Search

Side effects are a common concern of current and potential HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users, potentially leading to missed doses. We examined the relationship between reported side effects and adherence in the Ontario PrEP Cohort Study (ON-PrEP). In total, 600 predominantly gay (87.3%), White (65.8%), and male (95.0%) participants completed questionnaires assessing the presence and severity of five side effect categories (nausea, diarrhea, headache, abdominal pain, and "other") as well as their adherence to daily PrEP (any missed doses in the previous 4 days). In total, 175 participants (29%) ever reported experiencing side effects: most commonly diarrhea (7.5% of study visits), and most were of mild severity. Lower incomes (p = 0.01), identifying as bisexual (p = 0.04), and baseline concern about side effects (p < 0.001) were associated with ever reporting side effects. The odds of reporting any side effects decreased by a factor of 0.44 (95% confidence interval 0.25–0.80) with each additional year of PrEP use, however 1 in 10 participants still reported side effects after 1 year of use. The odds of reporting optimal adherence were 0.48 (0.28–0.83) times lower for participants reporting any side effects, 0.67 (0.51–0.89) times lower per additional side effect category reported, and 0.78 (0.65–0.97) times lower per incremental increase in side effect severity ratings. We found some evidence of interaction between side effect measures and duration of PrEP use, suggesting that these relationships were stronger for participants taking PrEP for longer. Clinicians should make efforts to ascertain patients' experience of side effects and consider risk counseling and alternative PrEP regimens to promote adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The partnership of ExxonMobil and Georgia Tech via the initiative “Partnership in Academic Laboratory Safety”, PALS, adopts an interdependent mindset of management of risks and safety for the permanent employees and an integral component of the student experience. In this Case Study, we report how the collaboration between academia and the private sector has mutually enhanced our safety programs and led to safety management being understood as a transferable skill for students. We also report on the specific tools that the program has developed to create, promote, and sustain a lived culture of safety to the benefit of all stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has emerged as a sexually transmitted infection in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM). We estimated the seroprevalence and incidence of HCV infection and examined patterns of HCV testing among GBM using human immunodeficiency virus preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Ontario, Canada., Methods: We analyzed data from the Ontario PrEP Cohort Study (ON-PrEP), a prospective cohort of PrEP users from 10 Ontario clinics. Participants completed an online questionnaire and study staff collected clinical information into a study database biannually for 2 years. We estimated the baseline seroprevalence and incidence of HCV infection and examined patterns of HCV testing during follow-up. We further explored differences in sociodemographic/clinical variables between those with and without prevalent/incident HCV infection through bivariate analysis., Results: Among 557 eligible PrEP users, 382 (68.6%) underwent baseline HCV antibody testing, of whom 5 tested HCV seropositive, giving a seroprevalence of 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], .43%-3.03%). Only 245 (43.9%) participants underwent HCV antibody testing after baseline, and median time to participants' first follow-up test was 245 days. During follow-up, 2 participants tested newly HCV seropositive, giving an incidence of 0.47/100 person-years (95% CI, .06-1.69) over 428.9 years of follow-up. Participants with prevalent/incident HCV infection during the study appeared more likely to report giving money, drugs, gifts, or services for sex in the 3 months preceding enrollment compared to those who never tested HCV seropositive ( P = .02)., Conclusions: HCV seroprevalence and incidence were low but not negligible among Ontario PrEP users. HCV antibody and RNA testing were suboptimal., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. D. H. S. T.'s institution has received support from Gilead for investigator-initiated research grants and from GlaxoSmithKline for participation in industry-sponsored clinical trials. P. M. has received speaker honoraria from Merck and Gilead. I. I. B. has consulted to the Weapons Threat Reduction Program, Global Affairs Canada. M. J. B. has received speaking and consulting fees from Gilead and ViiV. All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)