Search

Background: Disparity in access to liver transplantation (LT) in the United States persists despite directives from the federal government to reduce geographic variation. We assessed the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) and traveling to alternative donation service areas (DSAs) on patient survival., Methods: A prospective cohort study integrating transplant registry and U.S. Census data was analyzed using multivariate linear Cox proportional hazards models. A separate matched-pairs analysis was used to assess the benefit of traveling on patient survival and transplantation rate., Results: High SES is associated with increased access to LT (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.01-1.08) and reduced mortality after waitlisting (aHR [95% CI], 0.88 [0.85-0.93]). Increased access is mediated, in part, through inter-DSA travel. Travel was associated with high SES, white race, blood group O, private insurance, and residence in regions 1, 5, and 11. Transplant candidates in the highest SES quartile were approximately 70% more likely to travel (aHR [95% CI], 1.67 [1.43-1.97]) than those in the lowest SES quartile. Compared with matched control patients, travelers were 74% more likely to be transplanted (aHR [95% CI], 1.74 [1.56-1.94]) and 20% less likely to die after listing (aHR [95% CI], 0.79 [0.69-0.92])., Conclusion: High SES and inter-DSA travel are strongly associated with increased LT access and reduced mortality. Travelers are more likely to be sociodemographically advantaged and privately insured and to live in regions with reduced access to deceased-donor organs.

Objectives: Pediatric obesity has become a significant public health concern. The historical focus in pediatric liver transplant (LT) has been undernutrition, with limited knowledge regarding obesity. Therefore, we sought to determine the prevalence of obesity in pediatric LT, compare it to National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) data, and identify risk factors for obesity in pediatric LT., Methods: SPLIT, which collects pediatric LT data at 39 centers, was queried for subjects ages 2 to 18 years at follow-up, LT between 1995 and 2007, and with at least 1 body mass index measured 1 to 5 years after LT., Results: Of 1706 individuals included, 44% had biliary atresia (47% boys, 58% white, mean age at LT 4.6 years). Of these individuals, 19% were obese at 1 year and 18% at 3 years, higher than in the general pediatric population reported by 2003-2004 NHANES, whereas 11% obesity at 5 years after LT was similar to NHANES data. Using logistic regression, Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio [OR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-2.23), steroid use at follow-up (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.23-1.77), overweight (OR 4.34, 95% CI 2.91-6.68), and obesity (OR 10.62, 95% CI 5.9-19.65) at LT independently predicted post-LT obesity., Conclusions: These findings suggest a need to broaden standard care to include obesity assessment and intervention in routine pre- and posttransplant care.

There have been many reports showing significant associations between recipient genetic variants and allograft outcomes, including acute rejection and graft failure, but less is known about the contribution of the donor genotype. We analyzed 37 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) gene from deceased donor liver allografts transplanted into 738 recipients to determine their effects on liver graft failure (LGF). Two SNPs exhibited a significant association with LGF after adjustments for donor race and recipient race and corrections for multiple test comparisons: rs11536865 [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.5, P = 0.0003] and rs5030717 (HR = 1.67, P = 0.0008). An additional SNP, rs913930, exhibited a significant association in Caucasian donors (HR = 1.62, P = 0.0006), and 2 SNPs exhibited a suggestive association in African American donors: rs11536865 (HR = 2.45, P = 0.002) and rs5030717 (HR = 2.32, P = 0.002). Additionally, the liver donor risk index (HR = 2.56, 95% confidence interval = 1.54-4.26, P = 0.0003) and the recipient hepatitis C virus (HCV) status (HR = 1.53, 95% confidence interval = 1.04-2.24, P = 0.032) increased the risk of all-cause LGF in a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for recipient race. Donor polymorphisms in TLR4 could be important factors in modulating TLR4 activity and, therefore, affect the risk of graft loss. Additionally, there is a suggestion of an interaction between polymorphisms within TLR4 and the HCV status., (Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: We aimed to characterize offers of organs to candidates awaiting liver transplantation (LT)., Methods: We analyzed data from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry on all US LT candidates with nonfulminant disease who were offered livers from February 1, 2005, to January 31, 2010, and ultimately received transplants. We excluded candidates with a final Model for End-stage Liver Disease score of less than 15. Livers were classified as high quality if they were from donors 18-50 years of age who were ≥ 170 cm tall, of non-black race, suffered brain death secondary to trauma, hepatitis C antibody-negative, not categorized as high risk by the Centers for Disease Control, and locally or regionally located., Results: Of 33,389 candidates for LT, 20% died or were removed from the list and 64% received LT; the median (interquartile range) number of liver offers for all candidates was 5 (range, 2-12). Of those who died or were removed from the list, 84% received 1 or more liver offers. Overall, 55% of those who died or were removed from the list, and 57% of those who received LT, received 1 or more offers of a high-quality liver when they had Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of 15 or greater (P = .005). However, the proportion of last liver offers of high quality to patients who underwent LT was twice that of patients who died or were removed from the list (28% vs 14%; P < .001). Most liver offers (68%) were refused for reasons related to donor quality., Conclusions: Most candidates for LT who died or were removed from the list received 1 or more offers of a liver beforehand, and 55% received 1 or more offers of a high-quality liver. These findings indicate that a substantial proportion of wait-list mortality results in part from declined livers, rather than lack of opportunity, for transplantation. Understanding the real-time factors involved in the complex decision to accept a liver offer is vital to reducing wait-list mortality for LT candidates., (Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is a potent proinflammatory cytokine, which can promote hepatitis B virus clearance. The latest studies find that genetic polymorphisms near the IL-28B gene are strongly associated with sustained viral response and spontaneous viral clearance in patients with chronically infected hepatitis C and hepatitis B. We investigated the effect of rs187238 and rs1946518 in IL-18 gene and rs8099917 in IL-28B gene on HBV recurrence in liver transplant patients. A total of 200 liver transplant recipients and relevant donors were enrolled in this study. The patients' mean follow-up was 39 month (range 10-65 month). All liver transplant recipients were in a stable stage. The total recipients (n = 200) were divided into end-stage liver disease secondary to hepatitis B (n = 140) and end-stage liver disease secondary to other diseases (n = 60) before transplantation. Recipients (n = 140) with hepatitis B before transplantation were defined to nonHBV recurrence group (n = 119) or HBV recurrence group (n = 21), which was positive for HBsAg or elevatory in HBV DNA (>2.0 × 10(2) IU mL(-1)) after transplantation. For the recipients (n = 140) had hepatitis B before transplantation, we studied the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of IL-18 gene (rs187238 and rs1946518) and IL-28B gene (rs8099917) by high-resolution melting (HRM) curve analysis. The serum levels of IL-18 and IFN-γ were tested by ELISA. The serums levels of IFN-γ were lower in HBV recurrence group than that in nonHBV recurrence group (P < 0.01). The genotype of IL-28B gene rs8099917 was associated with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels in HBV-related liver transplant recipients (n = 140). The recipients with allele G (GG+GT) had higher ALT and AST levels (P < 0.05). No association was found between IL-18 gene and IL-28B gene polymorphisms with HBV recurrence in the liver transplant recipients or the donors. We identified that the IFN-γ was a protective factor of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation. The allele G of rs8099917 was associated with hepatitis B-related hepatocytes injury. The rs8099917 G allele subgroup should reinforce antiviral therapy., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Background: Black recipients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) have decreased patient and graft survival compared with white recipients, a finding that is primarily limited to black recipients of livers from white donors. The cause(s) for these discrepant outcomes are unclear but may be related to HCV disease recurrence. The rates of HCV-related disease recurrence and liver fibrosis progression among black and white liver transplant recipients have not been investigated., Methods: In this study, we compared liver fibrosis progression between 105 black and 364 white recipients after HCV-related LT in a multisite cohort study and assessed the impact of donor race., Results: At 6, 12, and 24 months after LT, there was a significantly higher percentage in the black recipient/white donor (B/W) group with severe fibrosis, defined as stage 3 or 4 (F3/F4), compared with all other recipient/donor race combinations. The adjusted odds ratio of developing F3/F4 for the B/W group was 2.54 (1.49-4.69; reference group, white recipient/white donor). Black recipients with black donors demonstrated a similar rate of progression to F3/F4 as white recipients. Patient survival was also decreased in the B/W group compared with other recipient/donor race combinations., Conclusion: African American recipients with white donors have more severe fibrosis progression after HCV-related LT. The mechanisms responsible for accelerating fibrosis progression in this high-risk race-mismatched group need to be investigated.

