Search

Your search keyword '"Linver, Michael N."' showing total 35 results
Start Over Author "Linver, Michael N."
35 results on '"Linver, Michael N."'

2. Agreement Between Radiologists’ Interpretations of Screening Mammograms

Author

Nishikawa, Robert M., Comstock, Christopher E., Linver, Michael N., Newstead, Gillian M., Sandhir, Vinay, Schmidt, Robert A., Hutchison, David, Series editor, Kanade, Takeo, Series editor, Kittler, Josef, Series editor, Kleinberg, Jon M., Series editor, Mattern, Friedemann, Series editor, Mitchell, John C., Series editor, Naor, Moni, Series editor, Pandu Rangan, C., Series editor, Steffen, Bernhard, Series editor, Terzopoulos, Demetri, Series editor, Tygar, Doug, Series editor, Weikum, Gerhard, Series editor, Tingberg, Anders, editor, Lång, Kristina, editor, and Timberg, Pontus, editor

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Mammographic Screening: Sensitivity of General Radiologists

Author

Schmidt, Robert A., Newstead, Gillian M., Linver, Michael N., Eklund, G. W., Metz, Charles E., Winkler, Michael A., Nishikawa, Robert M., Viergever, Max A., editor, Karssemeijer, Nico, editor, Thijssen, Martin, editor, Hendriks, Jan, editor, and van Erning, Leon, editor

Published
1998
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Image-Detected Breast Cancer: State-of-the-Art Diagnosis and Treatment

Author

Silverstein, Melvin J., Recht, Abram, Lagios, Michael D., Bleiweiss, Ira J., Blumencranz, Peter W., Gizienski, Terri, Harms, Steven E., Harness, Jay, Jackman, Roger J., Klimberg, V. Suzanne, Kuske, Robert, Levine, Gary M., Linver, Michael N., Rafferty, Elizabeth A., Rugo, Hope, Schilling, Kathy, Tripathy, Debu, Whitworth, Pat W., and Willey, Shawna C.

Published
2009
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Contributors

Author

Apple, Sophia Kim, primary, Banakar, Shida, additional, Bassett, Lawrence W., additional, Berns, Eric A., additional, Birdwell, Robyn L., additional, Bracha, Adam, additional, Braner, Shireen L., additional, Brenner, R. James, additional, Brinton, Louise A., additional, Butler, Priscilla F., additional, Castellino, Ronald A., additional, Comstock, Christopher, additional, D'Orsi, Carl J., additional, Dascalos, Jane M., additional, DeBruhl, Nanette D., additional, Dershaw, D. David, additional, DeSantis, Carol, additional, Doepke, Laura, additional, Duffy, Stephen W., additional, Feig, Stephen A., additional, Gold, Richard H., additional, Gorczyca, David P., additional, Harvey, Jennifer A., additional, Hoyt, Anne C., additional, Hsu, Christopher P., additional, Jackson, Valerie P., additional, Jemal, Ahmedin, additional, Kramer, Joan, additional, Levine, Gary M., additional, Linver, Michael N., additional, Lipnick, Scott, additional, Little, Jennifer, additional, Liu, Xiaoyu, additional, Lopez, January K., additional, Mahoney, Mary Catherine, additional, Mendelson, Ellen B., additional, Moatamed, Neda A., additional, Morris, Elizabeth A., additional, Newell, Mary S., additional, Nwamuo, Dawn C., additional, Oshiro, Thomas, additional, Overstreet, Jennifer M.J., additional, Poon, Cheryce M., additional, Poplack, Steven P., additional, Sayre, James W., additional, Schultze-Haakh, Helmuth, additional, Sethi, Erum W., additional, Sickles, Edward A., additional, Smith, Robert A., additional, Stavros, A. Thomas, additional, Thomas, M. Albert, additional, Walker, Katherine H., additional, Wells, Colin J., additional, and Zuley, Margarita L., additional

Published
2011
Full Text
View/download PDF

16. Benefits versus risks from mammography: a critical assessment

Author

Mettler, Fred A., Upton, Arthur C., Kelsey, Charles A., Ashby, Robert N., Rosenberg, Robert D., and Linver, Michael N.

Subjects
Mammography -- Health aspects, Breast cancer -- Diagnosis, Radiation -- Risk factors, Health
Published
1996

18. The war against breast cancer - or mammography?

Author

Linver, Michael N.

Subjects
Mammography, Breast cancer, General interest, News, opinion and commentary
Abstract

Byline: Michael N. Linver The ongoing attacks directed against screening mammography remain sources of bitter disappointment for those of us focused on another war on a daily basis, that against [...]

