Search

Problem solving is a composite cognitive process, invoking a number of systems and subsystems, such as perception and memory. Individuals may form collectives to solve a given problem together, in collaboration, especially when complexity is thought to be high. To determine if and when collaborative problem solving is desired, we must quantify collaboration first. For this, we investigate the practical virtue of collaborative problem solving. Using visual graph analysis, we perform a study with 72 participants in two countries and three languages. We compare ad hoc pairs to individuals and nominal pairs, solving two different tasks on graphs in visuospatial mixed reality. The average collaborating pair does not outdo its nominal counterpart, but it does have a significant trade-off against the individual: an ad hoc pair uses 1.46 more time to achieve 4.6 higher accuracy. We also use the concept of task instance complexity to quantify differences in complexity. As task instance complexity increases, these differences largely scale, though with two notable exceptions. With this study we show the importance of using nominal groups as benchmark in collaborative virtual environments research. We conclude that a mixed reality environment does not automatically imply superior collaboration., Comment: 18 pages, 7 figures

Graph and network visualization supports exploration, analysis and communication of relational data arising in many domains: from biological and social networks, to transportation and powergrid systems. With the arrival of AI-based question-answering tools, issues of trustworthiness and explainability of generated answers motivate a greater role for visualization. In the context of graphs, we see the need for visualizations that can convince a critical audience that an assertion about the graph under analysis is valid. The requirements for such representations that convey precisely one specific graph property are quite different from standard network visualization criteria which optimize general aesthetics and readability. In this paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive introduction to visual proofs of graph properties and a foundation for further research in the area. We present a framework that defines what it means to visually prove a graph property. In the process, we introduce the notion of a visual certificate, that is, a specialized faithful graph visualization that leverages the viewer's perception, in particular, pre-attentive processing (e.g. via pop-out effects), to verify a given assertion about the represented graph. We also discuss the relationships between visual complexity, cognitive load and complexity theory, and propose a classification based on visual proof complexity. Finally, we provide examples of visual certificates for problems in different visual proof complexity classes., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2024)

This paper studies planar drawings of graphs in which each vertex is represented as a point along a sequence of horizontal lines, called levels, and each edge is either a horizontal segment or a strictly $y$-monotone curve. A graph is $s$-span weakly leveled planar if it admits such a drawing where the edges have span at most $s$; the span of an edge is the number of levels it touches minus one. We investigate the problem of computing $s$-span weakly leveled planar drawings from both the computational and the combinatorial perspectives. We prove the problem to be para-NP-hard with respect to its natural parameter $s$ and investigate its complexity with respect to widely used structural parameters. We show the existence of a polynomial-size kernel with respect to vertex cover number and prove that the problem is FPT when parameterized by treedepth. We also present upper and lower bounds on the span for various graph classes. Notably, we show that cycle trees, a family of $2$-outerplanar graphs generalizing Halin graphs, are $\Theta(\log n)$-span weakly leveled planar and $4$-span weakly leveled planar when $3$-connected. As a byproduct of these combinatorial results, we obtain improved bounds on the edge-length ratio of the graph families under consideration., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2024)

Not every directed acyclic graph (DAG) whose underlying undirected graph is planar admits an upward planar drawing. We are interested in pushing the notion of upward drawings beyond planarity by considering upward $k$-planar drawings of DAGs in which the edges are monotonically increasing in a common direction and every edge is crossed at most $k$ times for some integer $k \ge 1$. We show that the number of crossings per edge in a monotone drawing is in general unbounded for the class of bipartite outerplanar, cubic, or bounded pathwidth DAGs. However, it is at most two for outerpaths and it is at most quadratic in the bandwidth in general. From the computational point of view, we prove that upward-$k$-planarity testing is NP-complete already for $k =1$ and even for restricted instances for which upward planarity testing is polynomial. On the positive side, we can decide in linear time whether a single-source DAG admits an upward $1$-planar drawing in which all vertices are incident to the outer face., Comment: This is the extended version, with full appendix, of a paper to appear in the Proc. 32nd Int. Symp. Graph Drawing & Network Visualization (GD 2024)

The \emph{local edge-length ratio} of a planar straight-line drawing $\Gamma$ is the largest ratio between the lengths of any pair of edges of $\Gamma$ that share a common vertex. The \emph{global edge-length ratio} of $\Gamma$ is the largest ratio between the lengths of any pair of edges of $\Gamma$. The local (global) edge-length ratio of a planar graph is the infimum over all local (global) edge-length ratios of its planar straight-line drawings. We show that there exist planar graphs with $n$ vertices whose local edge-length ratio is $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$. We then show a technique to establish upper bounds on the global (and hence local) edge-length ratio of planar graphs and~apply~it to Halin graphs and to other families of graphs having outerplanarity two.