Advanced age donors have inferior outcomes of liver transplantation for Hepatitis C (HCV). Aged donors grafts may be transplanted into young or low model for end stage liver disease (MELD) patients in order to offset the effect of donor age. However, it is not well understood how to utilize liver grafts from advanced aged donors for HCV patients. Using the UNOS database, we retrospectively studied 7508 HCV patients who underwent primary liver transplantation. Risk factors for graft failure and graft survival using advanced aged grafts (donor age ≥ 60 years) were analyzed by Cox hazards models, donor risk index (DRI) and organ patient index (OPI). Recipient's age did not affect on graft survival regardless of donor age. Advanced aged grafts had significant inferior survival compared to younger aged grafts regardless of MELD score (P < 0.0001). Risk factors of HCV patients receiving advanced aged grafts included donation after cardiac death (DCD, HR: 1.69) and recent hospitalization (HR: 1.43). Advanced aged grafts showed significant difference in graft survival of HCV patients with stratification of DRI and OPI. In conclusion, there was no offsetting effect by use of advanced aged grafts into younger or low MELD patients. Advanced aged grafts, especially DCD, should be judiciously used for HCV patients with low MELD score., (© 2012 The Authors. Transplant International © 2012 European Society for Organ Transplantation.)

Background: Hawaii has the highest incidence of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in the United States and the largest proportion of Asians and Pacific Islanders. HCC studies generally combine these groups into 1 ethnicity, and we sought to examine differences between Asian and Pacific Islander subpopulations., Methods: Demographic, clinical, and treatment data for 617 patients with HCC (420 Asians, 114 whites, and 83 Pacific Islanders) were reviewed. Main outcome measures included HCC screening and liver transplantation., Results: Asian and Pacific Islander subgroups had significantly more immigrants, and age was different between groups. Compared with whites, Pacific Islanders and Filipinos had less HCC screening and liver transplantation procedures, fewer met Milan criteria, and a smaller proportion of those with Milan criteria actually underwent transplantation., Conclusions: There were significant differences in risk factors, clinical presentation, treatment, and access to care among Asian, Pacific Islander, and white patients with HCC. Future HCC studies may benefit from differentiating subgroups within Asian and Pacific Islander populations to better focus these efforts., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Few studies have been performed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in liver transplantation (LT) patients in the mainland of China. This study aimed to investigate the HRQOL of post-LT patients in a single center., Methods: HRQOL was evaluated by the SF-36 (Chinese version) questionnaire in 60 patients (LT group) who had received LT for benign end-stage liver disease (BELD). Fifty-five patients with BELD (BELD group) and 50 healthy volunteers from the general population (GP group) were also evaluated, and the results were compared among the three groups., Results: There was a significant difference among the three groups in terms of the scores of eight domains in the SF-36 (P<0.01). Patients in the BELD group had lower scores in each domain of the SF-36 in comparison with those in the GP group (P<0.025). The LT group had mental health scores equivalent to those of the BELD group (P>0.025), but higher scores for the remaining seven domains (P<0.025). Compared with the GP group, the LT group scored equivalently for role physical, body pain, vitality, social function and role emotion (P>0.025), but had lower scores for the remaining three domains (P<0.025). Lower family income was found to be associated with reduced physical function and mental health scores (P<0.05). Better education was associated with increased mental health scores (P<0.05)., Conclusions: LT patients generally have a good HRQOL although some respects of their HRQOL remains to be improved. Lower family income and poor education are important factors relating to the poor HRQOL of LT patients.

African American (AA) recipient-donor race mismatch has been associated with graft loss and mortality, but studies of an association between race mismatch and hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease severity are lacking. HCV-infected adults from 4 US centers who underwent liver transplantation for the first time (n = 1093) were followed for a median of 3.05 years to determine the rates of advanced HCV disease (bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis) and graft failure; 11% of the patients were AA. The unadjusted cumulative rate of advanced fibrosis was higher in AAs than non-AAs (56% and 40% at 4 years, respectively, (P < 0.01), and 59% and 56% for AA recipient-donor-matched patients and AA recipient-donor-mismatched patients, respectively (P = 0.89). In adjusted models, both AA recipient race [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.06-2.03, P = 0.02] and AA recipient-donor mismatch (versus match; HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.03-2.12, P = 0.03) were significant predictors of advanced fibrosis; other independent predictors were donor age (HR = 1.21, P < 0.01) and cytomegalovirus infection (HR = 1.55, P < 0.01). The 4-year unadjusted cumulative rates for HCV-associated graft loss were 10% and 17% for non-AAs and AAs, respectively (P < 0.01), and 0% and 21% for AA recipient-donor-matched patients and AA recipient-donor-mismatched patients, respectively (P < 0.01). In adjusted models, AA recipient-donor-mismatched patients had a 62% higher rate of graft loss than non-AA recipients (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.14-2.29, P < 0.01), and AA recipient-donor-matched patients had a 76% lower rate of graft loss/mortality (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.06-0.97, P = 0.05). In conclusion, AA recipient-donor-mismatched patients who are infected with HCV are at high risk for advanced HCV disease and HCV-related graft loss and constitute a patient group that will benefit from new therapeutic strategies for preventing graft loss., (Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

