Search

Objectives: This study conducted a network meta-analysis comparing linezolid, teicoplanin, daptomycin, tigecycline, and ceftaroline fosamil with vancomycin for treating MRSA-related diseases, addressing the lack of comprehensive evaluations in existing research on antibiotic therapy for MRSA infections., Methods: We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Librar up to August 22, 2023. All eligible randomized controlled trials of the six antibiotics were included in the NMA, and their effectiveness and safety were compared across various MRSA-related diseases. Categorical data were used for the odds ratio (OR), and continuous data were used for mean difference (SMD). The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) was employed to evaluate the incidence rate., Results: According to SUCRA results, daptomycin was the most effective treatment (73.0%) in bloodstream infections. In pulmonary infections and skin and soft tissue infections, linezolid out-performed other antibiotics in effectiveness rate (90.6% and 86.3%), microbial killing rate (93.3% and 93.1%). Vancomycin showed lower adverse reactions than teicoplanin, with less hepatotoxicity compared to linezolid and tigecycline. Linezolid had higher thrombocytopenia risk but lower nephrotoxicity risk than others. Vancomycin was less effective in microbial killing rates than linezolid across various infections., Conclusion: The present research suggests that in pulmonary infections and skin and soft tissue infections, linezolid may be a better option for treating MRSA-related diseases. However, caution is warranted due to the association of linezolid with thrombocytopenia., Trial Registration: Our study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of SystematicReviews (PROSPERO); Registration number: CRD42024535142., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The concentrations of linezolid, its optimal regimen and the associated side effects in elderly patients remain unclear., Methods: In this multicentre, prospective study, elderly patients receiving linezolid at four tertiary hospitals in Beijing between May 2021 and December 2022 were included. Linezolid concentrations and haematological toxicity were monitored dynamically. Risk factors for linezolid overexposure and moderate-to-severe linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia (M/S LIT) were analysed, and a predictive model of M/S LIT was developed., Results: A total of 860 linezolid concentrations were measured in 313 patients. The median trough concentrations of linezolid were 24.4 (15.3, 35.8) mg/L at 36-72 h and 26.1 (17.0, 38.1) mg/L at 5-10 days (P = 0.132). Severe linezolid exposure was independently associated with age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the worst SOFA score (SOFA1), and we further recommended dose regimens for elderly patients based on these findings. The incidences of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia(LIT) and M/S LIT were 73.5% and 47.6%, respectively. M/S LIT was independently correlated with treatment duration, average trough concentration (TDMa), baseline platelet count, eGFR and baseline SOFA score (SOFA0). The developed nomogram predicted M/S LIT with an area under the curve of 0.767 (95% CI 0.715-0.820), a sensitivity of 71.1% and a specificity of 73.2%., Conclusions: Linezolid trough concentrations increased dramatically in the elderly, by about 10 mg/L in patients aged 65-80 years, followed by a further increase of 10 mg/L for every 10 years of age. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in elderly patients receiving linezolid. The developed nomogram may predict M/S LIT and guide dosage adjustments of linezolid. Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100045707., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Purpose: To investigate the pharmacokinetic changes of linezolid in patients with hepatic impairment and to explore a method to predict linezolid exposure., Methods: Patients with hepatic impairment who received linezolid were recruited. A population pharmacokinetic model (PPK) was then built using NONMEM software. And based on the final model, virtual patients with rich concentration values was constructed through Monte Carlo simulations (MCS), which were used to build machine learning (ML) models to predict linezolid exposure levels. Finally, we investigated the risk factors for thrombocytopenia in patients included., Results: A PPK model with population typical values of 3.83 L/h and 34.1 L for clearance and volume of distribution was established, and the severe hepatic impairment was identified as a significant covariate of clearance. Then, we built a series of ML models to predict the area under 0 -24 h concentration-time curve (AUC 0-24 ) of linezolid based on virtual patients from MCS. The results showed that the Xgboost models showed the best predictive performance and were superior to the methods for estimating linezolid AUC 0-24 based on though concentration or daily dose. Finally, we found that baseline platelet count, linezolid AUC 0-24 , and combination with fluoroquinolones were independent risk factors for thrombocytopenia, and based on this, we proposed a method for calculating the toxicity threshold of linezolid., Conclusion: In this study, we successfully constructed a PPK model for patients with hepatic impairment and used ML algorithm to estimate linezolid AUC 0-24 based on limited data. Finally, we provided a method to determine the toxicity threshold of linezolid., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Detailed data on safety associated with drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between Linezolid (LZD) and other antibiotics are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety signals related to these DDIs and to provide a reference for clinically related adverse drug event monitoring. Adverse event (AE) information from 1 January 2004 to 16 June 2022 of the target antibiotics including LZD using alone or in combination with LZD was extracted from the OpenVigil FDA data platform for safety signal analysis. The combined risk ratio model, reporting ratio method, Ω shrinkage measure model, and chi-square statistics model were used to analyze the safety signals related to DDIs. Meanwhile, we evaluated the correlation and the influence of sex and age between the drug(s) and the target AE detected. There were 18991 AEs related to LZD. There were 2293, 1726, 4449, 821, 2431, 1053, and 463 AE reports when LZD was combined with amikacin, voriconazole, meropenem, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and azithromycin, respectively. Except for azithromycin, there were positive safety signals related to DDIs between LZD and these antibiotics. These DDIs might influence the incidence of 13, 16, 7, 7, 6, and 15 types of AEs, respectively, and is associated with higher reporting rates of AEs compared with use alone. Moreover, sex and age might influence the occurrence of AEs. We found that the combinations of LZD and other antibiotics are related to multiple AEs, such as hepatotoxicity, drug resistance and electrocardiogram QT prolonged, but further research is still required to investigate their underlying mechanisms. This study can provide a new reference for the safety monitoring of LZD combined with other antibiotics in clinical practice., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Thrombocytopenia, a common adverse effect of linezolid, often occurs in patients lacking typical risk factors. In this study, we investigated the key risk factors for linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia using two real-world clinical databases and explored its underlying mechanism through in vitro and in vivo experiments. In a retrospective analysis of 150 linezolid-treated patients, multivariate analysis identified coadministration of lansoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, as a significant independent risk factor for thrombocytopenia (odds ratio: 2.33, p = 0.034). Additionally, analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database revealed a reporting odds ratio of thrombocytopenia for lansoprazole of 1.64 (95% CI: 1.25-2.16). In vitro studies showed that the uptake of PNU-142586, a major linezolid metabolite, was significantly higher in human organic anion transporter 3-expressing HEK293 (HEK-hOAT3) cells compared to HEK-pBK cells. The apparent IC 50 value of lansoprazole against hOAT3-mediated transport of PNU-142586 was 0.59 ± 0.38 µM. In a pharmacokinetic study using rats, coadministration of linezolid with lansoprazole intravenously resulted in approximately a 1.7-fold increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of PNU-142586, but not linezolid and PNU-142300. Moreover, PNU-142586, but not linezolid, exhibited concentration-dependent cytotoxicity in a human megakaryocytic cell line. These findings suggest that linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia should be due to delayed elimination of PNU-142586. Furthermore, delayed elimination of PNU-142586 due to renal failure and hOAT3-mediated transport inhibition by lansoprazole should exacerbate linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Mycetoma is a chronic granulomatous infectious disease with a triad of subcutaneous swelling, discharging sinuses and the presence of granules. The infection may occur following minor trauma or penetrating thorn injury. We report a case of a man in his 40s with a history of thorn prick 9 years ago, followed by the formation of painless discharging sinuses on the right foot for the past 2 years. Clinical, local epidemiological, histopathological examination and Gram stain confirmed the diagnosis of actinomycetoma. Prior to initiating the Welsh regimen, a pretreatment assessment of the patient's auditory function was conducted through pure tone audiometry, indicating the existence of pre-existing high-frequency bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The patient was treated with linezolid as an alternative to amikacin, at a dosage of 600 mg two times per day, leading to complete resolution within 3 weeks. This underscores linezolid's efficacy as a safe and cost-effective alternative for actinomycetoma, without causing ototoxic side effects., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Nausea and vomiting during linezolid therapy have been reported as part of safety analyses in clinical trials. We have previously examined the incidence of vomiting during linezolid therapy (18.1%). A previous study conducted at a single hospital showed low external validity. It is necessary to verify whether these results can be reproduced using generalizable data sources., Aim: To evaluate the incidence of nausea and vomiting during linezolid