance the baseline characteristics of the LRRT and non-LRRT groups to minimize selection bias before comparative analyses. Multivariate analyses were carried out using the Cox proportional hazards model., Results: We included 163 patients with dmNPC (median follow-up: 22 months). The median PFS was 20 months, and the ORR was 92.0%; the median OS was not achieved. After IPTW adjustments, patients who received LRRT had a significant survival benefit over those not receiving LRRT (median PFS: 28 versus 15 months, P < 0.001). The Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV DNA) level after four to six cycles of anti-PD-1 mAbs [weighted hazard ratio (HR): 2.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-3.92, P = 0.008] and LRRT (weighted HR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-0.99, P = 0.04) were independent prognostic factors. Patients with undetectable EBV DNA levels after four to six cycles of anti-PD-1 mAbs (early EBV DNA clearance) benefitted from LRRT (HR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.79, P = 0.008), whereas those with detectable levels did not (HR: 1.30, 95% CI 0.59-2.87, P = 0.51)., Conclusions: Palliative chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-1 mAbs followed by LRRT was associated with improved PFS in patients with dmNPC, especially for patients with early EBV DNA clearance., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: In locoregional radiotherapy of breast cancer with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), setup accuracy may depend on hospital protocol. At present, comparison between different positioning devices is challenging due to differing hospital protocols. The aim of this study was to evaluate the setup accuracy obtained with surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT; AlignRT®, Catalyst™) or with lasers and real-time position management (RPM™) in DIBH., Materials and Methods: A total of 1692 image pairs were analyzed in three groups: positioning using AlignRT® surface guidance system (Group A, n = 45), Catalyst™ (Group C, n = 50) and conventional lasers and tattoos (Group L, n = 46). We evaluated residual errors for the bony chest wall, th1 and humeral head in kV images with laser- or SGRT-based setup with and without daily image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT)., Results: Less isocenter variance was found in Group A than in Group L or C (p ≤ 0.05) and in Group C than in L (p = 0.02-0.6). With SGRT only, the smallest random rotation error was found in Group A (p = 0.01). With daily IGRT, only a small difference was found for residual errors between the groups., Conclusion: Setup with SGRT improves the isocenter reproducibility compared to lasers and RPM™. Only small differences were found in setup accuracy between the SGRT devices. Due to improved isocenter accuracy, daily orthogonal IGRT is suggested in all the groups., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None declared., (© 2022 Greater Poland Cancer Centre.)

Background: Data guiding radiotherapy (RT) decisions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is largely retrospective, based on older treatment approaches without molecular subtype information. This study evaluated outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with modern NAC by molecular subtype and locoregional treatment., Materials and Methods: There were 949 patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2016 treated with NAC followed by surgery ± locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT). Outcomes were 7-year locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: Median follow-up was 6.5 years, 92% had cT2-4 and 72% cN1-3 disease. Subtypes were: 21% Luminal A, 18% Luminal B, 35% Her2+, and 21% triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Combined taxane and anthracycline-based NAC was used in 91.7% of cases. All patients with Her2+ disease received anti-Her2 therapy. After NAC, the majority (84.9%) underwent mastectomy, and received LRRT (86.1%). Only 11% had mastectomy without RT. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates were 2.5% for Luminal A, 14.4% Luminal B, 27% TNBC, and 35.1% Her2+. Overall, adjuvant LRRT was associated with improved outcomes but was most significant for improved LRRFS in TNBC (92.5% vs. 68.5%, P < .001; Her2+ 95.4% vs. 93.6%, P = .81; Luminal A 97.4% vs. 100%, P = .49; Luminal B 89.7% vs. 100%, P = .17). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with reduced LRRFS were grade 3 histology (HR 4.96, P = .009) and no pCR (HR 7.0, P = .0008). Predictors of lower BCSS and OS were age >50, grade 3, cT3-4, lack of pCR, LRRT omission, and TNBC and Her2+ subtypes., Conclusion: In this analysis of patients treated with modern NAC, pCR rates varied by molecular subtype. Patients who did not receive LRRT, particularly those with TNBC, had lower survival compared to those treated with LRRT. These findings support the need for prospective studies to evaluate the safety of de-escalating RT after NAC., (Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Purpose: Radiotherapy is, similar to surgery, a local treatment. In the case of breast cancer, it is generally given after conservative or after more extensive, tumour and patient adapted, surgery. The target volumes can be the breast and/or the thoracic wall and/or the regional lymph node areas. The integration and the extent of radiotherapy as part of the comprehensive treatment of the breast cancer