The ethnicity and socioeconomic status of the host may affect the progression of hepatitis C virus (HCV). We aimed to compare survival and fibrosis progression in Hispanic white (HW) and non-Hispanic white (NHW) recipients of liver transplantation (LT) with HCV. All HW and NHW patients with HCV who underwent transplantation between January 2000 and December 2007 at 2 centers were retrospectively assessed. The primary outcomes were the time to death, death or graft loss due to HCV, and significant fibrosis [at least stage 2 of 4]. Five hundred eleven patients were studied (159 HW patients and 352 NHW patients), and the baseline demographics were similar for the 2 groups. NHW patients were more likely to be male, to have attended college, and to have private insurance, and they had a higher median household income (MHI). The unadjusted rates of survival (log-rank P = 0.93), death or graft loss due to HCV (P = 0.89), and significant fibrosis (P = 0.95) were similar between groups. In a multivariate analysis controlling for center, age [hazard ratio (HR) per 10 years = 1.43, P = 0.01], donor age (HR per 10 years = 1.25, P < 0.001), and rejection (HR = 1.47, P = 0.048) predicted death, whereas HW ethnicity (HR = 1.06, P = 0.77) was not significant. Independent predictors of significant fibrosis were HW ethnicity (HR = 2.42, P = 0.046), MHI (HR per $10,000 = 1.11, P = 0.01), donor age (HR per 10 years = 1.13, P = 0.02), cold ischemia time (HR = 1.06, P = 0.03), and the interaction between ethnicity and MHI (HR = 0.82, P = 0.03). In conclusion, there is no difference in post-LT survival or graft loss due to HCV between HW patients and NHW patients. Socioeconomic factors may influence disease severity; this is suggested by our findings of more significant fibrosis in HW patients with a low MHI., (Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

We performed a retrospective analysis of intestinal transplant patients from United States transplant centers using The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network of Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) registry. A total of 2164 intestinal transplants were performed in the United States between 1990 and the end of 2011 and were reported to UNOS. Gender, ethnicity, age at transplant, and original disease had little impact on intestinal allograft survival. We found that a shift in the type of transplant operation [intestine alone, intestine plus liver (I+L), or intestine plus liver and pancreas (I+L+P)] away from I+L, starting in 2005, led to better outcomes. Transplants including the stomach had significantly worse graft survival, and often were performed with the I+L+P method. Even though the outcomes of co-transplant of stomach methods, especially the I+L+P method were shown not to be favorable, in reality, the number of patients receiving the operation is still increasing. Despite the overall improvement in graft survival for intestinal transplants over the last 2 decades, within the 2 decades there is a different story. Graft survival after 2005 compared to seven years before 2005 has not improved. Going forward, there is still significant room for improvement in intestinal transplantation. Based on the improvements over the past 2 decades, there is hope that in the next 2 decades, intestinal transplant will reach the success of renal, cardiac, and liver transplantation.

Transplantation at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center in Memphis, which began at the William F. Bowld Hospital and transferred to Methodist University Hospital in 2004, includes pediatric transplantation at LeBonheur Children's Medical Center. The multidisciplinary institute is dedicated to the treatment of patients with end-stage liver and kidney disease and allows those patients access to the integrated expertise of transplant surgeons, hepatologists, and nephrologists. The current, and most successful, era for the program began in 2006, when a change in leadership and clinical vision led to a dramatic increase in clinical activity. These changes have included wider acceptance of potential recipients for liver transplantation and broader use of marginal donor allografts. Streamlined surgical techniques have decreased operative times and have limited blood product usage. Additionally, the program uses an innovative immunosuppression protocol with the world's largest reported series of steroid-free, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction and delayed introduction of tacrolimus in an effort to limit adverse effects of immunosuppression. Such adverse effects may include: infections, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, bone disease, and accelerated fibrosis from recurrent HCV related to steroids and impaired renal function from tacrolimus. These changes have resulted in aggressive donor usage with low complication rates and excellent outcomes.

Introduction: Eligibility for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) requires careful selection of the best possible candidate. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with transplantation ineligibility., Method: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients evaluated for OLT at our center (2004-2006) and deemed not eligible. We identified all patients who were evaluated using information from our transplantation database. We extracted demographic data, insurance status, laboratory data, and clinical information including psychosocial evaluations., Results: During the study period 242 evaluated candidates were not listed for transplantation. The most common reason for ineligibility for transplantation listing was early referral (n=59; 24.4%), followed by psychosocial (18.6%), medical contraindications (17.3%), death during evaluation (n=32; 13.2%), malignancy (n=22; 9.1%), declined evaluation or transfer to other transplantation center (n=21; 8.7%), and other reasons (8.7%). In contrast to whites, psychosocial factors were the most common reason among African American candidates., Conclusion: This study provides insight into factors contributing to OLT ineligibility among candidates of various ethnic backgrounds., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Access to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) varies among different ethnic groups. The aim of this study was to determine if distance from transplantation center (DT) impedes referral pattern and accessibility to OLT among ethnic groups., Method: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients evaluated for OLT at our center (2002-2007). The ZipCode Basic software was used to compute distance between the candidate's residence and transplantation center., Results: Five hundred one patients were evaluated during the study period and there were 439 (87.6%) whites 43 (8.6%) African Americans (AA), and others (3.8%). The median DT was 36.8 miles (range, 0.5-231), and there was no significant correlation with the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) at presentation (P=.87). Although AA had a higher likelihood of residing closer to a transplantation center they were more likely to have a higher MELD at presentation (20 vs 15.4; P<.001) and less likely to be referred early to initiate OLT evaluation (11.6% vs 26.4%; P=.04). Additionally, type of insurance correlated with higher MELD at presentation., Conclusion: DT was not a contributory factor to the observed access disparity in our patient population, rather the insurance type and disease severity as determined using MELD differed significantly among ethnic groups., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prior studies have demonstrated that among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), African Americans (AAs) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (APIs) are substantially less likely to undergo liver transplantation (LT) compared with whites. The authors examined whether disparities in the receipt of LT among LT-eligible HCC patients changed over a 10-year time period, and whether the disparities might be explained by sociodemographic or clinical factors., Methods: The National Cancer Data Base, a national hospital-based cancer registry, was used to study 7707 adults with small (≤ 5 cm), nonmetastatic HCC diagnosed between 1998 and 2007. Racial/ethnic patterns in the use of LT were compared during 2 periods of 5 years each: 1998 through 2002 (n = 2412 patients) and 2003 through 2007 (n = 5295 patients). Data regarding comorbid medical conditions were only available during the later time period., Results: Large and persistent racial/ethnic differences in the probability of receiving LT were observed. Compared with whites, hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for receiving LT from 1998 through 2002 were 0.64 (95% CI, 0.46-0.89) for AA patients, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.79-1.29) for Hispanic patients, and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.39-0.68) for API patients. Analogous results for 2003 through 2007 were 0.64 (95% CI, 0.54-0.76) for AA patients, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75-0.99) for Hispanic patients, and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.49-0.69) for API patients. AA patients were less likely than whites to undergo any form of surgery, and API patients were more likely than whites to undergo surgical resection. Adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical factors produced only small changes in these HRs., Conclusions: Between 1998 and 2007, there were large and persistent racial/ethnic disparities noted in the receipt of LT among patients with HCC. These disparities were not explained by sociodemographic or clinical factors., (Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.)

