Search

Background: Conducted electrical weapons (CEWs) are used by law enforcement to subdue combative subjects. Occasionally, subjects will die after a CEW has been used on them. It is theorized that CEWs may contribute to these deaths by impairing respiration. Objectives: To examine the respiratory effects of CEWs. Methods: Human volunteers received a 15-second application of electrical current from a CEW while wearing a respiratory measurement device. Common respiratory parameters were collected before, during, and after exposure. Health histories and demographic information were also collected. Results: Fifty-two subjects were analyzed. Thirty-four underwent a 15-second continuous exposure, and 18 underwent three 5-second burst exposures. In the continuous application group, the baseline mean tidal volume of 1.1 L increased to 1.8 L during application, the baseline end-tidal CO2 level went from 40.5 mm Hg to 37.3 mm Hg after exposure, the baseline end-tidal oxygen level went from 118.7 mm Hg to 121.3 mm Hg after exposure, and the baseline respiratory rate went from 15.9 breaths/min to 16.4 breaths/min after exposure. In the 5-second burst group, the baseline mean tidal volume increased to 1.85 L during application, the baseline end-tidal CO2 level went from 40.9 mm Hg to 39.1 mm Hg after exposure, the baseline end-tidal oxygen level went from 123.1 mm Hg to 127.0 mm Hg after exposure, and the baseline respiratory rate went from 13.8 breaths/min to 14.6 breaths/min after exposure. Conclusions: Prolonged CEW application did not impair respiratory parameters in this population of volunteers. Further study is recommended to validate these findings in other populations.

Size and shape are critical determinants of the mechanical properties of skeletal elements and can be anticipated to be highly heritable. Moreover, the genes responsible may be independent of those that regulate bone mineral density (BMD). To begin to identify the heritable determinants of skeletal geometry, we have examined femoral cross-sectional area (FCSA) in male and female mice from two inbred strains of mice with divergent FCSA (C57BL/6 [B6] and DBA/2 [D2]), a large genetically heterogeneous population (n = 964) of B6D2F2 mice and 18 BXD recombinant inbred (RI) strains derived from their F2 cross. Femora were harvested from 16-week-old mice and FCSA (bone and marrow space enclosed within the periosteum) was measured at the midshaft by digital image analysis. In all mouse populations examined, FCSA was positively correlated with body weight and weight-corrected FCSA (WC-FCSA) values were normally distributed in the BXD-RI and F2 populations, suggesting polygenic control of this trait. Genome-wide quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of the B6D2F2 population revealed regions on four different chromosomes that were very strongly linked to WC-FCSA (chromosomes 6, 8, 10, and X) in both genders. Evidence of gender-specific genetic influences on femoral geometry was also identified at three other chromosomal sites (chromosomes 2, 7, and 12). Supporting evidence for the WC-FCSA QTLs on chromosomes 2, 7, 8, 10, and 12 also was present in the RI strains. Interestingly, none of these WC-FCSA QTLs were identified in our previous QTL analysis of whole body BMD in the same B6D2F2 population. Thus, the genetic determinants of bone size appear to be largely, if not entirely, distinct from those that regulate BMD attainment. The identification of the genes responsible for geometric differences in bone development should reveal fundamentally important processes in the control of skeletal integrity.

Objectives: The objective was to compare the time to medication administration, the side effects, and the analgesic effect at sequential time points after medication administration of an oral treatment strategy using oxycodone solution with an intravenous (IV) treatment strategy using morphine sulfate for the initial treatment of musculoskeletal pain in emergency department (ED) patients. Methods: This was a prospective randomized clinical trial of patients >6 years old who were going to receive IV morphine sulfate for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain but did not yet have an IV. Consenting patients were randomized to have the treating physician order either 0.1 mg/kg morphine sulfate IV or 0.125 mg/kg oxycodone orally in a 5 mg/5 mL suspension as their initial treatment for pain. The time from the placement of the order to the administration of the medication was recorded. Pain was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and recorded at 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes after drug administration. Results: A total of 405 eligible patients were identified during the study period; 328 (81.0%) patients consented to be in the study. A total of 158 patients were randomized to the IV morphine sulfate treatment group, and 162 were randomized to the oral oxycodone treatment group. Of the patients who were randomized to IV therapy, 34 were withdrawn from the study prior to drug administration; leaving 125 patients in the IV group for analysis. Of the patients who randomized to oral therapy, 22 were withdrawn from the study prior to drug administration, leaving 140 patients for analysis. No serious adverse events were detected. There was a 12-minute difference between the median time of the order and the administration of oral oxycodone (8.5 minutes) and IV morphine (20.5 minutes). The mean percent change in VAS score was larger for patients in the IV therapy group than those in the oral therapy group at 10 and 20 minutes. At 30 and 40 minutes, the authors could no longer detect a difference. The satisfaction scale score was higher after treatment for the morphine group (median = 4; interquartile range [IQR] = 4 to 5) than for the oxycodone group (median = 4; IQR = 2 to 5; p = 0.008). Conclusions: The oral loading strategy was associated with delayed onset of analgesia and decreased patient satisfaction, but a shorter time to administration. The oral loading strategy using an oxycodone solution provided similar pain relief to the IV strategy using morphine 30 minutes after administration of the drug. Oral 0.125 mg/kg oxycodone represents a feasible alternative to 0.1 mg/kg IV morphine in the treatment of severe acute musculoskeletal pain when difficult or delayed IV placement greater than 30 minutes presents a barrier to treatment.