Search

Background: Drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral treatment (ART) and cytostatics may have a negative impact in the prognosis of people with HIV (PWH) and cancer., Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the implementation of interdisciplinary management and the type of ART in PWH diagnosed with lymphoid neoplasms., Methods: This is a multicentric, retrospective observational cohort study including PWH diagnosed with lymphoid neoplasm who started first-line chemotherapy between 2008 and 2020. Demographic, clinical and therapeutic variables were obtained from the electronic medical records and associated with 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox proportional hazard models., Results: A total of 118 individuals were included. Boosted ART was being used in 55 (46.6%) cases at the time of neoplasm diagnosis. The Infectious Diseases or the Pharmacy Department was consulted before starting chemotherapy in 79/118 (66.9%) cases. Interdisciplinary management resulted in fewer subjects taking boosted ART (17.7% versus 71.8%, P < 0.001) and more subjects using unboosted integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based ART (74.7% versus 7.7%, P < 0.001). The use of boosted ART with chemotherapy was associated with worse 5-year PFS (P = 0.003) and 5-year OS (P = 0.016). There was a trend towards better 5-year PFS and OS when interdisciplinary management was implemented, with significant differences for individuals receiving boosted ART at neoplasm diagnosis (P = 0.0246 and P = 0.0329, respectively)., Conclusions: Our findings underscore the significant impact of the type of ART on the prognosis of PWH undergoing chemotherapy. Encouraging collaborative management between oncologists, pharmacists and HIV teams for these patients enhances PFS and OS rates., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Improving understanding of actual pulmonary hypertension (PH) treatment adherence patterns is crucial to properly treating these patients. We aimed to primarily assess adherence to treatments used for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) specific therapies, identify potential factors related to it and secondly describe its treatment patterns., Methods: A 6-month observational cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital was conducted. Patients with PH-targeted therapy who picked it up in the ambulatory hospital pharmacy and who had been on treatment with the same drug for at least 1 year were included. Adherence was assessed as: 1) Proportion of days covered (PDC); and 2) Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ). PDC ≥80% was considered adherent. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the study outcomes. Logistic regressions were estimated to identify the association between baseline characteristics and factors associated with adherence. P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance., Results: A total of 63 patients with 127 different treatments were included, 71.4% were females with a mean age (SD) of 59 (15) years. PAH was the most common diagnosis (74.6%). Double therapy was used in 39.7% of patients, being the combination of Macitentan + Tadalafil and Ambrisentan + Tadalafil the most prescribed. Endothelin receptor antagonists were the most used treatment (40.2%). Adherence according to PDC was 93.7%, showing no great differences depending on the targeted drug used, and according to SMAQ 61.9%. The agreement degree of both methods was slight (65.1%; Kappa 0.12). Only female sex (OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.06-0.90; p = 0.035) was associated with worse adherence in the SMAQ method but not in the PDC. Adverse events were reported by a 55.6% of participants and the perception of effective treatment was high (95.2%)., Conclusions: Adherence to PH therapy differs depending on the assessment method; PDC showed greater adherence rate than SMAQ. According to SMAQ, female sex may have a negative impact on adherence in this cohort, but PDC revealed no factors influencing it. No notable differences in adherence between treatment types were found and generally patients felt the treatments were effective in controlling their disease., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (S.E.F.H). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)