We study the problem of gradually representing a complex graph as a sequence of drawings of small subgraphs whose union is the complex graph. The sequence of drawings is called \emph{storyplan}, and each drawing in the sequence is called a \emph{frame}. In an outerplanar storyplan, every frame is outerplanar; in a forest storyplan, every frame is acyclic. We identify graph families that admit such storyplans and families for which such storyplans do not always exist. In the affirmative case, we present efficient algorithms that produce straight-line storyplans., Comment: Appears in Proc. SOFSEM 2024

The problem of deciding whether a biconnected planar digraph $G=(V,E)$ can be augmented to become an $st$-planar graph by adding a set of oriented edges $E' \subseteq V \times V$ is known to be NP-complete. We show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the size of the set $E'$.

A pair $\langle G_0, G_1 \rangle$ of graphs admits a mutual witness proximity drawing $\langle \Gamma_0, \Gamma_1 \rangle$ when: (i) $\Gamma_i$ represents $G_i$, and (ii) there is an edge $(u,v)$ in $\Gamma_i$ if and only if there is no vertex $w$ in $\Gamma_{1-i}$ that is ``too close'' to both $u$ and $v$ ($i=0,1$). In this paper, we consider infinitely many definitions of closeness by adopting the $\beta$-proximity rule for any $\beta \in [1,\infty]$ and study pairs of isomorphic trees that admit a mutual witness $\beta$-proximity drawing. Specifically, we show that every two isomorphic trees admit a mutual witness $\beta$-proximity drawing for any $\beta \in [1,\infty]$. The constructive technique can be made ``robust'': For some tree pairs we can suitably prune linearly many leaves from one of the two trees and still retain their mutual witness $\beta$-proximity drawability. Notably, in the special case of isomorphic caterpillars and $\beta=1$, we construct linearly separable mutual witness Gabriel drawings., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2023)

Upward planarity testing and Rectilinear planarity testing are central problems in graph drawing. It is known that they are both NP-complete, but XP when parameterized by treewidth. In this paper we show that these two problems are W[1]-hard parameterized by treewidth, which answers open problems posed in two earlier papers. The key step in our proof is an analysis of the All-or-Nothing Flow problem, a generalization of which was used as an intermediate step in the NP-completeness proof for both planarity testing problems. We prove that the flow problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by treewidth on planar graphs, and that the existing chain of reductions to the planarity testing problems can be adapted without blowing up the treewidth. Our reductions also show that the known $n^{O(tw)}$-time algorithms cannot be improved to run in time $n^{o(tw)}$ unless ETH fails., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2023)

Computing planar orthogonal drawings with the minimum number of bends is one of the most relevant topics in Graph Drawing. The problem is known to be NP-hard, even when we want to test the existence of a rectilinear planar drawing, i.e., an orthogonal drawing without bends (Garg and Tamassia, 2001). From the parameterized complexity perspective, the problem is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the sum of three parameters: the number of bends, the number of vertices of degree at most two, and the treewidth of the input graph (Di Giacomo et al., 2022). We improve this last result by showing that the problem remains fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized only by the number of vertices of degree at most two plus the number of bends. As a consequence, rectilinear planarity testing lies in \FPT~parameterized by the number of vertices of degree at most two., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2023)