Published
2017

22. Cases

Author

Linver, Michael N., primary and Rosenberg, Robert D., additional

Full Text
View/download PDF

24. Bilateral Multiple Mammary Myofibroblastomas in an Adult Male.

Author

Viswanathan, Kartik, Cheng, Esther, Linver, Michael N., Feddersen, Richard, and Hoda, Syed

Subjects
BREAST diseases, MAMMARY gland diseases, BREAST disease diagnosis, COMPUTED tomography, MAMMOGRAMS, MAGNETIC resonance imaging, PATIENTS
Abstract

The article presents a case study of a 74-year-old male with bilateral breast masses. Topics discussed include diagnosis of bilateral multiple mammary myofibroblastomas (MM) using computed tomography; myofibroblastic differentiation exhibited by benign and malignant entities; results of mammography which revealed masses in the right breast; and mentions that a magnetic resonance imaging was performed for all five tumors.

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. Risk of Risk-Based Mammography Screening, Ages 40 to 49

Author

Bassett, Lawrence W., primary, Jackson, Valerie P., additional, Cardenosa, Gilda, additional, Kopans, Daniel B., additional, D'Orsi, Carl J., additional, Linver, Michael N., additional, Dempsey, Peter J., additional, Mendelson, Ellen B., additional, Dershaw, D. David, additional, Monsees, Barbara, additional, Destouet, Judy M., additional, Racenstein, Michael J., additional, Evans, W. Philip, additional, Sickles, Edward A., additional, Feig, Stephen A., additional, Stelling, Carol B., additional, Hendrick, R. Edward, additional, Warren, Linda, additional, Gail, Mitchell H., additional, and Rimer, Barbara K., additional

Published
1999
Full Text
View/download PDF

28. Benefits Versus Risks From Mammography

Author

Mettler, Fred A., primary, Upton, Arthur C., additional, Kelsey, Charles A., additional, Ashby, Robert N., additional, Rosenberg, Robert D., additional, and Linver, Michael N., additional

Published
1996
Full Text
View/download PDF

31. Gaining Trust.

Author

Linver, Michael N.

Abstract

The article discusses the author's views on the benefits of good personal patient communication at breast imaging facilities. He explains the needed communication skill that is purely derived from intuition and experience to effectively dissipate a patient's fear and anxiety with compassion and empathy. The author believes that communicating effectively with breast imaging patients can spawn trust, stronger relationship, and loyalty.

Published
2011

34. Contributors

Author

Barnes, Gary T., Bassett, Lawrence W., Bennion, Robert S., Bilimoria, Malcolm M., Brenner, R. James, Brinton, Louise A., Butler, Priscilla F., Cardall, Seth Y., Chang, Helena R., Chantra, Prem K., DeBruhl, Nanette D., Dershaw, D. David, D'Orsi, Carl J., Edmond, Victoria J., Feig, Stephen A., Fu, Karin L., Fu, Yao S., Gold, Richard H., Gorczyca, David P., Hawkins, Randall A., Heinlein, Rita W., Hoyt, Anne C., Jackson, Valerie P., Jemal, Ahmedin, Kim, Christine H., Kramer, Joan L., Linver, Michael N., Lopez, January K., Love, Susan M., Michael, Dawn, Ramaswamy, Mohan, Reynolds, Handel E., Shiroishi, Mark S., Smith, Robert A., So, George J., To, Bao, Tumyan, Lusine, Winchester, David P., Wollman, Jerome S., Yaffe, Martin J., and Yun, Juanita

35. Clinically missed cancer: how effectively can radiologists use computer-aided detection?

Author

Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Linver MN, Edwards AV, Papaioannou J, and Stull MA

Subjects
Female, Humans, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Diagnostic Errors prevention & control, Mammography
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness with which radiologists can use computer-aided detection (CADe) to detect cancer missed at screening., Materials and Methods: An observer study was performed to measure the ability of radiologists to detect breast cancer on mammograms with and without CADe. The images in the study were from 300 analog mammographic examinations. In 234 cases the mammograms were read clinically as normal and free of cancer for at least 2 subsequent years. In the other 66 cases, cancers were missed clinically. In 256 cases, current and previous mammograms were available. Eight radiologists read the dataset and recorded a BI-RADS assessment, the location of the lesion, and their level of confidence that the patient should be recalled for diagnostic workup for each suspicious lesion. Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis was used., Results: The jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic figure of merit was 0.641 without aid and 0.659 with aid (p = 0.06; 95% CI, -0.001 to 0.036). The sensitivity increased 9.9% (95% CI, 3.4-19%) and the callback rate 12.1% (95% CI, 7.3-20%) with CADe. Both increases were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Radiologists on average ignored 71% of correct computer prompts., Conclusion: Use of CADe can increase radiologist sensitivity 10% with a comparable increase in recall rate. There is potential for CADe to have a bigger clinical impact because radiologists failed to recognize a correct computer prompt in 71% of missed cancer cases [corrected].

Published
2012
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results