Search

8q21.11 microdeletions encompassing the gene encoding transcription factor ZFHX4, have previously been associated by us with a syndromic form of intellectual disability, hypotonia, decreased balance and hearing loss. Here, we report on 57 individuals, 52 probands and 5 affected family members, with protein truncating variants (n=36), (micro)deletions (n=20) or an inversion (n=1) affecting ZFHX4 with variable developmental delay and intellectual disability, distinctive facial characteristics, morphological abnormalities of the central nervous system, behavioral alterations, short stature, hypotonia, and occasionally cleft palate and anterior segment dysgenesis. The phenotypes associated with 8q21.11 microdeletions and ZFHX4 intragenic loss-of-function variants largely overlap, identifying ZFHX4 as the main driver for the microdeletion syndrome, although leukocyte-derived DNA shows a mild common methylation profile for (micro)deletions only. We identify ZFHX4 as a transcription factor that is increasingly expressed during human brain development and neuronal differentiation. Furthermore, ZFHX4 interacting factors identified via IP-MS in neural progenitor cells, suggest an important role for ZFHX4 in cellular and developmental pathways, especially during histone modifications, cytosolic transport and development. Additionally, using CUT&RUN, we observed that ZFHX4 binds with the promoter regions of genes with crucial roles in embryonic, neuron and axon development. Since loss-of-function variants in ZFHX4 are found with consistent dysmorphic facial features, we investigated whether the disruption of zfhx4 causes craniofacial abnormalities in zebrafish. First-generation (F0) zfhx4 crispant zebrafish, (mosaic) mutant for zfhx4 loss-of-function variants, have significantly shorter Meckel's cartilages and smaller ethmoid plates compared to control zebrafish. Furthermore, behavioral assays show a decreased movement frequency in the zfhx4 crispant zebrafish in comparison with control zebrafish larvae. Although further research is needed, our in vivo work suggests a role for zfhx4 in facial skeleton patterning, palatal development and behavior., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests No declaration of interests is reported in this manuscript.

Background: PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome (PHTS) is a rare syndrome with a broad phenotypic spectrum, including increased risks of breast (BC, 67%-78% at age 60 years), endometrial (EC, 19%-28%), and thyroid cancer (TC, 6%-38%). Current risks are likely overestimated due to ascertainment bias. We aimed to provide more accurate and personalized cancer risks., Methods: This was a European, adult PHTS cohort study with data from medical files, registries, and/or questionnaires. Cancer risks and hazard ratios were assessed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses, and standardized incidence ratios were calculated. Bias correction consisted of excluding cancer index cases and incident case analyses., Results: A total of 455 patients were included, including 50.5% index cases, 372 with prospective follow-up (median 6 years, interquartile range = 3-10 years), and 159 of 281 females and 39 of 174 males with cancer. By age 60 years, PHTS-related cancer risk was higher in females (68.4% to 86.3%) than males (16.4% to 20.8%). Female BC risks ranged from 54.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 43.0% to 66.4%) to 75.8% (95% CI = 60.7% to 88.4%), with two- to threefold increased risks for PTEN truncating and approximately twofold for phosphatase domain variants. EC risks ranged from 6.4% (95% CI = 2.1% to 18.6%) to 22.1% (95% CI = 11.6% to 39.6%) and TC risks from 8.9% (95% CI = 5.1% to 15.3%) to 20.5% (95% CI = 11.3% to 35.4%). Colorectal cancer, renal cancer, and melanoma risks were each less than 10.0%., Conclusions: Females have a different BC risk depending on their PTEN germline variant. PHTS patients are predominantly at risk of BC (females), EC, and TC. This should be the main focus of surveillance. These lower, more unbiased and personalized risks provide guidance for optimized cancer risk management., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Evaluation of clinical genetic services is challenging due to the nature of their interventions. The Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24), a patient-reported outcome measure, was developed to measure empowerment, an important patient-reported outcome from genetic counseling. Previously, we translated and adapted GCOS-24 for use in Spain, but neither test-retest reliability nor structural and construct validity were assessed at that time. In the present study, we set out to test the reliability and validity of the Spanish adaptation of the GCOS-24 against already validated Spanish language measures of satisfaction with life, anxiety, and health locus of control. 880 patients/families who attended the genetics clinic were invited to participate in a online survey. 201 participants (23%) completed the four questionnaires at the first timepoint, and 59 of these (29%) completed GCOS-24 again the second timepoint, 2-4 weeks later. Test-retest reliability was confirmed, with no significant differences between responses to GCOS-24 at the first and second timepoints and good internal consistency. Convergent validity was confirmed between GCOS-24 and measures of satisfaction with life and anxiety but not with measures of health locus of control. For the structural and construct validation, an exploratory factor analysis was performed. The resulting factorial structure of GCOS-24 consists of 6 factors that accumulate 68% of the variance shared by the 21 items that remained in the model. We applied the factor structure of the three validated measures to the available data and analyzed the correlation between factors of GCOS-24 and the other scales. The results showed significant and consistent correlation with factors of the satisfaction with life and anxiety scales but no significant correlation with internal health locus of control. The use of the Spanish adaptation of GCOS-24 in other genetic clinics in Spain will help to validate it further. This study contributes to the international validation of GCOS-24 to evaluate the quality of genetic counseling in Europe., (© 2021 National Society of Genetic Counselors.)