therapy compared with vancomycin using a Japanese claims database., Method: Patients administered linezolid or vancomycin were selected from the database between January 2005 and June 2017. The primary endpoint was the comparison of nausea and vomiting between the linezolid and vancomycin groups. We conducted propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for patient characteristics. To assess risk factors for nausea and vomiting, logistic regression was conducted as the secondary endpoint. We defined nausea and vomiting as the first prescription of antiemetics during linezolid or vancomycin therapy as a surrogate endpoint., Results: In total, 1215 patients were enrolled. After PSM, the number of patients in the linezolid and vancomycin groups was 241. Nausea and vomiting were observed in 11.2% and 5.0% of patients in the linezolid and vancomycin groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Linezolid administration was extracted as a risk factor for nausea and vomiting (odds ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-4.30)., Conclusion: This study clarified the relationship between linezolid and nausea and vomiting using a Japanese claims database. Further studies are required to elucidate the unknown mechanisms of linezolid-induced nausea and vomiting., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Electronic health records (EHRs) provide meaningful knowledge of drug-related adverse events (AEs) that are not captured in standard drug development and postmarketing surveillance. Using variables obtained from EHR data in the University of California San Francisco de-identified Clinical Data Warehouse, we aimed to evaluate the potential of machine learning to predict two hematological AEs, thrombocytopenia and anemia, in a cohort of patients treated with linezolid for 3 or more days. Features for model input were extracted at linezolid initiation (index), and outcomes were characterized from index to 14 days post-treatment. Random forest classification (RFC) was used for AE prediction, and reduced feature models were evaluated using cumulative importance (cImp) for feature selection. Grade 3+ thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred in 31% of 2,171 and 56% of 2,170 evaluable patients, respectively. Of the total 53 features, as few as 7 contributed at least 50% cImp, resulting in prediction accuracies of 70% or higher and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.886 for grade 3+ thrombocytopenia and 0.759 for grade 3+ anemia. Sensitivity analyses in strictly defined patient subgroups revealed similarly high predictive performance in full and reduced feature models. A logistic regression model with the same 50% cImp features showed similar predictive performance as RFC and good concordance with RFC probability predictions after isotonic calibration, adding interpretability. Collectively, this work demonstrates potential for machine learning prediction of AE risk in real-world patients using few variables regularly available in EHRs, which may aid in clinical decision making and/or monitoring., (© 2024 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: Effectiveness, safety, tolerability, and adherence are critical considerations in shifting to shorter tuberculosis (TB) regimens. Novel 6-month oral regimens that include bedaquiline (B), pretomanid (Pa), and linezolid (L), with or without a fourth drug, have been shown to be as or more effective than the established longer regimens for the treatment of multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB). We aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of linezolid in BPaL-containing regimens for the treatment of MDR/RR-TB among recently completed clinical trials., Methods: A review and meta-analysis was undertaken including published and unpublished data from clinical trials, conducted between 2010 and 2021, that evaluated regimens containing BPaL for the treatment of MDR/RR-TB. Individual patient data were obtained. For each BPaL-containing regimen, we evaluated the frequency and severity of treatment-related adverse events. The risk difference of adverse events for each regimen was calculated, in comparison to patients assigned to receiving the lowest cumulative exposure of linezolid., Results: Data from 3 clinical trials investigating 8 unique BPaL-containing regimens were included, comprising a total of 591 participants. Adverse events were more frequent in groups randomized to a higher cumulative linezolid dose. Among patients who were randomized to a daily dose of 1200 mg linezolid, 68 of 195 (35%) experienced a grade 3-4 adverse event versus 89 of 396 (22%) patients receiving BPaL-containing regimens containing 600 mg linezolid., Conclusions: Regimens containing BPaL were relatively well tolerated when they included a daily linezolid dose of 600 mg. These novel regimens promise to improve the tolerability of treatment for MDR/RR-TB., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. E. E., S. F., and M. L. were employed by TB Alliance and B.-T. N., I. M., and C. B. were employed by Médecins sans Frontières during the respective trials. M. G., F. M., and S. S. are members of the sponsor (WHO) and contributed to the writing of this publication but not to data collection or analysis. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background and Objective: Oral linezolid is often used as alternative therapy for intravenous vancomycin. According to the current guidelines, no dose adjustment has to be made in case of renal impairment. Nevertheless, in our hospital we have seen several patients with renal impairment who developed linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia when linezolid was taken in the standard dose. In this case series and review we want to emphasize the necessity of reviewing the Dutch and international guidelines., Methods: We describe five cases with renal impairment that developed linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in our hospital. A PubMed literature review was conducted to identify other cases and find the optimal dosing regimen for these patients., Results: Our cases join a long list of cases and available literature about linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with renal impairment. Less linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia was found, both in our cases and in the literature, after dose reduction of 50%. High linezolid trough concentrations were associated with a higher risk of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia. Besides renal impairment, other risk factors for developing linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia were also identified, such as low body weight, high daily dose/kg, higher age, longer duration of therapy, low baseline count, malignity, low-dose aspirin and interacting co-medication., Conclusion: Re-evaluation of the current dose advice is necessary. We advocate for a standard dose reduction to 50% after 2 days of standard dosing for all patients with an estimated glomerular filtration of <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Besides this, therapeutic drug monitoring and thrombocytes monitoring may be executed weekly when patients have renal impairment or other risk factors for developing linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the association between drug exposure and adverse events (AEs) during the standardized multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment, as well as to identify predictive drug exposure thresholds., Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational multicenter study among participants receiving standardized MDR-TB treatment between 2016 and 2019 in China. AEs were monitored throughout the treatment and their relationships to drug exposure (e.g., the area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h, AUC 0-24 h ) were analyzed. The thresholds of pharmacokinetic predictors of observed AEs were identified by boosted classification and regression tree (CART) and further evaluated by external validation., Results: Of 197 study participants, 124 (62.9%) had at least one AE, and 15 (7.6%) experienced serious AEs. The association between drug exposure and AEs was observed including bedaquiline, its metabolite M2, moxifloxacin and QTcF prolongation (QTcF >450 ms), linezolid and mitochondrial toxicity, cycloserine and psychiatric AEs. The CART-derived thresholds of AUC 0-24 h predictive of the respective AEs were 3.2 mg·h/l (bedaquiline M2); 49.3 mg·h/l (moxifloxacin); 119.3 mg·h/l (linezolid); 718.7 mg·h/l (cycloserine)., Conclusions: This study demonstrated the drug exposure thresholds predictive of AEs for key drugs against MDR-TB treatment. Using the derived thresholds will provide the knowledge base for further randomized clinical trials of dose adjustment to minimize the risk of AEs., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Linezolid (LZD) plays an important role in the treatment of severe infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Thrombocytopenia is regarded as one of the most common side effects of linezolid, which results from the destruction of platelets or myelosuppression. The study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with the development of thrombocytopenia in Vietnamese patients., Methodology: This retrospective, descriptive cross-sectional study was performed on adult patients who received parenteral LZD therapy (1,200 mg/day) in at least 3 days between January 2020 and June 2021 at a tertiary referral hospital in Vietnam. Thrombocytopenia was defined as either a final platelet count of less than 100 G/L or a 25% decrease in platelet count from baseline. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to predict risk factors associated with LZD-induced thrombocytopenia., Results: In the 208 patients included in the study, the average age was 69 and males accounted for 73.1%. LZD-induced thrombocytopenia occurred in 37% of patients. LZD-induced thrombocytopenia was significantly associated with shock (HR = 8.26, 95% CI 3.82 - 17.84, p < 0.001), baseline creatinine clearance (HR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.01 - 1.03], p = 0.002), and duration of LZD treatment of at least 14 days (HR = 4.45, 95% CI [1.83 - 11.05], p = 0.001)., Conclusions: The results showed that thrombocytopenia was fairly common in patients using linezolid. Shock, renal failure, and duration of linezolid therapy of at least 14 days were significant risk factors for the incidence of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia., Competing Interests: No Conflict of Interest is declared, (Copyright (c) 2024 Le Thi Phuong Thao, Nguyen Duc Trung, Le Thi My, Le Minh Hong, Bui Viet Hoan, Vu Quang Hung, Pham Dang Hai.)