Background: A higher incidence of autoimmune disorders may predispose First Nations (FN) individuals to higher rates and more severe episodes of rejection, graft loss and mortality following liver transplantation for advanced liver disease., Methods: A retrospective review of patient outcomes in a single centre providing long-term follow-up care for FN and non-FN patients transplanted for advanced liver disease was conducted., Results: A total of 20 FN and 129 non-FN charts were available for review. FN subjects were younger at transplantation (mean [± SD] age 32.4±4.1 years versus 46.3±1.4 years; P=0.00005), less often male (35% versus 58%; P=0.05), more commonly transplanted for autoimmune hepatitis (30% versus 4.7%; P=0.006), less often from urban residences (25% versus 74%; P=0.0001) and less compliant with medical care (20% versus 80%; P=0.007). After a mean follow-up period of 11.0±1.5 years and 8.4±0.5 years in FN and non-FN subjects, respectively, the incidence and severity of rejection, graft and patient survival were similar between cohorts., Conclusion: Although demographic profiles, nature of the underlying disease and compliance differed, the rates and severity of rejection, graft and patient survival were similar in FN and non-FN patients who underwent liver transplantation for advanced liver disease.

This was a historic cohort analysis based on 110,521 patients who underwent liver transplant between 1987 and July 2011 in the United States and were reported to the UNOS registry. In addition to univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, we used cox proportional hazard analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis to evaluate hazard ratios adjusted for clinical factors. The overall 5- and 10-year patient survival rates were 81% and 72%, respectively, for 4,412 recipients of living donor livers and 73% and 59%, respectively, for 106,109 recipients of deceased donor livers. Multivariate analyses suggest that these differences are due to demographics, including patient age rather than differences due to the donor organs. Recipients of zero HLA-mismatched livers had significantly worst graft survival (HR 1.29, p = 0.02) compared with those given an HLA mismatched graft. This appears to be due in part to graft versus host disease. Among recipients who experienced GVHD, multivariate analysis revealed that zero mismatch of HLA-A (HR 2.75), zero mismatch of HLA-B (HR 4.79), recipient age > 65 (HR 2.57) and Asian recipient (HR 2.70) were significant risk factors for GVHD respectively.

Objectives: Liver transplant is an established treatment for end-stage liver failure. Vitamin D has been shown to exert multiple immunomodulatory effects, which act through its own receptor (vitamin D receptor). In the present study, the association between Iranian patients with liver transplant and the polymorphism of vitamin D receptor FokI T>C (rs10735810) was investigated., Materials and Methods: The candidate gene locus was genotyped in 51 liver transplant recipients, and the association of each genotype with allograft acute rejection was evaluated., Results: In this study, we found no evidence to suggest that vitamin D receptor FokI polymorphism determines the incidence of acute rejection after liver transplant. The distribution of alleles was not different according to the underlying liver disease., Conclusions: Larger epidemiologic studies are needed to elucidate the importance of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism in transplant recipients.

Asia has a disproportionate share of the world's burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the highly regarded clinical practice guidelines and recommendations for the design and conduct of clinical trials for HCC largely reflect Western practice. In order to design mutually beneficial international clinical trials of promising targeted therapies, it is imperative to understand how the aetiology, staging and treatment of HCC differ between Asian and Western countries. Our group, comprising experts in oncology and hepatology from countries that constitute the Eastern Asian region, convened to compare and contrast our current practices, evaluate potential compliance with the clinical trial recommendations, and offer suggestions for modifications that would enhance international collaboration. Here, we describe the results of our discussions, including recommendations for appropriate patient stratification based on potentially important differences in HCC aetiology, identification of practices that may confound interpretation of clinical trial outcomes (traditional Chinese medicine; antivirals that target hepatitis B virus; heterogeneous embolization procedures), suggestions for utilizing a common staging system in study protocols, recognition that sorafenib usage is limited by financial constraints and potentially increased toxicity in Asian patients, and expansion of patient populations that should be eligible for initial clinical trials with new agents., (© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)

Access to liver transplantation is reportedly inequitable for racial/ethnic minorities, but inadequate adjustments for geography and disease progression preclude any meaningful conclusions. We aimed to evaluate the association between candidate race/ethnicity and liver transplant rates after thorough adjustments for these factors and to determine how uniform racial/ethnic disparities were across Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. Chronic end-stage liver disease candidates initially wait-listed between February 28, 2002 and February 27, 2007 were identified from Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients data. The primary outcome was deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT); the primary exposure covariate was race/ethnicity (white, African American, Hispanic, Asian, and other). Cox regression was used to estimate the covariate-adjusted DDLT rates by race/ethnicity, which were stratified by the donation service area and MELD score. With averaging across all MELD scores, African Americans, Asians, and others had similar adjusted DDLT rates in comparison with whites. However, Hispanics had an 8% lower DDLT rate versus whites [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92, P = 0.011]. The disparity among Hispanics was concentrated among patients with MELD scores < 20, with HR = 0.84 (P = 0.021) for MELD scores of 6 to 14 and HR = 0.85 (P = 0.009) for MELD scores of 15 to 19. Asians with MELD scores < 15 had a 24% higher DDLT rate with respect to whites (HR = 1.24, P = 0.024). However, Asians with MELD scores of 30 to 40 had a 46% lower DDLT rate (HR = 0.54, P = 0.004). In conclusion, although African Americans did not have significantly different DDLT rates in comparison with similar white candidates, race/ethnicity-based disparities were prominent among subgroups of Hispanic and Asian candidates. By precluding the survival benefit of liver transplantation, this inequity may lead to excess mortality for minority candidates., ((c) 2010 AASLD.)

