Search

Hypoglycemia is a common metabolic disorder that occurs in the neonatal period. Early identification of neonates at risk of developing hypoglycemia can optimize therapeutic strategies in neonatal care. This study aims to develop a machine learning model and implement a predictive application to assist clinicians in accurately predicting the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia within four hours after birth. Our retrospective study analyzed data from neonates born ≥35 weeks gestational age and admitted to the well-baby nursery between 1 January 2011 and 31 August 2021. We collected electronic medical records of 2687 neonates from a tertiary medical center in Southern Taiwan. Using 12 clinically relevant features, we evaluated nine machine learning approaches to build the predictive models. We selected the models with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for integration into our hospital information system (HIS). The top three AUC values for the early neonatal hypoglycemia prediction models were 0.739 for Stacking, 0.732 for Random Forest and 0.732 for Voting. Random Forest is considered the best model because it has a relatively high AUC and shows no significant overfitting (accuracy of 0.658, sensitivity of 0.682, specificity of 0.649, F1 score of 0.517 and precision of 0.417). The best model was incorporated in the web-based application integrated into the hospital information system. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values indicated mode of delivery, gestational age, multiparity, respiratory distress, and birth weight < 2500 gm as the top five predictors of neonatal hypoglycemia. The implementation of our machine learning model provides an effective tool that assists clinicians in accurately identifying at-risk neonates for early neonatal hypoglycemia, thereby allowing timely interventions and treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Predicting and improving the response of rectal cancer to second primary cancers (SPCs) remains an active and challenging field of clinical research. Identifying predictive risk factors for SPCs will help guide more personalized treatment strategies. In this study, we propose that experience data be used as evidence to support patient-oriented decision-making. The proposed model consists of two main components: a pipeline for extraction and classification and a clinical risk assessment. The study includes 4402 patient datasets, including 395 SPC patients, collected from three cancer registry databases at three medical centers; based on literature reviews and discussion with clinical experts, 10 predictive variables were considered risk factors for SPCs. The proposed extraction and classification pipelines that classified patients according to importance were age at diagnosis, chemotherapy, smoking behavior, combined stage group, and sex, as has been proven in previous studies. The C5 method had the highest predicted AUC (84.88%). In addition, the proposed model was associated with a classification pipeline that showed an acceptable testing accuracy of 80.85%, a recall of 79.97%, a specificity of 88.12%, a precision of 85.79%, and an F1 score of 79.88%. Our results indicate that chemotherapy is the most important prognostic risk factor for SPCs in rectal cancer survivors. Furthermore, our decision tree for clinical risk assessment illuminates the possibility of assessing the effectiveness of a combination of these risk factors. This proposed model may provide an essential evaluation and longitudinal change for personalized treatment of rectal cancer survivors in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) prediction is increasingly used for decision making in health care, but its application for adverse outcomes in emergency department (ED) patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) is not well understood. This study aimed to clarify this aspect. Methods: Data from 8274 ED patients with AP in three hospitals from 2009 to 2018 were analyzed. Demographic data, comorbidities, laboratory results, and adverse outcomes were included. Six algorithms were evaluated, and the one with the highest area under the curve (AUC) was implemented into the hospital information system (HIS) for real‐time prediction. Predictive accuracy was compared between the AI model and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP). Results: The mean ± SD age was 56.1 ± 16.7 years, with 67.7% being male. The AI model was successfully implemented in the HIS, with Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) showing the highest AUC for sepsis (AUC 0.961) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (AUC 0.973), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) showing the highest AUC for mortality (AUC 0.975). Compared to BISAP, the AI model had superior AUC for sepsis (BISAP 0.785), ICU admission (BISAP 0.778), and mortality (BISAP 0.817). Conclusions: The first real‐time AI prediction model implemented in the HIS for predicting adverse outcomes in ED patients with AP shows favorable initial results. However, further external validation is needed to ensure its reliability and accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shared decision making is a patient-centered clinical decision-making process that allows healthcare workers to share the existing empirical medical outcomes with patients before making critical decisions. This study aims to explore a project in a medical center of developing a mobile SDM in Taiwan. Chi Mei Medical Center developed the mobile SDM platform and conducted a survey of evaluation from healthcare workers. A three-tier platform that based on cloud infrastructure with seven functionalities was developed. The survey revealed that healthcare workers with sufficient SDM knowledge have an antecedent effect on the three perceptive factors of acceptance of mobile SDM. Resistance to change and perceived ease of use show significant effect on behavioral intention. We provided a comprehensive architecture of mobile SDM and observed the implementation in a medical center. The majority of healthcare workers expressed their acceptancem; however, resistance to change still present. It is, therefore, necessary to be eliminated by continuously promoting activities that highlight the advantages of the Mobile SDM platform. In clinical practice, we validated that the mobile SDM provides patients and their families with an easy way to express their concerns to healthcare workers improving significantly their relationship with each other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]