Objectives: Linezolid is the first oxazolidinone antimicrobial agent developed for treating multi-drug-resistant gram-positive bacterial infections. The study aimed to investigate the risk factors of linezolid (LI)-induced thrombocytopenia (LI-TP) and to develop and validate a risk prediction model to identify elderly patients at high risk of developing LI-TP during linezolid therapy., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at Zhongshan Hospital, FuDan University, China. The study involved elderly Chinese patients aged ≥65 years administered with linezolid (600 mg) twice a day between January 2015 and April 2021. We collected the patients' clinical characteristics and demographic data from electronic medical records, and compared the differences between LI-TP patients and those who had not developed thrombocytopenia (NO-TP) after linezolid treatment. The risk prediction model was developed based on the regression coefficient generated from logistic regression model., Results: A total of 343 inpatients were enrolled from January 2015 to August 2020 and were used as the training set. Among them, 67 (19.5%) developed LI-TP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that baseline platelet counts <150×10 9 ·L -1 (odds ratio (OR)=3.576; p<0.001), age ≥75 years (OR=2.258; p=0.009), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR <60 mL·(min·1.73 m2) -1 (OR=2.553; p=0.002), duration of linezolid therapy ≥10 d (OR=3.218; p<0.001), intensive care unit (ICU) admittance (OR=2.682; p=0.004), concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam (OR=3.863; p=0.006) were independent risk factors for LI-TP in elderly patients. The LI-TP risk prediction model was established using a scoring method based on the regression coefficient and exhibited a good discriminative power, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.795 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.740 to 0.851) and 0.849 (95% CI 0.760 to 0.939) in the training set (n=343) and validation set (n=90) respectively., Conclusions: These findings indicate that duration of linezolid therapy, age, eGFR, ICU admittance, baseline platelet counts, concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam were significantly associated with LI-TP in elderly patients. A risk prediction model based on these risk factors showed a good discriminative performance and may be useful for clinicians to identify patients at high risk of developing LI-TP., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Linezolid is a commonly prescribed antibiotic in clinical practice. Although thrombocytopenia and peripheral neuropathy are frequently encountered following prolonged administration of linezolid, lactic acidosis is a rare adverse drug reaction. We present the case of a patient on linezolid for disseminated multidrug-resistant tuberculosis who presented with vomiting, dyspnoea, hypotension and high anion gap metabolic acidosis. The initial presentation mimicked sepsis syndrome. Ketoacidosis and renal dysfunction were ruled out. There was no history of ingestion of toxins/toxic alcohols. Sepsis was unlikely because extensive radiological and microbiological testing could not identify an infection. Given the possibility of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis (LILA), linezolid was discontinued on admission. The patient's lactic acidosis resolved, and his overall condition improved. A retrospective diagnosis of LILA was thus established. LILA should be considered when patients on linezolid present with lactic acidosis and other causes for the lactic acidosis have been ruled out., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Linezolid is the first and only oxazolidinone antibacterial drug was approved in the last 35 years. It exhibits bacteriostatic efficacy against M. tuberculosis and is a crucial constituent of the BPaL regimen (Bedaquiline, Pretomanid, and Linezolid), which was authorized by the FDA in 2019 for the treatment of XDR-TB or MDR-TB. Despite its unique mechanism of action, Linezolid carries a considerable risk of toxicity, including myelosuppression and serotonin syndrome (SS), which is caused by inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis (MPS) and monoamine oxidase (MAO), respectively. Based on the structure toxicity relationship (STR) of Linezolid, in this work, we used a bioisosteric replacement approach to optimize the structure of Linezolid at the C-ring and/or C-5 position for myelosuppression and serotogenic toxicity. Extensive hierarchical multistep docking, drug likeness prediction, molecular binding interactions analyses, and toxicity assessment identified three promising compounds ( 3071 , 7549 and 9660 ) as less toxic potential modulators of Mtb EthR protein. Compounds 3071 , 7549 and 9660 were having the significant docking score of -12.696 Kcal/mol, -12.681 Kcal/mol and -15.293 Kcal/mol towards the Mtb EthR protein with less MAO-A and B affinity [compound 3071 : MAO A (-4.799 Kcal/mol) and MAO B (-6.552 Kcal/mol); compound 7549 : MAO A (> -2.00 Kcal/mol) and MAO B (> -2.00 Kcal/mol) and compound 9660 : MAO A (> -5.678 Kcal/mol) and MAO B (> -6.537Kcal/mol) and none of them shown the Leukopenia as a side effect due to the Myelosuppression. The MD simulation results and binding free energy estimations correspond well with docking analyses, indicating that the proposed compounds bind and inhibit the EthR protein more effectively than Linezolid. The quantum mechanical and electrical characteristics were evaluated using density functional theory (DFT), which also demonstrated that the proposed compounds are more reactive than Linezolid.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Aims: Bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid (BPaL) combination treatment against Mycobacterium tuberculosis is promising, yet safety and adherence concerns exist that motivate exploration of alternative dosing regimens. We developed a mechanistic modelling framework to compare the efficacy of the current and alternative BPaL treatment strategies., Methods: Pharmacodynamic models for each drug in the BPaL combination treatment were developed using in vitro time-kill data. These models were combined with pharmacokinetic models, incorporating body weight, lesion volume, site-of-action distribution, bacterial susceptibility and pharmacodynamic interactions to assemble the framework. The model was qualified by comparing the simulations against the observed clinical data. Simulations were performed evaluating bedaquiline and linezolid approved (bedaquiline 400 mg once daily [QD] for 14 days followed by 200 mg three times a week, linezolid 1200 mg QD) and alternative dosing regimens (bedaquiline 200 mg QD, linezolid 600 mg QD)., Results: The framework adequately described the observed antibacterial activity data in patients following monotherapy for each drug and approved BPaL dosing. The simulations suggested a minor difference in median time to colony forming unit (CFU)-clearance state with the bedaquiline alternative compared to the approved dosing and the linezolid alternative compared to the approved dosing. Median time to non-replicating-clearance state was predicted to be 15 days from the CFU-clearance state., Conclusions: The model-based simulations suggested that comparable efficacy can be achieved using alternative bedaquiline and linezolid dosing, which may improve safety and adherence in drug-resistant tuberculosis patients. The framework can be utilized to evaluate treatment optimization approaches, including dosing regimen and duration of treatment predictions to eradicate both replicating- and non-replicating bacteria from lung and lesions., (© 2023 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