Background & Aims: Donor race has been proposed to predict graft failure after liver transplantation. We evaluated the extent to which the center where the transplantation surgery was performed and other potential confounding factors might account for the observed association between donor race and graft failure., Methods: We analyzed data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (January 2003-December 2005) for adult patients undergoing primary liver transplantation in the United States. We examined the association between graft failure and the donor races of African American (AA), Caucasian, Asian/Pacific Islander (API), or those classified as other., Results: Of 10,874 livers that were donated for transplantation, 7631 came from Caucasians, 1579 from AAs, 243 from APIs, and 1421 from others. After 36 months of follow-up evaluation, 2687 grafts failed. Without any adjustments, AA donors (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.24), API donors (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.77), and other donors (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.29) were associated with graft failure. After stratification by center and adjustments for age, height, and hepatitis B core antibody status of donors as well as serum creatinine and hepatitis C status of recipients, donor race was no longer statistically significant for AA (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.95-1.20) and API (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.89-1.49) donors. However, livers donated from members of other race still had an increased risk of graft failure (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35), although the effect was not uniform across donor-recipient pairs., Conclusions: Donor race is not a uniform predictor of graft failure and should not be construed as an indicator of donor quality., (Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the USA, end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among ethnic minorities. Ethnic populations vary with respect to chronic liver disease prevalence, access to transplantation, and therapeutic outcomes post liver transplantation. These ethnic differences present unique challenges to healthcare professionals involved in the care of patients with chronic liver disease prior and post transplantation. This review will discuss the variations and challenges of liver transplantation in the ethnic minority population.

Background: Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continue to exist. The authors of this report hypothesized that these differences result from inequities in access to care and in response to therapy., Methods: Patients with HCC (n = 20,920) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and patients who underwent liver transplantation for HCC (n = 4735) were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Clinical and pathologic factors were compared after patients were stratified by race and ethnicity., Results: The survival of patients with HCC improved over time for all racial, ethnic, and income groups (P < .001). Black and low income individuals had the poorest long-term survival (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, black race was predictive of the poorest survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.22; P < .001), whereas Asian race was associated with the best survival (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.91; P < .001). After liver transplantation, black patients had the worst graft survival and overall survival (median survival [MS], 30.5 months and 39.7 months, respectively; P < .001), whereas Hispanics had the best survival (MS, 83.4 months and 86.6 months, respectively; P < .001). In a multivariate analysis of transplantation patients, race and ethnicity were associated significantly with outcome., Conclusions: Significant racial and ethnic disparities in the outcome of patients with HCC persist despite the receipt of comparable treatment. The authors concluded that further investigations are warranted to identify the reasons for the stark disparity in outcomes between black patients and Hispanic patients after liver transplantation for HCC.

Objective: To investigate the distribution of health-related quality of life in pediatric liver transplant recipients compared with a normative population., Study Design: This cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted at select centers. Patients between 2 and 18 years of age, surviving liver transplantation by at least 12 months, were eligible. Parent/guardian fluency in English or Spanish was required. Children > or =8 years and parents of all children completed the age-appropriate versions of the PedsQL 4.0 (Mapi Research Institute, Lyon, France). Scores were compared with a sample of healthy children (n = 3911) matched by age group, sex, and race/ethnicity and with a sample of pediatric patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation., Results: Participants included 65% (873/1339) of eligible patients. Mean age was 8.17 +/- 4.43 years, and 55% were female. The total and subscale scores of PedsQL 4.0 were lower than in healthy children (P < .001), with effect sizes for self-report ranging from -0.25 for Emotional Functioning to -0.68 for School Functioning. Patients and their parents reported better physical functioning than patients with cancer but similar social and school functioning. Correlations between parent and self-reports were in the moderate agreement range., Conclusions: Pediatric liver transplant recipients and their parents report lower health-related quality of life than control subjects with some domains equal to children receiving cancer therapy., (Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Racial/ethnic disparities in access to and outcomes of liver transplantation are an important topic given the increasing diversity in the United States. Most reports on this topic predate the advent of allocation based on the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). For many patients with a variety of lethal conditions, liver transplantation is the only effective therapy, signifying the importance of equitable access to care. Racial/ethnic disparities have been described at various steps of the liver transplant process, including liver disease prevalence and treatment, access to a transplant center and its waitlist, receipt of a liver transplant and posttransplant outcomes. The purpose of this minireview is to critically evaluate the published literature on racial/ethnicity-based disparities in liver disease prevalence and treatment, transplant center referral, transplant rates and posttransplant outcomes. We identify the shortcomings of previous reports and detail the barriers to completing properly constructed analyses, particularly emphasizing deficits in requisite data and the need for improved study design. Understanding the nature of race/ethnicity-based disparities in liver transplantation is necessary to improve research initiatives, policy design and serves the broader responsibility of providing the highest quality care to all patients with liver disease.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of donor race on the outcome of black patients with chronic hepatitis C infection who undergo liver transplantation. The records for deceased donor liver transplants that occurred in the United States between January 1998 and December 2007 were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing. 26,212 records contained sufficient data to be included in the analysis. Of these, 11,989 (45.7%) records were for patients positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) and 1292 (4.9%) were for patients both HCV-positive and black. Black recipients with white donors were found to have significantly worse outcomes than all other recipient-donor race combinations (P < 0.001). The crude 5-year survival rate for black recipients who had a black donor was 14% higher than the 5-year survival rate for black recipients who had a white donor. Multivariate regression analysis determined that a graft from a race-unmatched donor was an independent risk factor for graft failure (hazard ratio = 1.41, 95% confidence interval = 1.11-1.79) among HCV-positive black recipients but not among HCV-negative black recipients after adjustments for donor age, recipient age, cold ischemia time, serum creatinine, serum bilirubin, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, and donor cytomegalovirus status. The observation that race-unmatched grafts are a risk factor in HCV-positive black recipients, but not in HCV-negative black recipients, suggests an alteration of the graft-host relationship by HCV. In conclusion, our results suggest that HCV-positive black recipients who undergo liver transplantation can have increased graft survival if their donors are black, with survival rates approaching those of white liver transplant recipients., ((c) 2009 AASLD.)

Several previous studies found that Asians transplanted for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection had worse post-transplant outcomes than Caucasians. Data on post-transplant outcomes of African Americans and waitlist outcomes of Asian Americans and African Americans with hepatitis B are scant. The aim of this study was to compare waitlist and post-transplant outcomes among Asian Americans, African Americans, and Caucasians who had HBV-related liver disease. Data from a retrospective-prospective study on liver transplantation for HBV infection were analyzed. A total of 274 patients (116 Caucasians, 135 Asians, and 23 African Americans) from 15 centers in the United States were enrolled. African Americans were younger and more Asian Americans had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at the time of liver transplant listing. The probability of undergoing transplantation and the probability of survival on the waitlist were comparable in the 3 racial groups. Of the 170 patients transplanted, 19 died during a median follow-up of 31 months. The probability of post-transplant survival at 5 years was 94% for African Americans, 85% for Asian Americans, and 89% for Caucasians (P = 0.93). HCC recurrence was the only predictor of post-transplant survival, and recurrence rates were similar in the 3 racial groups. Caucasians had a higher rate of HBV recurrence: 4-year recurrence was 19% versus 7% and 6% for Asian Americans and African Americans, respectively (P = 0.043). In conclusion, we found similar waitlist and post-transplant outcomes among Caucasians, Asian Americans, and African Americans with hepatitis B. Our finding of a higher rate of HBV recurrence among Caucasians needs to be validated in other studies., ((c) 2009 AASLD.)

