Search

Objectives: Morning Report is a prevalent classroom learning activity in residency programs. Yet, its contribution to resident education remains unclear. Our objective was to explore pediatric residents' perceptions of the purpose of Morning Report as well as their experiences at Morning Report both as learners and resident presenters. Methods: We performed a qualitative study with a grounded theory approach using semi-structured focus groups of pediatric residents (November 2016-July 2017) from a large academic health center. We analyzed data with the constant comparative method, generating codes using an iterative approach and collecting data until reaching saturation. We identified major themes and resolved disagreements by consensus. Results: Twenty-six residents participated in five focus groups. Data analysis yielded four themes: Morning Report is Multipurpose, Socialization and Engagement Influence the Learning Environment, Potential for Emotional Discomfort, and Barriers to Prioritizing Morning Report Attendance. Residents felt the primary purpose of Morning Report was acquiring medical knowledge, but also acknowledged Morning Report's added benefits of providing an opportunity for socialization and a mental reprieve before work rounds. Residents felt Morning Report was educational when engaged in interactive discussion; however, it was challenging to meet the differing needs in this mixed learner level format. Some resident learners were hesitant to participate due to fears of being judged, and some resident presenters perceived a need to be topic experts. Clinical responsibilities and exhaustion following busy service rotations often precluded Morning Report attendance. Conclusion: Pediatric residents described numerous purposes of Morning Report, including opportunities for valuable learning. Self-perceived learning was positively influenced by engagement and a sense of connection and challenged by emotional discomfort at times. Future work can explore how to best promote engagement and foster a safe learning environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phenomenon: The phenomenon of individualized education, an essential component of competency-based medical education, addresses individual learner needs while working toward standardized learning outcomes. One challenge with broadly implementing individualized education is the lack of a pragmatic operational definition. To formalize expectations for individualized education, the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education in 2013 began requiring six months of individualized curriculum (IC) during pediatric residency; however, there is not a national standard of formal curricular goals for the IC as an educational entity. Examining and describing the overarching curricular goals of IC could provide a framework for discourse about and further study of individualized education in medicine across disciplines and the continuum of medical education. Thus, we aimed to describe the phenomenon of individualized education through the lens of the goals of the IC in pediatric residency in the United States. Approach: In 2017, a purposeful sample of Pediatric Residency leaders were recruited to represent a diverse sample of program sizes, regions of the country, and importance of the IC to the program leadership. They completed an online survey with open-ended questions describing formal and implicit goals of their program's IC. The authors analyzed responses initially using conventional content analysis, then investigated whether the themes for program goals aligned with any existing educational theory. The concepts and language aligned with the principles of self-determination theory (SDT); therefore, the IC goals were subsequently grouped using the SDT domains of relatedness, autonomy, and competence. A focus group with a subset of survey respondents was conducted for member checking and elaboration of concepts. Findings: Program leaders from a diverse sample of 36 programs participated in the survey and a subset of 11 programs participated in the focus group. The common goals across all programs are listed in parentheses and organized by domains of SDT: 1)Relatedness goals (engage in mentorship, select a career) cultivate resident's professional identity based on their desired future career path; 2)autonomy goals (create a learning plan, practice accountability) help residents plan their path; and fulfillment of their plans lead to 3)competence goals (develop targeted clinical skills and knowledge, ensure comprehensive exposure, address learning gaps), ensuring they have a comprehensive skill set for their chosen identity. Insights: This study provides a framework to describe the phenomenon of individualized education through the lens of IC curricular goals in pediatric residency. The goals for IC that emerged from this study serve as a pragmatic framework for implementation of individualized education. They provide a common language and structure to promote more rigorous and collaborative study of individualized education across programs, disciplines, and settings in medicine. They may function as a roadmap for learners to navigate educational activities and for programs to help shape the experiences of their learners and examine outcomes of individualized education in their programs. The framework can also help individual pediatric residency programs structure improvements to their IC. Disciplines beyond pediatrics may also use this framework to better structure elective experiences to capitalize on the benefits of individual education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Epigenetic effects of medications are an evolving field of medicine, and can change the landscape of drug development. The aim of this paper is to systematically review the literature of the relationship between common medications used for treatment of bipolar disorders and epigenetic modifications. MedLine/PubMed searches were performed based on pre-specified inclusion criteria frominception toNovember 2017. Six animal and human studiesmet the inclusion criteria. These studies examined the epigenetic changes in the main classes of medications that are used in bipolar disorders, namely mood stabilizers and antipsychotics. Although these initial studies have small to moderate sample size, they generally suggest an evolving and accumulating evidence of epigenetic changes that are associated with several of the medications that are used in bipolar I and II disorders. In this manuscript, we describe the specific epigenetic changes that are associated with the medications studied. Of the studies reviewed, five of the six studies revealed epigenetic changes associated with the use of mood stabilizers or antipsychotic medications. This review contributes to future research directions. Further understanding of the complexities of the epigenome and the untangling of the effects and contributions of disease states versus medications is crucial for the future of drug design and the development of new therapeutics. Epigenetic therapeutics hold great promise for complex disease treatment and personalized interventions, including psychiatric diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractPhenomenonApproachFindingsInsightsMarginalized individuals in medicine face many structural inequities which can have enduring consequences on their progress. Therefore, inequity must be addressed by dismantling underlying unjust policies, environments, and curricula. However, once these injustices have been taken apart, how do we build more just systems from the rubble? Many current strategies to address this question have foundational values of urgency, solutionism, and top-down leadership.This paper explores a counternarrative: Design Justice. As a set of guiding principles, Design Justice centers the experiences and perspectives of marginalized individuals and communities. These principles include mutual accountability and transparency, co-ownership, and community-led outcomes, and honoring local, traditional, Indigenous knowledge.Rooted in critical scholarship and critical design, Design Justice recognizes the interconnectedness of various forms of marginalization and works to critically examine power dynamics that exist in every design process. These co-created principles act as practical guardrails, directing progress toward justice.This paper begins with an overview of Design Justice’s history in critical scholarship and critical design, providing foundational background knowledge for medical educators, scholars, and leaders in key concepts of justice and design. We explore how the Design Justice principles were developed and have been applied across sectors, highlighting its applications, including education applications. Finally, we raise critical questions about medical education prompted by Design Justice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phenomenon: Marginalized individuals in medicine face many structural inequities which can have enduring consequences on their progress. Therefore, inequity must be addressed by dismantling underlying unjust policies, environments, and curricula. However, once these injustices have been taken apart, how do we build more just systems from the rubble? Many current strategies to address this question have foundational values of urgency, solutionism, and top-down leadership., Approach: This paper explores a counternarrative: Design Justice. As a set of guiding principles, Design Justice centers the experiences and perspectives of marginalized individuals and communities. These principles include mutual accountability and transparency, co-ownership, and community-led outcomes, and honoring local, traditional, Indigenous knowledge., Findings: Rooted in critical scholarship and critical design, Design Justice recognizes the interconnectedness of various forms of marginalization and works to critically examine power dynamics that exist in every design process. These co-created principles act as practical guardrails, directing progress toward justice., Insights: This paper begins with an overview of Design Justice's history in critical scholarship and critical design, providing foundational background knowledge for medical educators, scholars, and leaders in key concepts of justice and design. We explore how the Design Justice principles were developed and have been applied across sectors, highlighting its applications, including education applications. Finally, we raise critical questions about medical education prompted by Design Justice.