World Health Organization (WHO) issued the latest recommendations regarding the management of drug-resistant Tuberculosis (TB) in 2022, allowing the replacement of ethambutol (6 months) with linezolid (2 months). This recommendation also introduced a new regimen, namely bedaquiline, pretomanide, linezolid, moxifloxacin (BPaLM) for fluoroquinolone-sensitive patients and bedaquiline, pretomanide, linezolid, (BPaL) for patients insensitive to fluoroquinolone (6-9 months). The latest TB regimen introduced by WHO provides a shorter-course treatment, however not much has been discussed about the impact of this new regimen on chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, particularly on hemodialysis (HD). The condition of CKD can interfere with the pharmacokinetics of TB medication, thus could reduce effectiveness and increase toxicity. The drugs used on this new regimen are mostly safe for renal impairment patients due to the dominant metabolism in the liver. Particular precaution is given to the administration of linezolid due to increased hematology side effects and bedaquiline with the side effect of QTC interval lengthening and increased risk of arrhythmias. Although this regimen research has not been in many studies in renal failure patients, no significant side effects nor kidney damage evidence was found. This remains to be proven by more research on the patient population with renal failure., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have none to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Tuberculosis Association of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Monitoring and managing adverse drug reactions (ADR) are critical for treating drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB)., Objective: To study symptomatic, linezolid-attributable ADRs in TB patients initiated on all oral longer bedaquiline-based treatment regime for multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant (MDR/RR)-TB under programmatic conditions., Methods: It was a multicenter, retrospective study of people with MDR/RR-TB in nine TB units in Nagpur, India, from March 2020 to April 2022., Results: The study consisted of a sample size of 106 individuals with multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis out of a total of 110 individuals with the disease. Of these, 45 (42.45%) experienced linezolid ADRs, with an incidence of 11.37 cases per 1000 person-weeks. These patients were significantly younger (31.24 ± 11.13 years) and more likely to be female (27, 50%) than those without ADRs. ADR severity was mild in 20 (44.45%), moderate in 15 (33.33%), and severe in 10 (22.22%) patients. The most common ADR was peripheral neuropathy (42, 93.33%), followed by lactic acidosis (3, 6.67%), anemia (2, 4.44%), and optic neuritis (2, 4.44%). Dosing was reduced in 17 (37.78%) patients, and linezolid was withdrawn entirely in 19 (42.22%) patients. Only 9 (20%) patients continued linezolid unmodified. For mild to moderate linezolid-associated symptomatic peripheral neuropathy, symptom management with or without dose reduction is an effective strategy; however, immediate linezolid withdrawal is necessary in severe or life-threatening peripheral neuropathy cases. After a mean follow-up of 41 ± 21.33 weeks, ADR symptoms resolved completely in 4 (6.67%) patients and decreased in 42 (93.33%) patients., Conclusion: Linezolid ADRs, often neuropathy, frequently occur in patients on an all-oral bedaquiline-based treatment regime for MDR/RR-TB. Women and younger patients are more likely to experience these ADRs, usually mild to moderate in severity. Management of symptomatic linezolid-associated peripheral neuropathy should be based on ADR severity. These ADRs often affect linezolid dosing, so it is important to identify and manage them early., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors have none to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Tuberculosis Association of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In developing countries like India, Linezolid is widely used for the treatment of Multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB). Long-term administration of Linezolid is reported to cause toxic optic neuropathy causing bilateral, progressive visual loss in patients. We report case details of three patients on anti-tubercular therapy presented to us with sudden, progressive, painless blurring of vision of both eyes the cause of which was confirmed to be toxic optic neuropathy due to linezolid. Subsequently, cessation of the drug resulted in complete visual recovery in two patients whereas one patient had minimal visual improvement due to secondary optic atrophy. Clinicians and health care workers need to be aware of sight threatening complications of Linezolid., (Copyright © 2023 Tuberculosis Association of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be a global challenge. Reducing the duration of TB treatment for drug-sensitive TB (DSTB) has direct and distinct advantages. We ventured into the aspect of utilizing linezolid as a pivotal drug in shortening therapy in DSTB. Linezolid has gained prominence as it is faring well in resistant TB management. Only a few studies use the strategy of Linezolid in DS-TB but it seems a lucrative approach, the bactericidal effects have been reported favourably in the studies. There have been concerns about the potential adverse drug effects of Linezolid reported but clinical trials have demonstrated safety and tolerability when administered for shorter periods. If the safety and efficacy of giving Linezolid for a shorter period along with standard drugs for DSTB is established it could lead to newer avenues using Linezolid for shortening the duration of treatment for DSTB as an alternative to treat DSTB., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare nil conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of linezolid-containing regimens for treatment of M. abscessus pulmonary disease., Methods: The records of 336 patients with M. abscessus pulmonary disease who were admitted to Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 164 patients received a linezolid-containing regimen and 172 controls did not. The effectiveness, safety, antibiotic susceptibility profiles, outcomes, culture conversion, cavity closure, and adverse reactions were compared in these two groups., Results: The two groups had similar treatment success (56.1% vs. 48.8%; P > 0.05), but treatment duration was shorter in the linezolid group (16.0 months [inter-quartile ranges, IQR: 15.0-17.0] vs. 18.0 months [IQR: 16.0-18.0]; P < 0.01). The rates of sputum culture conversion were similar (53.7% vs. 46.5%, P > 0.05), but time to conversion was shorter in the linezolid group (3.5 months [IQR: 2.5-4.4] vs. 5.5 months [IQR: 4.0-6.8]; P < 0.01). The linezolid group had a higher rate of cavity closure (55.2% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.05) and a shorter time to cavity closure (3.5 months [IQR: 2.5-4.4] vs. 5.5 months [IQR: 4.0-6.8]; P < 0.01). Anemia and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the linezolid group (17.7% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.01; 12.8% vs. 0.6%, P < 0.01)., Conclusions: The linezolid and control groups had similar treatment success rates. The linezolid group had a shorter treatment duration, shorter time to sputum culture conversion, and higher rate and shorter time to lung cavity closure. More patients receiving linezolid developed anemia and peripheral neuropathy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

BACKGROUND Cutaneous adverse drug reactions are the skin's response to a systemic exposure to drugs. Linezolid is an oral oxazolidine used to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Even though it has well-known adverse effects, purpuric cutaneous adverse drug reactions to linezolid have been scarcely described. This report is of a Puerto Rican man in his 80s who developed an extensive purpuric drug eruption secondary to linezolid use. Clinicians should be aware of this phenomenon, since prompt identification and discontinuation of the agent are essential for recovery. CASE REPORT An 89-year-old Puerto Rican man was given oral linezolid therapy for healthcare-associated pneumonia and developed a widespread, purpuric cutaneous eruption 5 days into therapy. His condition prompted immediate discontinuation of the drug. Forty-eight hours after stopping the medication, he visited the Emergency Department. Abdominal punch biopsy revealed a superficial and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with dermal eosinophils, a pathologic finding consistent with a purpuric drug eruption. This allowed for a timely diagnosis, exclusion of other mimickers, such as cutaneous vasculitis, and effective management. CONCLUSIONS Cutaneous adverse drug reactions to linezolid have been scarcely reported in the literature. Due to the low incidence of this manifestation, the identification of the causative agent and accompanying treatment may be delayed. Mainstays in therapy are avoidance of the offending agent and treatment with corticosteroids, antihistamines, barrier ointments, and oral analgesics. Primary healthcare providers should be aware of linezolid-induced cutaneous manifestations, diagnostic clues, and treatment options so they can rapidly identify and effectively treat such complications.

