Search

Background: While memantine has been considered a promising drug for migraine prevention, no conclusive evidence exists comparing its efficacy with other migraine-preventive medications. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to access the effectiveness and acceptability of memantine and other guideline-recommended prophylactic agents for migraine. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials databases from their inception to 1 June 2024. Randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) examining the pharmacological prevention of adult migraine patients were included. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in migraine days, and the primary safety outcome was withdrawal due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included 50% response rates and frequency of any adverse events. The analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Thirty-eight RCTs, including a total of 13,223 participants, were analyzed. Our analysis showed that memantine demonstrated the second-largest reduction in migraine days [standardized mean difference (SMD): −0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.26, −0.41 compared with placebo] and the highest 50% response rates [odds ratio (OR): 5.58, 95% CI: 1.31 to 23.69] in all studied interventions. Moreover, among all interventions, memantine appeared to show the lowest dropout rate and moderate frequency of adverse events. However, its confidence intervals contained null values. Conclusion: This study provides prioritisation evidence for memantine in migraine prevention, as memantine can significantly decrease the frequency of migraine attacks, improves response rates, and fair acceptability. These beneficial effects were not inferior to currently recommended pharmacological regimens. However, due to the lack of long-term efficacy and safety data, as well as few direct comparisons with active control agents, the estimates of memantine may be overly optimistic. Clinicians should interpret the findings of current NMA cautiously and apply them in a relatively conservative manner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stroke is considered one of the most common and life-threatening manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which leads to high mortality and permanent disability. This study investigated the prevalence and the potential risk factors of stroke in APS. We enrolled 361 APS patients retrospectively from 2009 to 2022 at Peking University People's Hospital. Stroke was found in 25.8% (93/361) of the participants. The multivariate logistic regression showed that hypertension, diabetes, livedo reticularis, and other central nervous system involvements were significant related factors for stroke. The use of hydroxychloroquine appeared to relate to a lower incidence of stroke. During a median follow-up of 3.0 years, 11.8% (11/93) of the individuals with a previous stroke developed stroke recurrence, and thrombocytopenia seemed to be a predictor of stroke recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The precise detection and interpretation of pathogenic DYSF variants are sometimes challenging, largely due to rare deep‐intronic splice‐altering variants. Here, we report on the genetic diagnosis of a male patient with dysferlinopathy. He remained genetically unsolved after routine exonic detection approaches that only detected a novel heterozygous frameshift variant (c.407dup, p.Thr137Tyrfs*11) in DYSF exon 5. Via muscle‐derived DYSF mRNA studies, we identified a novel deep‐intronic DYSF variant in the other allele (c.1397 + 649C > T), which causing in‐frame alterations in DYSF mRNA and protein structure and confirmed his genetic diagnosis of dysferlinopathy. Our study emphasizes the potential role of undetected deep‐intronic splice‐altering variants in monogenic diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]