Search

OBJECT Given the scrutiny of spine surgery by policy makers, spine surgeons are motivated to demonstrate and improve outcomes, by determining which patients will and will not benefit from surgery, and to reduce costs, often by reducing complications. Insurers are similarly motivated. In 2013, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) and Blue Care Network (BCN) established the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) as a Collaborative Quality Initiative (CQI). MSSIC is one of the newest of 21 other CQIs that have significantly improved—and continue to improve—the quality of patient care throughout the state of Michigan. METHODS MSSIC focuses on lumbar and cervical spine surgery, specifically indications such as stenosis, disk herniation, and degenerative disease. Surgery for tumors, traumatic fractures, deformity, scoliosis, and acute spinal cord injury are currently not within the scope of MSSIC. Starting in 2014, MSSIC consisted of 7 hospitals and in 2015 included another 15 hospitals, for a total of 22 hospitals statewide. A standardized data set is obtained by data abstractors, who are funded by BCBSM/BCN. Variables of interest include indications for surgery, baseline patient-reported outcome measures, and medical history. These are obtained within 30 days of surgery. Outcome instruments used include the EQ-5D general health state score (0 being worst and 100 being the best health one can imagine) and EQ-5D-3 L. For patients undergoing lumbar surgery, a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for leg and back pain and the Oswestry Disability Index for back pain are collected. For patients undergoing cervical surgery, a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for arm and neck pain, Neck Disability Index, and the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score are collected. Surgical details, postoperative hospital course, and patient-reported outcome measures are collected at 90-day, 1-year, and 2-year intervals. RESULTS As of July 1, 2015, a total of 6397 cases have been entered into the registry. This number reflects 4824 eligible cases with confirmed surgery dates. Of these 4824 eligible cases, 3338 cases went beyond the 120-day window and were considered eligible for the extraction of surgical details, 90-day outcomes, and adverse events. Among these 3338 patients, there are a total of 2469 lumbar cases, 862 cervical cases, and 7 combined procedures that were entered into the registry. CONCLUSIONS In addition to functioning as a registry, MSSIC is also meant to be a platform for quality improvement with the potential for future initiatives and best practices to be implemented statewide in order to improve quality and lower costs. With its current rate of recruitment and expansion, MSSIC will provide a robust platform as a regional prospective registry. Its unique funding model, which is supported by BCBSM/BCN, will help ensure its longevity and viability, as has been observed in other CQIs that have been active for several years.

The Environmental Health Sciences (EHS) Center at Wayne State University (WSU) in Detroit Michigan, was established in 1993 to study the effects of environmental factors on human health. The EHS Center and its membership form a highly interactive multidisciplinary team of scientists and physicians from several hospitals and research facilities in and around WSU. Because of its diverse array of expertise, the EHS Center is in an optimal position to bring the knowledge of highly contemporary biomedical technologies to the K-12 educational community. The EHS Center has an extremely active Community Outreach and Education Program (COEP) that facilitates the transfer of environmental health information into benefical programs for the educational community. The COEP has offered several programs to the local five-country area around WSU for the past six years. Included in these offerings are a constructivist, inquiry-based hands-on curriculum for grades K-12 (Chemicals in My World TM ), a web-based multimedia in...

Background Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) pose a substantial burden to patients and the health care system, due to long diagnostic and treatment delays. Methods This study used medical chart notes from 103 patients to shed light on the diagnostic process. Electronic medical records and cost data from a US health system were also used to investigate costs and utilization for the 12-months before and after PNES diagnosis. Results The results show that accurate diagnosis was typically achieved via the use of multiple medical tests, including vEEG, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) scans, as well as historical diagnostic and clinical information. In the year following PNES diagnosis, a decline in average visits (−1.45) and costs (−$1784) were observed. The largest cost savings were seen in neurology care and inpatient stays. Conclusions This study has implications for timely and accurate diagnosis of PNES, which may decrease the overall health care burden for individuals and the health care system.