The study of nonplanar drawings of graphs with restricted crossing configurations is a well-established topic in graph drawing, often referred to as beyond-planar graph drawing. One of the most studied types of drawings in this area are the $k$-planar drawings $(k \geq 1)$, where each edge cannot cross more than $k$ times. We generalize $k$-planar drawings, by introducing the new family of min-$k$-planar drawings. In a min-$k$-planar drawing edges can cross an arbitrary number of times, but for any two crossing edges, one of the two must have no more than $k$ crossings. We prove a general upper bound on the number of edges of min-$k$-planar drawings, a finer upper bound for $k=3$, and tight upper bounds for $k=1,2$. Also, we study the inclusion relations between min-$k$-planar graphs (i.e., graphs admitting min-$k$-planar drawings) and $k$-planar graphs. In our setting we only allow simple drawings, that is, any two edges cross at most once, no two adjacent edges cross, and no three edges intersect at a common crossing point., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2023)

We study the following problem: Given a set $S$ of $n$ points in the plane, how many edge-disjoint plane straight-line spanning paths of $S$ can one draw? A well known result is that when the $n$ points are in convex position, $\lfloor n/2\rfloor$ such paths always exist, but when the points of $S$ are in general position the only known construction gives rise to two edge-disjoint plane straight-line spanning paths. In this paper, we show that for any set $S$ of at least ten points, no three of which are collinear, one can draw at least three edge-disjoint plane straight-line spanning paths of~$S$. Our proof is based on a structural theorem on halving lines of point configurations and a strengthening of the theorem about two spanning paths, which we find interesting in its own right: if $S$ has at least six points, and we prescribe any two points on the boundary of its convex hull, then the set contains two edge-disjoint plane spanning paths starting at the prescribed points., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2023)

Orienting the edges of an undirected graph such that the resulting digraph satisfies some given constraints is a classical problem in graph theory, with multiple algorithmic applications. In particular, an $st$-orientation orients each edge of the input graph such that the resulting digraph is acyclic, and it contains a single source $s$ and a single sink $t$. Computing an $st$-orientation of a graph can be done efficiently, and it finds notable applications in graph algorithms and in particular in graph drawing. On the other hand, finding an $st$-orientation with at most $k$ transitive edges is more challenging and it was recently proven to be NP-hard already when $k=0$. We strengthen this result by showing that the problem remains NP-hard even for graphs of bounded diameter, and for graphs of bounded vertex degree. These computational lower bounds naturally raise the question about which structural parameters can lead to tractable parameterizations of the problem. Our main result is a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm parameterized by treewidth.

This paper studies a \emph{packing} problem in the so-called beyond-planar setting, that is when the host graph is ``almost-planar'' in some sense. Precisely, we consider the case that the host graph is $k$-planar, i.e., it admits an embedding with at most $k$ crossings per edge, and focus on families of $\Delta$-regular caterpillars, that are caterpillars whose non-leaf vertices have the same degree $\Delta$. We study the dependency of $k$ from the number $h$ of caterpillars that are packed, both in the case that these caterpillars are all isomorphic to one another (in which case the packing is called \emph{placement}) and when they are not. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for the placement of $h$ $\Delta$-regular caterpillars and sufficient conditions for the packing of a set of $\Delta_1$-, $\Delta_2$-, $\dots$, $\Delta_h$-regular caterpillars such that the degree $\Delta_i$ and the degree $\Delta_j$ of the non-leaf vertices can differ from one caterpillar to another, for $1 \leq i,j \leq h$, $i\neq j$.

Orthogonal graph drawings are used in applications such as UML diagrams, VLSI layout, cable plans, and metro maps. We focus on drawing planar graphs and assume that we are given an \emph{orthogonal representation} that describes the desired shape, but not the exact coordinates of a drawing. Our aim is to compute an orthogonal drawing on the grid that has minimum area among all grid drawings that adhere to the given orthogonal representation. This problem is called orthogonal compaction (OC) and is known to be NP-hard, even for orthogonal representations of cycles [Evans et al., 2022]. We investigate the complexity of OC with respect to several parameters. Among others, we show that OC is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the most natural of these parameters, namely, the number of \emph{kitty corners} of the orthogonal representation: the presence of pairs of kitty corners in an orthogonal representation makes the OC problem hard. Informally speaking, a pair of kitty corners is a pair of reflex corners of a face that point at each other. Accordingly, the number of kitty corners is the number of corners that are involved in some pair of kitty corners., Comment: 40 pages, 26 figures, to appear in Proc. SOFSEM 2023

Let $\Gamma$ be a straight-line drawing of a graph and let $u$ and $v$ be two vertices of $\Gamma$. The Gabriel disk of $u,v$ is the disk having $u$ and $v$ as antipodal points. A pair $\langle \Gamma_0,\Gamma_1 \rangle$ of vertex-disjoint straight-line drawings form a mutual witness Gabriel drawing when, for $i=0,1$, any two vertices $u$ and $v$ of $\Gamma_i$ are adjacent if and only if their Gabriel disk does not contain any vertex of $\Gamma_{1-i}$. We characterize the pairs $\langle G_0,G_1 \rangle $ of complete bipartite graphs that admit a mutual witness Gabriel drawing. The characterization leads to a linear time testing algorithm. We also show that when at least one of the graphs in the pair $\langle G_0, G_1 \rangle $ is complete $k$-partite with $k>2$ and all partition sets in the two graphs have size greater than one, the pair does not admit a mutual witness Gabriel drawing., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2022)

Motivated by dynamic graph visualization, we study the problem of representing a graph $G$ in the form of a \emph{storyplan}, that is, a sequence of frames with the following properties. Each frame is a planar drawing of the subgraph of $G$ induced by a suitably defined subset of its vertices. Between two consecutive frames, a new vertex appears while some other vertices may disappear, namely those whose incident edges have already been drawn in at least one frame. In a storyplan, each vertex appears and disappears exactly once. For a vertex (edge) visible in a sequence of consecutive frames, the point (curve) representing it does not change throughout the sequence. Note that the order in which the vertices of $G$ appear in the sequence of frames is a total order. In the \textsc{StoryPlan} problem, we are given a graph and we want to decide whether there exists a total order of its vertices for which a storyplan exists. We prove that the problem is NP-complete, and complement this hardness with two parameterized algorithms, one in the vertex cover number and one in the feedback edge set number of $G$. Also, we prove that partial $3$-trees always admit a storyplan, which can be computed in linear time. Finally, we show that the problem remains NP-complete in the case in which the total order of the vertices is given as part of the input and we have to choose how to draw the frames., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2022)

A graph is rectilinear planar if it admits a planar orthogonal drawing without bends. While testing rectilinear planarity is NP-hard in general (Garg and Tamassia, 2001), it is a long-standing open problem to establish a tight upper bound on its complexity for partial 2-trees, i.e., graphs whose biconnected components are series-parallel. We describe a new O(n^2)-time algorithm to test rectilinear planarity of partial 2-trees, which improves over the current best bound of O(n^3 \log n) (Di Giacomo et al., 2022). Moreover, for partial 2-trees where no two parallel-components in a biconnected component share a pole, we are able to achieve optimal O(n)-time complexity. Our algorithms are based on an extensive study and a deeper understanding of the notion of orthogonal spirality, introduced several years ago (Di Battista et al, 1998) to describe how much an orthogonal drawing of a subgraph is rolled-up in an orthogonal drawing of the graph., Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2110.00548 Appears in the Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2022)

A planar orthogonal drawing of a planar 4-graph G (i.e., a planar graph with vertex-degree at most four) is a crossing-free drawing that maps each vertex of G to a distinct point of the plane and each edge of $G$ to a sequence of horizontal and vertical segments between its end-points. A longstanding open question in Graph Drawing, dating back over 30 years, is whether there exists a linear-time algorithm to compute an orthogonal drawing of a plane 4-graph with the minimum number of bends. The term "plane" indicates that the input graph comes together with a planar embedding, which must be preserved by the drawing (i.e., the drawing must have the same set of faces as the input graph). In this paper, we positively answer the question above for the widely-studied class of series-parallel graphs. Our linear-time algorithm is based on a characterization of the planar series-parallel graphs that admit an orthogonal drawing without bends. This characterization is given in terms of the orthogonal spirality that each type of triconnected component of the graph can take; the orthogonal spirality of a component measures how much that component is "rolled-up" in an orthogonal drawing of the graph., Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2008.03784

We study the long-standing open problem of efficiently testing rectilinear planarity of series-parallel graphs (SP-graphs) in the variable embedding setting. A key ingredient behind the design of a linear-time testing algorithm for SP-graphs of vertex-degree at most three is that one can restrict the attention to a constant number of ``rectilinear shapes'' for each series or parallel component. To formally describe these shapes the notion of spirality can be used. This key ingredient no longer holds for SP-graphs with vertices of degree four, as we prove a logarithmic lower bound on the spirality of their components. The bound holds even for the independent-parallel SP-graphs, in which no two parallel components share a pole. Nonetheless, by studying the spirality properties of the independent-parallel SP-graphs, we are able to design a linear-time rectilinear planarity testing algorithm for this graph family.

This paper studies optimal-area visibility representations of $n$-vertex outer-1-plane graphs, i.e. graphs with a given embedding where all vertices are on the boundary of the outer face and each edge is crossed at most once. We show that any graph of this family admits an embedding-preserving visibility representation whose area is $O(n^{1.5})$ and prove that this area bound is worst-case optimal. We also show that $O(n^{1.48})$ area can be achieved if we represent the vertices as L-shaped orthogonal polygons or if we do not respect the embedding but still have at most one crossing per edge. We also extend the study to other representation models and, among other results, construct asymptotically optimal $O(n\, pw(G))$ area bar-1-visibility representations, where $pw(G)\in O(\log n)$ is the pathwidth of the outer-1-planar graph $G$., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 29th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2021)

This paper studies the problem of computing quasi-upward planar drawings of bimodal plane digraphs with minimum curve complexity, i.e., drawings such that the maximum number of bends per edge is minimized. We prove that every bimodal plane digraph admits a quasi-upward planar drawing with curve complexity two, which is worst-case optimal. We also show that the problem of minimizing the curve complexity in a quasi-upward planar drawing can be modeled as a min-cost flow problem on a unit-capacity planar flow network. This gives rise to an $\tilde{O}(m^\frac{4}{3})$-time algorithm that computes a quasi-upward planar drawing with minimum curve complexity; in addition, the drawing has the minimum number of bends when no edge can be bent more than twice. For a contrast, we show bimodal planar digraphs whose bend-minimum quasi-upward planar drawings require linear curve complexity even in the variable embedding setting., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 29th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2021)

The $\textit{planar slope number}$ $psn(G)$ of a planar graph $G$ is the minimum number of edge slopes in a planar straight-line drawing of $G$. It is known that $psn(G) \in O(c^\Delta)$ for every planar graph $G$ of degree $\Delta$. This upper bound has been improved to $O(\Delta^5)$ if $G$ has treewidth three, and to $O(\Delta)$ if $G$ has treewidth two. In this paper we prove $psn(G) \in \Theta(\Delta)$ when $G$ is a Halin graph, and thus has treewidth three. Furthermore, we present the first polynomial upper bound on the planar slope number for a family of graphs having treewidth four. Namely we show that $O(\Delta^2)$ slopes suffice for nested pseudotrees., Comment: Extended version of "Planar Drawings with Few Slopes of Halin Graphs and Nested Pseudotrees" to appear in the Proceedings of the 17th Algorithms and Data Structures Symposium (WADS 2021)

The LR-drawing-method is a method of drawing an ordered rooted binary tree based on drawing one root-to-leaf path on a vertical line and attaching recursively obtained drawings of the subtrees on the left and right. In this paper, we study how to generalize this drawing-method to trees of higher arity. We first prove that (with some careful modifications) the proof of existence of a special root-to-leaf path transfers to trees of higher arity. Then we use such paths to obtain generalized LR-drawings of trees of arbitrary arity.

In social networks, individuals' decisions are strongly influenced by recommendations from their friends and acquaintances. The influence maximization (IM) problem asks to select a seed set of users that maximizes the influence spread, i.e., the expected number of users influenced through a stochastic diffusion process triggered by the seeds. In this paper, we present VAIM, a visual analytics system that supports users in analyzing the information diffusion process determined by different IM algorithms. By using VAIM one can: (i) simulate the information spread for a given seed set on a large network, (ii) analyze and compare the effectiveness of different seed sets, and (iii) modify the seed sets to improve the corresponding influence spread., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2020)