Rationale: Linezolid itself is rarely reported to cause blood pressure elevation, and it is rare to report that linezolid causes hypertensive urgency., Patients Concerns: This case report describes a 38-year-old man who developed acute hypertension after a postoperative foot infection that was treated with linezolid antitherapy. Hypertensive urgency occurred without obvious potential interaction between linezolid and drugs. After receiving appropriate treatment and stopping medication, the patient's blood pressure returned to normal and did not recur., Diagnoses: Hypertensive crises occurred during the treatment of linezolid., Interventions: After stopping linezolid, the patient's blood pressure gradually returned to normal., Outcomes: The patient's blood pressure returned to normal on the 26th day after stopping linezolid, and no abnormal blood pressure was found in the follow-up 2 months after discharge., Lessons: Linezolid is rarely reported to cause elevated blood pressure, even though it may occur in the absence of obvious drug interactions. Case reported fewer reasons may be for clinicians statistically insignificant or notice, and hypertensive urgency often lead to clinical risk, should be given enough attention to clinical. Pay attention to blood pressure monitoring during use, when there is abnormal increase in blood pressure, should consider adverse drug reactions, give timely discontinuation and give symptomatic treatment., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

BACKGROUND: Linezolid (LZD) is a key treatment option for patients with multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB). We investigated the long-term treatment outcomes and safety of MDR/RR-TB treatment using low-dose LZD. METHODS: Medical records of patients with MDR/RR-TB treated with LZD ≥4 weeks between 2004 and 2018 at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea, were reviewed. Standard-dose and low-dose LZD groups were defined as patients initially administered LZD ≥600 mg/day or 300 mg/day, respectively. RESULTS: Among 94 patients, 65 were included in the low-dose LZD group; mean age was 43.1 ± 15.6 years, 53 (56.4%) were men and 77 (83.7%) were resistant to fluoroquinolone. The low-dose LZD group showed features of less severe disease, such as limited MDR-TB history and less severe radiological findings. There was no difference in treatment outcomes, relapse and safety between groups. In the low-dose LZD group, 54 (83.1%) succeeded treatment, of whom 48 (88.9%) were followed-up for a median of 38 months; there was no recurrence. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 41 (63.1%); peripheral neuropathy was most frequently reported ( n = 31, 47.7%), while myelosuppression was reported in 12 (18.5%). CONCLUSION: Low-dose LZD in selected patients with less severe disease is both effective in the long-term and safe for the treatment of MDR/RR-TB.

Background: Treatment for fluoroquinolone-resistant multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR TB) often lasts longer than treatment for less resistant strains, yields worse efficacy results, and causes substantial toxicity. The newer anti-tuberculosis drugs, bedaquiline and delamanid, and repurposed drugs clofazimine and linezolid, show great promise for combination in shorter, less-toxic, and effective regimens. To date, there has been no randomized, internally and concurrently controlled trial of a shorter, all-oral regimen comprising these newer and repurposed drugs sufficiently powered to produce results for pre-XDR TB patients., Methods: endTB-Q is a phase III, multi-country, randomized, controlled, parallel, open-label clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a treatment strategy for patients with pre-XDR TB. Study participants are randomized 2:1 to experimental or control arms, respectively. The experimental arm contains bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine, and delamanid. The control comprises the contemporaneous WHO standard of care for pre-XDR TB. Experimental arm duration is determined by a composite of smear microscopy and chest radiographic imaging at baseline and re-evaluated at 6 months using sputum culture results: participants with less extensive disease receive 6 months and participants with more extensive disease receive 9 months of treatment. Randomization is stratified by country and by participant extent-of-TB-disease phenotype defined according to screening/baseline characteristics. Study participation lasts up to 104 weeks post randomization. The primary objective is to assess whether the efficacy of experimental regimens at 73 weeks is non-inferior to that of the control. A sample size of 324 participants across 2 arms affords at least 80% power to show the non-inferiority, with a one-sided alpha of 0.025 and a non-inferiority margin of 12%, against the control in both modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations., Discussion: This internally controlled study of shortened treatment for pre-XDR TB will provide urgently needed data and evidence for clinical and policy decision-making around the treatment of pre-XDR TB with a four-drug, all-oral, shortened regimen., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT03896685. Registered on 1 April 2018; the record was last updated for study protocol version 4.3 on 17 March 2023., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Antibiotic treatment for bone and joint infections generally lasts for 6 weeks or longer. Linezolid may be a good option for treating bone and joint infections, but there is an increased risk of potential serious adverse drug events (ADEs) when used for more than 28 days. The aim of this study was to obtain detailed information on the type and time to occurrence of the patient-reported ADEs, the dynamics of haematopoiesis over time, and the reasons for early discontinuation of linezolid when used for an intended maximum duration of 12 weeks., Methods: This single-centre retrospective study was conducted at the Sint Maartenskliniek in The Netherlands. Patients were included if they were planned to use linezolid for more than 28 days. The main reason for discontinuation of linezolid, the ADE according to the Naranjo score, and the time to occurrence of ADEs were analysed., Results: Among 78 patients, drug toxicity led to early discontinuation of linezolid in 11 (14%) patients before and nine (12%) after 28 days of therapy. The median treatment duration was 42 days. Gastrointestinal intolerance (42%) and malaise (32%) were the most common ADEs. In 75% of the cases the ADE occurred within 28 days of therapy. Sixty-seven patients were able to continue linezolid beyond 28 days, 87% of whom completed therapy as scheduled. Severe cytopenia, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events (CTCA), was observed in four patients and was reversible after discontinuation of linezolid. One patient suffered optic neuropathy related to linezolid use., Conclusions: Linezolid could be considered an alternative option to the current standard of IV glycopeptides for the treatment of bone and joint infection for up to 12 weeks. If patients pass the first 28 days of therapy, the likelihood of successful completion of therapy is high with a low risk of serious ADEs., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Purpose of Review: In this article, we reviewed 67 reported cases of linezolid optic neuropathy and describe the common characteristics and expectations for recovery with an emphasis on recent findings in the literature., Recent Findings: Linezolid classically causes a reversible, duration-dependent optic neuropathy. However, in our review, we found only 66.7% of patients recovered complete visual function. Vision loss most commonly affected visual acuity followed by visual field and color vision. We also found patients taking higher doses of linezolid experienced full recovery less often, suggesting a dose-dependent component of linezolid optic neuropathy. Linezolid use has increased in frequency and duration, especially in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis, and data indicate that these patients experience lower rates of complete vision recovery compared with patients taking linezolid for other indications., Summary: Linezolid is an effective medication for treating drug-resistant infections; however, it may result in optic neuropathy. It is reasonable for patients on linezolid to undergo screening examinations, especially those on higher doses or for prolonged duration of therapy., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rifampin-resistant tuberculosis is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide; only one-third of persons start treatment, and outcomes are often inadequate. Several trials demonstrate 90% efficacy using an all-oral, 6-month regimen of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL), but significant toxicity occurred using 1200-mg linezolid. After US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2019, some US clinicians rapidly implemented BPaL using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose adjusted by serum drug concentrations and clinical monitoring., Methods: Data from US patients treated with BPaL between 14 October 2019 and 30 April 2022 were compiled and analyzed by the BPaL Implementation Group (BIG), including baseline examination and laboratory, electrocardiographic, and clinical monitoring throughout treatment and follow-up. Linezolid dosing and clinical management was provider driven, and most patients had linezolid adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring., Results: Of 70 patients starting BPaL, 2 changed to rifampin-based therapy, 68 (97.1%) completed BPaL, and 2 of the 68 (2.9%) experienced relapse after completion. Using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose daily adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring and careful clinical and laboratory monitoring for adverse effects, supportive care, and expert consultation throughout BPaL treatment, 3 patients (4.4%) with hematologic toxicity and 4 (5.9%) with neurotoxicity required a change in linezolid dose or frequency. The median BPaL duration was 6 months., Conclusions: BPaL has transformed treatment for rifampin-resistant or intolerant tuberculosis. In this cohort, effective treatment required less than half the duration recommended in 2019 US guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Use of individualized linezolid dosing and monitoring likely enhanced safety and treatment completion. The BIG cohort demonstrates that early implementation of new tuberculosis treatments in the United States is feasible., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. C. A. H. reports honoraria from the Infectious Diseases Society of America for an IDWeek 2022 presentation, travel support from the University of Employer, and Pfizer stock ownership. M. C. S. reports grants from the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (R21MD017943-01; Neighborhood transportation vulnerability and geographic patterns of diabetes-related limb loss) and the American Diabetes Association (Diabetic Ulcer Computational Sensing System), paid to the institution, and payment from the Society for Advancement in Wound Care for speaking at the 2023 spring meeting. D. A. reports a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as the primary investigator of TB Centers of Excellence, travel support from the CDC, and participation in the CDC's Tuberculosis Trials Consortium data and safety monitoring board. L. C. reports grants from USAID (federal award to institution for global research capacity building) and the California Department of Public Health (training award to institution for pandemic response); an unpaid position as president of the Executive Leadership Board for the North American Region Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases; and an unpaid position on the coordinating board of STOP TB USA. M. B. D reports institutional contracts with the CDC and Westat. A. V. E. reports travel support for meetings from the CDC. K. A. R. reports grants and travel support from the CDC’s Division of TB Elimination and a position as the liaison for the National Association of County and City Health Officials to the Advisory Committee for the Elimination of Tuberculosis. M. C. R. reports travel support for meeting from Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) and positions as chair of the APHL Infectious Diseases Committee and member of the APHL Tuberculosis Subcommittee and the College of American Pathologists Microbiology Committee. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: The incidence of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia (LIT) has been reported to vary widely across studies. We performed a meta-analysis to identify the risk factors for thrombocytopenia among patients who received linezolid treatment., Methods: The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to November 2022 to identify eligible studies. Data on the potential predictors of incidence in LIT were pooled using a random effects model. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the robustness of the results when significant heterogeneity was observed., Results: Forty observational studies involving 6454 patients treated with linezolid were included in the analysis. LIT was estimated to occur in 37% of patients. The following important factors were associated with the incidence of LIT: advanced age, body mass index, concurrent renal impairment or liver disease, abnormal laboratory parameters (including white blood cell count, serum creatinine, baseline platelet count, albumin, creatinine clearance rate, and estimated glomerular filtration rate), treatment duration and renal replacement therapy., Conclusions: A variety of risk factors related to the occurrence of LIT were revealed in our analysis. Early identification of these factors could help patients improve clinical outcomes., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: Linezolid is commonly used in intensive care units (ICU) but has the potential to interact with other drugs. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in ICU patients receiving linezolid., Patients and Methods: Data of ICU patients receiving linezolid were extracted and included in the Hospital Prescription Analysis Program of China, and the risk of potential drug-drug interactions between concomitant drugs and linezolid was evaluated using the Lexicomp database., Results: A total of 3,712 ICU patients from 59 hospitals were included in the analysis, and patients received an average of 17 concomitant drugs. A total of 67.9% of patients had potential drug-drug interactions. Patients receiving concomitant drugs with risk ratings of "X", "D", and "C" categories were 20.8%, 30.4%, and 35.1%, respectively. Opioids were the most frequently prescribed drug class with drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in the "X" category, whereas butorphanol, metoclopramide, and sufentanil were the most contraindicated concomitant drugs., Conclusions: ICU patients receiving linezolid have a high prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions, and efforts should be made to better recognize and manage this risk.

Linezolid (LZD) is an effective drug in treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of LZD in the treatment of patients with rifampicin resistant tuberculosis. This was a multicenter retrospective study. A total of 184 patients of the rifampicin resistant tuberculosis patients treated with LZD from Jan 2018 to Apr 2020 in three hospitals were involved, and their clinical symptoms were recorded and analyzed. Meanwhile, the types and incidence of adverse effects associated with LZD were evaluated. It showed that peripheral neuritis (51, 27.7%) and hemochromatosis (42, 22.8%) were the most common adverse effects observed among these patients. The median time of symptoms after LZD treatment was 45.5 and 120.0 days, respectively. Furthermore, female patients had a significantly higher risk for leukopenia (P = 0.002) and hemochromatosis (P = 0.033) when compared with male patients. History of underlying disease was the risk factor for thrombocytopenia (P = 0.022). Patients with long duration of medication (RR = 1.004, 95%CI: 1.002-1.006, P < 0.001) and daily dosage ≥600mg (RR = 3.059, 95%CI: 1.238-7.558, P = 0.015) were at higher risk of hemochromatosis. Age was the risk factor for rash (P = 0.008) and nausea and vomiting (P = 0.018). In addition, LZD administration time was the risk factor for optic neuritis (P < 0.001) and peripheral neuritis (P < 0.001). LZD can cause adverse symptoms in patients with rifampicin resistant tuberculosis. Gender, history of underlying disease, LZD use time, LZD dosage, and age are the risk factors in the LZD treatment of these patients. During medication, bone marrow suppression and neuropathy should be closely monitored. This study could potentially provide useful information for the clinical practice.

Objectives: Linezolid is an oxazolidin commonly related to the development of haematological toxicity, being renal clearance the major factor involved in the drug clearance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of increased filtration rates in the incidence of linezolid-induced haematological toxicity by comparing augmented renal clearance (ARC) patients versus normal renal function patients., Material and Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted on hospitalized patients treated with linezolid for 5 days or more during 2014-2019 period. Patients with a filtration rate of ≥130 mL/min versus reference patients (60-90 mL/min) were compared. Haematological toxicity was defined as a decrease of 25% in platelets, of 25% in haemoglobin, and/or 50% in neutrophils from baseline. Toxicity relevance was classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Incidence of haematological toxicity between groups was studied by chi-square and Fisher test. Furthermore, percentage diminution of all 3 parameters was calculated and compared by Mann-Whitney test and treatment interruption and transfusion requirements were registered., Results: 30 ARC patients and 38 reference patients were included. Haematological toxicity was observed in 16.66% of ARC patients vs 44.74% of reference patients (P=.014); thrombocytopenia in 13.33% vs 36.84% (P=.051), anaemia in 3.3% vs 10.52% (P=.374) and neutropenia in 10% vs 23.68% (P=.204). Median percentage of platelets decrease in ARC patients was -10.36 (-193.33-62.03) vs 2.68 (-163.16-82.71) in reference patients (P=.333), while haemoglobin decrease was 2.50 (-12.12-25.93) vs 9.09 (-17.72-30.63) (P=.047) and neutrophils decrease was 9.14 (-73.91-76.47) vs 27.33 (-86.66-90.90) (P=.093). 10.5% of normal renal function patients reported at least 1 adverse event grade 3 or superior while 2.6% of them interrupted treatment and 5.2% had transfusion requirements. No major events or interruptions were reported in ARC patients., Conclusion: Our findings suggest a lower incidence and clinical relevance of haematological toxicity in augmented renal clearance patients. Thrombocytopenia was the major event in both populations. This might be related to a lower exposure to the drug due to the higher clearance and likely lower therapeutic efficiency. These results suggest a potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring on high risk patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None declared., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (S.E.F.H). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Linezolid is an oxazolidin commonly related to the development of hematological toxicity, being renal clearance the major factor involved in the drug clearance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of increased filtration rates in the incidence of linezolid-induced hematological toxicity by comparing augmented renal clearance (ARC) patients versus normal renal function patients., Material and Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted on hospitalized patients treated with linezolid for 5 days or more during 2014-2019 period. Patients with a filtration rate of ≥130 mL/min versus reference patients (60-90 mL/min) were compared. Hematological toxicity was defined as a decrease of 25% in platelets, of 25% in hemoglobin and/or 50% in neutrophils from baseline. Toxicity relevance was classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Incidence of hematological toxicity between groups was studied by chi-square and Fisher test. Furthermore, percentaje disminution of all three parameters was calculated and compared by Mann-Whitney test and treatment interruption and tranfusion requirements were registered., Results: 30 ARC patients and 38 reference patients were included. Hematological toxicity was observed in 16.66% of ARC patients vs 44.74% of reference patients (p = 0.014); thrombocytopenia in 13.33% vs 36.84% (p = 0.051), anemia in 3.3% vs 10.52% (p = 0.374) and neutropenia in 10% vs 23.68% (p = 0.204). Median percentaje of platelets decrease in ARC patients was -10.36 (-193.33-62.03) vs 2.68 (-163.16-82.71) in reference patients (p = 0.333), while hemoglobin decrease was 2.50 (-12.12-25.93) vs 9.09 (-17.72-30.63) (p = 0.047) and neutrophils decrease was 9.14 (-73.91-76.47) vs 27.33 (-86.66-90.90) (p = 0.093). 10.5% of normal renal function patients reported at least one adverse event grade 3 or superior while 2.6% of them interrupted treatment and 5.2% had tranfusion requirements. No major events or interruptions were reported in ARC patients., Conclusion: Our findings suggest a lower incidence and clinical relevance of hematological toxicity in augmented renal clearance patients. Thrombocytopenia was the major event in both populations. This might be related to a lower exposure to the drug due to the higher clearance and likely lower therapeutic efficiency. These results suggest a potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring on high risk patients., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (S.E.F.H). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Vancomycin and linezolid are first-line drugs used for the prophylaxis and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Vancomycin is well known as the best alternative drug when linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia occurs. However, several cases with vancomycin-induced thrombocytopenia, especially with bleeding complications, have been reported recently, which has attracted attention. The objective of this study is to assess the potential relevance between vancomycin and bleeding complications in thrombocytopenia., Methods: This is a real-world pharmacovigilance study conducted in October 2022 using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. We performed a disproportional analysis to assess the risk of bleeding complications in vancomycin-induced thrombocytopenia by calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs) and information components (ICs), with a weak signal defined as a lower limit of the IC 95% CI of 0 to 1.5, a middle signal defined as a lower limit of the IC 95% CI of 1.5 to 3.0, and a strong signal defined as a lower limit of the IC 95% CI of >3.0., Findings: There were 21,854 cases in the FAERS database that listed vancomycin as a suspected drug from quarter 1 of 2004 to quarter 2 of 2022. There were 800 cases of vancomycin-induced thrombocytopenia and 125 cases of bleeding complications in vancomycin-induced thrombocytopenia. Teicoplanin, tigecycline, and vancomycin (3 middle signals) were sequentially less associated with thrombocytopenia than linezolid (strong signal). However, bleeding complications in thrombocytopenia were significant associated with vancomycin (ROR = 9.641; 95% CI, 8.105-11.468; IC = 3.184; 95% CI, 2.929-3.440 [middle signal]), followed by linezolid (ROR = 9.350; 95% CI, 7.318-11.947; IC = 3.106; 95% CI, 2.745-3.466 [middle signal]), teicoplanin (ROR = 6.399; 95% CI, 2.869-14.272; IC = 2.059; 95% CI, 0.881-3.283 [weak signal]), and daptomycin (ROR = 2.784; 95% CI, 1.496-5.180; IC = 1.287; 95% CI, 0.374-2.201 [weak signal]). Tigecycline and daptomycin were the least likely anti-MRSA drug to cause thrombocytopenia (middle signal and weak signal, respectively) and bleeding complications in thrombocytopenia (no signal and weak signal, respectively). Middle signals of bleeding complication in vancomycin-induced thrombocytopenia were found in all group except those <45 to ≥80 years of age (weak signal)., Implications: Bleeding complications in thrombocytopenia were significantly associated with vancomycin use, and the risk was highest among all the anti-MRSA drugs. Physicians should be aware of this possible serious adverse reaction., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Most drugs used in the treatment of Tuberculous Meningitis have limited CNS penetration thereby limiting efficacy. CSF penetration of linezolid is 80-100%.The study was a prospective, randomized, open label with blinded outcome assessment pilot trial carried out in patients with TBM. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two treatment groups either to receive standard ATT alone or add on oral 600 mg BD Linezolid for 4 weeks along with standard four drug ATT [HRZE/S]. Primary outcome was safety and mortality at the end of one and three months measured by intention to treat analysis. 29 patients were recruited and 27 completed three months of follow up. There was no significant difference in terms of mortality with Odds ratio (95% CI) of 2 (0.161-24.87; p = 1) at one month and 0.385 (0.058-2.538; p = 0.39) at three months. There was a significant improvement in GCS in Linezolid group at one month and mRS within the Linezolid group at one and three months. No major safety concerns were observed. The sample size is underpowered to draw any definitive conclusions but improvement in mRS and GCS as well as mortality change make a case for a large sample size trial., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest There is no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia is the main factor restricting the clinical application of linezolid., Objectives: To investigate the relationship between PNU-14230 concentration and linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia and further develop and validate a risk model for predicting linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia., Methods: A regression model was constructed to predict the occurrence of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia, and further externally validated. The predictive performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Linezolid Cmin and PNU-142300 concentrations were compared for different kidney function groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the difference in cumulative incidence of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia among different kidney function patients., Results: In the derivation (n = 221) and validation (n = 158) cohorts, 28.5% and 24.1% of critically ill patients developed linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the independent risk factors were linezolid Cmin, PNU-142300 concentration, baseline platelet count, renal insufficiency (RI) and continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH). The AUC for the risk model was 0.901, and the model was good (P = 0.633). The model also showed good discrimination (AUC 0.870) and calibration (P = 0.282) in the external validation cohort. Compared with normal kidney function patients, patients with RI and CVVH had higher linezolid Cmin and PNU-142300 concentrations (P < 0.001) and higher cumulative incidence of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: PNU142300 concentration, as well as linezolid Cmin, might identify patients at risk of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia. The risk prediction model had good predictive performance for linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia development. Concentrations of linezolid and PNU-142300 accumulated in patients with RI and CVVH., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: This study evaluated the intervention effect of clinical pharmacist-mediated optimisation of a linezolid regimen using a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model., Methods: Patients treated with linezolid in two medical centres from January 2020 to June 2021 were retrospectively included in the control group; those treated from July 2021 to June 2022 were prospectively enrolled in the intervention group. Clinical pharmacists optimised the dosage regimen according to a published linezolid PPK model in the intervention group. An interrupted times series approach was used to analyse the data. The incidence of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia (LIT), target attainment of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters and other adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were compared between the two groups., Results: In total, 77 and 103 patients were enrolled in the control and intervention groups, respectively. The intervention group had a lower incidence of LIT and other ADRs than the control group (10.7% vs. 23.4%, P = 0.002; 1.0% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.027). The intervention group exhibited a considerably lower trough concentration (C