patient, including the amount of surgery and the sequencing with the systemic treatments, has to be well discussed with all medical specialists involved in treating breast cancer on a multidisciplinary basis. Guidelines for the appropriate prescription and execution of radiotherapy are of utmost importance. However, individualisation based on the individual patients’ and tumours’ characteristics should always be envisaged. Materials and methods: Based on a review of the literature the level of evidence that is available for the indications for radiotherapy is summarised, as well as the main clinical questions that are unanswered today. An overview of the recent and ongoing clinical trails in breast cancer will highlight some of the current ongoing debates. Conclusions: In the case of breast cancer, radiotherapy, given after as well conservative as extensive risk-adapted surgery, significantly reduces the risk of local and regional recurrences. Especially for patients with an intermediate to high absolute risk for local recurrences, a positive influence on overall survival has been shown, notably when appropriate radiotherapy techniques are used. Most important is that the best results that we can offer to our breast cancer patients for all clinical endpoints (local and regional control; quality of life; cosmetic results; survival) can be obtained by a multidisciplinary and patient-oriented approach, involving all those involved in the treatment of breast cancer patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the toxicity of locoregional adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy after implementation of this service in a rural healthcare region with long travel distance., Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective single-institution analysis of 87 consecutive female patients (the initial cohort), managed with conventionally fractionated 3-D conformal radiotherapy with or without boost, including both post mastectomy and breast conservation scenarios. Treatment was administered in line with comprehensive national guidelines. Intensity-modulated techniques were not utilized., Results: The median follow-up time was 4 years. None of the patients developed any grade IV side-effects. According to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria, acute grade 2b or 3 skin toxicity was observed in 16%. In addition, 35% developed acute grade 2a skin reactions. A trend was observed regarding grade 2-3 skin toxicities and administration of a boost (p=0.058). There was a significant association between the clinical target volume of the breast and grade 2-3 skin reactions in women who had breast-conserving surgery (p=0.016). Five patients (6%) developed grade 1 pneumonitis, unrelated to dosimetric or other baseline parameters., Conclusion: The toxicity profile after a median follow-up of 4 years was in accordance with published data. Recently, intensity-modulated techniques have been implemented at the study center, which may reduce radiotherapy toxicity in patients with large clinical target volume due to better dose homogeneity., (Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: To evaluate the value of locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT) in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (dmNPC) and identify predictive factors for additional LRRT after palliative chemotherapy (PCT)., Methods: Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Patients who underwent PCT and LRRT were categorized as the PCT+LRRT group; patients who only received palliative chemotherapy were categorized as the PCT group. Oligometastatic diseases (OMD) was defined as ≤5 metastatic lesions and ≤2 metastatic organs., Results: A total of 168 patients were included for this study. The median OS of patients in the PCT+LRRT group was significantly higher than those in the PCT group (57 months vs. 22 months, P<0.001). Multivariate analyses (MVA) showed that LRRT (HR=0.533, 95% CI: 0.319-0.889, P = 0.016) and OMD (HR=0.548, 95% CI: 0.331-0.907, P = 0.019) were independent prognostic factors for dmNPC. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that the 3-year OS of patients who received LRRT was significantly better than those who did not receive LRRT in the OMD subgroup (66.3% vs. 25.2%, P<0.001). While, the 3-year OS of patients who received LRRT and without LRRT was no different in the polymetastatic disease (PMD) subgroup (38.9% vs.11.5%, P = 0.115). MVA showed that LRRT was a favorable prognosticator in the OMD subgroup (HR=0.308, 95% CI: 0.159-0.598; P<0.001), and not a favorable prognosticator in the PMD subgroup (HR=0.510, 95% CI: 0.256-1.014, P = 0.055)., Conclusions: LRRT has the potential to prolong OS in NPC patients with de novo OMD. These results suggest that OMD is a potential indicator for filtering beneficiaries from LRRT., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: There is no clinically applicable prognostic model designed for patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) treated with chemotherapy followed by locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT). We sought to develop a predictive tool of overall survival for individualized prediction and risk stratification in this heterogeneous patient population., Patients and Methods: A total of 244 eligible patients with de novo mNPC, who were treated with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy followed by LRRT, were included in this retrospective study. We