Storyline visualizations depict the temporal dynamics of social interactions, as they describe how groups of actors (individuals or organizations) change over time. A common constraint in storyline visualizations is that an actor cannot belong to two different groups at the same time instant. However, this constraint may be too severe in some application scenarios, thus we generalize the model by allowing an actor to simultaneously belong to distinct groups at any point in time. We call this model Storyline with Ubiquitous Actors (SUA). Essential to our model is that an actor is represented as a tree rather than a single line. We describe an algorithmic pipeline to compute storyline visualizations in the SUA model and discuss case studies on publication data., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2020)

A plane graph is rectilinear planar if it admits an embedding-preserving straight-line drawing where each edge is either horizontal or vertical. We prove that rectilinear planarity testing can be solved in optimal $O(n)$ time for any plane series-parallel graph $G$ with $n$ vertices. If $G$ is rectilinear planar, an embedding-preserving rectilinear planar drawing of $G$ can be constructed in $O(n)$ time. Our result is based on a characterization of rectilinear planar series-parallel graphs in terms of intervals of orthogonal spirality that their components can have, and it leads to an algorithm that can be easily implemented., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2020)

We introduce and study the 1-planar packing problem: Given $k$ graphs with $n$ vertices $G_1, \dots, G_k$, find a 1-planar graph that contains the given graphs as edge-disjoint spanning subgraphs. We mainly focus on the case when each $G_i$ is a tree and $k=3$. We prove that a triple consisting of three caterpillars or of two caterpillars and a path may not admit a 1-planar packing, while two paths and a special type of caterpillar always have one. We then study 1-planar packings with few crossings and prove that three paths (resp. cycles) admit a 1-planar packing with at most seven (resp. fourteen) crossings. We finally show that a quadruple consisting of three paths and a perfect matching with $n \geq 12$ vertices admits a 1-planar packing, while such a packing does not exist if $n \leq 10$.

A planar orthogonal drawing $\Gamma$ of a planar graph $G$ is a geometric representation of $G$ such that the vertices are drawn as distinct points of the plane, the edges are drawn as chains of horizontal and vertical segments, and no two edges intersect except at their common end-points. A bend of $\Gamma$ is a point of an edge where a horizontal and a vertical segment meet. $\Gamma$ is bend-minimum if it has the minimum number of bends over all possible planar orthogonal drawings of $G$. This paper addresses a long standing, widely studied, open question: Given a planar 3-graph $G$ (i.e., a planar graph with vertex degree at most three), what is the best computational upper bound to compute a bend-minimum planar orthogonal drawing of $G$ in the variable embedding setting? In this setting the algorithm can choose among the exponentially many planar embeddings of $G$ the one that leads to an orthogonal drawing with the minimum number of bends. We answer the question by describing an $O(n)$-time algorithm that computes a bend-minimum planar orthogonal drawing of $G$ with at most one bend per edge, where $n$ is the number of vertices of $G$. The existence of an orthogonal drawing algorithm that simultaneously minimizes the total number of bends and the number of bends per edge was previously unknown., Comment: 40 pages, 32 figures, full version of SODA 2020 final submission

We study the interplay between embedding constrained planarity and hybrid planarity testing. We consider a constrained planarity testing problem, called 1-Fixed Constrained Planarity, and prove that this problem can be solved in quadratic time for biconnected graphs. Our solution is based on a new definition of fixedness that makes it possible to simplify and extend known techniques about Simultaneous PQ-Ordering. We apply these results to different variants of hybrid planarity testing, including a relaxation of NodeTrix Planarity with fixed sides, that allows rows and columns to be independently permuted.

We study planar straight-line drawings of graphs that minimize the ratio between the length of the longest and the shortest edge. We answer a question of Lazard et al. [Theor. Comput. Sci. 770 (2019), 88--94] and, for any given constant $r$, we provide a $2$-tree which does not admit a planar straight-line drawing with a ratio bounded by $r$. When the ratio is restricted to adjacent edges only, we prove that any $2$-tree admits a planar straight-line drawing whose edge-length ratio is at most $4 + \varepsilon$ for any arbitrarily small $\varepsilon > 0$, hence the upper bound on the local edge-length ratio of partial $2$-trees is $4$., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2020)