Objectives: The recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplant is common and may endanger both graft and patient survival. We investigated the frequency and outcome of and risk factors for the recurrence of that virus after living-donor liver transplant in hepatitis C virus positive recipients., Materials and Methods: Seventy-four adult hepatitis C virus positive subjects were monitored for 36 months after living-donor liver transplant and demographic and laboratory data for the recipients and donors were evaluated. Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection was diagnosed on the basis of viral replication revealed by polymerase chain reaction after transplant, elevated levels of transaminases, and the results of liver biopsy., Results: Hepatitis C virus recurrence was identified in 31.1% of the patients studied. Histopathologic recurrence was mild, and 91% of the subjects had a fibrosis score of < or = F2. No recipient exhibited cirrhosis or clinical decompensation during followup. Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection was associated with pretransplant and posttransplant viral load and antibody positive to hepatitis B core antigen. No other risk factors (sex, donor or recipient age, pretransplant Child-Pugh or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, immunosuppressive drug therapy, and treatment with pulse steroids) were significantly correlated with the frequency of hepatitis C virus recurrence, the grade of the histologic activity index, or the stage of fibrosis., Conclusions: In living-donor liver transplant recipients, patient and graft survival rates associated with hepatitis C virus (genotype 4) related cirrhosis were comparable to those in deceased-donor liver transplant recipients reported in the literature. Recurrent infection with hepatitic C virus after living-donor liver transplant was mild. After transplant, a higher viral load and the presence of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen could be risk factors for hepatitis C virus recurrence. Long-term follow-up in a large number of patients is required.

Background: Studies to address the ethnic minorities in liver transplantation (LT) have focused traditionally on African Americans and Hispanics. Although, the Asian population accounts for 4.4% of the US population, there is limited information on transplantation trends for this ethnic group. The aim of this study was to evaluate the transplantation trends and determine survival patterns of Asian LT recipients., Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was reviewed for all Asian adult (>18 years) recipients who underwent LT between 1998 and 2007 (n=1953). The data collected included demographics, diagnosis, survival data, and United Network for Organ Sharing regions., Results: During the study period 1953 Asians received liver transplantation. The most frequent indication for transplantation among Asians was HBV (28.1%) in contrast to the non-Asian group in which HCV (29.6%) was the most common. The 5-yr Patient and graft survival was 76%, 74%, 73%, 65% and 71%, 68%, 67% and 57% for Asian, Hispanic, White and Black respectively., Conclusion: We found (1) regional variation and differences in liver disease pattern among Asian population; and (2) overall LT recipients of Asian ethnicity have a significant survival advantage in comparison to non-Asian groups.

Factors contributing to inequitable access to liver transplantation include socioeconomic status, geographic location, and delayed referral. The aim of this study is to identify the factors associated with a high MELD at the time of listing. Using the UNOS database, we identified all adults listed from 2002 to 2006. Data collected included demographics, insurance payor (private and government, i.e., Medicaid and non-Medicaid), diagnosis, and MELD score categorized as low (<20) and high (>or=20). The results obtained show that a high MELD was associated with age, ethnicity, and insurance (P < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, insurance (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.13-1.30, P < 0.001) and ethnicity (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.28-1.88, P < 0.001) were independently associated with high MELD. In conclusion, ethnic minorities and liver transplant candidates with Medicaid are more likely to have a high MELD score at initial listing. The above results suggest that the type of insurance and ethnicity are independently associated with a high MELD (i.e., sicker patients).

Background: The Japanese Liver Transplantation Society presented its first report on donor morbidity in 2003. The Society has been continuing to survey outcomes in living liver donors in Japan., Methods: By using a uniform comprehensive medical record review process, data were collected on 3565 living liver donors who had donated grafts by the end of December 2006 at 38 Japanese centers., Results: Preoperative problems were reported in 2 donors, intraoperative problems in 27, and postoperative complications in 270. In total, 299 donors (8.4%) suffered complications related to liver donation. Postoperative complications included biliary complications in 3.0%, reoperation in 1.3%, severe after-effects in two (0.06%), and death (apparently related to donor surgery) in one donor (0.03%). The incidence of postoperative complications in left and right lobe donors was 8.7% and 9.4%, respectively., Conclusions: The accumulated experience indicates a reduction in the incidence of donor complications, especially for right lobe resection. One donor death and two cases of severe after effects related to liver donation have been reported during 18 years of living donor liver transplantation experience in Japan.

The outcome of liver transplantation in China remains speculative. From 1998 to 2007, 177 adult Hong Kong patients underwent liver transplantation in China and were subsequently followed up at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong. One hundred six (59.9%) patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The grafts were probably derived from uncontrolled non-heart-beating donors. The 1-month mortality rate was 4.0%. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 73.9%, 59.0%, and 53.9%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates for non-HCC, HCC, HCC (within the Milan criteria), and HCC (beyond the Milan criteria) patients were 66.3%, 44%, 58%, and 26.2%, respectively. The long-term survival was compromised by the high incidence of HCC recurrence and graft failure secondary to diffuse intrahepatic biliary strictures. The overall survival rate of the entire group was lower than that of the patients receiving deceased donor liver grafts at Queen Mary Hospital in the same period. For non-HCC patients, however, the 5-year survival rate of 66.3% was comparable to that of recent reports from the Western world.

Background: An enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) provides convenient and accurate measurements of mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentrations for determination of immunosuppression during treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). No abbreviated model for estimating the full 12-hour MPA AUC using an EMIT assay in liver transplant recipients has been described previously., Objective: This study was conducted to determine the best model for predicting the MPA AUC using the EMIT method and a limited-sampling strategy in Chinese patients undergoing liver transplantation., Methods: The study enrolled consecutive liver transplant patients who were receiving MMF 1 g BID along with tacrolimus. A complete MPA pharmacokinetic profile was obtained for each patient on a single day, 7 to 14 days after transplantation. The EMIT method was used to determine MPA concentrations before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after dosing on the sampling day. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate potential models for estimating the full 12-hour MPA AUC. The accuracy and robustness of the models were evaluated using bootstrap analysis. Prediction error and prediction bias were calculated. Agreement between the estimated MPA AUC(0-12) and the full 12-hour MPA AUC was investigated using Bland-Altman analysis., Results: The study enrolled 48 Chinese liver transplant recipients (45 male, 3 female) with a mean (SD) age of 50 (12) years, mean weight of 64 (12) kg, and mean height of 169 (6) cm. Twenty-four models that included blood sampling at 1 through 4 time points were developed (r(2) = 0.015-0.950). Four models with the highest r(2) values were selected; the lack of significant differences from the original dataset on bootstrap analysis indicated acceptable accuracy and robustness. The best model for predicting the MPA AUC(0-12) employed concentrations at 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours; 40 of 48 (83.3%) MPA AUC(0-12) values estimated using this model were within 15% of the full 12-hour MPA AUC. This model had a minimal mean prediction error (mean [SD], 0.27% [1.79%]) and mean absolute prediction error (8.83% [1.24%]). On Bland-Altman analysis, this model also had the best agreement between the estimated MAP AUC(0-12) and the full 12-hour MPA AUC, with a mean error of 9.02 mg . h/L., Conclusions: In this small group of Chinese liver transplant patients receiving MMF and concomitant tacrolimus, models for estimating the MPA AUC(0-12) were developed using the EMIT method and a limited-sampling strategy. The best model for prediction of the full 12-hour MPA AUC was 4.46 + 0.81 . C1 + 1.78 . C(2)+2.51.C(4)+4.94.C8.

