Search

In females, X chromosome inactivation (XCI) begins with the expression of the XIST gene from the X chromosome destined to be inactivated (Xi) and the coating of XIST RNA in cis. It has recently been reported that this process is supported by the product of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene and that BRCA1−/− cancers show Xi chromatin structure defects, thus suggesting a role of XCI perturbation in BRCA1-mediated tumorigenesis. Using a combined genetic and epigenetic approach, we verified the occurrence of XCI in BRCA1−/− and BRCA1wt breast cancer cell lines. It was ascertained that the Xi was lost in all cancer cell lines, irrespective of the BRCA1 status and that more than one active X (Xa) was present. In addition, no epigenetic silencing of genes normally subjected to XCI was observed. We also evaluated XIST expression and found that XIST may be occasionally transcribed also from Xa. Moreover, in one of the BRCA1wt cell line the restoring of XIST expression using a histone deacetylase inhibitor, did not lead to XCI. To verify these findings in primary tumors, chromosome X behavior was investigated in a few BRCA1-associated and BRCA1–not associated primary noncultured breast carcinomas and the results mirrored those obtained in cancer cell lines. Our findings indicate that the lack of XCI may be a frequent phenomenon in breast tumorigenesis, which occurs independently of BRCA1 status and XIST expression and is due to the loss of Xi and replication of Xa and not to the reactivation of the native Xi.

Equivalent levels of X-linked gene products between males and females are reached by means of X chromosome inactivation (XCI). In the human and murine embryonic tissues, both the paternally and maternally derived X chromosomes (X(P) and X(M)) may be inactivated. In murine extra-embryonic tissues, X(P) is imprinted and always silenced; humans, unlike mice, can inactivate the X(M) in extra-embryonic lineages without an adverse outcome. This difference is probably due to the presence of imprinted placental genes on the murine X chromosome, but not on the human homologue, essential for placental development and function. An example is the paternally imprinted Esx1 gene; mice with a null maternally derived Esx1 allele show intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) because of placental insufficiency. We investigated the imprinting status of the human orthologous Esx1 gene (ESX1L) in placental samples of four normal full-term and 13 IUGR female fetuses, in which we determined the XCI pattern. Our findings demonstrated that IUGR as well as normal placentas display XCI heterogeneity, thus indicating that the IUGR phenotype is not correlated with a preferential pattern of XCI in placentas. Moreover, ESX1L is equally expressed in IUGR and normal placentas, and shows the same methylation pattern in the presence of both random and skewed XCI. These findings provide evidence that ESX1L is not imprinted in human third-trimester placentas and there is no parent-of-origin effect of chromosome X associated with placental insufficiency.