divided patients into the training and validation sets based on the date of initial treatment, with 152 patients treated between 2008 and 2013 comprising the training set for model development and 92 patients treated at a later time (2014 to 2015) forming the validation set. We applied Cox proportional hazards model to examine factors associated with overall survival (OS). We developed and subsequently validated a prognostic model to predict OS. We assessed the performance of this prognostic model and stratified patients based on prognostic scores obtained from this proposed model., Results: The median OS of the entire cohort was 60.9 months. C-creative protein, number of metastatic sites, liver metastasis, post-treatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA, and response of metastasis were significantly associated with OS. A prognostic model for individual survival prediction was developed and graphically represented as a nomogram. The model showed favorable discrimination (C-index: 0.759), predictive accuracy [time dependent area under the curve (tAUC) at 5 years: 0.800], and calibration, and was further validated in an independent dataset. A risk stratification derived from the model can stratify these patients into three prognostic subgroups with significantly different survival., Conclusion: We developed and validated a prognostic model that exhibited adequate performance in individualized prediction and risk stratification for patients with de novo mNPC treated with chemotherapy followed by LRRT., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Ethics approval The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center. Data sharing The authenticity of this article has been validated by uploading the key raw data on to the Research Data Deposit public platform (www.researchdata.org.cn), with the approval RDD number, RDDA2020001681., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate the optimal treatment pattern in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)., Methods: We assessed 502 consecutive and unselected de novo metastatic NPC patients in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) from November 2006 to October 2016 in our study. All patients were treated with palliative chemotherapy (PCT) and 308 patients received locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT) subsequently. Our primary study endpoint was overall survival (OS)., Results: The patients treated with LRRT were associated with improved survival on univariate analysis (3-year OS rate 63.7% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.40-0.68, P < 0.001). The overall survival benefit of more than 4 PCT cycles was significant in female (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.86, P = 0.016) and patients with multiple metastatic sites (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.66, P < 0.001). The application of concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) was not associated with better survival among patients receiving LRRT (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.86, P = 0.141)., Conclusion: LRRT prolonged survival in de novo metastatic NPC. For patients treated with multiple metastatic sites, more than 4 cycles of PCT is necessary. CCT does not improve survival in de novo metastatic NPC patients., (Copyright © 2020 Sun, Liang, Chen, Guo, Liu, Sun, Luo, Tang and Mai.)

Purpose: To determine the value of the intent to include internal mammary nodes (IMNs) in the radiation therapy (RT) volume for patients receiving adjuvant locoregional (breast or chest wall plus axillary and supraclavicular fossa) RT for breast cancer. Methods and Materials: 2413 women with node-positive or T3/4N0 invasive breast cancer, treated with locoregional RT from 2001 to 2006, were identified in a prospectively maintained, population-based database. Intent to include IMNs in RT volume was determined through review of patient charts and RT plans. Distant relapse free survival (D-RFS), breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Prespecified pN1 subgroup analyses were performed. Results: The median follow-up time was 6.2 years. Forty-one percent of study participants received IMN RT. The 5-year D-RFS for IMN inclusion and exclusion groups were 82% vs. 82% (p = 0.82), BCSS was 87% vs. 87% (p = 0.81), and OS was 85% vs. 83% (p = 0.06). In the pN1 subgroup, D-RFS was 90% vs. 88% (p = 0.31), BCSS was 94% vs. 92% (p = 0.18), and OS was 91% vs. 88% (p = 0.01). After potential confounding variables were controlled for, women who received IMN RT did not have significantly different D-RFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84–1.24; p = 0.85), BCSS (HR = 0.98 (95% CI, 0.79–1.22; p = 0.88), or OS (HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.78–1.15; p = 0.57). In the pN1 subgroup, IMN RT was associated with trends for improved survival that were not statistically significant: D-RFS (HR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.63–1.22; p = 0.42), BCSS (HR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.57–1.25; p = 0.39), and OS (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.56–1.09; p = 0.14). Conclusions: After a median follow-up time of 6.2 years, although intentional IMN RT was not associated with a significant improvement in survival, this population-based study suggests that IMN RT may contribute to improved outcomes in selected patients with N1 disease. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]