Context: In February 2002, the allocation system for liver transplantation became based on the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Before MELD, black patients were more likely to die or become too sick to undergo liver transplantation compared with white patients. Little information exists regarding sex and access to liver transplantation., Objective: To determine the association between race, sex, and liver transplantation following introduction of the MELD system., Design, Setting, and Patients: A retrospective cohort of black and white patients (> or = 18 years) registered on the United Network for Organ Sharing liver transplantation waiting list between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2000 (pre-MELD cohort, n = 21 895) and between February 28, 2002, and March 31, 2006 (post-MELD cohort, n = 23 793)., Main Outcome Measures: Association between race, sex, and receipt of a liver transplant. Separate multivariable analyses evaluated cohorts within each period to identify predictors of time to death and the odds of dying or receiving liver transplantation within 3 years of listing. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were analyzed separately., Results: Black patients were younger (mean [SD], 49.2 [10.7] vs 52.4 [9.2] years; P < .001) and sicker (MELD score at listing: median [interquartile range], 16 [12-22] vs 14 [11-19]; P < .001) than white patients on the waiting list for both periods. In the pre-MELD cohort, black patients were more likely to die or become too sick for liver transplantation than white patients (27.0% vs 21.7%) within 3 years of registering on the waiting list (odds ratio [OR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-1.98; P = .003). In the post-MELD cohort, black race was no longer associated with increased likelihood of death or becoming too sick for liver transplantation (26.5% vs 22.0%, respectively; OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.74-1.26; P = .76). Black patients were also less likely to receive a liver transplant than white patients within 3 years of registering on the waiting list pre-MELD (61.6% vs 66.9%; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.97; P = .03), whereas post-MELD, race was no longer significantly associated with receipt of a liver transplant (47.5% vs 45.5%, respectively; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84-1.28; P = .75). Women were more likely than men to die or become too sick for liver transplantation post-MELD (23.7% vs 21.4%; OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08-1.47; P = .003) vs pre-MELD (22.4% vs 21.9%; OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.91-1.26; P = .37). Similarly, women were less likely than men to receive a liver transplant within 3 years both pre-MELD (64.8% vs 67.6%; OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.92; P = .002) and post-MELD (39.9% vs 48.7%; OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79; P < .001)., Conclusion: Following introduction of the MELD score to the liver transplantation allocation system, race was no longer associated with receipt of a liver transplant or death on the waiting list, but disparities based on sex remain.

Background: A preliminary study using national cancer surveillance data from 1998 through 2002 suggested that there were significant differences between non-Hispanic whites ('whites') and Asian/Pacific Islanders (APIs) in the use of liver transplantation as a treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methods: The objective of the current study was to examine whether differences in liver transplantation between whites and APIs with HCC were changing over time. By using a population-based, statewide cancer registry, data were obtained on all HCC cases diagnosed in California between 1998 and 2005, and the study was limited to white and API patients with nonmetastatic HCC who had tumors that measured < or = 5 cm in greatest dimension (n = 1728 patients)., Results: From 1998 through 2003 (n = 1051 patients), the odds of undergoing liver transplantation were 2.56 times greater for white patients than for API patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72-3.80 times higher), even after adjusting for age, sex, marital status, year of diagnosis, TNM stage, and tumor grade. In contrast, during 2004 and 2005 (n = 677 patients), there were no significant differences in the odds of undergoing liver transplantation. Between 2002 and 2004, changes in liver transplantation policy assigned priority points to patients with HCC (initially to stage I and II, then to stage II only). After the policy changes, API patients with HCC experienced a significant increase in stage II diagnoses, whereas white patients did not., Conclusions: In California, there was a large and significant disparity in the rate of liver transplantation among white and API patients with HCC from 1998 through 2003 but not during 2004 and 2005. Changes in liver transplantation policy from 2002 through 2004 may have played a role in decreasing this difference., ((c) 2008 American Cancer Society.)

Despite well-documented racial/ethnic disparities in liver transplantation and hospice enrollment, reasons for these disparities are unclear. This study was conducted to elucidate what is known and unknown about the underlying causes of racial/ethnic disparities in liver transplantation and hospice enrollment. The root causes of inequities in access to liver transplantation and hospice are as yet poorly understood. Potential contributors to differences include differences in preferences, mistrust of the health care system, geographic factors such as neighborhood, health care system factors such as access to care and managed care versus fee-for-service insurance status, and social factors such as the availability of a full time caregiver. Although the goals of care are different, by examining hospice and transplant surgery side by side in the larger context of health disparities, a number of potentially promising avenues for future research have been uncovered.

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) provides long-term survival for adults with end-stage liver disease. As a result of improved survival and an aging United States population the demand for LT in older patients is expected to increase. The aim of this study was to describe the transplantation trends in the older recipient (older than 65 years)., Methods: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we identified LT recipients between 1990 and 2006. We used Kaplan-Meier method to calculate overall survival (1, 3, 5 and 10 years) and Cox regression for predictors of survival., Results: During the study period 5630 (7.6%) LT recipients were older than 65 years. There were 4256 (79.4%) whites, Hispanic (10.3%), African Americans (AA) (3.6%), and rest (6.7%). There was an increase in LT for older than 65 years from 4.1% in 1990 to 10.2% in 2006 (P=0.002) and a regional variation (P<0.001). The 10-year patient and graft survival was 60% and 57% for less than 65 years versus 42% and 40% for more than 65 years (P<0.0001). With age stratification (65-75 years vs. >75 years), there was no difference in survival but when adjusted for race there was a significant difference in graft survival with a 10 year (white 40%, Hispanic 44%, and AA 19%) (P=0.04)., Conclusion: The demand for LT in recipients older than 65 years is increasing. Although their survival is lower in comparison with recipients less than 65 years, there seems to be no difference in unadjusted survival with age stratification above 65 years. Among ethnic minorities, there was a disproportionately lower percentage of African Americans LT and a decreased survival.

