1. Ethical and moral perspectives of individuals who considered/used preimplantation (embryo) genetic testing
- Author
-
Samantha L. Klein, Lisa R. Rubin, Miriam Sarwana, Jiahui Zhang, Lisa M. Pastore, and Marci Lobel
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Genetic counseling ,Disease ,Computer-assisted web interviewing ,Morals ,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis ,Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) ,Pregnancy ,medicine ,Humans ,Genetic Testing ,Child ,Preimplantation Diagnosis ,Genetics (clinical) ,Genetic testing ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Disposition ,Aneuploidy ,medicine.disease ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Trait ,Female ,business ,Demography - Abstract
This study examined perspectives on the ethical implications of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) among individuals who actually (not hypothetically) used or considered using PGT. Most of the prior patient-centered research on PGT ethics used qualitative designs (9 out of the 11 articles) and focused only on single gene testing. This cross-sectional study used an anonymous online questionnaire; 15 items assessed potential ethical concerns involved in PGT decision-making, including clinical indications for PGT, the greater implications of PGT for society, and unused embryo disposition. N = 207 individuals (mean female/male age 35.7/38.9 years, 21% Hispanic or non-White) who had recently used or considered using PGT for single gene (60%) or for chromosomal testing (40%) completed the questionnaire. Most respondents supported PGT screening for disease conditions with childhood or adult onset that are untreatable (64%-85% across items); most opposed PGT for trait selection (76%-81%). Most respondents agreed that PGT aids in parental decision-making (66%-67%), although some expressed concern over potential unforeseen consequences (25%-30%). Regarding disposition of embryos without known genetic abnormalities, most respondents favored freezing indefinitely (86%) or donating to another family (69%), while for embryos with genetic abnormalities, most respondents favored donating to research (78%) or destroying them (62%). Stratification by religious affiliation revealed several differences, such as less acceptance of PGT for diseases that occur in adulthood and have no treatment options among Protestants (p = .015) and greater willingness to donate surplus embryos to research among participants without a religious affiliation (p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF