Search

Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are at high risk of co-occurring mental health conditions, including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, psychotic illnesses, impulse control disorders, and others. Because of symptoms associated with these illnesses and with the disabilities themselves, these individuals are often served in a mental health service system framework. However, treatment for them in these settings has typically not been sufficiently nimble, knowledgeable, or adept. Most mental health professionals receive little training about the needs of this population, and system structures typically bifurcate care, when, in reality, conditions can be complex and overlapping. In this first of two articles on care for persons with IDD in the mental health system, the authors provide a clinical overview of these neurodevelopmental disorders and of mental health and other conditions that co-occur with IDD. Considerations and challenges for treating this population in the mental health system include early recognition of mental health conditions, which often requires caregiver and family input, as well as information from a variety of additional collateral sources; the importance of trauma-informed and person-centered care; the promotion of self-determination through use of decision supports; use of approaches such as applied behavior analysis to develop a frame to address challenging behaviors; and the need to properly assess and provide thoughtful pharmacologic intervention when appropriate. The ability of individuals with IDD to thrive in a wide range of community integration opportunities depends on many factors, and clinicians must understand and use the available approaches for treating them.

Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are at high risk of co-occurring mental health conditions, including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorders, anxiety disorders, impulse control disorders, and others. Because of symptoms associated with these illnesses and with the disabilities themselves, these individuals are often served in a mental health service system framework. In this second of two articles on care for persons with IDD in the mental health system, the authors focus on policy and systems considerations to assist practitioners and administrators to provide high-quality mental health services for these individuals by recognizing existing infrastructures of support. The authors describe historical factors, including legislation and case law, that have led to greater inclusion of persons with IDD in mainstream settings; systemic barriers to integrating services for persons with IDD and Medicaid waivers and provisions of the Affordable Care Act designed to overcome such barriers; and considerations for treating persons with IDD in various settings, such as emergency departments and forensic settings. They propose approaches to developing the workforce, such as by training direct service professionals and utilizing the services of board-certified behavioral analysts. A robust continuum of care and service delivery system that is increasingly sophisticated in working with persons with IDD, with and without co-occurring mental illness, is critical to maximize the autonomy and community inclusion of these individuals.

The general public often looks to mental health professionals to predict or somehow stop acts of gun violence, especially after highly publicized mass shootings. What is often less sought by the public, but no less critical, is the role of mental health professionals in examining risk of suicide related to firearms. Therefore, it is important for mental health professionals to understand the current data about firearms as they relate to violence against others, suicide, and mental illness, as well as the associated clinical implications. Understanding the general public's conceptions related to gun violence and mental illness, as well as the background and current developments of these important issues, will aid the mental health professional on legal and clinical matters, including variations of legislation related to guns and mental illness, gun violence–restraining orders, firearm-related clinical conversations, and risk assessments. [ Psychiatr Ann. 2018;48(9):416–420.]

Psychiatrists and mental health professionals in the role of forensic examiners require certain knowledge and skills to perform competency examinations, which are the most common type of forensic mental health examinations. Competency refers to necessary basic abilities to make certain decisions, such as medical treatment decisions in the civil legal arena. In criminal proceedings, the most common evaluation is the competency to stand trial examination. This article discusses competencies in general, with a focus on medical decision-making capacity and competency to stand trial. [ Psychiatr Ann. 2018;48(2):79–85.]

Gun violence and mental illness is a major area of media attention, especially because highly publicized mass shootings seem to have become more commonly reported in the press. Gun access also is undergoing a highly politicized debate in the United States. It is important for mental health practitioners to understand the background and context of laws related to firearms access, and to understand data related to risk of suicide and violence toward others caused by gun violence among persons with mental illness. In addition, clinically driven risk assessments with specific inquiry related to firearms can be important for identifying individuals for whom firearm-focused clinical risk mitigation may be warranted.