Search

A tissue-specific gene expression shapes the formation of tissues, while gene expression changes reflect the immune response of the human body to environmental stimulations or pressure, particularly in disease conditions, such as cancers. A few genes are commonly expressed across tissues or various cancers, while others are not. To investigate the functional differences between widely and rarely expressed genes, we defined the genes that were expressed in 32 normal tissues/cancers (i.e., called widely expressed genes; FPKM >1 in all samples) and those that were not detected (i.e., called rarely expressed genes; FPKM <1 in all samples) based on the large gene expression data set provided by Uhlen et al. Each gene was encoded using the gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment scores. Minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) was used to measure and rank these features on the mRMR feature list. Thereafter, we applied the incremental feature selection method with a supervised classifier recurrent neural network (RNN) to select the discriminate features for classifying widely expressed genes from rarely expressed genes and construct an optimum RNN classifier. The Youden's indexes generated by the optimum RNN classifier and evaluated using a 10-fold cross validation were 0.739 for normal tissues and 0.639 for cancers. Furthermore, the underlying mechanisms of the key discriminate GO and KEGG features were analyzed. Results can facilitate the identification of the expression landscape of genes and elucidation of how gene expression shapes tissues and the microenvironment of cancers.

Messenger RNA (mRNA) and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) are two main subgroups of RNAs participating in transcription regulation. With the development of next generation sequencing, increasing lncRNAs are identified. Many hidden functions of lncRNAs are also revealed. However, the differences in lncRNAs and mRNAs are still unclear. For example, we need to determine whether lncRNAs have stronger tissue specificity than mRNAs and which tissues have more lncRNAs expressed. To investigate such tissue expression difference between mRNAs and lncRNAs, we encoded 9339 lncRNAs and 14,294 mRNAs with 71 expression features, including 69 maximum expression features for 69 types of cells, one feature for the maximum expression in all cells, and one expression specificity feature that was measured as Chao-Shen-corrected Shannon's entropy. With advanced feature selection methods, such as maximum relevance minimum redundancy, incremental feature selection methods, and random forest algorithm, 13 features presented the dissimilarity of lncRNAs and mRNAs. The 11 cell subtype features indicated which cell types of the lncRNAs and mRNAs had the largest expression difference. Such cell subtypes may be the potential cell models for lncRNA identification and function investigation. The expression specificity feature suggested that the cell types to express mRNAs and lncRNAs were different. The maximum expression feature suggested that the maximum expression levels of mRNAs and lncRNAs were different. In addition, the rule learning algorithm, repeated incremental pruning to produce error reduction algorithm, was also employed to produce effective classification rules for classifying lncRNAs and mRNAs, which gave competitive results compared with random forest and could give a clearer picture of different expression patterns between lncRNAs and mRNAs. Results not only revealed the heterogeneous expression pattern of lncRNA and mRNA, but also gave rise to the development of a new tool to identi