min ) and area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio (AUC 24 /MIC) (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001). C min and AUC 24 /MIC rates within the target range were substantially higher in the intervention group (49.6% vs. 20.0%, adjusted P < 0.05; 48.1% vs. 25.6%, adjusted P < 0.05)., Conclusion: Interventions by clinical pharmacists reduced the incidence of LIT and other ADRs. Implementation of model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) for linezolid markedly increased the C min and AUC 24 /MIC rates within the target range. We recommend MIPD-guided linezolid dose reduction for patients with renal impairment., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This systematic review aims to evaluate the existing evidence associating linezolid to serotonin toxicity when used as monotherapy or when co-administered with other serotonergic agents., Methods: A systematic literature search using PubMed (till March 2023), IDWeek meetings (2003-2023), the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Annual Meetings (2001-2023), and the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (1999-2023) identified studies and abstracts related to linezolid and serotonin toxicity., Results: A total of 84 studies were included. The data collected in retrospective/observational studies compared the incidence of serotonin toxicity with linezolid monotherapy at 0.0050% and linezolid combination therapy at 0.0134%. All cases which discontinued linezolid and serotonergic agent/s at signs and symptoms of toxicity found symptom resolution; 75% of cases reported serotonin toxicity resolution within 24-48 h after discontinuation., Conclusion: Linezolid therapy when optimal should not be deferred due to the risk of serotonin syndrome. The data collected reveals a low prevalence of serotonin toxicity in both linezolid monotherapy and linezolid concurrent with other serotonergic agents., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Linezolid (LZD) is one of the antibiotics used to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In Japan, the dose of LZD is not generally adjusted by renal function or therapeutic drug monitoring and is readily available for critically ill patients. The adverse effects of LZD include pancytopenia, especially thrombocytopenia. We investigated the effect of LZD on platelet counts in critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia during admission to the intensive care unit (ICU)., Methods: Fifty-five critically ill patients with existing thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100 ×103 /μL) who received LZD for five days or more during the period from January 2011 to October 2018 were included. Changes in platelet count and frequency of platelet concentrate (PC) transfusion were evaluated retrospectively., Results: Mean (± standard error) platelet count prior to initiation of LZD was 47 ± 4 ×103 /uL, which increased significantly to 86 ± 13 ×103 /uL on day 15 (p<0.01). Median [interquartile range] duration of LZD therapy was 9 [8-12] days. Thirty-two patients (58.2%) required PC transfusion in the 15-day study period. The daily rate of PC transfusion decreased from 30.2% on days 1-5 to 18.2% on days 11-15. Similar tendencies were observed in patients with non-hematological and hematological disease., Conclusion: Thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients in the ICU did not worsen after initiation of LZD therapy, and may be considered for the treatment of MRSA in this setting., Competing Interests: Tatsumi H received lecture fees from TSUMURA & CO and industry-academia collaborative research grant from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc. Masuda Y received lecture fees from MSD K.K., Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp. and Japan Blood Product and industry-academia collaborative research grant from JIMRO Co., Ltd. Other authors declare that they have no competing interests. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2023 Tatsumi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Linezolid is widely used in various clinical settings. Studies have revealed that it may cause thrombocytopenia in adults. However, the correlation between the use of linezolid and thrombocytopenia in pediatric patients is still unclear. This study aimed to identify the impact of Linezolid on the occurrence of thrombocytopenia in children. A retrospective observational study was conducted using data on patients treated with linezolid from the Pediatric Intensive Care clinical database. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors of linezolid-related severe thrombocytopenia. A total of 134 patients were included. The prevalence of severe thrombocytopenia was 8.96% (12/134). Univariate analysis indicated that the severe thrombocytopenia group showed significantly higher proportion of concomitant carbapenem (75% vs 44.3%; P < .05) and piperacillin/tazobactam (25% vs 6.6%; P < .05) than that of the non-severe thrombocytopenia group. Multivariate analysis also revealed that the occurrence of severe thrombocytopenia was significantly associated with concurrent use of carbapenem (odd ratio = 4.058; 95% confidence interval: 1.012-16.274; P = .048) and piperacillin/tazobactam (odd ratio = 5.335; 95% confidence interval: 1.117-25.478; P = .036). 75% of patients (9/12) developed severe thrombocytopenia within the first 7 days of linezolid use. The concomitant use of carbapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam was associated with an increased probability of severe thrombocytopenia in pediatric patients undergoing linezolid treatment. Further prospective clinical studies are required, and more detailed mechanisms of blood toxicity in pediatric patients must be investigated., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Drug regimens that include intensified antibiotics alongside effective anti-inflammatory therapies may improve outcomes in tuberculous meningitis (TBM). Safety data on their use in combination and in the context of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are needed to inform clinical trial design., Methods: We conducted a phase 2, open-label, parallel-design, randomized, controlled trial to assess the safety of high-dose rifampicin, linezolid, and high-dose aspirin in HIV-associated TBM. Participants were randomized (1.4:1:1) to 3 treatment arms (1, standard of care [SOC]; 2, SOC + additional rifampicin [up to 35 mg/kg/d] + linezolid 1200 mg/d reducing after 28 days to 600 mg/d; 3, as per arm 2 + aspirin 1000 mg/d) for 56 days, when the primary outcome of adverse events of special interest (AESI) or death was assessed., Results: A total of 52 participants with HIV-associated TBM were randomized; 59% had mild disease (British Medical Research Council (MRC) grade 1) vs 39% (grade 2) vs 2% (grade 3). AESI or death occurred in 10 of 16 (63%; arm 3) vs 4 of 14 (29%; arm 2) vs 6 of 20 (30%; arm 1; P = .083). The cumulative proportion of AESI or death (Kaplan-Meier) demonstrated worse outcomes in arm 3 vs arm 1 (P = .04); however, only 1 event in arm 3 was attributable to aspirin and was mild. There was no difference in efficacy (modified Rankin scale) between arms., Conclusions: High-dose rifampicin and adjunctive linezolid can safely be added to the standard of care in HIV-associated TBM. Larger studies are required to determine whether potential toxicity associated with these interventions, particularly high-dose aspirin, is outweighed by mortality or morbidity benefit., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03927313., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. S. W. reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer for management of gram-negative infections and participation on the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Linezolid-induced lactic acidosis is a rare, but life-threatening complication of a commonly used drug. Patients present with persistent lactic acidosis, hypoglycaemia, high central venous oxygen saturation and shock. Linezolid causes mitochondrial toxicity due to impaired oxidative phosphorylation. This is evidenced by cytoplasmic vacuolations in the myeloid and erythroid precursors of bone marrow smear as illustrated in our case. Discontinuation of the drug, administration of thiamine and haemodialysis reduces lactic acid levels.

Aims: Few studies have investigated linezolid (LZD)-associated cardiotoxicity. This study explored the potential association between LZD and QT interval prolongation., Methods: Adverse event reports of QT interval prolongation associated with LZD from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from January 2013 to December 2021 were analysed and the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated., Results: A total of 6738 adverse event reports of LZD as the primary and secondary suspected drug were obtained from the database, including 192 reports with electrocardiogram QT prolonged (QTp), and the ROR value was 26.1 (95% CI = 22.6-30.2). There were 8 reports of long QT syndrome, ROR 14.2 (95% CI = 7.1-28.5); 5 reports of torsade de pointes, ROR 3.2 (95% CI = 1.3-7.6); and 5 reports of ventricular tachycardia, ROR 1.9 (95% CI = 0.8-4.5). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with tuberculosis treated with LZD had a higher reporting rate among all QTp reports, exhibiting an odds ratio of 330.0 (95% CI = 223.1-488.1). The odds ratios of QTp associated with LZD treatments in patients with and without tuberculosis were 4.2 (95% CI = 3.4-5.3) and 1.2 (95% CI = 0.8-1.6), respectively., Conclusion: The study showed an association between LZD and QT interval prolongation. In the report on patients with tuberculosis, the incidence of QTp was higher when treated with LZD., (© 2022 British Pharmacological Society.)