Context: The contribution of social support networks to the recovery of transplant recipients is an important assessment in measuring improved physical and psychosocial well-being. Social support networks are described by structure, type, and function., Objectives: (1) To describe the levels of structure (size, formal and informal support), type (concrete, emotional, and informational), and function (criticalness, direction, closeness, frequency, and duration) of the social support network and (2) to examine the relationships between individual characteristics of sex, race, and social class and social support networks., Methods: This exploratory-descriptive study was done in a Mid-south transplant center. A total of 258 kidney, liver, and pancreas transplant recipients participated, 61% of whom were less than 50-years-old. Instruments included a demographic questionnaire, the social support network pie chart, and the social support network grid. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used with a .05 significance level., Results: The social support network comprised extended family (67%), with a mean of 13.68 members. Emotional support was the most prevalent type of support reported. The mean (SD) duration of support was 7.9 (4.9) years. Sex, race, and social class had no main relationships with structure and type of support. However, women had a main effect with closeness (F = 4.98, P < .03) and African Americans had significantly higher levels of frequency of support (F = 7.51, P < .01) and longer duration of support (F = 9.07, P < .01) than did whites. Social and nursing intervention may improve the network closeness in males and may also augment support frequency and duration for whites.

Background: Data about the influence of race on survival after liver transplantation (LT) are limited and conflicting. This study was undertaken to evaluate longterm outcomes for LT in African-American (AA) recipients compared with recipients of other races and to determine factors responsible for any observed differences., Study Design: This was a retrospective case series. Among 2,728 adult patients who underwent primary LT from 1984 to 2007, 1,566 (57%) were Caucasian, 761 (28%) were Hispanic, 290 (11%) were Asian, and 111 (4%) were AA. The primary immunosuppressive agent was cyclosporine from 1984 to 1993 (Era I, n=817) and tacrolimus from 1994 to 2007 (Era II, n=1922)., Results: In Era I, the 1-, 5- and 10-year patient and graft survival figures for AA and Asian recipients were considerably lower compared with Caucasian and Hispanic recipients. In Era II, patient and graft survival figures were comparable for all groups. Statistically significant independent predictors of diminished patient survival included LT in Era I; recipient or donor age greater than 55 years; and liver failure secondary to cryptogenic cirrhosis, malignancy, or hepatitis C. Predictors of graft failure included LT in Era I; recipient or donor age greater than 55 years; prolonged cold ischemia time; liver failure secondary to hepatitis C, cryptogenic cirrhosis, or malignancy; and acute rejection. Patient and graft survival were independent of race in both eras., Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate equivalent longterm results after LT for AA and other races. Modern immunosuppression with tacrolimus substantially lowered rejection rates and improved graft and patient survival after LT.

The extent of organ sales from commercial living donors (CLDs) or vendors has now become evident. At the Second Global Consultation on Human Transplantation of the World Health Organization's (WHO) in March 2007, it was estimated that organ trafficking accounts for 5-10% of the kidney transplants performed annually throughout the world. Patients with sufficient resources in need of organs may travel from one country to another to purchase a kidney (or liver) mainly from a poor person. Transplant centers in 'destination' countries have been well known to encourage the sale of organs to 'tourist' recipients from the 'client' countries.

Objectives: Beginning February 28, 2002, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was introduced to better allocate donor livers. Racial differences in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) outcomes prior to this time have been attributed to late listing of some racial groups. Racial differences in post-transplant survival in the MELD era have not been previously examined., Methods: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing database for adult liver transplants performed between 2002 and 2006. We examined patient and graft survival at 2 yr and compared disease-specific survival rates among the different races., Results: A total of 10,409 whites, 1,133 blacks, 1,548 Hispanics, and 765 transplant recipients belonging to other races were included in the study. On multivariate analysis, blacks had lower overall (hazard ratio for death [HR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.10-1.52) and graft (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.20-1.58) survival at 2 yr compared to whites, while Hispanics had better overall (HR 0.78) and graft (HR 0.82) survival. Compared to whites, blacks transplanted for hepatitis C or HCC had lower survival at 2 yr., Conclusion: In the MELD era, black patients have significantly lower overall and graft survival at 2 yr compared to whites.

The annual number of liver transplants increased from 1,678 in 1988 to 6,139 in 2006 and appeared to decline slightly in 2007. Living donor (LD) liver transplants (most from biologically unrelated donors) increased from less than 100 each year prior to 1999 to 522 in 2001 and have slowly declined since. In 2007, 265 LD liver transplants were performed. Most of the increased activity in liver transplantation has been in the adult population. About 500 pediatric liver transplants are performed each year and the number has remained roughly constant since 1990. Pediatric LD liver recipients were significantly younger than deceased donor (DD) liver recipients. Unadjusted graft and patient survival rates were 61% and 71% at 7 years, respectively, for 2,375 LD recipients and 58% and 66%, respectively, for 71,686 DD recipients during 1988-2007. Five-year graft survival rates improved by 9% comparing transplants done in 1988-1993 to those done in 2002-2004. Adult female patients and recipients of a male donor graft had better survival rates, whereas recipient and donor gender in the pediatric age group showed no significant association with survival rates. Implementation of the MELD/PELD scoring system resulted in more patients with severe liver failure receiving DD grafts. Nevertheless, recipients transplanted from 2002 onwards showed improved graft survival. Comparing patients with different levels of MELD/PELD scores however, showed that the cohort with the highest score (> 30) had the worst survival, suggesting that improved survival rates since 2002 would be more likely attributed to the great progress in medical science.

Background and Aims: The extent of use of liver transplantation on a population scale to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States is unknown. We assessed recent predictors of use of liver transplantation and its effect on survival for those with nonmetastatic HCC., Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program is a collection of population-based cancer registries. We identified adults registered in SEER with HCC between 1998 and 2002. We examined determinants for receipt of a liver transplant in univariate and multivariable analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for those who received and did not receive a transplant for HCC., Results: We identified 1,156 adults with small (5 cm or less) nonmetastatic HCC. Approximately 45% were white, 29% Asian, 17% Hispanic, and 9% African American. Only 21% received a transplant. More recent year of diagnosis, younger age, being married, white race, and smaller tumor size each predicted receipt of transplant. African Americans and Asians were about half as likely to receive a transplant as compared with white patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.90 for African Americans, and 0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.89 for Asians). Hispanics trended in the same direction, but this was not statistically significant (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.39-1.12). Those who underwent liver transplantation for localized HCC had 3- and 5-yr survivals of 81% and 75%, respectively., Conclusions: Only one-fifth of those with small, nonmetastatic HCC received liver transplantation. Transplanted patients have long-term survival similar to that of the best single-institution studies. However, marked racial variations were seen, with African Americans and Asians significantly less likely to receive a transplant after controlling for other variables.